Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

ICT-Enabled Work Extension and Its Consequences: A Paradoxical Situation Between High Performance and Low Wellbeing

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Flexible Working Practices and Approaches

Abstract

The work-related use of mobile technological devices allows workers to reach out to digital work content or to engage in job-related communications outside their working hours. ICT-enabled work extension represents a new challenge for workers and management, yet we do not know much about its consequences. We thus systematically review and synthesize empirical results on the consequences of work extending behaviors and availability expectations presented by 68 peer-reviewed pieces of literature published between 2007 and 2019. Our findings reveal a paradoxical situation: The more workers engage in work extending behaviors, the lower is their wellbeing, yet the higher is their work performance and commitment. Availability expectations are only associated with lower levels of wellbeing. We call upon future research to further investigate the mechanism leading to preferable outcomes and to consider moderating factors such as workers’ motivation for ICT-enabled work extension in order to resolve this high-performance-low-wellbeing paradox.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    Literature included in the review is marked with an asterisk

References

Literature included in the review is marked with an asterisk

  • *Adkins, C. L., & Premeaux, S. A. (2014). The use of communication technology to manage work-home boundaries. Journal of Behavioral and Applied Management, 15, 82–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • *Albertsen, K., Persson, R., Garde, A. H., & Rugulies, R. (2010). Psychosocial determinants of work-to-family conflict among knowledge workers with boundaryless work. Applied Psychology: Health and Well-Being, 2, 160–181.

    Google Scholar 

  • *Arlinghaus, A., & Nachreiner, F. (2013). When work calls – Associations between being contacted outside of regular working hours for work-related matters and health. Chronobiology International, 30, 1197–1202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • *Arlinghaus, A., & Nachreiner, F. (2014). Health effects of supplemental work from home in the European Union. Chronobiology International, 31, 1100–1107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ashforth, B. E., Kreiner, G. E., & Fugate, M. (2000). All in a day’s work: Boundaries and micro role transitions. Academy of Management Review, 25, 472–491.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bakker, A. B., & Demerouti, E. (2007). The job demands-resources model: State of the art. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 22, 309–328.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (1979). Self-referent mechanisms in social learning theory. American Psychologist, 34, 439–441.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • *Barber, L. K., & Jenkins, J. S. (2013). Creating technological boundaries to protect bedtime: Examining work-home boundary management, psychological detachment and sleep. Stress and Health, 30, 259–264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • *Barber, L. K., & Santuzzi, A. M. (2015). Please respond ASAP: Workplace telepressure and employee recovery. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 20, 172–189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • *Boswell, W. R., & Olson-Buchanan, J. B. (2007). The use of communication technologies after hours: The role of work attitudes and work-life conflict. Journal of Management, 33, 592–610.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • *Bowen, P., Govender, R., Edwards, P., & Cattell, K. (2018). Work-related contact, work–family conflict, psychological distress and sleep problems experienced by construction professionals: An integrated explanatory model. Construction Management and Economics, 36, 153–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Butts, M. M., Becker, W. J., & Boswell, W. R. (2015). Hot buttons and time sinks: The effects of electronic communication during nonwork time on emotions and work-nonwork conflict. Academy of Management Journal, 58, 763–788.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caldwell, S. (2018, May 15). Revealed: How Britain’s always-on culture is really affecting employees. Business advice.https://businessadvice.co.uk/hr/employment-law/always-on-culture-affecting-employees/

  • Centre for Reviews and Dissemination. (2009). Systematic reviews: CRD’s guidance for undertaking reviews in healthcare. Centre for Reviews and Dissemination, University of York.

    Google Scholar 

  • *Chen, A., & Karahanna, E. (2018). Life interrupted: The effects of technology-mediated work interruptions on work and nonwork outcomes. MIS Quarterly, 42, 1023–1042.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christian, M. S., & Slaughter, J. E. (2007). Work engagement: A meta-analytical review and directions for research in an emerging area. Academy of Management Proceedings, 2007, 1–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, S. C. (2000). Work/family border theory: A new theory of work/family balance. Human Relations, 53, 747–770.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • cnet.com. (2017, June 26). iPhone 2007, meet 2017: Using the original, 10 years later. cnet.com. https://www.cnet.com/news/using-the-2007-iphone-in-2017/

  • Cooper, C. L., & Lu, L. (2019). Excessive availability for work: Good or bad? Charting underlying motivations and searching for game-changers. Human Resource Management Review, 29, Article 100682.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cotton, P., & Hart, P. M. (2003). Occupational wellbeing and performance: A review of organisational health research. Australian Psychologist, 38, 118–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • *Day, A., Paquet, S., Scott, N., & Hambley, L. (2012). Perceived information and communication technology (ICT) demands on employee outcomes: The moderating effect of organizational ICT support. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 17, 473–491.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Menezes, L. M., & Kelliher, C. (2011). Flexible working and performance: A systematic review of the evidence for a business case. International Journal of Management Reviews, 13, 452–474.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11, 227–268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deci, E. L., Olafsen, A. H., & Ryan, M. R. (2017). Self-determination theory in work organizations: The state of a science. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 4, 19–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • *Derks, D., van Duin, D., Tims, M., & Bakker, A. B. (2015). Smartphone use and work–home interference: The moderating role of social norms and employee work engagement. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 88, 155–177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dery, K., Kolb, D., & MacCormick, J. (2014). Working with connective flow: How smartphone use is evolving in practice. European Journal of Information Systems, 23, 558–570.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • *Dettmers, J. (2017). How extended work availability affects well-being: The mediating roles of psychological detachment and work-family-conflict. Work & Stress, 31, 24–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • *Dettmers, J., Bamberg, E., & Seffzek, K. (2016). Characteristics of extended availability for work: The role of demands and resources. International Journal of Stress Management, 23, 276–297.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, J. R., & Rothbard, N. P. (2000). Mechanisms linking work and family: Clarifying the relationship between work and family constructs. Academy of Management Review, 25, 178–199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eurofound. (2020). Living, working and COVID-19 (COVID-19 Series, p. 80), Publications Office of the European Union.

    Google Scholar 

  • *Fender, C. M. (2010). Electronic tethering: perpetual wireless connectivity to the organization. Doctoral dissertation, Drexel University.

    Google Scholar 

  • *Fenner, G. H., & Renn, R. W. (2010). Technology-assisted supplemental work and work-to-family conflict: The role of instrumentality beliefs, organizational expectations and time management. Human Relations, 63, 63–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • *Ferguson, M., Carlson, D., Boswell, W., Whitten, D., Butts, M. M., & Kacmar, K. M. (2016). Tethered to work: A family systems approach linking mobile device use to turnover intentions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 101, 520–534.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feuchtl, S., Hartner-Tiefenthaler, M., & Koeszegi, S. (2016). Erreichbarkeit außerhalb der Arbeitszeit: Ergebnisse einer quantitativen Fragebogenstudie in Niederösterreich [Accessibility outside working hours: Results of a quantitative questionnaire study in Lower Austria]. Wirtschafts- und Sozialpolitische Zeitschrift (WISO), 39, 69–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibson, M. (2014, August 15). Here’s a radical way to end vacation email overload. Time. https://time.com/3116424/daimler-vacation-email-out-of-office/

  • *Glavin, P., Schieman, S., & Reid, S. (2011). Boundary-spanning work demands and their consequences for guilt and psychological distress. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 52, 43–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Golden, A. G., & Geisler, C. (2007). Work-life boundary management and the personal digital assistant. Human Relations, 60, 519–551. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726707076698

  • Greenhaus, J. H., & Beutell, N. J. (1985). Sources of conflict between work and family roles. Academy of Management Review, 10, 76–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hassler, M., & Rau, R. (2016). Ständige Erreichbarkeit: Flexibilisierungsanforderung oder Flexibilisierungsmöglichkeit. [Constant availability: Flexibility requirement or flexibility possibility]. Wirtschaftspsychologie [Economic Psychology], 2, 25–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • *Hecht, T. D., & Allen, N. J. (2009). A longitudinal examination of the work–nonwork boundary strength construct. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 30, 839–862.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heissler, C. C. (2019). Working after hours, sharing availability expectations, and interrupting yourself: Extending perspectives on ICT-related concepts in research. Doctoral dissertation, Universität Kassel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jarvenpaa, S. L., & Lang, K. R. (2005). Managing the paradoxes of mobile technology. Information Systems Management, 22, 7–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Katz, D., & Kahn, R. L. (1978). The social psychology of organizations. Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • *Kim, S., & Hollensbe, E. (2017). When work comes home: Technology-related pressure and home support. Human Resource Development International, 21, 91–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • *Kinnunen, U., Rantanen, J., de Bloom, J., Mauno, S., Feldt, T., & Korpela, K. (2016). The role of work–nonwork boundary management in work stress recovery. International Journal of Stress Management, 23, 99–123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • *Kossek, E. E., Ruderman, M. N., Braddy, P. W., & Hannum, K. M. (2012). Work–nonwork boundary management profiles: A person-centered approach. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 81, 112–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kubicek, B., & Tement, S. (2016). Work intensification and the work-home interface: The moderating effect of individual work-home segmentation strategies and organizational segmentation supplies. Journal of Personnel Psychology, 15, 76–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lanaj, K., Johnson, R. E., & Barnes, C. M. (2014). Beginning the workday yet already depleted? Consequences of late-night smartphone use and sleep. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 124, 11–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • *Leung, L. (2011). Effects of ICT connectedness, permeability, flexibility, and negative spillovers on burnout and job and family satisfaction. Human Technology: An Interdisciplinary Journal on Humans in ICT Environments, 7, 250–267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • *Leung, L., & Zhang, R. (2017). Mapping ICT use at home and telecommuting practices: A perspective from work/family border theory. Telematics and Informatics, 34, 385–396.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • *Manapragada, A. (2017). The always on employee: The antecedents and consequences of work-related email use after hours. Doctoral dissertation, Florida International University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maslach, C., Schaufeli, W. B., & Leiter, M. P. (2001). Job burnout. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 397–422.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meijman, T. F., & Mulder, G. (1998). Psychological aspects of workload. In P. J. D. Drenth & H. Thierry (Eds.), A Handbook of Work and Organizational Psychology (Work psychology) (Vol. 2, pp. 5–33). Psychology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • *Mellner, C. (2016). After-hours availability expectations, work-related smartphone use during leisure, and psychological detachment: The moderating role of boundary control. International Journal of Workplace Health Management, 9, 146–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Messenger, J. C., & Gschwind, L. (2016). Three generations of telework: New ICTs and the (r)evolution from home office to virtual office. New Technology, Work and Employment, 31, 195–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • *Moore, A. T. (2017). Computers, cell phones, and social media: How after-hours communication impacts work–life balance and job satisfaction. Doctoral dissertation, Regent University.

    Google Scholar 

  • *Ohly, S., & Latour, A. (2014). Work-related smartphone use and well-being in the evening: The role of autonomous and controlled motivation. Journal of Personnel Psychology, 13, 174–183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olson-Buchanan, J. B., & Boswell, W. R. (2006). Blurring boundaries: Correlates of integration and segmentation between work and nonwork. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 68, 432–445.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • *Palm, E., Glaser, J., Heiden, B., Herbig, B., Kolb, S., Nowak, D., & Herr, C. (2016). Zusammenspiel von organisationalen Normen, individuellen Praeferenzen und arbeitsbezogenem Entgrenzungsverhalten [Interrelations of organizational norms, individual preferences and work-related boundary behavior]. Wirtschaftspsychologie [Economic Psychology], 18, 44–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • *Pangert, B., & Schuepbach, H. (2014). Auswirkungen arbeitsbezogener erweiterter Erreichbarkeit auf Gesundheit und Life-Domain-Balance von Beschäftigten. [Consequences of work-related extended availability on health and employees‘ life-domain-balance]. Wirtschaftspsychologie [Economic Psychology], 4, 73–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • *Piszczek, M. M. (2016). Boundary control and controlled boundaries: Organizational expectations for technology use at the work-family interface: Boundary control or controlled boundaries? Journal of Organizational Behavior, 38, 592–611.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • *Poethke, U., Klasmeier, K. N., Diebig, M., Hartmann, N., & Rowold, J. (2019). Entwicklung eines Fragebogens zur Erfassung zentraler Merkmale der Arbeit 4.0 [Development of a questionnaire to capture key characteristics of work 4.0]. Zeitschrift für Arbeits- und Organisationspsychologie [Journal for Work and Organizational Psychology], 63, 129–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • *Ragsdale, J. M., & Hoover, C. S. (2016). Cell phones during nonwork time: A source of job demands and resources. Computers in Human Behavior, 57, 54–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • *Rau, R., & Göllner, M. (2019). Erreichbarkeit gestalten, oder doch besser die Arbeit? [Designing accessibility, or even better the work]. Zeitschrift für Arbeits- und Organisationspsychologie [Journal for Work and Organizational Psychology], 63, 1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, K., & Benbunan-Fich, R. (2011). Examining the antecedents of work connectivity behavior during non-work time. Information and Organization, 21, 142–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • *Richardson, K. M., & Thompson, C. A. (2012). High tech tethers and work-family conflict: A conservation of resources approach. Engineering Management Research, 1, 29–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • *Russo, M., Ollier-Malaterre, A., Kossek, E. E., & Ohana, M. (2018). Boundary management permeability and relationship satisfaction in dual-earner couples: The asymmetrical gender effect. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, article 1723.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schaufeli, W. B., Bakker, A. B., & Salanova, M. (2006). The measurement of work engagement with a short questionnaire: A cross-national study. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 66, 701–716.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schaufeli, W. B., Leiter, M. P., & Maslach, C. (2009). Burnout: 35 years of research and practice. Career Development International, 14, 202–220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schaufeli, W. B., Taris, T. W., & van Rhenen, W. (2008). Workaholism, burnout, and work engagement: Three of a kind or three different kinds of employee well-being? Applied Psychology, 57, 173–203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • *Schieman, S., & Young, M. (2010). The demands of creative work: Implications for stress in the work-family interface. Social Science Research, 39, 246–259.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schieman, S., & Young, M. (2014). Who engages in work–family multitasking? A study of Canadian and American workers. Social Indicators Research, 120, 741–767.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schlachter, S., McDowall, A., Cropley, M., & Inceoglu, I. (2018). Voluntary work-related technology use during non-work time: A narrative synthesis of empirical research and research agenda. International Journal of Management Reviews, 20, 825–846.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • *Senarathne Tennakoon, K. L. U. (2011). Empowerment or enslavement: ICT use and work-life balance of managers and professionals. Doctoral dissertation, Wilmington University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Senarathne Tennakoon, K. L. U., da Silveira, G., & Taras, D. (2013). Drivers of context-specific ICT use across work and nonwork domains: A boundary theory perspective. Information and Organization, 23, 107–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • *Shi, Y., Zhang, H., Xie, J., & Ma, H. (2018). Work-related use of information and communication technologies after hours and focus on opportunities: The moderating role of work-family centrality. Current Psychology, 37, 1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siegrist, J. (2002). Effort-reward imbalance at work and health. In P. L. Perrewe & D. C. Ganster (Eds.), Historical and current perspectives on stress and health (pp. 261–291). JAI Elsevier.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Sonnentag, S., & Fritz, C. (2007). The recovery experience questionnaire: Development and validation of a measure for assessing recuperation and unwinding from work. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 12, 204–221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Statista. (2020). Change in remote work trends due to COVID-19 in the United States in 2020, https://www.statista.com/statistics/1122987/change-in-remote-worktrends-after-covid-in-usa/

  • Wajcman, J., Bittman, M., & Brown, J. E. (2008). Families without borders: Mobile phones, connectedness and work-home divisions. Sociology, 42, 635–652.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Warr, P., Bindl, U. K., Parker, S. K., & Inceoglu, I. (2014). Four-quadrant investigation of job-related affects and behaviours. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 23, 342–363.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • *Wepfer, A. G., Allen, T. D., Brauchli, R., Jenny, G. J., & Bauer, G. F. (2018). Work-life boundaries and well-being: Does work-to-life integration impair well-being through lack of recovery? Journal of Business and Psychology, 33, 727–740.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Westman, M., Hobfoll, S. E., Chen, S., Davidson, O. B., & Laski, S. (2005). Organizational stress through the lens of conservation of resources (COR) theory. In P. L. Perrewé & D. C. Ganster (Eds.), Research in occupational stress and well-being (Vol. 4, pp. 167–220). Emerald Group Publishing Limited.

    Google Scholar 

  • *Wilson, M. S. (2013). Drivers and outcomes of responsiveness to technological interruptions from work during nonwork time. Doctoral dissertation, University of Illinois.

    Google Scholar 

  • *Wright, K. B., Abendschein, B., Wombacher, K., O’Connor, M., Hoffman, M., Dempsey, M., Krull, C., Dewes, A., & Shelton, A. (2014). Work-related communication technology use outside of regular work hours and work life conflict: The influence of communication technologies on perceived work life conflict, burnout, job satisfaction, and turnover intentions. Management Communication Quarterly, 28, 507–530.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • *Wright, N. A., Kutschenko, K., Bush, B. A., Hannum, K. M., & Braddy, P. W. (2015). Measurement and predictive invariance of a work–life boundary measure across gender. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 23, 131–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • *Xie, J., Ma, H., Zhou, Z. E., & Tang, H. (2018). Work-related use of information and communication technologies after hours (W_ICTs) and emotional exhaustion: A mediated moderation model. Computers in Human Behavior, 79, 94–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria

    Julia Schöllbauer

  2. Technical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria

    Martina Hartner-Tiefenthaler

  3. Cranefield University, Bedfordshire, UK

    Clare Kelliher

Authors
  1. Julia Schöllbauer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Martina Hartner-Tiefenthaler
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Clare Kelliher
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Julia Schöllbauer .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Psychology, University of Vienna, Wien, Austria

    Christian Korunka

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Schöllbauer, J., Hartner-Tiefenthaler, M., Kelliher, C. (2021). ICT-Enabled Work Extension and Its Consequences: A Paradoxical Situation Between High Performance and Low Wellbeing. In: Korunka, C. (eds) Flexible Working Practices and Approaches. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-74128-0_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation