Skip to main content

Reaction Force Exposure for Tightening Tool Users: An Experimental Study on Nutrunners

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Proceedings of the 21st Congress of the International Ergonomics Association (IEA 2021) (IEA 2021)

Abstract

Assembly workers within for example the motor vehicle industry, are subject to physically demanding work tasks. One common type of load exposure for assembly workers, are reaction forces generated by tightening tools, such as nutrunners. The tool users counteract these forces through repetitive muscular force exertions, which in the long-term can pave the way for musculoskeletal disorders. As with other well-acknowledged load exposures commonly occurring in the assembly line environment, such as vibrations from tools, or adverse postures, reaction loads generated by nutrunners need thoroughly founded recommendations regarding acceptable exposure, in order to enable sustainable physical workloads for the tool users. The aim of this study was to lay a foundation for such recommendations. An experimental study was carried out in a simulated workstation, where assembly workers performed tightenings with an electric angle nutrunner, at different tool settings, joint stiffnesses and work-paces. Through a psychophysical approach, the participants judged the maximum amount of reaction load exposure which they perceived would enable a sustainable workload. The highly dynamic tool setting resulted in the highest chosen tightening torque levels, i.e. 35.0 and 37.7 Nm at five and eight tightenings per minute, respectively. This corresponded to a peak reaction force exposure of 71.6 and 69.8 N, respectively. Despite the statistically significant differences in impulse between the highly dynamic tightenings on hard joints and continuous drive tightenings on medium joints, no statistically significant difference between the chosen torque levels was found, suggesting that additional factors may contribute to the experience of reaction load exposure.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Potvin, J., Agnew, M., Ver Woert, C.: An ergonomic comparison of pneumatic and electrical pistol grip hand tools. Int. J. Ind. Ergon. 34(6), 467–478 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Putz-Anderson, V.: Cumulative Trauma Disorders, 1st edn. Taylor & Francis Group, London (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Mazaheri, A., Rose, L.: Reaction load exposure from handheld powered tightening tools: a scoping review. Int. J. Ind. Ergon. 81, 103061 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Kihlberg, S., Kjellberg, A., Lindbeck, L.: Discomfort from pneumatic tool torque reaction: acceptability limits. Int. J. Ind. Ergon. 15(6), 417–426 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Radwin, R., Chourasia, A., Fronczak, F., Subedi, Y., Howery, R., Yen, T., Sesto, M., Irwin, C.: Predicting tool operator capacity to react against torque within acceptable handle deflection limits in automotive assembly. Appl. Ergon. 54, 205–211 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Snook, S., Irvine, C.: Maximum acceptable weight of lift. Am. Ind. Hygiene Assoc. J. 28(4), 322–329 (1967)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Valencia, J.: Ergonomic determination of physical capability limits while using right angle power tools. https://scholar.uwindsor.ca/etd/7483. Accessed 16 Dec 2020

  8. Kuorinka, I., Jonsson, B., Kilbom, A., Vinterberg, H., Biering-Sørensen, F., Andersson, G., Jørgensen, K.: Standardised Nordic questionnaires for the analysis of musculoskeletal symptoms. Appl. Ergon. 18(3), 233–237 (1987)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Borg, G.: Psychophysical scaling with applications in physical work and the perception of exertion. Scand. J. Work Environ. Health 16(1), 55–58 (1990)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Zhang, L., Diraneyya, M., Ryu, J., Haas, C., Abdel-Rahman, E.: Jerk as an indicator of physical exertion and fatigue. Autom. Constr. 104, 120–128 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The participation of the assembly workers and their organization is greatly acknowledged, as well as the support from the research assistant, Lina Kluy, throughout the experiments. We would like to pay gratitude to the valuable contributions from other researchers, and in particular Dr. Joel Cort from University of Windsor, for continuous input.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ava Mazaheri .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Mazaheri, A., Forsman, M., Haettel, R., Rose, L. (2021). Reaction Force Exposure for Tightening Tool Users: An Experimental Study on Nutrunners. In: Black, N.L., Neumann, W.P., Noy, I. (eds) Proceedings of the 21st Congress of the International Ergonomics Association (IEA 2021). IEA 2021. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, vol 221. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-74608-7_53

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-74608-7_53

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-74607-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-74608-7

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics