Abstract
Trust in the news media and the role of journalism in society is currently highly discussed. Media outlets are concerned about their trustworthiness and consider how to strengthen their audience’s trust. In order to build trust, journalism outlets have two main starting points. We argue that, one, journalism can work on the perceived risk of its performance, two, journalism can try to actively work on its trustworthiness and put out signals that prove it. One influential way to do so is often seen in journalistic transparency. This article examines how transparency influences journalistic trustworthiness, risk, and the formation of trust. In order to shed light on the concepts of trust, risk, and transparency as well as their connection, we conducted a representative survey of 1029 media users in Germany. Our study shows that transparency can be a way for news outlets to increase their trustworthiness and improve risk perceptions, which in turn presents a way to restore and strengthen trust in their work.
The results enable us to develop a more defined view of the concepts of risks and trust in journalism, along with indications for journalistic practice on how to work more transparently and to win (back) trust.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Author’s translation from the German. https://www.zeit.de/2015/26/journalismus-medienkritik-luegenpresse-vertrauen-ukraine-krise.
- 2.
Some of these theoretical underpinnings have already been published in Badura et al. (2020).
- 3.
The classification is based on an already-published article from the authors (Badura et al. 2020).
- 4.
The mean value and the index were calculated excluding the answer option “I don’t know” (n = 934–976).
- 5.
Trust in the media was measured on a five-point scale via the statement: “In general, the media can be trusted.”
- 6.
Out of these 72.1%, only 67% (497 out of 741 respondents) rather or fully agree that they have to check information from another source as to whether a journalistic medium presents false information.
References
Badura, L. (2016). Riskante Rezeption. Eine explorative Studie zur Einschätzung der Risiken nachrichtenjournalistischer Berichterstattung aus Rezipientensicht [Risky Reception. An explorative study to assess the risks of news journalistic reporting from the recipient’s point of view]. Unpublished Master thesis.
Badura, L., Schmidt, M.G., Gessner, F. (2018). Trust in journalistic content: Exploring the antecedents of trust in journalism on a micro-level. Paper presented at the 68th annual conference of the International Communication Association, Prague, Czech Republic, 25.05.2018.
Badura, L., & Uth, B. (2019). Zur Relationalität von Vertrauen und Risiko. Modellierung eines Prozesses für die Journalismusforschung [On the relationship between trust and risk. Modelling a process for journalism research]. Paper presented at the Preconference of the 64th annual conference of the DGPuK, Münster, Germany, 09.05.2019.
Badura, L., Uth, B., & Engelke, K. (2020). Individual- statt Pauschallösungen: Transparenzstrategien im Nachrichtenjournalismus und ihr Zusammenhang mit Rezipierendenvertrauen [Individual instead of overall solutions: Transparency strategies in news journalism and their connection with recipients’ trust]. In T. Köhler (Ed.), Fake News, Framing, Fact-Checking: Nachrichten im digitalen Zeitalter [Fake News, Framing, Fact-Checking: News in a digital age] (pp. 425–446). Bielefeld: Transcript.
Blöbaum, B. (2014). Trust and journalism in a digital environment. Working Paper. Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism.
Blöbaum, B. (2016). Key factors in the process of trust. On the analysis of trust under digital conditions. In B. Blöbaum (Ed.), Trust and communication in a digitized world: Models and concepts of trust research (pp. 3–25). Cham: Springer International Publishing.
Blöbaum, B. (2018). Bezugspunkte von Medienvertrauen. Ergebnisse einer explorativen Studie [References for media trust. Results of an exploratory study]. Media Perspektiven, 12, 601–607.
Bogaerts, J., & Carpentier, N. (2013). The postmodern challenge to journalism: Strategies for constructing a trustworthy identity. In C. Peters & M. J. Broersma (Eds.), Rethinking journalism: Trust and participation in a transformed news landscape (pp. 60–70). New York: Routledge.
Carlson, M. (2016). Metajournalistic discourse and the meanings of journalism: Definitional control, boundary work, and legitimation. Communication Theory, 26, 349–368. https://doi.org/10.1111/comt.12088.
Chadha, K., & Koliska, M. (2015). Newsrooms and transparency in the digital age. Journalism Practice, 9(2), 215–229. https://doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2014.924737.
Chen, G.M., Curry, A.L., Whipple, K. (2019). Building trust: What works for news organizations. Center for Media Engagement. Retrieved from https://mediaengagement.org/research/building-trust
Coleman, J. S. (1994). Foundations of social theory. Cambridge: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
Currall, S. C., & Judge, T. A. (1995). Measuring trust between organizational boundary role persons. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 64(2), 151–170. https://doi.org/10.1006/obhd.1995.1097.
Curry, A. L., & Stroud, N. J. (2019). The effects of journalistic transparency on credibility assessments and engagement intentions. Journalism, 4(3), 146488491985038. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884919850387.
Das, T. K., & Teng, B.-S. (2004). The risk-based view of trust: A conceptual framework. Journal of Business and Psychology, 19(1), 85–116. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JOBU.0000040274.23551.1b.
Dietz, G., & Den Hartog, D. N. (2006). Measuring trust inside organisations. Personnel Review, 35(5), 557–588. https://doi.org/10.1108/00483480610682299.
Esser, F., & Neuberger, C. (2019). Realizing the democratic functions of journalism in the digital age: New alliances and a return to old values. Journalism, 20(1), 194–197. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884918807067.
Fischer, S. (2016). Vertrauen in Gesundheitsangebote im Internet: Einfluss von Informationsquellen und wissenschaftlichen Unsicherheiten auf die Rezeption von Online-Informationen [Trust in health services on the Internet: Influence of information sources and scientific uncertainties on the reception of online information]. Baden-Baden: Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft. https://doi.org/10.5771/9783845275444.
Giddens, A. (1991). The consequences of modernity. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Gronke, P., & Cook, T. E. (2007). Disdaining the media: The American Public’s changing attitudes toward the news. Political Communication, 24(3), 259–281. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584600701471591.
Grosser, K. M. (2016). Trust in online journalism. Digital Journalism, 4(8), 1035–1057.
Grosser, K. M., Hase, V., & Wintterlin, F. (2019). Trustworthy or Shady? Exploring the influence of verifying and visualizing user-generated content (UGC) on online journalism’s trustworthiness. Journalism Studies, 20, 500–522.
Hardin, R. (2002). Trust and trustworthiness. The Russell Sage Foundation series on trust (Vol. 4). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
Heikkilä, H., Domingo, D., Pies, J., Glowacki, M., Kus, M., Baisnée, O. (2012). Media accountability goes online. A transnational study on emerging practices and innovations. MediaAct Working Paper No. 14/2012; January 2012. Retrieved from http://www.mediaact.eu/fileadmin/user_upload/WP4_Outcomes/WP4_Report.pdf
Hellmueller, L., Vos, T. P., & Poepsel, M. A. (2013). Shifting journalistic capital? Journalism Studies, 14(3), 287–304. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2012.697686.
Jackob, N. (2012). Gesehen, gelesen - geglaubt?: Warum die Medien nicht die Wirklichkeit abbilden und die Menschen ihnen dennoch vertrauen [Seen, read - believed? Why the media do not depict reality and people still trust them]. München: Olzog.
Jackob, N., Schultz, T., Jakobs, I., Ziegele, M., Quiring, O., & Schemer, C. (2019). Medienvertrauen im Zeitalter der Polarisierung [Media trust in times of polarization]. Media Perspektiven, 5, 210–220.
Jakobs, I. (2018). Vertrauenszuschreibung an die Medien: Eine experimentelle Studie zu den Ebenen von Vertrauen in die Medien [Attribution of trust to the media: An experimental study on the levels of trust in the media]. Mainz: Inaugural Dissertation.
Karlsson, M. (2010). Rituals of transparency: Evaluating online news outlet’s uses of transparency rituals in the United States, United Kingdom and Sweden. Journalism Studies, 11(4), 535–545.
Karlsson, M., Clerwall, C., & Nord, L. (2014). You ain’t seen nothing yet. Journalism Studies, 15(5), 668–678. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2014.886837.
Karlsson, M., Clerwall, C., & Nord, L. (2017). Do not stand corrected. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, 94(1), 148–167. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077699016654680.
Kee, H. W., & Knox, R. E. (1970). Conceptual and methodological considerations in the study of trust and suspicion. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 14(3), 357–366.
Kohring, M. (2004). Vertrauen in Journalismus: Theorie und Empirie [Trust in journalism. Theory and empirics]. Konstanz: UVK Verlagsgesellschaft.
Koliska, M. (2017). Testing the effects of transparency on trust in journalism. Paper presented at the 67th Annual Conference of the International Communication Association. San Diego, USA, 27.05.2017.
Kovach, B., & Rosenstiel, T. (2001). The elements of journalism: What newspeople should know and the public should expect (1st ed.). New York: Crown Publishers.
Lewis, J. D., & Weigert, A. J. (1985). Trust as a social reality. Social Forces, 63(4), 967–985. https://doi.org/10.2307/2578601.
Li, P. P. (2012). When trust matters the most: The imperatives for contextualising trust research. Journal of Trust Research, 2(2), 101–106. https://doi.org/10.1080/21515581.2012.708494.
Luhmann, N. (1968). Vertrauen: Ein Mechanismus der Reduktion sozialer Komplexität[Trust: A mechanism for reducing social complexity]. Stuttgart: Ferdinand Enke Verlag.
Mayer, R. C., Davis, J. H., & Schoorman, F. D. (1995). An integrative model of organizational trust. The Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 709–734. https://doi.org/10.2307/258792.
McKnight, D. H., & Chervany, N. L. (2001). Trust and distrust definitions: One bite at a time. In R. Falcone, M. Singh, & Y.-H. Tan (Eds.), Lecture notes in computer science (Vol. 2246, pp. 27–54). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
Meier, K. (2017). Transparenz: Grundbegriffe der Kommunikations- und Medienethik [Transparency: Basic concepts of communication and media ethics]. Communicatio Socialis, 50(2), 223–228. https://doi.org/10.5771/0010-3497-2017-2-223.
Meier, K., & Reimer, J. (2011). Transparenz im Journalismus [Transparency in journalism]. Publizistik, 56(2), 133–155. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11616-011-0116-7.
Prochazka, F., & Schweiger, W. (2016). Medienkritik online: Was kommentierende Nutzer am Journalismus kritisieren [Media criticism online: What commenting users criticize about journalism]. Studies in Communication, 5(4), 454–469. https://doi.org/10.5771/2192-4007-2016-4-454.
Reimer, J. (2017). Vertrauen durch Transparenz? Potenziale und Probleme journalistischer Selbstoffenbarung [Trust through transparency? Potentials and problems of journalistic self-revelation]. In M. Haller (Ed.), Öffentliches Vertrauen in der Mediengesellschaft [Public trust in the media society] (pp. 139–157). Köln: Herbert von Halem Verlag.
Reinemann, C., Fawzi, N., & Obermaier, M. (2017). Die „Vertrauenskrise“ der Medien – Fakt oder Fiktion? Zu Entwicklung, Stand und Ursachen des Medienvertrauens in Deutschland [The “trust crisis” in the media - fact or fiction? On the development, status and causes of media trust in Germany]. In V. Lilienthal & I. Neverla (Eds.), Lügenpresse. Anatomie eines politischen Kampfbegriffs [Lying press: Anatomy of a political concept] (pp. 77–94). Kiepenheuer & Witsch: Köln.
Renn, O. (1989). Risikowahrnehmung - Psychologische Determinanten bei der intuitiven Erfassung und Bewertung von technischen Risiken [Risk perception - Psychological determinants in the intuitive recording and evaluation of technical risks]. In G. Hosemann (Eds.), Risiko in der Industriegesellschaft: Analysen, Vorsorge und Akzeptanz; sieben Vorträge [Risk in the industrial society: Analyses, prevention and acceptance; seven lectures] (pp. 167–192). Erlangen: Universitätsbund Erlangen-Nürnberg.
Rousseau, D. M., Sitkin, S. B., Burt, R. S., & Camerer, C. (1998). Not so different after all: A cross-discipline view of trust. Academy of Management Review, 23(3), 393–404. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1998.926617.
Schultz, T., Jackob, N., Ziegele, M., Quiring, O., & Schemer, C. (2017). Erosion des Vertrauens zwischen Medien und Publikum? Ergebnisse einer repräsentativen Bevölkerungsumfrage [Erosion of trust between media and audience? Results of a representative population survey]. Media Perspektiven, 5, 246–259.
Sztompka, P. (1999). Trust: A sociological theory. Cambridge cultural social studies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Tsfati, Y., & Ariely, G. (2014). Individual and contextual correlates of trust in media across 44 countries. Communication Research, 41(6), 760–782. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650213485972.
Tsfati, Y., & Cohen, J. (2005). Democratic consequences of hostile media perceptions. Harvard International Journal of Press, 10(4), 28–51.
Uth, B. (2019). An integrative model for trust-building in journalism.Presentation at the ECREA Journalism Studies Conference“Breaking binaries: Exploring the diverse meanings of journalism in contemporary societies”. Vienna: University of Vienna. 14.02.2019.
Uth, B., & Blöbaum, B. (2019). Inaccurate and biased? A representative study of how Germans perceive and trust their media. Paper presented at the 69th annual international communication association conference: Communication beyond boundaries, Washington DC, 25.05.2019.
Warren, M. E. (1999). Democracy and trust. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511659959.
Wintterlin, F., Engelke, K. M., & Hase, V. (2020). Can transparency preserve journalism’s trustworthiness? Recipients’ views on transparency about source origin and verification regarding user-generated content in the news. Studies in Communication and Media, 9(2), 218–240.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Uth, B., Badura, L., Blöbaum, B. (2021). Perceptions of Trustworthiness and Risk: How Transparency Can Influence Trust in Journalism. In: Blöbaum, B. (eds) Trust and Communication. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-72945-5_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-72945-5_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-72944-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-72945-5
eBook Packages: Business and ManagementBusiness and Management (R0)