Abstract
This study describes research conducted in a national natural history museum in Taiwan. It describes how a museum education professional drew on the Benzene Ring Heuristic of scientific practice to integrate science education theory into the museum’s educational practices. Since 2001, the museum has strengthened its partnership with schools and social institutions related to education. A majority of these partners confirmed that the museum represents a strong resource for education but that its programming was difficult to fit into their science education practices. In response, the present study developed a scaffold for engaging participants with its exhibitions through inquiry, more specifically about the dilemma between renewable energy production and environmental protection. This chapter includes three parts. First, it introduces the significance of natural history dioramas for framing the controversy as a socio-scientific issue (SSI). Second, it discusses inquiry learning and clarifies the differences between the school setting and the natural history exhibition environment. Finally, it describes how the scaffolded educational program Which Renewable Energy Installations You Would Choose was iteratively developed for the gallery Life on Earth. The study concludes by discussing the advantages of using the Benzene Ring Heuristic of scientific practice for developing the program and offering a number of guidelines for scaffolding an SSI education program in a natural history museum.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
The elementary school with less than 300 students was defined as small size school. Schools with 301–900 students were defined as middle size schools.
References
Abu-Shumays, M., & Leinhardt, G. (2002). Two docents in three museums: Central and peripheral participation. In G. Leinhardt, K. Crowley, & K. Knutson (Eds.), Learning conversations in museums (pp. 45–80). Erlbaum.
Achiam, M., Simony, L., & Lindow, B. E. K. (2016). Objects prompt authentic scientific activities among learners in a museum programme. International Journal of Science Education, 38(6), 1012–1035. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2016.1178869
Banchi, H., & Bell, R. (2008). The many levels of inquiry. Science and Children, 46, 26–22.
Bruner, J. S. (1961). The act of discovery. Harvard Educational Review, 31, 21–32.
Bybee, R. W., Taylor, J. A., Gardner, A., van Scotter, P., Powell, J. C., Westbrook, A., & Landes, N. (2008). The BSCS 5E instructional model origins and effectiveness. In R. W. Bybee (Ed.), Measuring our success: The first 50 years of BSCS (pp. 113–184) BSCS.
Chang, C. L., Hung, Y. Y., & Pan, C. T. (2011). Retrospect and prospect of power engineering development in the past 100 years. Science Development, 547, 56–60.
Chiu, M., Yeh, H., & Spangler, J. (2016). Public constructs of energy values and behaviors in implementing Taiwan’s ‘energy-conservation/carbon reduction’ declarations. International Journal of Science Education, Part B, 6(1), 46–67. https://doi.org/10.1080/21548455.2014.969357
Chiu, M. S. (2012). Gaps between valuing and purchasing green-technology products: Product and gender differences. International Journal of Technology and Human Interaction, 8, 54–68.
Chiu, M. S. (2013). Tensions in implementing the “energy-conservation/carbon-reduction” policy in Taiwanese culture. Energy Policy, 55, 415–425. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2012.12.022
Collins, A., Brown, J. S., & Newman, S. E. (1989). Cognitive apprenticeship: Teaching the crafts of reading, writing, and mathematics. In L. B. Resnick (Ed.), Knowing, learning, and instruction: Essays in honor of Robert Glaser (pp. 453–494). Erlbaum.
Cox-Petersen, A. M., Marsh, D. D., Kisiel, J., & Melber, L. M. (2003). Investigation of guided school tours, student learning, and science reform recommendations at a museum of natural history. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40(2), 200–218. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.10072
Davidson, S. K., Passmore, C., & Anderson, D. (2010). Learning on zoo field trips: The interaction of the agendas and practices of students, teachers and zoo educators. Science Education, 94(1), 122–141. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20356
Davis, E. A., & Linn, M. C. (2000). Scaffolding students’ knowledge integration: Prompts for reflection in KIE. International Journal of Science Education, 22, 819–837. https://doi.org/10.1080/095006900412293
Dillon, J. (2017). Wicked problems and the need for civic science. Spokes, 29, 1–24.
Erduran, S., & Dagher, Z. R. (2014). Reconceptualizing the nature of science for science education (Contemporary trends and issues in science education) (Vol. 43). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9057-4
Falk, J. H., & Dierking, L. M. (2000). Learning from museums: Visitor experiences and the making of meaning. AltaMira Press.
Garvin, T. (2001). Analytical paradigms: The epistemological distances between scientists, policy makers, and the public. Risk Analysis, 21, 443–456. https://doi.org/10.1111/0272-4332.213124
Gutwill, J. P., & Allen, S. (2010). Group inquiry at science museum exhibits. Exploratorium.
Han, M. S., Phillips, B. C., Evans, E. M., Block, F., Diamond, J., & Shen, C. (2016). Visualizing biological data in museums: Visitor learning with an interactive tree of life exhibit. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 53, 895–918. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21318
Hein, G. E. (1998). Learning in the museum. Routledge.
Hmelo-Silver, C. E. (2004). Problem-based learning: What and how do students learn. Educational Psychology Review, 16, 235–266. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:EDPR.0000034022.16470.f3
Hmelo-Silver, C. E., & Barrows, H. S. (2006). Goals and strategies of a problem-based learning facilitator. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problembased Learning, 1, 21–39. https://doi.org/10.7771/1541-5015.1004
Huang, T., Chang, D., & Lee, C. (2012). Overcoming political barriers: A preliminary study of the public’s knowledge, risk perception and policy attitudes about nuclear energy. Paper presented in 2nd international conference on constructing civil society: Public values of governance, Tamkang University, New Taipei City.
Jackson, S., Stratford, S. J., Krajcik, J. S., & Soloway, E. (1996). Making system dynamics modeling accessible to pre-college science students. Interactive Learning Environments, 4, 233–257.
Kisiel, J. F. (2010). Exploring a school-aquarium collaboration: An intersection of communities of practice. Science Education, 94(1), 95–121. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20350
Leinhardt, G., & Knutson, K. (2004). Listening in on museum conversations. Altamira Press.
Ministry of Education. (2018). Twelve-year national basic education curriculum outline, core literacy statement in various scientific fields. www.k12ea.gov.tw
National Energy Program Phase Two Program Office. (2013). Taiwan National Energy Program- Phase II. http://www.nepii.tw/language/en/about-nep-ii/introduction
National Energy Program One Executive Office. (2015). Energy technology and environment: Report of National Energy Program One. Taipei: Department of International Cooperation and Science Education, Ministry of Science and Technology.
Neitscher, E., & Weon-Kettenhofen, H.-Y. (2019). Window to nature: Museobil box-dioramas in the Museum Koenig. In A. Scheersoi & S. D. Tunnicliffe (Eds.), Natural history dioramas – Traditional exhibits for current educational themes (pp. 37–50). Springer.
Public Television Service. (2000). Our island: The anti-nuclear life. Taipei: Public Television.
Quintana, C., Reiser, B. J., Davis, E. A., Krajcik, J., Fretz, E., & Duncan, R. G. (2004). A scaffolding design framework for software to support science inquiry. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13, 337–386. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327809jls1303_4
Reiser, B. J. (2004). Scaffolding complex learning: The mechanisms of structuring and problematizing student work. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13, 273–304. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327809jls1303_2
Reiser, B. J., Tabak, I., Sandoval, W. A., Smith, B. K., Steinmuller, F., & Leone, A. J. (2001). BGuILE: Strategic and conceptual scaffolds for scientific inquiry in biology classrooms. In S. M. Carver & D. Klahr (Eds.), Cognition and instruction: Twenty-five years of progress (pp. 263–305). Erlbaum.
Russell, T. (1994). The enquiring visitor: Usable learning theory for museum contexts. Journal of Education in Museums, 15, 19–21.
Scott, M. (2010). The pleasures and pitfalls of teaching human evolution in the museum. Evolution: Education and Outreach, 3(3), 403–409. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12052-010-0252-y
Shen, Y. (2011). Study on misconceptions of global warming for primary school students and teachers. Unpublished Master’s thesis. National Taiwan Normal University.
Stocklmayer, S., & Gilbert, J. K. (2002). New experiences and old knowledge: Towards a model for the personal awareness of science and technology. International Journal of Science Education, 24(8), 835–858. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690210126775
Toth, E. E., Suthers, D. D., & Lesgold, A. M. (2002). “Mapping to know”: The effects of representational guidance and reflective assessment on scientific inquiry. Science Education, 86, 244–263. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.10004
Tran, L. U. (2007). Teaching science in museums: The pedagogy and goals of museum educators. Science Education, 91, 278–297. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20193
White, B. Y., & Frederiksen, J. R. (1998). Inquiry, modeling, and metacognition: Making science accessible to all students. Cognition and Instruction, 16, 3–118. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532690xci1601_2
Yeh, J. H. (2017). Museum science teaching: Museum educators’ personal epistemologies and created learning experiences. In P. G. Patrick (Ed.), Preparing informal science educators: Perspectives from science communication and education (pp. 105–126). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-50398-1_6
Yeh, J. H., & Ku, C. C. (2011). The impact of counting carbon-footprint during the energy education teacher seminar: Cognition, attitudes and motivation toward energy conservation actions. Paper presented in 2011 International Forum for a Low Carbon Vision, Taipei, Taiwan.
Yeh, S., Huang, J., & Yu, H. (2017). Analysis of energy literacy and misconceptions of junior high students in Taiwan. Sustainability, 9, 423. https://doi.org/10.3390/su9030423
Yoon, S. A., Elinich, K., Wang, J., Van Schooneveld, J. B., & Anderson, E. (2013). Scaffolding informal learning in science museums: How much is too much? Science Education, 97, 848–877. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21079
Acknowledgements
This study was funded by the Taiwan Ministry of Science and Technology project no. MOST-107-2511-H-178-001. The author thanks the anonymous reviewers and Marianne Achiam for comments on earlier versions of the article.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Yeh, J.H. (2021). Real-World Problem: Connecting Socio-Scientific Contexts and Dioramas. In: Achiam, M., Dillon, J., Glackin, M. (eds) Addressing Wicked Problems through Science Education. Contributions from Science Education Research, vol 8. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-74266-9_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-74266-9_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-74265-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-74266-9
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)