Skip to main content

The Diagnostic Assessment and Achievement of College Skills (DAACS): A Powerful Tool for the Regulation of Learning

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Technology and Innovation in Learning, Teaching and Education (TECH-EDU 2020)

Abstract

The Diagnostic Assessment and Achievement of College Skills (DAACS) is an open-source diagnostic assessment tool that measures students’ college readiness and is designed to promote success through feedback and resources. Evidence for the validity and reliability of the four DAACS assessments (reading, writing, mathematics, and self-regulated learning) have been addressed, which further supports the use of DAACS with our targeted population. Empirical studies have shown that the DAACS improves the prediction accuracy of students’ performance, which allows DAACS to be used to identify at-risk students. Students who use DAACS feedback and resources are more successful than those who do not. Various behavioral nudges were sent to students as reminders to complete and use the DAACS, which resulted in a significant increase in the use of feedback and resources. DAACS is not just a tool but a system that facilitates the self and co-regulation of learning. Since the DACCS is now being implemented in new settings and contexts, further validation will be needed. The future of DAACS will involve expansion from use at the institutional level to the instructor level, where DAACS could be maximized to support students’ SRL development and academic achievement.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Efklides, A.: Interactions of metacognition with motivation and affect in self-regulated learning: the MASRL model. Educ. Psychol. 46(1), 6–25 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2011.538645

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Winne, P.H., Hadwin, A.F.: Studying as self-regulated engagement in learning. In: Hacker, D., Dunlosky, J., Graesser, A. (eds.) Metacognition in Educational Theory and Practice, pp. 277–304. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, New Jersey (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Zimmerman, B.J.: Attaining self-regulation: a social-cognitive perspective. In: Boekaerts, M., Pintrich, P., Zeidner, M. (eds.) Self-regulation: Theory, Research, and Applications, pp. 13–39. Academic Press, Cambridge (2000)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. Bronfenbrenner, U.: The Ecology of Human Development: Experiments by Nature and Design. Harvard University Press, Cambridge (1979)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Cleary, T.: The development and validation of the self-regulation strategy inventory—self-report. J. Sch. Psychol. 44(4), 307–322 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2006.05.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Driscoll, R.: Westside Test Anxiety Scale Validation. ERIC Digest (2007). https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED495968.pdf

  7. Dugan, R., Andrade, H.L.: Exploring the construct validity of academic self-regulation using a new self-report questionnaire - the survey of academic self-regulation. Int. J. Educ. Psychol. Assess. 7(1), 45–63 (2011). https://scholarsarchive.library.albany.edu/edpsych_fac_scholar/1

  8. Dweck, C.S.: Mindset: The New Psychology of Success. Random House, New York (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Schraw, G., Dennison, R.S.: Assessing metacognitive awareness. Contemp. Educ. Psychol. 19(4), 460–475 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Lui, A., et al.: Validity evidence of the internal structure of the DAACS self-regulated learning survey. Future Rev. Int. J. Trans. Coll. Career Success 1(1), 1–8 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Mayfield, E., Rosé, C.P.: LightSIDE: Open source machine learning for text. In: Shermis, M., Burstein, J. (eds.) Handbook of Automated Essay Evaluation, pp. 146–157. Routledge, Abingdon (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Yagelski, R.: The Essentials of Writing: Ten Core Concepts. Cengage Learning, Boston (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Akhmedjanova, D., Lui, A.M., Andrade, H.L., Bryer, J.: Validity and reliability of the DAACS writing assessment. Paper presentation, Annual Meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education (NCME), Toronto, Canada, 4–8 April 2019

    Google Scholar 

  14. Ekowo, M., Palmer, I.: Predictive analytics in higher education: five guiding practices for ethical use. Education Policy, 6 March 2016. https://www.newamerica.org/education-policy/reports/predictive-analytics-in-higher-education/

  15. Bryer, J., Lui, A.M., Andrade, H.L., Franklin, D., Cleary, T.: Efficacy of the diagnostic assessment and achievement of college skills on multiple success indicators. Roundtable presentation, Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association (AERA), Toronto, Canada, 5–9 April 2019

    Google Scholar 

  16. Thaler, R.H., Sunstein, C.R.: Nudge: Improving Decisions About Health and Happiness. Penguin Group, New York (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Halpern, D.: Inside the Nudge Unit: How Small Changes Can Make a Big Difference. Penguin Random House, New York (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Perkins, H.W.: The Social Norms Approach to Preventing School and College Age Substance Abuse. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Eskreis-Winkler, L., Gross, J.J., Duckworth, A.L.: GRIT: sustained self-regulation in the service of superordinate goals. In: Vohs, K.D., Baumeister, R.F. (eds.) Handbook of Self-regulation: Research, Theory and Applications, 3rd edn., pp. 380–396. Guilford, New York (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Damgaard, M.T., Nielsen, H.S.: Nudging in education. Econ. Educ. Rev. 64, 313–342 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econedurev.2018.03.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Castleman, B.L., Page, L.C.: Parental influences on postsecondary decision making: evidence from a text messaging experiment. Educ. Eval. Policy Anal. 39(2), 361–377 (2017). https://doi.org/10.3102/0162373716687393

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Alan, S., Boneva, T., Ertac, S.: Ever failed, try again, succeed better: results from a randomized educational intervention on grit. Q. J. Econ. 134(3), 1121–1162 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1093/qje/qjz006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. De Paola, M., Scoppa, V.: Procrastination, academic success and the effectiveness of a remedial program. J. Econ. Behav. Organ. 115, 217–236 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2014.12.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Yeomans, M., Reich, J.: Planning prompts increase and forecast course completion in massive open online courses. In: Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on Learning Analytics & Knowledge Conference, ACM, New York, pp. 464–473 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1145/3027385.3027416

  25. Bettinger, E.P., Baker, R.B.: The effects of student coaching: an evaluation of a randomized experiment in student advising. Educ. Eval. Policy Anal. 36(1), 3–19 (2014). https://doi.org/10.3102/0162373713500523

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Franklin, D., Bryer, J., Akhmedjanova, D., Lui, A.M., Andrade, H.L.: The effects of nudges on students’ use of the diagnostic assessment and achievement of college skills. Roundtable presentation, Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association (AERA), San Francisco, CA, USA (Conference Canceled), 17–21 April 2020

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the U.S. Department of Education under grant #P116F150077. The contents do not necessarily represent the policy of the U.S. Department of Education, and endorsement by the Federal Government should not be assumed.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Elie ChingYen Yu or Angela M. Lui .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Yu, E.C., Lui, A.M., Akhmedjanova, D. (2021). The Diagnostic Assessment and Achievement of College Skills (DAACS): A Powerful Tool for the Regulation of Learning. In: Reis, A., Barroso, J., Lopes, J.B., Mikropoulos, T., Fan, CW. (eds) Technology and Innovation in Learning, Teaching and Education. TECH-EDU 2020. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 1384. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-73988-1_14

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-73988-1_14

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-73987-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-73988-1

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics