Skip to main content

E-Learning in Times of Crisis: An Incidental or Facilitative Event?

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Handbook of Operations Research and Management Science in Higher Education

Abstract

As a result of the COVID-19 epidemic that erupted in 2020 the various higher education institutions in Israel, as elsewhere, were compelled to embrace E-Learning at short notice. This was a revolution that appeared with no preparation and that put on the agenda the efficacy of E-Learning from pedagogical aspects and the implications of the lecturer’s functions and the act of teaching for the quality of students’ learning as well as for the meaning of the learning expanse (campus—home) in teaching and learning processes. The current study examined the opinions of students and lecturers regarding the advantages and disadvantages of E-Learning from various aspects in a systemic, multi-institutional perspective. The study included 2015 students studying at various academic institutions: universities, academic teachers’ colleges, academic colleges, and private colleges. The study also included 223 lecturers.

The research findings show that the respondents did not display a high preference for E-Learning: less than half the students and about one-third of the lecturers expressed a preference for E-Learning. Both groups noted the lack of personal, social, and emotional interaction with both students and lecturers as one of the main shortcomings of E-Learning. Most of the students and lecturers did not grasp E-Learning as providing them with better quality teaching and learning. The study illuminates the role of the lecturer in the digital era as a teacher, and particularly—the role of the professional elements in charge of teaching and learning at academic institutions, particularly in the pedagogical aspects. According to student evaluations, the use of technological platforms and tools does not improve teaching, as they are used by the faculty only technically with no matching pedagogy. In order to succeed, E-Learning requires other pedagogical educational approaches aside from copying frontal teaching patterns using the Zoom platform, as well as others: Weber, MS Teams, etc.

In addition, the study indicates the need for perceptual changes, both by the students, who must take responsibility for their learning, and by the lecturers, who must reexamine the teaching and learning processes and adapt their role and areas of responsibility to the new opportunities afforded by the technological tools. The research findings also indicate that effective teaching is teaching that arouses in student’s inquisitiveness, motivation, and learning experiences, and note that learning products must be adapted to include essential skills in addition to knowledge. Further, the study illuminates the thorough discussion that must be held by leaders of higher education and of the academic institutions concerning the new effective designation of the campus after the COVID-19 crisis, including distinguishing between the virtual and the realistic in academic teaching and challenges and ways of dealing with the new circumstances.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Allen, I. E., & Seaman, J. (2007). Online nation: Five years of growth in online learning. Sloan Consortium.

    Google Scholar 

  • Altbach, G. P. G., & De Wit, H. (2020). Are we at a transformative moment for online learning? https://www.forbes.com/sites/andrewdepietro/2020/04/30/impact-coronavirus-covid-10-collegesuniversities/#1867f57d61a6

  • Anderson, T. (Ed.). (2008). The theory and practice of online learning. Athabasca University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ashburn, F. A., & Floden, E. R. (2006). Meaningful learning using technology: What educators need to know and do. Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barak, M., Dori, Y. J., & Hussein-Farraj, R. (2012). Lifelong learning at the Technion: Students’ perceptions of and experiences in distance learning. In Y. Eshet-Alkalai, A. Caspi, S. Eden, N. Geri, Y. Yair, & I. Kalman (Eds.), Conference proceedings: Chais conference of learning technologies 2012: The learning individual in the age of technology. Open University. [Hebrew]

    Google Scholar 

  • Bates, R., & Khasawneh, S. (2007). Self-efficacy and college students’ perceptions and use of online learning systems. Computers in Human Behavior, 23(1), 175–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benade, L. (2017). The impact on teachers’ work: Practitioner attitudes and reflective transitions. In Being a teacher in 21 st century (pp. 163–176). Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Berger-Tikochinski, T., Cohen, E., Hadad, N., & Manny-Ikan, E. (2020). Essential skills for distance learning (Vol. 1, pp. 1–16). Henrietta Szold Institute [Hebrew]

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, R. E. (1994). Media will never influence learning. Educational Technology Research and Development, 42, 21–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, A. (1999). Moderated teaching and distance learning via the internet. Mahshevim Behinuch, 49, 8–16. [Hebrew]

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, E., & Davidovitch, N. (2020). The development of online learning in Israeli higher education. Journal of Education and Learning, 9(5), 15–26. Published by Canadian Center of Science and Education, Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dabbagh, N., & Bannan-Ritland, B. (2005). Online learning: Concepts, strategies, and application (pp. 68–107). Pearson/Merrill/Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davidovitch, N. (2014). Learning-focused teaching and backward course design—from transferring knowledge to imparting skills. In N. Notzer (Ed.), To excel in academic teaching: LECTURER handbook of updated strategies and competencies (pp. 63–74). College for Academic Studies. ISBN: 978-965-916628-2-0

