Skip to main content

The Role of Formal Psychometric Assessment in Fetal Alcohol Spectrum Disorder (FASD)

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Prevention, Recognition and Management of Fetal Alcohol Spectrum Disorders

Abstract

The main benefit of carrying out a psychometric assessment in any clinical or educational psychology setting is that it allows more objective assessment of an individual’s underlying cognitive strengths and difficulties, rather than relying on clinical judgement alone. Although each individual is unique in their strengths and difficulties, psychometric testing allows assessment scores to be compared to a set of normative data; that is, individuals’ abilities can be compared to those of a sample which provide data about what is usual in a defined population at a specific point in time (see Fig. 14.1 for normal distribution curve). Another benefit of psychometric assessments is that they are standardised, whereby they are designed in such a way that the questions, conditions for administering, scoring procedures, and interpretations, are consistent and are administered and scored in a predetermined manner, as far as possible. Subtests within psychometric assessments are statistically chosen for their validity and reliability. In other words, subtests are included in a testing battery if they measure what they are supposed to measure (validity) and results are consistent (reliability). There is not one approach to this form of testing. This chapter sets out the approach used in the UK National Fetal Alcohol Spectrum Disorder (FASD) behavioural specialist clinic.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Astley SJ. Diagnostic guide for fetal alcohol spectrum disorders: the 4-digit diagnostic code. 3rd ed. Seattle: University of Washington Publication Services; 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Chudley AE, Conry J, Cook JL, Loock C, Rosales T, LeBlanc N. Fetal alcohol spectrum disorder: Canadian guidelines for diagnosis. CMAJ. 2005;172(5 Suppl):S1–S21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Cook JL, Green CR, Lilley CM, Anderson SM, Baldwin ME, Chudley AE, Rosales T. Fetal alcohol spectrum disorder: a guideline for diagnosis across the lifespan. Can Med Assoc J. 2016;188(3):191–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Wechsler D. Wechsler intelligence scale for children. 5th ed. Bloomington, MN: Pearson; 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Flanagan DP, Alfonso VC. Essentials of WISC-V assessment. Hoboken: Wiley; 2017.

    Google Scholar 

  6. McCloskey G, Perkins LA. Essentials of executive functions assessment. Hoboken: Wiley; 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Delis DC, Kaplan E, Kramer JH. Delis-Kaplan executive function system (D-KEFS). San Antonio: Psychological Corporation; 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Zelazo PD, Muller U. Executive function in typical and atypical development. In: Goswami U, editor. Blackwell handbook of childhood cognitive development. Oxford: Blackwell Handbooks of Developmental Psychology; 2002. p. 445–69.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  9. Kodituwakku PW, May PA, Clericuzio CL, Weers D. Emotion-related learning in individuals prenatally exposed to alcohol: an investigation of the relation between set-shifting, extinction of responses, and behavior. Neuropsychologia. 2001;39(7):699–708.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Kully-Marten K, Treit S, Pei J, Rasmussen C. Affective decision-making on the Iowa gambling task in children and adolescents with fetal alcohol spectrum disorders. J Inter Neuropsychol Soc. 2013;19(2):134–44.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Mohamed Z, ACS C, Livesey AC, RAS M. Comparisons of the BRIEF parental report and neuropsychological clinical tests of executive function in Fetal Alcohol Spectrum Disorders: data from the UK national specialist clinic. Child Neuropsychol. 2018; https://doi.org/10.1080/09297049.2018.1516202.

  12. Mukherjee RAS, Layton M, Yacoub E, Turk JT. Autism and autistic traits in people exposed to heavy prenatal alcohol: data from a clinical series of 21 individuals and a nested case control study. Adv Ment Health Intellect Disabil. 2011;5:43–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Wechsler D. Wechsler intelligence scale for children. 4th ed. San Antonio: Psychological Corporation; 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Wechsler D, Coalson DL, Raiford SE. WAIS-IV technical and interpretive manual. San Antonio, TX: Pearson; 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Rasmussen C. Executive functioning and working memory in fetal alcohol spectrum disorder. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2005;29(8):1359–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Emslie H, Wilson FC, Burden V, Nimmo-Smith I, Wilson BA. Behavioural assessment of the dysexecutive syndrome for children (BADS-C). London, UK: Harcourt Assessment/The Psychological Corporation; 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Korkman M, Kirk U, Kemp S. NEPSY. 2nd ed. San Antonio, TX: Pearson; 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Gioia GA, Isquith PK, Guy SC, Kenworthy L. Behavior rating inventory of executive function. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources; 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Mattson SN, Goodman AM, Caine C, Delis DC, Riley EP. Executive functioning in children with heavy prenatal alcohol exposure. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 1999;23(11):1808–15.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Stratton K, Howe C, Battaglia FC. Fetal alcohol syndrome: diagnosis, epidemiology, prevention, and treatment. National Academies Press; 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  21. George M, Gilbert S. Mental Capacity Act (2005) assessments: why everyone needs to know about the frontal lobe paradox. The Neuropsychologist. 2018, 5:59–66.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Wing L, Leekam S, Libby S, Gould J, Larcombe M. Diagnostic interview for social and communication disorders: background, inter-rater reliability and clinical use. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2002;43:307–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Conners CK. Conners 3rd ed manual. Toronto, ON: Multi-Health Systems; 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Sparrow SS, Cicchetti DV, Balla DA. Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scales: Second edition (Vineland II), survey interview form/caregiver rating form. Livonia: Pearson; 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Einfeld SL, Tonge BJ. Manual for the developmental behaviour checklist. Clayton, Melbourne and Sydney: Monash University for Developmental Psychiatry and School of Psychiatry, University of New South Wales; 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Parham LD, Ecker C, Miller H, Henry DA, Glennon TJ. Sensory processing measure. Los Angeles: WPS; 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Rutter M, Bailey A, Lord C. The social communication questionnaire. Los Angeles: Western Psychological Services; 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Dunn W. The sensory profile: user’s manual. San Antonio: Psychological Corporation; 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Semel E, Wiig EH, Secord WA. Clinical evaluation of language fundamentals. 4th ed. Toronto, Canada: The Psychological Corporation/ A Harcourt Assessment Company; 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Bishop D. Children’s communication checklist. 2nd ed. London: Harcourt Assessment; 2003.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alexandra Carlisle .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Carlisle, A., Livesey, A. (2021). The Role of Formal Psychometric Assessment in Fetal Alcohol Spectrum Disorder (FASD). In: Mukherjee, R.A.S., Aiton, N. (eds) Prevention, Recognition and Management of Fetal Alcohol Spectrum Disorders. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-73966-9_14

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-73966-9_14

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-73965-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-73966-9

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics