Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Risk, Asset and Liability Management in Banking: Conceptual and Contemporary Approach

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Financial Ecosystem and Strategy in the Digital Era

Part of the book series: Contributions to Finance and Accounting ((CFA))

  • 2041 Accesses

Abstract

The main determinants of bank profitability is the net interest margin. Although the net interest margin is an important component of bank profitability, it is also important to manage assets, liabilities and risks such as market interest rates, exchange rates, credit risk effectively and efficiently. Risk management (RM) requires an effective asset and liability management (A&LM). (A&LM) is the effective arrangement, planning and management of the bank balance-sheet in order to achieve the goal of maximum profitability, stable and sustainable growth by taking risk and liquidity principles in banking as reference. (A&LM) includes the management of assets and cash flows in order to meet the liabilities of the changing conditions in the economy and financial markets, and the distribution of funds realised from various sources to obtain the highest resource efficiency. It is a way of risk management, which aims to reduce banks’ failure to fulfil their liabilities and to increase their profitability. Although RM in banks is not an (A&LM) but they complement each other in terms of increasing market value, sustainability and performance of banks. In this context, the aim of the study is to examine the risks (of credit, market, liquidity, operational) in the banking sector (A&LM), together with techniques used in (A&LM). In this regard, Basel III, developed by the Basel Committee for the purpose of helping banks in management of potential risks, and one of the most important regulations for banks’ capital adequacy, planning of liquidity and reducing systemic risk and preventing or resolving financial crises in a systematic and conceptual approach would be explored.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Acharya, V., & Pedersen, L. H. (2005). Asset pricing with liquidity risk. Journal of Financial Economics, 77, 375–410.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Agostino, M., & Mazzuca, M. (2008). Why do banks securitize? Evidence from Italy, XVI Spanish Finance Forum Conference Proceedings. Madrid: Spanish Finance Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aksoy, T. (1998). Çağdaş Bankacılıktaki Son Eğilimler ve Türkiye’de Uluslarüstü Bankacılık, (Sistematik ve Analitik Bir Yaklaşım), Sermaye Piyasası Kurulu (SPK) Yayınları, No:109. Ankara: Tisamat Matbaası.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aksoy, T. (2007). Derecelendirme Süreci Işığında Basel II’nin KOBİ’lere Etkileri ve KOBİ’lerce Atılması Gereken Adımlar: Analitik Bir Bakış. Mali Çözüm/Financial Analysis, ismmmo, 18(84), 71–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aksoy, T. (2010). Derecelendirme ve Kurumsal Yönetim Süreci ile KOBİ’ler, Bankalar ve Kurumsal İşletmeler Işığında Basel ve İç Kontrol, No: 384. Ankara: Türmob yayınları.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alexander, C. (2009). Market risk analysis, value at risk models (Vol. 4). Chichester: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arslan, İ. (2007). Basel Kriterleri ve Türk Bankacılık Sektörüne Etkileri. Selçuk Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 18, 25–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Altunbaş, Y., Gambacorta, L., & Marques-Ibanez, D. (2009). Securitisation and the bank lending channel. European Economic Review, 53, 8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Balin, B.J. (2008). Basel I, Basel II, and emerging markets: A nontechnical analysis. Retrieved from SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1477712 or https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1477712.

  • Barclays Bank. (2012). Financial market risks, Barclays Bank Portugal.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99–120. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639101700108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • BCBS. (2009). Basel committee on banking supervision, “Basel III and financial stability.” Bank for international settlement.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bessis, J. (2002). Risk management in banking, 2nd Edn. New York: John Wiley and Sons Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhattacharya, B., & Roy, T. (2008). Macroeconomic determinants of asset quality of indian public sector banks: A recursive VAR approach. Journal of Bank Management, 7(1), 20–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • BIS. (2001). Bank for International Settlements, The New Basel Accord: An Explanatory Note. Secretariat of the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision.

    Google Scholar 

  • BIS. (2006). Convergence of capital measurement and capital standards: A Revised Framework, Comprehensive Version. Basel Committee on International Banking Supervision, June.

    Google Scholar 

  • BIS. (2009). Bank for International Settlements. In Principles for sound stres testing practices and supervision.

    Google Scholar 

  • BIS. (2010). Bank for International Settlements. “Basel III: International framework for liquidity risk measurement, standards and monitoring”, Bank of International Settlements Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • BIS. (2011). Bank for International Settlements. “Basel III: A global regulatory framework for more resilient banks and banking systems”, Bank of International Settlements Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • BIS. (2015). Bank for international settlements, An explanatory note on the basel II IRB risk weight functions. Retrieved from http://www.bis.org/bcbs/irbriskweight.pdf.

  • Blaschke, W., Jones, M., Majnoni, G., & Peria, S. (2001). Stress testing of financial systems: An overview of issues, methodologies, and FSAP experiences. IMF Working Paper, No: 01/88. http://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/wp/2001/wp0188.pdf. Retriewed: 20.12.2021.

  • Bofondi, M., & Ropele, T. (2011). Macroeconomic determinants of bad loans: Evidence from italian banks. Bank of Italy Occasional Papers, No. 89http://www.bancaditalia.it/pubblicazioni/econo/quest ecofin2/QF89/QEF89.pdf.

  • Bolgün, K. E., & Akçay, M. B. (2003). Risk Yönetimi, Scala Yayıncılık, August.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradley, S. P., & Crane, D. B. (1975). Management of bank portfolios. New York: John Willey and Sons Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brigham, E. F., & Gapenski, L. C. (1990). Financial management: Theory and practice (6th ed.). Orlando: Dryden Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • BRSA. (2010). Banking regulation and supervision agency, base III with questions.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brummelhuis, R., & Zhongmin, L. (2019). Bank net interest margin forecasting and capital adequacy stress testing by machine learning techniques (March 2). Retieved from SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3282408 or https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3282408

  • Busch, R., & Memmel, C. (2015). Banks’ net interest margin and the level of interest rates bundesbank discussion paper no. 16. Retrieved from SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2797040.

  • Çağıl, G., Köse, A., & Omağ, A. (2010). Türk Bankacılık Sektöründe Risk Yönetimi: Piyasa Riski Üzerine Bir Uygulama. İstanbul: M.Ü. Finansal Piyasalar Araştırma ve Uygulama Merkezi.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campello, M., & Matta, R. (2012). Credit default swaps and risk shifting. Economics Letters, 117, 639–641.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Çankaya, S. (2020). Retrieved October 10, 2020, from https://docplayer.biz.tr/4031736-Finansal-yonetim-nakit-yonetimi.html.

  • Castrén, O., Fitzpatrick, T., & Matthias Sydow, M. (2009). Assessing portfolio credit risk changes in a sample of EU large and complex banking groups in reaction to macroeconomic shocks, European Central Bank, Working Paper Series No 1002.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chambers, N. (2009). Türev piyasalar (derivatives), 2 edn. Beta Printing House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chance, D. M., & Brooks, R. (2009). Introduction to derivatives and risk management, Eight Edition. Mason: South-Western Genngage Learning.

    Google Scholar 

  • Charles-Cadogan, G. (2011). A theory of asset pricing and performance evaluation for minority banks with implications for bank failure prediction, compensating risk, and CAMELS rating. Retrieved from SSRN https://ssrn.com/abstract=1711002.

  • Chaudhuri, A., & Ghosh, S. (2016). Quantitative modeling of operational risk in finance and banking using possibility theory, Volume 331.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chincarini, L. B. (2018). The crisis of crowding: Quant copycats, ugly models, and the new crash normal, 1st Edition. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc..

    Google Scholar 

  • Choudhry, M. (2007). Bank asset and liability management. New York: John Wiley and Sons (Asia) Pte Ltd..

    Google Scholar 

  • Choudhry, M. (2012). The principles of banking. New York: Wiley.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Chu-Hsiung, L., & Shen, S. (2006). Can the student-t distribution provide accurate value at risk? The Journal of Risk Finance, 7(3), 292–300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • CPA. (2008). Understanding and managing interest rate risk. Melbourne, Australia: CPA, Finance and Treasury, April.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dalessandro, A. (2013). Effective strategies for assets and liabilities management.

    Google Scholar 

  • Das, S. (2006). Derivative products and pricing, The swaps and financial derivatives library. New York: John Wiley and Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dash, M. (2013). A study of the impact of asset-liability management on the profitability of banks in India (November 25). Journal of Applied Management and Investments, 2, 4. Retrieved from SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2403644.

    Google Scholar 

  • Demirgüç-Kunt, A., & Huizinga, H. (1998). Determinants of commercial bank interest margins and profitability: Some International Evidence, The World Bank Development Research Group. Policy Research Working Paper, 13(2), 1–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Demirgüç-Kunt, A., & Huizinga, H. (2000). Financial structure and bank profitability, World Bank Working Paper.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dempster, M. A. H., Germano, M., Medova, E. A., & Verde, V. (2002). Global asset liability management. British Actuarial Journal, 9, 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeYoung, R. (2003). The failure of new entrants in commercial banking markets: A split-population duration analysis. Review of Financial Economics, 12, 1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dilmaç, M., Dikmen, A. T., & Keleş, Ş. (2015). Bankaların Finansal Yapılarının Karlılıkları Üzerine Etkileri: Türk Bankacılık Sektörü Üzerine Bir Uygulama (1998–2015). The International New Issues In Social Sciences (TINI-SOS), 1, 143–165.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dincer, H., Gencer, G., Orhan, N., & Sahinbas, K. (2011). A performance evaluation of the Turkish banking sector after the global crisis via CAMELS ratios, 7th International Strategic Management Conference.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dionne, G., & Harchaoui, T., (2003). Bank’s capital, securitization and credit risk: An empirical evidence for Canada. Working Paper CREF No. 03-01, Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doliente, J. S. (2005). Determinants of bank net interest margins in Southeast Asia. Applied Financial Economics Letters, 1, 1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dowd, K. (2005). Measuring market risk (2nd ed.). New Jersey: Wiley Finance.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Durbin, M. (2006). All about derivatives. New York, USA: McGraw Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Federal Financial Institutions Examination Council. (2011). Large Banks Supervision, Comptroller’s Handbook. http://ithandbook.iec.gov/media/22019/occ-comptr_handbook_large_bank_superv.pdf. May 2011.

  • Ferreira, M. A., Motos, P., & Pires, P. (2018). Asset management within commercial banking groups: International evidence. The Journal of Finance, LXXIII, 5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Financial Times. (2020). Oliver Ralph, Why banks come back to return on equity. Retrieved Decemeber 20, 2020, from https://www.ft.com/content/17954cde-8c46-11e5-8be4-3506bf20cc2b.

  • Flavell, R. R. (2010). Swaps and other derivatives, 2nd edition. New York: John Wiley and Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Francis, G. J., & Siegel, S. M. (2001). Principles of banking: An overview of the financial services industry. Washington, DC: American Bankers Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghosh, A. (2015). Banking-industry specific and regional economic determinants of nonperforming loans: Evidence from us States. Journal of Financial Stability, 20, 93–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glasserman, P. (2013). Monte Carlo methods in financial engineering (Vol. 53). New York, USA: Springer Science & Business Media.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gunter, U., Krenn, G., & Sigmund, M., Macroeconomic, Market and Bank-Specific Determinants of the Net Interest Margin in Austria (2013, July 15). Oesterreichische Nationalbank Financial Stability Report, Vol. 25, June 2013. Retrieved from SSRN https://ssrn.com/abstract=2293794.

  • Gup, B. E. (2004). The new capital accord. Nashville: South Western Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gupta, S. L. (2006). Financial derivatives, theory, concept and problems. New Delhi: Prentice Hall of India.

    Google Scholar 

  • Güzel, A. (2020). Macro-economic and bank-specific determinants of credit risk: An amprical study on the turkish banking sector. 7th International Congress of Accounting and Finance Research, Ankara, Turkey 2020.

    Google Scholar 

  • Güzel, A., & Karakaş, A. (2019). Fund transfer pricing in commercial banks: A Comparative application with the branch current accounts/interest, taras shevchenko, 2. International Congress on Social Sciences, February 1–3, 2019.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hempel, G. H., Simonson, D. G., & Coleman, A. B. (1994). Bank management: Text and cases. New York: John Wiley and Sons Inc..

    Google Scholar 

  • Hess, K., & Francis, G. (2004). Cost income ratio benchmarking in banking: A case study. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 11, 3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hou, A. (2005). Market risk management. Montego Bay, Jamaica: Value at Risk Approach and Capital Edequacy Caribbean Actuarial Assocation Annuel Conference.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hull, J. (2005). Options, futures and other derivatives, 6th edn. New Jersey: Pearson Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hull, J. (2012). Risk management and financial institutions. New Jersey: Wiley Finance.

    Google Scholar 

  • IIF. (2007). (Institute of International Finance-IIF), Principles of liquidty risk management.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin, C., & Shen, S. (2006). Can the student‐t distribution provide accurate value at risk?, Journal of Risk Finance, 7(3),292–300.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ishaq, A., Karim, A., Zaheer, A., & Ahmed, S. (2016, January 16). Evaluating performance of commercial banks in Pakistan: An application of camel model. Retrieved from SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2716691 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2716691.

  • Jarrow, R. A., & Oldfield, G. S. (1981). Forward contracts and futures contracts. Journal of Financial Economics, 9, 4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jorion, P. (2001). The benchmark for controlling market risk: Value at risk (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kara, A., Ozkan, A., & Altunbas, Y. (2016). Securitisation and banking risk: What do we know so far? Review of Behavioral Finance, 8(1), 2–16. https://doi.org/10.1108/RBF-07-2014-0039.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kittu, V. M., & Aruna, P. (2018, November 9). National conference on non-performing assets—disclose or dispense: Problems, process and progress. Visakhapatnam: GITAM Deemed to be University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koch, T. W., & Scott Macdonald, S. (2009). Bank management, 7th Edition. Nashville: South-Western Collage Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolb, R., & Overdalh, J. A. (2006). Financial derivatives, 3rd Edition. New York: John Wiley and Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mamun, A., & Parvez, M. (2011). Corporate social disclosure during the global financial crisis. International Journal of Economics and Finance, 3(6), 174–187.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marques, O. M., & Santos, C. M. (2003). Capital structure policy and determinants: Evidence from the portuguese banking industry. Unpublished Working Paper.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matz, L. (2002). Liquidity risk measurement and management. Honolulu: Kamakura Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matz, L. (2003). Managing liquidity risk: Preparing for extreme events. Honolulu: The Kamakura Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maudos, J., & Fernandez de Guevara, J. (2004). Factors explaining the interest margin in the banking sectors of the European Union. Journal of Banking & Finance, 28, 2259–2281.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mawutor, J. K. M. (2015). Analysis of basel III and risk management in banking. European Journal of Business Management, 6(6), 2014. Retrieved from SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2155987 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2155987.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mishkin, F. S., & Eakins, S. G. (2011). Financial markets and institutions. New York: Pearson Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, C. R., & Schwert, G. W. (2006). Short-term interest rates as predictors of inflation on testing the hypothesis that the real rate of interest is constant. American Economic Review, 67, 487–486.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ong, M. K. (1998, January 5) Internal credit risk models: Capital allocation and performance measurement.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ongena, S., & Smith, D. C. (2001). The duration of bank relationships. Journal of Financial Economics, 61(3), 449–475.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Philippe, J. (2001). Value at risk: The new benchmark for managing financial risk. New York: McGraw-Hill Professional.

    Google Scholar 

  • Romanyuk, Y. (2010). Asset—liability management: An overview. Bank of Discussion Papers, No: 2010-10, August.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rose, P. S. (1999). Commercial bank management, 4th Edition. Irwın: McGraw Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Santomero, A.M. (1995). Commercial bank risk management: An analyses of the process, Wharton School, Financail Institutions Center Working Papers, No:95-11B, October.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saunders, A. (1997). Financial institutions management. Chicago: Irwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saunders, A., & Cornett, M. M. (2001). Financial markets and institutions. A modern perspective (pp. 546–550). New York: McGraw Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saunders, A., & Cornett, M. M. (2011). Management of financial institutions, Teaching notes.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saunders, S., & Cornett, T. (2005). Financial Institution Management. McGraw Hill Pub.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schuermann, T. (2014). Stress testing banks. International Journal of Forecasting, 30(3), 717.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Selçuk, H., & Tunay, K.B. (2014). Ticari Banka Yönetiminin Temelleri, Nobel Yayınları, No: 1047, 1st edn.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stoll, H., & Whaley, R. (1993). Futures and options, theory and aplications. Nashville: South Western.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strong, R. (2002). Derivatives: An introduction (2nd ed.). New York, USA: Thomson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swamy, V. P. M., (2012). Determinants of bank asset quality and profitability—An empirical assessment (August 8, 2012). Retrieved from SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2126761.

  • Tevfik, A. T., & Tevfik, G. (1997). Bankalarda finansal yönetime giriş. İstanbul: Türkiye Bankalar Birliği Yayınları, No: 203.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vadrale, K. S., & Katti, V. P. (2018). Break-even point analysis of public and private banking business. IJMBF, 7(3), 82–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, H. (2012). Monte Carlo simulation with applications to finance. New York, USA: CRC Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Whaley, R. E. (2006). Derivatives: Markets, valuation and risk management. New Jersey: John Wiley and Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woolridge, J. R., & Gray, G. (2008). Applied principles of finance.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Business Administration, University of Turkish Aeronautical Association, Ankara, Turkey

    Adnan Guzel

Authors
  1. Adnan Guzel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. School of Business, Ibn Haldun University, Istanbul, Turkey

    Umit Hacioglu  & Tamer Aksoy  & 

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Guzel, A. (2021). Risk, Asset and Liability Management in Banking: Conceptual and Contemporary Approach. In: Hacioglu, U., Aksoy, T. (eds) Financial Ecosystem and Strategy in the Digital Era. Contributions to Finance and Accounting. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-72624-9_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation