Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

How to Staff Software Engineering Team Roles Using the Concept of Personality? – An Exploratory Study

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Trends and Applications in Information Systems and Technologies (WorldCIST 2021)

Part of the book series: Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing ((AISC,volume 1367))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Nowadays, software is developed in teams. But how should software development teams be staffed in order to build a high performing team?

This study investigates how the different roles in a software development team derived from the software lifecycle – project leader, requirements engineer, architect/designer, and developer/tester/maintainer – should be staffed with respect to HEXACO personality traits in order to form a high performing team.

We conduct a qualitative analysis by leading 12 semistructured interviews with experts from the software engineering sector and with working experience of at least 2 years. We follow a Grounded Theory approach to derive personality traits and link them to software engineering roles.

Our study shows that different personality profiles are beneficial for different roles and that corresponding staffing decisions can be beneficial for team performance.

Our results support the composition of software engineering teams with the aim to successfully build high performing teams.

Further studies can build on our findings, e.g. by measuring certain software quality aspects and connecting them to the personality profile of the developing team.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    The corresponding HEXACO personality inventory as well as the scoring key are freely available at http://hexaco.org/hexaco-inventory.

  2. 2.

    https://www.skype.com/de/.

  3. 3.

    The transcripts of the interviews are in German.

  4. 4.

    https://www.maxqda.de/.

  5. 5.

    https://www.mindjet.com/de/.

References

  1. Acuña, S.T., Gómez, M.N., Hannay, J.E., Juristo, N., Pfahl, D.: Are team personality and climate related to satisfaction and software quality? Aggregating results from a twice replicated experiment. Inf. Softw. Technol. 57, 141–156 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infsof.2014.09.002. ISSN 09505849

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Allen, N.J., O’Neill, T.: Team composition and performance. In: Chiocchio, F., Kevin Kelloway, E., Hobbs, B. (eds.) The Psychology and Management of Project Teams, pp. 301–328. Oxford University Press, Oxford and New York (2015). https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199861378.003.0012. ISBN 9780199861378

  3. Amin, A., Rehman, M., Basri, S., Fadzil Hassan, M.: A proposed conceptual framework of programmer’s creativity. In: 2015 International Symposium on Technology Management and Emerging Technologies (ISTMET), pp. 108–113, Piscataway, NJ. IEEE (2015). https://doi.org/10.1109/ISTMET.2015.7359011. ISBN 978-1-4799-1723-5

  4. André, M., Baldoquín, M.G., Acuña, S.T.: Formal model for assigning human resources to teams in software projects. Inf. Softw. Technol. 53(3), 259–275 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infsof.2010.11.011. ISSN 09505849

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Apesteguia, J., Azmat, G., Iriberri, N.: The impact of gender composition on team performance and decision making: evidence from the field. Manage. Sci. 58(1), 78–93 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1110.1348. ISSN 0025-1909

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Ashton, M.C.: Individual Differences and Personality, 3rd edn. Academic Press is an imprint of Elsevier Ltd., London (2018). ISBN 0128098465

    Google Scholar 

  7. Ashton, M.C., Lee, K.: Empirical, theoretical, and practical advantages of the hexaco model of personality structure. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Rev. Off. J. Society Pers. Soc. Psychol. Inc. 11(2), 150–166 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868306294907. ISSN 1088-8683

  8. Ashton, M.C., Lee, K.: The prediction of honesty-humility-related criteria by the hexaco and five-factor models of personality. J. Res. Pers. 42(5), 1216–1228 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2008.03.006. ISSN 00926566

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Ashton, M.C., Lee, K., Goldberg, L.R.: A hierarchical analysis of 1,710 english personality-descriptive adjectives. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 87(5), 707–721 (2004). https://search.proquest.com/docview/614397034?accountid=15918. ISSN 0022-3514

  10. Ashton, M.C., Lee, K., Perugini, M., Szarota, P., de Vries, R.E., Di Blas, L., Boies, K., de Raad, B.: A six-factor structure of personality-descriptive adjectives: solutions from psycholexical studies in seven languages. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 86(2), 356–366 (2004). https://search.proquest.com/docview/614386182?accountid=15918. ISSN 0022-3514

  11. Barrick, M.R., Stewart, G.L., Neubert, M.J., Mount, M.K.: Relating member ability and personality to work-team processes and team effectiveness. J. Appl. Psychol. 83(3), 377–391 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.83.3.377. ISSN 0021-9010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Bryman, A.: Social Research Methods, 5th edn. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2016). https://books.google.de/books?id=vCq5m2hPkOMC. ISBN 9780199689453

  13. Coffield, F., Moseley, D., Hall, E., Ecclestone, K.: Learning styles and pedagogy in post-16 learning: a systematic and critical review. Learning&Skills Research Centre (2004). https://web.archive.org/web/20081205043419if_/http://www.lsda.org.uk/files/PDF/1543.pdf

  14. Corbin, J.M., Strauss, A.L.: Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory, 4th edn. SAGE, Los Angeles (2015). ISBN 9781412997461

    Google Scholar 

  15. Costa, P.T., McCrae, R.R., Inc Psychological Assessment Resources: Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO PI-R) and NEO Five-Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI). Psychological Assessment Resources (1992). https://books.google.de/books?id=mp3zNwAACAAJ

  16. da Silva, F.Q.B., França, A.C.C., Suassuna, M., de Sousa, M., Leila, M.R., Rossiley, I., de Miranda, R.C.G., Gouveia, T.B., Monteiro, C.V.F., Lucena, E., Cardozo, E.S.F., Espindola, E.: Team building criteria in software projects: a mix-method replicated study. Inf. Softw. Technol. 55(7), 1316–1340 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infsof.2012.11.006. ISSN 09505849

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Graziotin, D.: The dynamics of creativity in software development. In: Proceedings of the PROFES 2013, pp. 1–6 (2013). https://doi.org/10.6084/M9.FIGSHARE.703568. https://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/1305/1305.6045.pdf

  18. DeMarco, T., Lister, T.R.: Peopleware: Productive Projects and Teams, 3rd edn. Addison-Wesley, Upper Saddle River (2014). ISBN 0321934113

    Google Scholar 

  19. Fenwick, G.D., Neal, D.J.: Effect of gender composition on group performance. Gender Work Organ. 8(2), 205–225 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0432.00129. ISSN 0968-6673

  20. Flick, U.: Qualitative Sozialforschung: Eine Einführung, volume 55694 of Rororo Rowohlts Enzyklopädie. rowohlts enzyklopädie im Rowohlt Taschenbuch Verlag, Reinbek bei Hamburg, 8. auflage, originalausgabe edition (2017). ISBN 9783499556944

    Google Scholar 

  21. Gardner, W.: Using the myers-briggs type indicator to study managers: a literature review and research agenda. J. Manage. 22(1), 45–83 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0149-2063(96)90012-4. https://ac.els-cdn.com/S0149206396900124/1-s2.0-S0149206396900124-main.pdf?tid=52c20eea-b1ba-4479-82f0-0dc85130d72e&acdnat=15282793390042a77b79121c1b90ad62bfb5d27c24. ISSN 01492063

  22. Gila, A.R., Jaafa, J., Omar, M., Tunio, M.Z.: Impact of personality and gender diversity on software development teams’ performance. In: International Conference on Computer, Communications, and Control Technology (I4CT 2014), pp. 261–265. IEEE, Piscataway (2014). https://doi.org/10.1109/I4CT.2014.6914186. ISBN 978-1-4799-4555-9

  23. Glaser, B.G., Strauss, A.L.: Grounded theory: Strategien qualitativer Forschung. Programmbereich Gesundheit. Verlag Hans Huber, Bern, 3., unveränderte auflage edition (2010). ISBN 9783456849065

    Google Scholar 

  24. Grams, D., Frank, T., Rehberger, S., Vogel-Heuser, B.: Female characteristics and requirements in software engineering in mechanical engineering. In: 2014 International Conference on Interactive Collaborative Learning (ICL), pp. 272–279. IEEE, Piscataway (2014). https://doi.org/10.1109/ICL.2014.7017783. ISBN 978-1-4799-4437-8

  25. Hogan, R.: Personality and the Fate of Organizations. Erlbaum, Mahwah (2007). http://www.loc.gov/catdir/enhancements/fy0662/2006010473-b.html. ISBN 1410614999

  26. Hoogendoorn, S., Oosterbeek, H., van Praag, M.: The impact of gender diversity on the performance of business teams: evidence from a field experiment. Manage. Sci. 59(7), 1514–1528 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1120.1674. ISSN 0025-1909

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Janke, E., Bartel, A., Figas, P., et al.: Die lehre von software engineering - eine erhebung aus der praxis. Tagungsband Embedded Software Engineering Kongress ESE-Kongress 2012, 683–689 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Kanij, T., Merkel, R., Grundy, J.: An empirical investigation of personality traits of software testers. In: Eighth International Workshop on Cooperative and Human Aspects of Software Engineering, CHASE 2015, pp. 1–7. IEEE, Piscataway (2015). https://doi.org/10.1109/CHASE.2015.7. ISBN 978-1-4673-7031-8

  29. Karimi, Z., Wagner, S.: The influence of personality on computer programming: a summary of a systematic literature review. http://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=0CCIQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Felib.uni-stuttgart.de%2Fopus%2Fvolltexte%2F2014%2F8987%2Fpdf%2FSLR_Summary.pdf&ei=8nEuVebmDsriO8yxgbAD&usg=AFQjCNHSHTiWSNQZRuLiGWAH_OzUIqD4Ig&bvm=bv.90790515,d.ZWU

  30. Lee, K., Ashton, M.C.: The hexaco personality inventory - revised - scaledescriptions (2009). http://hexaco.org/scaledescriptions

  31. Ludewig, J., Lichter, H.: Software Engineering: Grundlagen, Menschen, Prozesse, Techniken. Dpunkt.verl., Heidelberg, 3., korr. aufl. edition (2013). ISBN 9783864900921

    Google Scholar 

  32. Saucier, G., Goldberg, L.R.: Evidence for the big five in analyses of familiar English personality adjectives. Eur. J. Pers. 10(1), 61–77 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-0984(199603)10:1<61::AID-PER246>3.0.CO;2-D. ISSN 0890-2070

  33. Schaeper, H., Briedis, K.: Kompetenzen von hochschulabsolventinnen und hochschulabsolventen, berufliche anforderungen und folgerungen für die hochschulreform. HIS Kurzinformation Hochschul-Informations-System 2004(A6), 1–62 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  34. Tett, R.P., Burnett, D.D.: A personality trait-based interactionist model of job performance. J. Appl. Psychol. 88(3), 500–517 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.3.500. ISSN 0021-9010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Winsborough, D., Chamorro-Premuzic, T.: Great teams are about personalities, not just skills (2017). https://hbr.org/2017/01/great-teams-are-about-personalities-not-just-skills

  36. Zaraket, F.A., Olleik, M., Yassine, A.A.: Skill-based framework for optimal software project selection and resource allocation. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 234(1), 308–318 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2013.09.035. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S037722171300790X. ISSN 0377-2217

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Neu-Ulm University of Applied Sciences, Neu-Ulm, Germany

    Erica Weilemann & Philipp Brune

Authors
  1. Erica Weilemann
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Philipp Brune
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Erica Weilemann .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. ISEG, University of Lisbon, LISBOA, Portugal

    Álvaro Rocha

  2. College of Engineering, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA

    Hojjat Adeli

  3. Institute of Data Science and Digital Te, Vilnius University, Vilnius, Lithuania

    Gintautas Dzemyda

  4. DCT, Universidade Portucalense, Porto, Portugal

    Fernando Moreira

  5. Department of Information Sciences, University of Sheffield, Lisboa, Portugal

    Ana Maria Ramalho Correia

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Weilemann, E., Brune, P. (2021). How to Staff Software Engineering Team Roles Using the Concept of Personality? – An Exploratory Study. In: Rocha, Á., Adeli, H., Dzemyda, G., Moreira, F., Ramalho Correia, A.M. (eds) Trends and Applications in Information Systems and Technologies . WorldCIST 2021. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 1367. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-72660-7_26

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation