Skip to main content

Abstract

Artificial’ ability the term artificial intelligence (AI) was first coined by John McCarthy in 1956 when he had the initial theoretical meeting on this topic. But this journey to see if machines will really believe started much before this. Five years later Alan Turing published the article on this idea of machines being able to imitate human race and the ability to do intelligent things, e.g., play chess. Yet, most people be uncertain about the purpose of AI. What if he produces the AI that has the only aim of estimating the amount of Pi, but has decided that by getting earthly death and giving human lives, it could gain another digit to its collection of digits efficiently? Therefore, the entire idea of knowing in machines is unlikely. The only plausible explanation of the power to philosophize, emotionally interact with humans and reason motivation is artificial awareness.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Abbas M, Sajid S, Mumtaz S (2018) Personal and contextual antecedents of knowledge sharing and innovative performance among engineers. Eng Manage J 30(3):154–164

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Adams M (2016) Is Artificial Intelligence Dangerous? Forbes. https://www.forbes.com/sites/robertadams/2016/03/25/is-artificial-intelligence-dangerous/

  3. Adler RP, Goggin J (2005) What do we mean by civic engagement? J Transf Educ 3(3):236–253

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Alafif A, Adly A, Adly M (2020) Faculty of Computers and Artificial Intelligence. In: Adly C (n.d.) Approaches Based on Artificial Intelligence and the Internet of Intelligent Things to Prevent the Spread of COVID-19: Scoping Review. Retrieved November 29, 2020. https://www.jmir.org/2020/8/e19104/

  5. Alafif T (2020) Machine and Deep Learning Towards COVID-19 Diagnosis and Treatment: Survey, Challenges, and Future Directions. https://doi.org/10.31224/osf.io/w3zxy

  6. Alguezaui S, Filieri R (2010) Investigating the role of social capital in innovation: sparse versus dense network. J Knowl Manage 14(6):891–909

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Allam Z, Jones D (2020) On the coronavirus (COVID-19) outbreak and the smart city network: universal data sharing standards coupled with artificial intelligence (AI) to benefit urban health monitoring and management. Accessed 29 Nov 2020. https://www.mdpi.com/2227-9032/8/1/46/htm

  8. Bircham-Connolly H, Corner J, Bowden S (2005) An empirical study of the impact of question structure on recipient attitude during knowledge sharing. Electron J Knowl Manage 32(1):1–10

    Google Scholar 

  9. Bradeško L, Mladenić D (2017) A survey of chabot systems through a loebner prize competition. Artificial Intelligence laboratory, Jozef Stefan Institute, Ljubljana Slovenia

    Google Scholar 

  10. Britannica (2018). Artificial intelligence. www.britannica.com/technology/artificial-intelligence

  11. Brandtzæg PB, Følstad A, Mainsah H (2012). Designing for youth civic engagement in social media. In: Proceedings of the IADIS International Conference of Web Based Communities and Social Media, pp. 65–73, July 2012

    Google Scholar 

  12. Brandtzaeg PB, Følstad A (2017) Why people use chatbots. In: International Conference on Internet Science, pp. 377–392. Springer, Cham, November 2017

    Google Scholar 

  13. Brooks R (2014) Artificial intelligence is a tool, not a threat, 10 November 2014. Archived from the original on 12 November 2014

    Google Scholar 

  14. Boulos MNK, Resch B, Crowley DN, Breslin JG, Sohn G, Burtner R, Chuang KYS (2011) Crowdsourcing, citizen sensing and sensor web technologies for public and environmental health surveillance and crisis management: trends, OGC standards and application examples. Intl J Health Geograph 10(1):1–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Bullock J, Luccioni A, Pham K, Lam C, Luengo-Oroz M (2020) Mapping the landscape of artificial intelligence applications against COVID-19. Accessed 29 Nov 2020. https://arxiv.org/abs/2003.11336

  16. Castrounis A (2017) Artificial intelligence, deep learning, and neural networks, explained. Kdnuggets.com. https://www.kdnuggets.com/2016/10/artificial-intelligence-deep-learning-neural-networks-explained.html

  17. Checkoway B, Aldana A (2013) Four forms of youth civic engagement for diverse democracy. Child Youth Serv Rev 35(11):1894–1899

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Chen NDJ, Nokes RME, Kruijshaar JK-H, Yu A, Diekmann OH, Pastor-Satorras A, McCall B (1970) A review of mathematical modeling, artificial intelligence and datasets used in the study, prediction and management of COVID-19. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10489-020-01770-9. Accessed 29 Nov 2020

  19. Chong AYL, Ooi KB, Bao H, Lin B (2014) Can e-business adoption be influenced by knowledge management? An empirical analysis of Malaysian SMEs. J Knowl Manage

    Google Scholar 

  20. Chong CW, Yuen YY, Gan GC (2014) Knowledge sharing of academic staff. Libr. Rev. 63:203–223

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Correction to Lancet Digital Health 2020 published online May 6. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2589-7500(20)30104-7. (2020). The Lancet Digital Health 2(6). https://doi.org/10.1016/s2589-7500(20)30110-2

  22. Da Silva R, Ribeiro M, Mariani V, Coelho L (2020). Forecasting Brazilian and American COVID-19 cases based on artificial intelligence coupled with climatic exogenous variables, October 2020. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7324930/. Accessed 29 Nov 2020

  23. Dahlgren P (2011) Young citizens and political participation: online media and civic cultures. Taiwan J Democracy 7(2):11–25

    Google Scholar 

  24. Davies T, Chandler R (2012) Online deliberation design. Democracy in motion: Evaluation the practice and impact of deliberative civic engagement 103–131

    Google Scholar 

  25. Dee J, Leisyte L (2017) Knowledge sharing and organizational change in higher education. Learn Organ 24:355–365

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. de Paz JP, Caujapé-Castells J (2013) A review of the allozyme data set for the Canarian endemic flora: causes of the high genetic diversity levels and implications for conservation. Ann Bot 111(6):1059–1073

    Google Scholar 

  27. Diller EC (2001) Citizens in service: The challenge of delivering civic engagement training to national service programs. Corporation for National and Community Service, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  28. Ehrlich T (Ed.). (2000). Civic responsibility and higher education. Greenwood Publishing Group.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Ekbia HR, Nardi BA (2017) Heteromation, and other stories of computing and capitalism. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  30. Fatemi F (2017) Artificial Intelligence and Human Intelligence: The Essential Codependency. Forbes, October 2017. https://www.forbes.com/sites/falonfatemi/2017/10/24/artificial-intelligence-and-human-intelligence-the-essential-codependency/

  31. Forsythe DP (2017) Human rights in international relations. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  32. Galvan J (1997) Entering the posthuman collective in Philip K. Dick’s, “Do androids dream of electric sheep?” Sci Fiction Stud 24(3):413–429

    Google Scholar 

  33. Gerwe O, Al-Ansari H (2020) Impact of artificial intelligence based social capital on civic engagement in an environment of changing technology: development of a theoretical framework. SSRN 3659186

    Google Scholar 

  34. Habeeb A (2017) Introduction to artificial intelligence. University of Mansoura, Egypt

    Google Scholar 

  35. Harmon S, Sanford T, Xu S, Turkbey E, Roth H, Xu Z, Yang D, Myronenko A, Anderson V, Amalou A, Blain M, Kassin M, Long D, Varble N, Walker S, Bagci U, Ierardi AM, Stellato E, Plensich GG, Franceschelli G, Girlando C, Irmici G, Labella D, Hammoud D, Malayeri A, Jones E, Summers R, Choyke P, Xu D, Flores M, Tamura K, Obinata H, Mori H, Patella F, Cariati M, Carrafiello G, An P, Wood B, Turkbey B (2020). Artificial intelligence for the detection of COVID-19 pneumonia on chest CT using multinational datasets, 14 August 2020. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-020-17971-2. Accessed 29 Nov 2020

  36. He J (2019) The practical implementation of artificial intelligence technologies in medicine. Nat Med 25:30–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Hollis C (2018) Let Artificial Intelligence Earn Your Trust. Forbes. https://www.forbes.com/sites/oracle/2018/03/26/let-artificial-intelligence-earn-your-trust/

  38. Inkinen H (2016) Review of empirical research on knowledge management practices and firm performance. J Knowl Manage. 20:230–257

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Jennex M (2017) Re-examining the Jennex Olfman knowledge management success model. In: Proceedings of the 50th Hawaii international conference on system sciences., January 2017

    Google Scholar 

  40. Kang M, Lee MJ (2017) Absorptive capacity, knowledge sharing, and innovative behaviour of R&D employees. Technol Anal Strat Manage 29(2):219–232

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Khalil OE, Shea T (2012) Knowledge sharing barriers and effectiveness at a higher education institution. Int J Knowl Manage (IJKM) 8(2):43–64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Kiesa A, Orlowski AP, Levine P, Both D, Kirby EH, Lopez MH, Marcelo KB (2007) Millennials talk politics: a study of college student political engagement. In: Center for information and research on civic learning and engagement (CIRCLE)

    Google Scholar 

  43. Lalmuanawma S, Hussain J, Chhakchhuak L (2020) Applications of machine learning and artificial intelligence for Covid-19 (SARS-CoV-2) pandemic: a review. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7315944/. Accessed 28 Nov 2020

  44. Li L, Qin L, Xu Z, Yin Y, Wang X, Kong B, Bai J, Lu Y, Fang Z, Song Q, Cao K, Liu D, Wang G, Xu Q, Fang X, Zhang S, Xia J, Xia J (2020). Using Artificial Intelligence to Detect COVID-19 and Community-acquired Pneumonia Based on Pulmonary CT: Evaluation of the Diagnostic Accuracy, August 2020. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7233473/. Accessed 28 Nov 28, 2020

  45. Lilleoere AM, Hansen EH (2011) Knowledge-sharing enablers and barriers in pharmaceutical research and development. J Knowl Manage 15:53–70

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Martin A, Nateqi J, Gruarin S, Munsch N, Abdarahmane I, Zobel M, Knapp B (2020, November 04). An artificial intelligence-based first-line defence against COVID-19: Obeid, J, Davis, M, Turner, M, Meystre, S, Heider, P, O'Bryan, E, Lenert, L. (2020, July 04). Artificial intelligence approach to COVID-19 infection risk assessment in virtual visits: A case report, 04 November 2020. https://academic.oup.com/jamia/article/27/8/1321/5843795. Accessed 29 Nov 2020

  47. McCurdy P, Uldam J (2014) Connecting participant observation positions: toward a reflexive framework for studying social movements. Field Methods 26(1):40–55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. McDermott R, O’dell C (2001) Overcoming cultural barriers to sharing knowledge. J Knowl Manage 5(1):76–85

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Mei X, Lee H, Diao K, Huang M, Lin B, Liu C, Xie Z, Ma Y, Robson P, Chung M, Bernheim A, Mani V, Calcagno C, Li K, Li S, Shan H, Lv J, Zhao T, Xia J, Long Q, Steinberger S, Jacobi A, Deyer T, Luksza M, Liu F, Little B, Fayad A, Yang Y (2020). Artificial intelligence–enabled rapid diagnosis of patients with COVID-19, 19 May 2020. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41591-020-0931-3. Accessed 29 Nov 2020

  50. Naudé W (2020). Artificial Intelligence Against Covid-19: an early review, 06 April 2020. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3568314. Accessed 29 Nov 2020

  51. O'Neill E (2016). Accounting, automation and AI. www.icas.com. Archived from the original on 18 November 2016. Accessed 18 Nov 2016

  52. O'Keefe B (2015) Can artificial intelligence stop hackers? Fortune. https://fortune.com/2015/07/14/artificial-intelligence-hackers/

  53. Orf D (2016) The 8 best chatbots of 2016. https://venturebeat.com/2016/12/21/8-top-chatbots-of-2016/

  54. Patel SJ, Sanjana NE, Kishton RJ, Eidizadeh A, Vodnala SK, Cam M, Gartner JJ, Jia L, Steinberg SM, Yamamoto TN, Merchant AS, Mehta GU, Chichura A, Shalem O, Tran E, Eil R, Sukumar M, Guijarro EP, Day CP, Robbins P, Feldman S, Merlino G, Zhang F, Restifo NP (2017). Identification of essential genes for cancer immunotherapy. Nature, 548(7669):537–542

    Google Scholar 

  55. Pritzker S, Springer M, McBride AM (2015) Learning to vote: informing political participation among college students. J Commun Engage Schol 8(1):8

    Google Scholar 

  56. Roberts J (2016) Thinking machines: the search for artificial intelligence. Distillations. 2(2):14–23

    Google Scholar 

  57. Rameesh A (2004) Artificail intelligence in medicine

    Google Scholar 

  58. Rao A, Vazquez J (2020) Identification of COVID-19 can be quicker through artificial intelligence framework using a mobile phone–based survey when cities and towns are under quarantine: Infection Control Hospital Epidemiology. https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/infection-control-and-hospital-epidemiology/article/identification-of-covid19-can-be-quicker-through-artificial-intelligence-framework-using-a-mobile-phonebased-survey-when-cities-and-towns-are-under-quarantine/7151059680918EF9B8CDBCC4EF19C292. Accessed 29 Nov 2020

  59. Salvatore S, Fini V, Mannarini T, Veltri GA, Avdi E, Battaglia F, Castro-Tejerina J, Ciavolino E, Cremaschi M, Kadianaki I, Kharlamov N, Krasteva A, Kullasepp K (2018). Symbolic universes between present and future of Europe. First results of the map of European societies’ cultural milieu. PloS one 13(1):e0189885

    Google Scholar 

  60. Sanchez GR (2006) The role of group consciousness in political participation among Latinos in the United States. Am Pol Res 34(4):427–450

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Singh N, Koiri P (2016) Understanding social capital. Soc Sci Spectr 2(4):275–280

    Google Scholar 

  62. Solaimalai A, Ramesh RT, Baskar M (2004) Pesticides and environment. Environ Contaminat Bioreclamat 345–382

    Google Scholar 

  63. Shklovski I, Valtysson B (2012) Secretly political: civic engagement in online publics in Kazakhstan. J Broadcast Electron Media 56(3):417–433

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Sweeney L (2002) Achieving k-anonymity privacy protection using generalization and suppression. Int J Uncert Fuzz Knowl-Based Syst 10(05):571–588

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  65. Vaishya R, et al Artificial Intelligence (AI) applications for COVID-19 pandemic. In: IEEE reviews in biomedical engineering. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dsx.2020.04.012

  66. Van Benshoten E (2001) Civic engagement for people of all ages through national service. Unpublished manuscript

    Google Scholar 

  67. Van den Hooff B, de Leeuw van Weenen F (2004) Committed to share: commitment and CMC use as antecedents of knowledge sharing. Knowl Process Manage 11(1):13–24

    Google Scholar 

  68. Vellido A (2018) Societal issues concerning the application of artificial intelligence in medicine. Kidney Dis 5:11–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  69. Weber K, Dacin MT (2011) The cultural construction of organizational life: Introduction to the special issue. Organ Sci 22(2):287–298

    Article  Google Scholar 

  70. Yeşil S, Hırlak B (2013) An empirical investigation into the influence of knowledge sharing barriers on knowledge sharing and individual innovation behaviour. Int J Knowl Manage 9(2):38–61

    Article  Google Scholar 

  71. Zhang R, Tie X, Qi Z, Bevins N, Zhang C, Griner D, Song T, Nadig J, Schiebler M, Garrett J, Li K, Reeder S, Chen GH (2020). Diagnosis of COVID-19 Pneumonia Using Chest Radiography: Value of Artificial Intelligence, 24 September 2020. https://pubs.rsna.org/doi/full/10.1148/radiol.2020202944. Accessed 29 Nov 2020

  72. Zhou Y, Wang F, Tang J, Nussinov R, Cheng F (2020) Artificial intelligence in COVID-19 drug repurposing. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589750020301928. Accessed 29 Nov 2020

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Alansari, H., Gerwe, O., Razzaque, A. (2021). Role of Artificial Intelligence During the Covid-19 Era. In: Musleh Al-Sartawi, A.M.A. (eds) The Big Data-Driven Digital Economy: Artificial and Computational Intelligence. Studies in Computational Intelligence, vol 974. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-73057-4_13

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics