Abstract
Faced with the “New Metropolitan Landscape”, it is imperative to define an approach to design capable of observing phenomena at different scales (from the geographical of the territory to the human of architecture); to bring multiple knowledge to synthesis; but above all, to deal with the processes of transformation in an adaptive way, tackling in an integrated way decision-making, implementation and management aspects; to work, therefore, along a multidimensional and dilated time line to include different cycles and natural and anthropic processes.
This approach refers to an inclusive field of research and discussion, involving nature and human sciences, architecture, engineering, planning, geography, geology, botany, agronomy, anthropology, aesthetics, ethnography, art history, ecology, landscape ecology …Reformulating instruments derived from studies on urban morphology and building typology in the 1960s, it crosses research programmes open to very different languages, interpretations and description techniques, which address the issue of transformation with a renewed focus on the difficult dialectic between nature and artifice that characterises the contemporary world.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Berque, A. (1995). Les raisons du paysage. De la Chine Antique aux environnements de synthése. Hazan.
Corboz, A. (1983). Le territoire comme palimpseste. Diogène, 121, 12–34.
Cosgrove, D. E. (1988). The iconography of landscape: Essays on the symbolic representation, design and use of past environments. Cambridge University Press.
Cosgrove, D. E. (1998). Social formation and symbolic landscape (2nd edition with additional introductory chapter). Wisconsin: University of Wisconsin Press.
Gregotti, V. (1966). La forma del territorio. Feltrinelli
Gregotti, V. (1984). Modificazione. Casabella, 498(9), 4–5.
Gregotti, V. (2004). L’architettura del realismo critico. Laterza.
Marzot, N. (2002). The study of urban form in Italy. Urban Morphology, 6(2), 59–73. http://www.urbanmorphology.org/pdf/marzot2002.pdf
Ratzel, F. (1904). Geschichte, Völkerkunde und historische Perspektive. Historische Zeitschrift, 93(1), 1–46. https://www.jstor.org/stable/i27601131
Schlögel, K. (2016). In Space we read time. On the history of civilization and geopolitics. Bard Graduate Center – Cultural Histories of the Material World, Chicago (Monaco, 2003).
Von Humboldt, A. (1845). Kosmos. Entwurf einer physischen Weltbeschreibung. Cotta.
Zapf, H. (Ed.). (2016). Handbook of ecocriticism and cultural ecology. Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co KG.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Protasoni, S. (2021). Morphology as a Tool for the Articulation of the New Metropolitan Landscapes. In: Contin, A. (eds) Metropolitan Landscapes. Landscape Series, vol 28. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-74424-3_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-74424-3_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-74423-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-74424-3
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)