Abstract
The main benefit of carrying out a psychometric assessment in any clinical or educational psychology setting is that it allows more objective assessment of an individual’s underlying cognitive strengths and difficulties, rather than relying on clinical judgement alone. Although each individual is unique in their strengths and difficulties, psychometric testing allows assessment scores to be compared to a set of normative data; that is, individuals’ abilities can be compared to those of a sample which provide data about what is usual in a defined population at a specific point in time (see Fig. 14.1 for normal distribution curve). Another benefit of psychometric assessments is that they are standardised, whereby they are designed in such a way that the questions, conditions for administering, scoring procedures, and interpretations, are consistent and are administered and scored in a predetermined manner, as far as possible. Subtests within psychometric assessments are statistically chosen for their validity and reliability. In other words, subtests are included in a testing battery if they measure what they are supposed to measure (validity) and results are consistent (reliability). There is not one approach to this form of testing. This chapter sets out the approach used in the UK National Fetal Alcohol Spectrum Disorder (FASD) behavioural specialist clinic.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Astley SJ. Diagnostic guide for fetal alcohol spectrum disorders: the 4-digit diagnostic code. 3rd ed. Seattle: University of Washington Publication Services; 2004.
Chudley AE, Conry J, Cook JL, Loock C, Rosales T, LeBlanc N. Fetal alcohol spectrum disorder: Canadian guidelines for diagnosis. CMAJ. 2005;172(5 Suppl):S1–S21.
Cook JL, Green CR, Lilley CM, Anderson SM, Baldwin ME, Chudley AE, Rosales T. Fetal alcohol spectrum disorder: a guideline for diagnosis across the lifespan. Can Med Assoc J. 2016;188(3):191–7.
Wechsler D. Wechsler intelligence scale for children. 5th ed. Bloomington, MN: Pearson; 2014.
Flanagan DP, Alfonso VC. Essentials of WISC-V assessment. Hoboken: Wiley; 2017.
McCloskey G, Perkins LA. Essentials of executive functions assessment. Hoboken: Wiley; 2013.
Delis DC, Kaplan E, Kramer JH. Delis-Kaplan executive function system (D-KEFS). San Antonio: Psychological Corporation; 2001.
Zelazo PD, Muller U. Executive function in typical and atypical development. In: Goswami U, editor. Blackwell handbook of childhood cognitive development. Oxford: Blackwell Handbooks of Developmental Psychology; 2002. p. 445–69.
Kodituwakku PW, May PA, Clericuzio CL, Weers D. Emotion-related learning in individuals prenatally exposed to alcohol: an investigation of the relation between set-shifting, extinction of responses, and behavior. Neuropsychologia. 2001;39(7):699–708.
Kully-Marten K, Treit S, Pei J, Rasmussen C. Affective decision-making on the Iowa gambling task in children and adolescents with fetal alcohol spectrum disorders. J Inter Neuropsychol Soc. 2013;19(2):134–44.
Mohamed Z, ACS C, Livesey AC, RAS M. Comparisons of the BRIEF parental report and neuropsychological clinical tests of executive function in Fetal Alcohol Spectrum Disorders: data from the UK national specialist clinic. Child Neuropsychol. 2018; https://doi.org/10.1080/09297049.2018.1516202.
Mukherjee RAS, Layton M, Yacoub E, Turk JT. Autism and autistic traits in people exposed to heavy prenatal alcohol: data from a clinical series of 21 individuals and a nested case control study. Adv Ment Health Intellect Disabil. 2011;5:43–9.
Wechsler D. Wechsler intelligence scale for children. 4th ed. San Antonio: Psychological Corporation; 2003.
Wechsler D, Coalson DL, Raiford SE. WAIS-IV technical and interpretive manual. San Antonio, TX: Pearson; 2008.
Rasmussen C. Executive functioning and working memory in fetal alcohol spectrum disorder. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2005;29(8):1359–67.
Emslie H, Wilson FC, Burden V, Nimmo-Smith I, Wilson BA. Behavioural assessment of the dysexecutive syndrome for children (BADS-C). London, UK: Harcourt Assessment/The Psychological Corporation; 2003.
Korkman M, Kirk U, Kemp S. NEPSY. 2nd ed. San Antonio, TX: Pearson; 2007.
Gioia GA, Isquith PK, Guy SC, Kenworthy L. Behavior rating inventory of executive function. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources; 2000.
Mattson SN, Goodman AM, Caine C, Delis DC, Riley EP. Executive functioning in children with heavy prenatal alcohol exposure. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 1999;23(11):1808–15.
Stratton K, Howe C, Battaglia FC. Fetal alcohol syndrome: diagnosis, epidemiology, prevention, and treatment. National Academies Press; 1996.
George M, Gilbert S. Mental Capacity Act (2005) assessments: why everyone needs to know about the frontal lobe paradox. The Neuropsychologist. 2018, 5:59–66.
Wing L, Leekam S, Libby S, Gould J, Larcombe M. Diagnostic interview for social and communication disorders: background, inter-rater reliability and clinical use. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2002;43:307–25.
Conners CK. Conners 3rd ed manual. Toronto, ON: Multi-Health Systems; 2008.
Sparrow SS, Cicchetti DV, Balla DA. Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scales: Second edition (Vineland II), survey interview form/caregiver rating form. Livonia: Pearson; 2005.
Einfeld SL, Tonge BJ. Manual for the developmental behaviour checklist. Clayton, Melbourne and Sydney: Monash University for Developmental Psychiatry and School of Psychiatry, University of New South Wales; 1992.
Parham LD, Ecker C, Miller H, Henry DA, Glennon TJ. Sensory processing measure. Los Angeles: WPS; 2007.
Rutter M, Bailey A, Lord C. The social communication questionnaire. Los Angeles: Western Psychological Services; 2003.
Dunn W. The sensory profile: user’s manual. San Antonio: Psychological Corporation; 1999.
Semel E, Wiig EH, Secord WA. Clinical evaluation of language fundamentals. 4th ed. Toronto, Canada: The Psychological Corporation/ A Harcourt Assessment Company; 2003.
Bishop D. Children’s communication checklist. 2nd ed. London: Harcourt Assessment; 2003.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Carlisle, A., Livesey, A. (2021). The Role of Formal Psychometric Assessment in Fetal Alcohol Spectrum Disorder (FASD). In: Mukherjee, R.A.S., Aiton, N. (eds) Prevention, Recognition and Management of Fetal Alcohol Spectrum Disorders. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-73966-9_14
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-73966-9_14
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-73965-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-73966-9
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)