    Google Scholar 

  • Davidovitch, N., & Eckhaus, E. (2020). Exploring the true motivation of faculty members to promote technological innovation in their courses. In S. Nazir, T. Ahram, & W. Karwowski (Eds.), Advances in human factors in training, education, and learning sciences. AHFE 2020. Advances in intelligent systems and computing (p. 1211). Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davidovitch, N., & Yavich, R. (2015). Technology-related involvement: The effect of the Mashov system on parent involvement in Israeli junior highs. Journal of International Education Research, 11(4), 243–252.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davidovitch, N., & Yavich, R. (2016). WhatsApp messaging: Achievements and success in academia. International Journal of Higher Education (IJHE), 5(4), 255–261.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davidovitch, N., & Yavich, R.. (2018). Usage of mobile phone applications and its impact on teaching and learning. International Journal of Higher Education (IJHE), 7(1), 1–9. ISSN: 1927-6044

    Google Scholar 

  • DePietro, A. (2020). Here’s a look at the impact of Coronavirus (COVID-19) on colleges and universities in the U.S. Forbes. https://www.forbes.com/sites/andrewdepietro/2020/04/30/impact-coronavirus-covid-19-colleges-universities/?sh=3ec5a84e61a6

  • Ertmer, P. A., & Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. T. (2010). Teacher technology change: How knowledge, confidence, beliefs, and culture intersect. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 42(3), 255–284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eshet-Alkalai, Y., & Geri, N. (2007). Does the medium affect the message? The influence of text representation format on critical thinking. Human Systems Management, 26(4), 269–279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldschmidt, R. (2013). Online academic learning and its recognition. Jerusalem: Knesset—Research and Information Center. [Hebrew]

    Google Scholar 

  • Hershkowitz, A., & Kaberman, T. (2009). Training and professional development of teachers via distance learning as a way of coping with the shortage of teachers. Technion, Israel Institute of Technology, Department of Education in Technology and Science. [Hebrew]

    Google Scholar 

  • Joanna, N. P., & Jason, A. S. (2016). Making hybrids work: An institutional framework for blending online and face-to-face instruction in higher education. National Council of Teachers of English.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kovoor, S. M. (2020). Crisis management: Resilience and change. SAGE Publications, Inc.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, N., & Forkosh-Baruch, A.. (2018). Use of online teaching in linguistics among high school students taking the matriculation exam in the eleventh grade. In Y. Eshet-Alkalai, et al. (Eds.), Conference proceedings: 13 th Chais conference of learning technologies: The learning individual in the age of technology. Open University. [Hebrew]

    Google Scholar 

  • Mioduser, D., Nachmias, R., & Forkosh-Baruch, A. (2010). New literacies for the knowledge society. Eureka.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nir-Gal, O. (2002). Distance learning: The role of the teacher in a virtual learning environment. Maof Umaaseh, 6, 103–124. [Hebrew]

    Google Scholar 

  • Palloff, R. M., & Pratt, K. (2007). Building online learning communities: Effective strategies for the virtual classroom. John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phelps, R. (2018). Crisis Management: How to develop a powerful program. Chandi Media.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salmon G. (2019) E-moderating: The key to online teaching and learning. .

    Google Scholar 

  • Song, L., Singleton, E. S., Hill, J. R., & Koh, M. H. (2004). Improving online learning: Student perceptions of useful and challenging characteristics. The Internet and Higher Education, 7(1), 59–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wadmany, R. (2017). Digital pedagogy—from theory to practice. Mofet, Kibbutzim College. [Hebrew]

    Google Scholar 

  • Wadmany, R. (2018). Digital pedagogy—Opportunities for different learning. Mofet, Kibbutzim College. [Hebrew]

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, E. D., & McCombs, B. L. (1995). Lerner centered psychological principles in practice: Designs for distance education. Educational Technology, 35, 32–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weissblei, E. (2020). Emergency distance learning while education institutions are closed due to the coronavirus outbreak. Knesset—Research and Information Center. [Hebrew]

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nitza Davidovitch .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Davidovitch, N., Wadmany, R. (2021). E-Learning in Times of Crisis: An Incidental or Facilitative Event?. In: Sinuany-Stern, Z. (eds) Handbook of Operations Research and Management Science in Higher Education. International Series in Operations Research & Management Science, vol 309. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-74051-1_15

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics