Skip to main content

Skull Sutures as Anatomical Landmarks

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Sutures of the Skull

Abstract

Despite great advances in clinical imaging of the human body, clinical determination of consistent surface landmarks for surgical approaches to the cranial cavity is still essential and can be vital for the safe outcome of operations and to minimize operative and postoperative complications as far as possible. Therefore, our aim here is to highlight the sutures and outer anatomical landmark points of the skull to provide a short simplified guide to the closed box of the cranial cavity to help surgeons and clinicians in their practice. In this chapter, we focus on the outer sutures of the skull vault and face that could be used for surgical approaches, without the excessive details that dominate in other textbooks of anatomy. The skull comprises two main parts: the neurocranium (bony box surrounding the brain) and the viscerocranium (skeleton of the face); each is formed from individual bones. All bones of skull except the mandible are firmly interconnected in adults by immobile fibrous joints called sutures. These sutures form important anatomical landmark points for surgical approaches to the closed box of the neurocranium enclosing the brain, arteries and venous sinuses.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Russell WP, Russell MR. Anatomy, head and neck, coronal suture. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2019. StatPearls [Internet]: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30252267

    Google Scholar 

  2. Showri R, Suma MP. Study of wormian bones in adult human skulls. IOSR J Dental Med Sci. 2016;15(12):54–60.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Ebeling U, Rikli D, Huber P, Reulen HJ. The coronal suture, a useful bony landmark in neurosurgery? Craniocerebral topography between bony landmarks on the skull and the brain. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 1987;89:130–4.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Özdemir M, Cömert A, Özdemir K, Kahiloğulları G, Bozkurt M, Ünlü A, Uğur HC. Anatomy-Based navigation for ventriculostomy: nasion-coronal suture distance measurement. J Clin Exp Invest. 2014;4(3):368–70.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Tubbs RS, Salter G, Elton S, Grabb PA, Oakes WJ. Sagittal suture as an external landmark for the superior sagittal sinus. J Neurosurg. 2001;94:985–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Reis CV, Gusmão SN, Elhadi AM, Dru A, Tazinaffo U, Zabramski JM, Spetzler RF, Preul MC. Midline as a landmark for the position of the superior sagittal sinus on the cranial vault: an anatomical and imaging study. Surg Neurol Int. 2015;6:121.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Currarino G. Normal variants and congenital anomalies in the region of the obelion. Am J Roentgenol. 1976;127:487–94.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Idriz S, Patel JH, Renani SA, Allan R, Vlahos I. CT of normal developmental and variant anatomy of the pediatric skull: distinguishing trauma from normality. Radiographics. 2015;35(5):1585–601.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Himabindu A, Rao BN. An insight into wormian bones. Int J Sci Res Eng Stud. 2015;2(6):26–8.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Alkhalili K, Tantawy M, Nageeb MM, Ragaee MA, Alshyal GH, Alcindor DS, Chen DA, Aziz KM. Role of squamosal suture as a consistent landmark for middle fossa approach craniotomy: an anatomical study. J Neurol Surg. 2015;B76:35–8.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Turgut HB, Anil A, Peker T, Pelin C, Gülekon IN. Supraarticular, supramastoid and suprameatal crests on the outer surface of the temporal bone and the relation between them. Surg Radiol Anat. 2003;25(5–6):400–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Tomblinson CM, Deep NL, Fletcher GP, Nelson KD, Patel AC, Weindling SM, Lane JI, Hoxworth JM. Normal variant occipital pneumatization. Otol Neurotol. 2018;39(9):e872–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Gardner S. A persistent metopic suture: a case report. Austin J Anat. 2016;3(1):1049.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Vu H, Panchal J, Parker EE, Levine NS, Francel P. The timing of physiologic closure of the metopic suture: a review of 159 patients using reconstructed 3D CT scans of the craniofacial region. J Craniofac Surg. 2001;12(6):527–32.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Karakaş P, Bozkir MG, Oguz O. Morphometric measurements from various reference points in the orbit of male Caucasians. Surg Radiol Anat. 2003;24(6):358–62.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Huanmanop T, Agthong S, Chentanez V. Surgical anatomy of fissures and foramina in the orbits of Thai adults. J Med Assoc Thail. 2007;90(11):2383–91.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Apinhasmit W, Chompoopong S, Chaisuksunt V, Thiraphatthanavong P, Phasukdee N. Anatomical consideration of pterion and its related references in Thai dry skulls for pterional surgical approach. J Med Assoc Thai. 2011;94(2):205–14.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Gupta R, Sinha MB, Aggarwal A, Gupta T, Kaur H, Sahni D, Garg R. Landmarks for keyhole neurosurgical procedures through pterion. Int J Healthcare Biomed Res. 2014;2(4):168–75.

    Google Scholar 

  19. von Piekartz HJM. Craniofacial pain: neuromusculoskeletal assessment. In: treatment and management. Amsterdam: Elsevier Health Sciences; 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Garg K. BD Chaurasia’s human anatomy: regional and applied dissection and clinical. In: Head, neck and brain, Vol. 3, 4th ed; CBS Publishers & Distributors Pvt Ltd. 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Toman H, Nasir A, Hassan R, Hassan R. Skeletal, dentoalveolar, and soft tissue cephalometric measurements of Malay transfusion-dependent thalassaemia patients. Eur J Orthod. 2011:1–5. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/cjq147.

  22. Snell R. Clinical neuroanatomy. 7th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Campero A, Socolovsky M, Martins C, Yasuda A, Torino R, Rhoton AL. Facial-zygomatic triangle: a relationship between the extracranial portion of facial nerve and the zygomatic arch. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2008;150:273–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Miloro M, Redlinger S, Pennington DM, Kolodge T. In situ location of the temporal branch of the facial nerve. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2007;65:2466–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Roselló EG, Granado AMQ, Garcia MA, Martí SJ, Sala GL, Mármol BB, Gutiérrez SP (2020) Facial fractures: classification and highlights for a useful report. Insights into Imaging 11(49). https://insightsimaging.springeropen.com/articles/10.1186/s13244-020-00847-w

  26. Peretti N, MacLeod S. Zygomaticomaxillary complex fractures: diagnosis and treatment. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2017;25(4):314–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Captiera G, Cristolb R, Montoyaa P, Prudhommeb M, Godlewski G. Prenatal organization and morphogenesis of the sphenofrontal suture in humans. Cells Tissues Organs. 2003;175:98–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Li WG, Zhang SZ, Yuan XL. Sphenozygomatic suture as a guide in the reduction of zygomatic fracture. Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue. 2003;12(2):112–4.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Hegazy A. Clinical embryology for medical students and postgraduate doctors. In: LAP. Berlin: Lambert Academic Publishing; 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  30. April EW, Erickson A. Anatomy: the national medical series for independent study. 2nd ed. Hoboken: A Wily Medical Publication, John Wiley & Sons; 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Solmaz B. Localization of the bregma and its clinical relevance. Accepted: November 27, 2018. https://doi.org/10.2399/ana.18.084

  32. Oberman DZ, Rasmussen J, T oscano M, Goldschmidt E, Ajler P. Computed tomographic localization of the central sulcus: a morphometric study in adult patients. Turk Neurosurg. 2018;28(6):877–81.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Lipsett BJ, Steanson K. Anatomy, head and neck, fontanelles. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2019. Available at: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK542197/

    Google Scholar 

  34. Venkatramaniah C, Praba AMA. Measurements of median points of skull in identification of sex and it’s application. J Pharm Biomed Sci. 2011;13(13):1–3.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Samadian M, Nazparvar B, Haddadian K, Rezaei O, Khormaee F. The anatomical relation between the superior sagittal sinus and the sagittal suture with surgical considerations. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2011;113(2):89–91.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Oguz O, Sanli SG¸ Bozkir MG, Soames RW (2004) The pterion in Turkish male skulls. Surg Radiol Anat 26: 220–224.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Adejuwon SA, Olopade FE, Bolaji M. Study of the location and morphology of the pterion in adult Nigerian skulls. Int Sch Res Notices. 2013; https://doi.org/10.5402/2013/403937.

  38. Ilknur A, Mustafa KI, Sinan B. A comparative study of variation of the pterion of human skulls from 13th and 20th century Anatolia. Int J Morphol. 2009;27(4):1291–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Standring S. Gray’s anatomy: The anatomical basis for clinical practice. 40th ed. London: Churchill Livingstone; 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Cowan PT, Adigun OO. Anatomy, head and neck, asterion. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2020. Available at: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK537214/

    Google Scholar 

  41. Ucerler H, Govsa F. Asterion as a surgical landmark for lateral cranial base approaches. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2006;34:415–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Xia Y, Li XP, Han DM, Zheng J, Long HS, Shi JF. Anatomic structural study of cerebellopontine angle via endoscope. Chin Med J. 2007;120(20):1836–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Suslu HT, Bozbuga M, Ozturk A, Sahinoglu K. Surface anatomy of the transverse sinus for the midline infratentorial supracerebellar approach. Turk Neurosurg. 2010;20(1):39–42.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Tubbs RS, Salter G, Oakes WJ. Superficial surgical landmarks for the transverse sinus and torcular herophili. J Neurosurg. 2000;93:279–81.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Ficke J, Varacallo M. Anatomy, head and neck, foramen magnum. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2019.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Cirpan S, Yonguc GN, Mas NG, Aksu F, Orhan Magden A. Morphological and morphometric analysis of foramen magnum: an anatomical aspect. J Craniofac Surg. 2016;27(6):1576–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Harris JH, Carson GC, Wagner LK. Radiologic diagnosis of traumatic occipitovertebral dissociation: 1. Normal occipitovertebral relationships on lateral radiographs of supine subjects. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1994;162:881–6.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Rojas CA, Bertozzi JC, Martinez CR, Whitlow J. Reassessment of the craniocervical junction: normal values on CT. Am J Neuroradiol. 2007;28(9):1819–23.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Kwong Y, Rao N, Latief K. Craniometric measurements in the assessment of craniovertebral settling: are they still relevant in the age of cross-sectional imaging? AJR. 2011;196:W421–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Halagatti M, Sagar S. An anatomical study of parietal emissary foramina in dry adult human skulls. Int J Anat Radiol Surg. 2018;7(2):AO20–2.

    Google Scholar 

  51. Murlimanju BV, Saralaya VV, Somesh MS, Prabhu LV, Krishnamurthy A, Chettiar GK, Pai MM. Morphology and topography of the parietal emissary foramina in South Indians: an anatomical study. Anat Cell Biol. 2015;48:292–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  52. Mann RW, Manabe J, Byrd JE. Relationship of the parietal foramen and complexity of the human sagittal suture. Int J Morphol. 2009;27(2):553–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The author would like to thank all members of the College of Biotechnology, Misr University, for Science and Technology (MUST) & Faculty of Medicine, Zagazig University, Egypt for their kind support and assistance throughout this work. The photographs were taken from specimens in the Anatomy Department, Faculty of Medicine, Zagazig University; the diagrams were drawn by the author.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Hegazy, A.A.M. (2021). Skull Sutures as Anatomical Landmarks. In: Turgut, M., Tubbs, R.S., Turgut, A.T., Dumont, A.S. (eds) The Sutures of the Skull. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-72338-5_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-72338-5_10

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-72337-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-72338-5

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics