Skip to main content

Metallurgical and Mining Waste Utilization in Preparation of Geo-Polymeric Bricks as the Future Construction Material

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Innovations in Sustainable Mining

Abstract

An excess amount of waste generated by the energy and metal industries has posed a great challenge of its disposal due to its adverse effects on the environment. There have been several initiatives world over, towards minimizing, detoxifying, and utilizing wastes, so as to make a value-addition in the existing mining operations. Among others, the geopolymers emerge as a viable, low-cost, and environment friendly solution for using industrial wastes such as fly-ash. The geo-polymers are inorganic, ceramic material, which forms a long-range, covalently-bonded, non-crystalline (amorphous) networks. The bricks manufactured from fly-ash and rice-husk silica is well established, which, on the whole, work on the same principle of amorphous silica. However, in the present study, the source of the silica has been altered by using Bamboo (Bambusa vulgaris) leaves, which is known to be a potential agro-waste and capable to producing an amorphous silica with ~92% yield. During the present study, the ternary geo-polymer brick was synthesized using fly ash, iron oxide slag (red mud) and bamboo extracted amorphous silica. The structural and mechanical properties of this new material were tested and characterized. The results have shown double fold increase in compressive strength, increase in durability, heat resistance and strength with respect to time. Therefore, the new material has a potential to revamp construction and infrastructure industries by way of providing low-cost alternative to the clay bricks as well as sand. It will also have a positive impact on legal as well as illegal sand-mining, which is one of the greatest environmental threats today.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Davidovits J (1988) Soft mineralurgy and geopolymers. In: Proceedings 1st european conference of soft mineralurgy “Geopolymer ‘88”, Compiegne

    Google Scholar 

  2. Traoré S, Diarra A, Kourouma O, Traoré DL (2019) Survey of bauxite resources, alumina industry and the prospects of the production of geopolymer composites from the resulting by-product, geopolymers and other geosynthetics, survey of bauxite resources, alumina industry and the prospects of the production

    Google Scholar 

  3. Chen C, Habert G, Bouzidi Y, Jullien A (2010) Environmental impact of cement production: detail of the different processes and cement plant variability evaluation. J Clean Prod 18(5):478–485

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Hasanbeigi A, Menke C, Price L (2010) The CO2 abatement cost curve for the Thailand cement industry. J Clean Prod 18(15):1509–1518

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Wan Mastura WI, Mustafa AM, Bakri Al, Andrei V, Kamarudin H, Ioan G, Nizar IK Aeslina IAK, Binhussain M (2014) Processing and characterization of fly ash-based geopolymer bricks. Revista De Chimi 65(11):1340–1345

    Google Scholar 

  6. Gawatre D, Vairagade L (2014) Int J Sci Res (IJSR) 3(10):2247–2252

    Google Scholar 

  7. Cao VD, Pilehvar S, Salas-Bringas C, Szczotok A.M et al (2018) Influence of microcapsule size and shell polarity on the time-dependent viscosity of geopolymer paste, industrial & engineering chemistry research. J Am Chem Soc 1–9

    Google Scholar 

  8. Fernandez-Jimenez A, Palomo A, Criado A (2005) Microstructure development of alkali-activated fly ash cement: a descriptive model. Cem Concr Res 35(6):1204–1209

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Mohajerani A, Suter D, Jeffrey-Bailey T, Song T, Arulrajah A, Horpibulsuk S, Law D (2019) Recycling waste materials in geopolymer concrete. Clean Technol Envir 1–45

    Google Scholar 

  10. Abdullah MMA, Hussin K, Bnhussain M, Ismail KN and Ibrahim WMW (2011) Mechanism and chemical reaction of fly ash geopolymer cement-a review. Int J Pure Appl Sci Technol 6(1):35–44. ISSN 2229–6107

    Google Scholar 

  11. Hardjito D, Wallah SE, Sumajouw D (2004) On the development of fly ash based geopolymer concrete. Int Concr Abstr Portal Mater 101(6):467–472

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Gamage N, Liyanage K, Fragomeni S (2011) Overview of different type of fly ash and their use as a building and construction material. In: conference: international conference of structural engineering, construction and management, Sri Lanka

    Google Scholar 

  13. Malhotra VM, Ramezanianpour AA (2005) Fly ash in concrete, CANMET, 1994. ISBN 0660157640, 9780660157641:307

    Google Scholar 

  14. Khairul NI. Kamarudin H, Mohd SI (2007) Physical, chemical & mineralogical properties of fly ash. J Nucl Sci Technol 4(2007):47–51

    Google Scholar 

  15. Hardjito D, Wallah SE, Sumajouw DMJ, Rangan, BV (2005) Introducing fly ash based-geopolymer concrete: manufacture and engineering properties, in our world in concrete and structures international conference, Singapore: 271-278

    Google Scholar 

  16. Duchesne J, Duong L, Bostrom T, Frost R (2010) Microstructure study of early in situ reaction of fly ash geopolymer observed by environmental scanning electron microscopy (ESEM). Waste Biomass Valor 1:367–377

    Google Scholar 

  17. Ridzuan ARM, Khairulniza AA, Arshad MF (2014) Effect of sodium silicate types on the high calcium geopolymer concrete. Mater Sci Forum 803:185–193

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Skvara F (2007) Alkali activated material-geopolymer. Ceram Silik 51(3):173–177

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Pacheco-Torgal F, Castro-Gomes J, Jalali S (2008) Alkali-activated binders: a review part I, historical background, terminology, reaction mechanisms and hydration products. J Constr Build Mater 22:1305–1314

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Vargel C (2004) Inorganic salts, corrosion of aluminium. Elsevier, 17–441

    Google Scholar 

  21. Rattanasak U, Chindaprasirt P (2009) Influence of NaOH solution on the synthesis of fly ash geopolymer. Miner Eng Elsevier 1073–1078

    Google Scholar 

  22. Somna K, Jaturapitakkul C, Kajitvichyanukul P, Chindaprasirt P (2011) NaOH-activated ground fly ash geopolymer cured at ambient temperature. Fuel 90(6):2118–2124

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Chindaprasirt P, Chareerat T, Sirivivananon V (2007) Workability and strength of coarse high calcium fly ash geopolymer. Cem Concr Compos 29:224–229

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Swanepoel JC, Strydom CA (2002) Utilisation of fly ash in a geopolymeric material. Appl Geochem 17(8):1143–1148

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Panias D, Giannopoulou IP, Perraki T (2007) Effect of synthesis parameters on the mechanical properties of fly ash-based geopolymers. Colloids Surf A 301:246–254

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Bakharev T (2005) Geopolymeric materials prepared using class F fly ash and elevated temperature curing. Cem Concr Res 35:1224–1232

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Martinez JR, Palomares S, Ortega-Zarzosa G, Ruiz F, Chumakov Y (2006) Rietveld refinement of amorphous SiO2 prepared via sol–gel method. Mater Lett 60:3526

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Zhang G, Xu XuY, Wang D, Xue Y, Su W (2008) Pressure-induced crystallization of amorphous SiO2 with silicon-hydroxy group and the quick synthesis of coesite under lower temperature. High Press Res 28:641

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Deraman LM, Abdullah MMA, Ming LY et al (2017) Mechanical properties on geopolymer brick: a review, 3rd Electronic and Green Materials International Conference 2017

    Google Scholar 

  30. Sukri D (2010) Investigating of compressive strength foam brickwall panel with different bonding by using stretcher and Flemish bond, University Malaysia Pahang

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Dandekar, S., Deshmukh, K., Bangalkar, B., Zingare, P., Peshwe, D., Randive, K. (2021). Metallurgical and Mining Waste Utilization in Preparation of Geo-Polymeric Bricks as the Future Construction Material. In: Randive, K., Pingle, S., Agnihotri, A. (eds) Innovations in Sustainable Mining. Earth and Environmental Sciences Library. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-73796-2_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics