Abstract
Terrorist attacks in the United States on September 11, 2001, shook the entire world. These attacks in the United States, the superpower of the world, worried the world and were a harbinger of a new order. After attacks, states such as Iraq, Iran, Korea supported terrorism were considered devil states, and the US fought these states and global terrorism. In this context, Saddam Hussein has designated the axis of evil and the US wanted to make an operation. In this process, Turkey became a crucial ally for the United States. The US wanted to use Turkish territories. However, the Turkish government sent a memorandum to the Parliament, but it rejected this memorandum. Refusal of the memorandum was a harbinger of chaos and confusion. For example, the staff of the 11 Turkish Armed Forces, which established headquarters in Sulaymaniyah on July 4, 2003, was arrested and led away with hoods over their heads. This event, known as the Hood event in Turkey, has serious damage to relations between the US. As Edward N. Lorenz stated in the Butterfly Effect approach, everything in the universe could not be calculated and caused an insignificant event to occur unpredictable big events. In this framework, this study will be discussed with Lorenz’s Butterfly Effect Approach, also known as Chaos Theory.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Açıkalın, Ş. N., & Bölücek, C. A. (2014). Understanding of arab spring with chaos theory-uprising or revolution. In S. Banerjee, Ş. Ş. Erçetin, & A. Tekin (Eds.), Chaos, complexity and leadership (pp. 29–46). Switzerland: Springer International Publishing.
Açıkalın, Ş. N., & Artun, E. C. (2017). The concept of self-organized criticality: The case study of the arab uprising. In Ş. Ş. Erçetin, & N. Potas (Eds.), Chaos, complexity and leadership (pp. 73–85). Switzerland: Springer International Publishing.
Ağır, B. S. (2007). The bush doctrine: A search for global hegemonic stability? International Relations, 3(12), 71–100.
Akçay, E. Y. (2019). The Effectiveness of the European Union in the Iraq Crisis in 2003. In E. Y. Akçay, H. Demirhan, & S. Demez (Eds.), Crisis as a political and economic concept: A multidisciplinary approach (pp. 17–34). Berlin: Peter Lang.
Arbell, D. (2014). The US-Turkey-Israel triangle. Brookings Center for Middle East Policy Policy Paper, 34, 1–54.
Bağcı, H., & Kardas, S. (2004). Post-September 11 impact: The strategic importance of Turkey revisited. In İ. Bal (Ed.), Turkish foreign policy in post-cold era. Florida: Brown Walker Press.
Bağcı, H., & Açıkalın, Ş. N. (2013). From chaos to cosmos: Strategic depth and turkish foreing policy in syria. In Ş. Ş. Erçetin, & S. Banerjee (Eds.), Chaos, complexity and leadership (pp. 11–25). Switzerland: Springer International Publishing.
Barkey, H. J. (2010). Turkey’s new engagement in iraq embracing iraqi kurdistan. United States Instıtute of Peace Special Report, 237, 1–20.
Birdsall, N. (2003). The real challenge for iraqi development. The International Economy, 17(8), 58–61.
Brown, C. S. (2007). Turkey in the gulf wars of 1991 and 2003. Turkish Studies, 8(1), 85–119.
Cagaptay, S., & Parris, M. (2003). Turkey after the Iraq war: Still a U.S. Ally?. https://www.washingtoninstitute.org/policy-analysis/view/turkey-after-the-iraq-war-still-a-u.s.-ally.
Copson, R. W. (2003). Iraq war: Background and issues overview. Report for Congress, 15, 1–50.
Cordesman, A. H. (2003). The Iraq war: Strategy, tactics, and military lessons. Westport: Praeger.
Cox, M. (2002). Paradigm shifts and 9/11: International relations after twin towers. Security Dialogue, 33(2), 247–251.
Dale, C. (2008). Operation Iraqi freedom: Strategies, approaches, results, and issues for congress. CRS Report, 28, 1–124.
Demir, M. (2008). US Vice President to visit Turkey in March. https://www.hurriyet.com.tr/gundem/us-vice-president-to-visit-turkey-in-march-updated-8240009.
Flanagan, S. J., & Wilson, P. A. (2020). Implications for the U.S.-Turkish partnership and the U.S. Army. In S. J. Flanagan (Ed.), Turkish nationalist course: Implications for the U.S.-Turkish strategic partnership and the U.S. Army. Santa Monica: RAND.
Foundation Robert Schuman. (2002). General elections in Turkey 3rd November 2002. https://www.robert-schuman.eu/en/eem/0077-general-elections-in-turkey-3rd-november-2002.
Foreign Affairs, Defense, and Trade Division. (2003). Iraq War: Background and Issues Overview. https://www.everycrsreport.com/files/20030422_RL31715_423d9db6f13f3552cf646ac695f8021bcc84ef4e.pdf.
Gruen, G. E. (2004). Turkey’s strategic mideast regional initiatives. American Foreign Policy Interests, 26(6), 435–456.
Hale, W. (2007). Turkey, the US and Iraq. London: Middle East Institute at SOAS.
Henke, M. E. (2017). The rotten carrot: US-Turkish bargaining failure over Iraq in 2003 and the pitfalls of social embeddedness. Security Studies, 27(1), 120–147.
Human Rights Watch. (2003). Turkey and War in Iraq: Avoiding Past Patterns of Violation. https://www.hrw.org/legacy/backgrounder/eca/turkey/turkey_violations.pdf.
Huntington, S. P. (1993). The clash of civilizations? Foreign Affairs, 72(3), 22–49.
Kanat, K. B., Diptaş, S., Hannon, J., & Dudden, L. K. (2017). US-Turkey Relations under the AK Party. İstanbul: SETA Pub.
Kibaroğlu, M., & Sloane, M. (2005). Clash of interest over northern iraq drives turkish-israeli alliance to a crossroads. The Middle East Journal, 59(2), 246–264.
Maria, L. (2007). The concept of preventive war and its consequences for international relations. https://assembly.coe.int/nw/xml/XRef/X2H-Xref-ViewHTML.asp?FileID=11677&lang=en.
Migdalovitz, C. (2002). Turkey: Issues for U.S. Policy. https://www.everycrsreport.com/files/20020522_RL31429_9e7e7343894e9cae0833aee1ae7a86b877d8399c.pdf.
O’Hanion, M. (2005). Iraq Without a Plan. https://www.brookings.edu/articles/iraq-without-a-plan/.
Oktav, Ö. Z. (2004). Changing security perceptions in turkish-iranian relations. Perceptions, 9(2), 103–117.
Park, B. (2014). Turkey-Kurdısh regional government relations after The U.S. withdrawal from Iraq: putting the kurds on the map?. Carlisle: U.S. Army War College Press.
Peuch, J. C. (2002). Turkey: U.S. Deputy Defense Secretary Holds Iraq Talks. https://www.rferl.org/a/1100273.html.
Rosand, E. (2004). The security council as global legislator: ultra vires or ultra innovative. Fordham International Law Journal, 28(3), 542–590.
The White House. (2002). The National Security Strategy of the United States of America. https://2009-2017.state.gov/documents/organization/63562.pdf.
Thrall, A. T., & Goeper, E. (2017). Step back: Lessons for US foreign policy from the failed war on terror. CATO Institute Policy Paper, 814, 1–42.
US Department of State. (2001). The Unıted States and the Global Coalıtıon agaınst Terrorısm, September 2001-December 2003. https://2001-2009.state.gov/r/pa/ho/pubs/fs/5889.htm.
Weiner, T. (1999). U.S. Helped Turkey Find and Capture Kurd Rebel. https://www.nytimes.com/1999/02/20/world/us-helped-turkey-find-and-capture-kurd-rebel.html.
Wilson Center. (2004). Turkey. https://www.wilsoncenter.org/publication/turkey.
Wilson Center. (2020). Regime Change in Iraq: Repercussions for Turkey. https://www.wilsoncenter.org/publication/regime-change-iraq-repercussions-for-turkey.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Akçay, E.Y. (2021). The Butterfly Effect of the March 1 Memorandum: The Hood Event. In: Erçetin, Ş.Ş., Açıkalın, Ş.N., Vajzović, E. (eds) Chaos, Complexity and Leadership 2020. Springer Proceedings in Complexity. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-74057-3_18
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-74057-3_18
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-74056-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-74057-3
eBook Packages: Physics and AstronomyPhysics and Astronomy (R0)