Skip to main content

The Survival Signature for Quantifying System Reliability: An Introductory Overview from Practical Perspective

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Reliability Engineering and Computational Intelligence

Part of the book series: Studies in Computational Intelligence ((SCI,volume 976))

Abstract

The structure function describes the functioning of a system dependent on the states of its components, and is central to theory of system reliability. The survival signature is a summary of the structure function which is sufficient to derive the system’s reliability function. Since its introduction in 2012, the survival signature has received much attention in the literature, with developments on theory, computation and generalizations. This paper presents an introductory overview of the survival signature, including some recent developments. We discuss challenges for practical use of survival signatures for large systems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Aslett, L.J.M.: MCMC for inference on phase-type and masked system lifetime models. Ph.D. thesis, Trinity College Dublin (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Aslett, L.J.M.: Reliability theory: tools for structural reliability analysis. R package (2012). www.louisaslett.com

  3. Aslett, L.J.M.: Cryptographically secure multiparty evaluation of system reliability (2016). arXiv:1604.05180 [cs.CR]

    Google Scholar 

  4. Aslett, L.J.M., Coolen, F.P.A., Wilson, S.P.: Bayesian inference for reliability of systems and networks using the survival signature. Risk Anal. 35, 1640–1651 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Augustin, T., Coolen, F.P.A., de Cooman, G., Troffaes, M.C.M. (eds.): Introduction to Imprecise Probabilities. Wiley, Chichester (2014)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Coolen, F.P.A.: Nonparametric predictive inference. In: Lovric, M. (ed.) International Encyclopedia of Statistical Science, pp. 968–970. Springer (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Coolen, F.P.A., Utkin, L.V.: Imprecise reliability. In: Lovric, M. (ed.) International Encyclopedia of Statistical Science, pp. 649–650. Springer (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Coolen, F.P.A., Coolen-Maturi, T.: On generalizing the signature to systems with multiple types of components. In: Zamojski W., Mazurkiewicz J., Sugier J., Walkowiak T., Kacprzyk J. (eds.) Complex Systems and Dependability, pp. 115–130. Springer (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Coolen, F.P.A., Coolen-Maturi, T.: Predictive inference for system reliability after common-cause component failures. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 13, 27–33 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Coolen, F.P.A., Coolen-Maturi, T.: The structure function for system reliability as predictive (imprecise) probability. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 154, 180–187 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Coolen, F.P.A., Goldstein, M., Wooff, D.A.: Project viability assessment for support of software testing via Bayesian graphical modelling. In: Bedford, T., van Gelder, P. H. A. J. M. (eds.) Safety and Reliability (Proceedings ESREL’03), pp. 417–422. Swets & Zeitlinger (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Coolen, F.P.A., Goldstein, M., Wooff, D.A.: Using Bayesian statistics to support testing of software systems. J. Risk Reliab. 221, 85–93 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Coolen, F.P.A., Coolen-Maturi, T., Al-nefaiee, A.H.: Nonparametric predictive inference for system reliability using the survival signature. J. Risk Reliab. 228, 437–448 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Coolen, F.P.A., Huang, X., Najem, A.: Reliability analysis of phased mission systems when components can be swapped upon failure. ASCE-ASME J. Risk Uncertain. Eng. Syst. - Part B: Mech. Eng. 6(2), 020905 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Coolen-Maturi, T., Coolen, F.P.A., Balakrishnan, N.: The joint survival signature of coherent systems with shared components. In submission

    Google Scholar 

  16. De Finetti, B.: Theory of Probability (2 Vols). Wiley, Chichester (1974)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Eryilmaz, S., Coolen, F.P.A., Coolen-Maturi, T.: Marginal and joint reliability importance based on survival signature. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 172, 118–128 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Eryilmaz, S., Coolen, F.P.A., Coolen-Maturi, T.: Mean residual life of coherent systems consisting of multiple types of dependent components. Naval Res. Logist. 65, 86–97 (2018)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  19. Feng, G., Patelli, E., Beer, M., Coolen, F.P.A.: Imprecise system reliability and component importance based on survival signature. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 150, 116–125 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. George-Williams, H., Feng, G., Coolen, F.P.A., Beer, M., Patelli, E.: Extending the survival signature paradigm to complex systems with non-repairable dependent failures. J. Risk Reliab. 233, 505–519 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Huang, X., Coolen, F.P.A.: Reliability sensitivity analysis of coherent systems based on survival signature. J. Risk Reliab. 232, 627–634 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Huang, X., Aslett, L.J.M., Coolen, F.P.A.: Reliability analysis of general phased mission systems with a new survival signature. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 189, 416–422 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Huang, X., Coolen, F.P.A., Coolen-Maturi, T.: A heuristical survival signature based approach for reliability-redundancy allocation. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 185, 511–517 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Huang, X., Coolen, F.P.A., Coolen-Maturi, T., Zhang, Y.: A new study on reliability importance analysis of phased mission systems. IEEE Trans. Reliab. 69, 522–532 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Najem, A., Coolen, F.P.A.: System reliability and component importance when components can be swapped upon failure. Appl. Stoch. Model. Bus. Ind. 35, 399–413 (2019)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  26. Patelli, E., Feng, G., Coolen, F.P.A., Coolen-Maturi, T.: Simulation methods for system reliability using the survival signature. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 167, 327–337 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Reed, S.: An efficient algorithm for exact computation of system and survival signatures using binary decision diagrams. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 165, 257–267 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Rusnak, P., Zaitseva, E., Coolen, F.P.A., Kvassay, M., Levashenko, V.: Logic differential calculus for reliability analysis based on survival signature. In submission

    Google Scholar 

  29. Qin, J., Coolen, F.P.A.: Survival signature for reliability evaluation of a multi-state system with multi-state components. In submission

    Google Scholar 

  30. Samaniego, F.J.: On closure of the IFR class under formation of coherent systems. IEEE Trans. Reliab. 34, 69–72 (1985)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Samaniego, F.J.: System Signatures and Their Applications in Engineering Reliability. Springer, New York (2007)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  32. Samaniego, F.J., Navarro, J.: On comparing coherent systems with heterogeneous components. Adv. Appl. Probab. 48, 88–111 (2016)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  33. Utkin, L.V., Coolen, F.P.A.: Imprecise reliability: an introductory overview. In: Levitin, G. (ed.) Computational Intelligence in Reliability Engineering, Volume 2: New Metaheuristics, Neural and Fuzzy Techniques in Reliability, pp. 261–306. Springer (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  34. Walter, G., Aslett, L.J.M., Coolen, F.P.A.: Bayesian nonparametric system reliability using sets of priors. Int. J. Approx. Reason. 80, 67–88 (2017)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  35. Wooff, D.A., Goldstein, M., Coolen, F.P.A.: Bayesian graphical models for software testing. IEEE Trans. Softw. Eng. 28, 510–525 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Wooff, D.A., Goldstein, M., Coolen, F.P.A.: Bayesian graphical models for high complexity testing: aspects of implementation. In: Kenett, R.S., Ruggeri, F., Faltin, F.W. (eds.) Analytic Methods in Systems and Software Testing, pp. 213–243. Wiley (2018)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This paper is closely related to a presentation at The International Workshop on Reliability Engineering and Computational Intelligence (October 2020). We thank the organisers, in particular Elena Zaitseva, for the invitation to present our work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Frank P. A. Coolen .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Coolen, F.P.A., Coolen-Maturi, T. (2021). The Survival Signature for Quantifying System Reliability: An Introductory Overview from Practical Perspective. In: van Gulijk, C., Zaitseva, E. (eds) Reliability Engineering and Computational Intelligence. Studies in Computational Intelligence, vol 976. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-74556-1_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics