Skip to main content

Robotics in Neurosurgery – Past, Presence and Future

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Control, Computer Engineering and Neuroscience (ICBCI 2021)

Abstract

In multiple ways, neurosurgery is the perfect field for the implementation of robotic assisted procedures. Neurosurgical operations require precise and fine manipulation of deeply located critical neural structures that are accessed through a small corridor. The concept of robots has evolved from “human-like” machines to programmable, multifunctional specialized devices. To this day, the majority of robotic-assisted neurosurgical operations involve a shared-control system. They have involved a robotic arm that moves an instrument to a specific location based on Cartesian coordinates and is then locked in place. The operating neurosurgeon proceeds with the instrument along the path defined by the robot. One of the most important goals is to promote active cooperation between engineers and neurosurgeons. However, unfamiliarity with robot technology and the high costs of maintenance and purchasing the few available robotic systems can discourage their use. Nevertheless, improvements in the quality of healthcare should eventually surpass the inherent costs of robotic surgery systems. While we witness the dawn of artificial intelligence and brain-machine interfaces, neurosurgery and treatment of previously incurable diseases has already surpassed the ideas of science fiction writers. As with every tool created by man, we must ensure as scientists and medical doctors that robotics is used as means to benefits individuals and all of mankind.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Faria, M.A.: Violence, mental illness, and the brain—A brief history of psychosurgery: Part 1—From trephination to lobotomy. Surg. Neurol. Int. 4, 49 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Prioreschi, P.: A History of Medicine. Primitive and Ancient Medicine. Horatius Press, Omaha, Nebraska, vol. 1, pp. 21–30 (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Ormond, et al.: The history of neurosurgery and its relation to the development and refinement of the frontotemporal craniotomy. Neurosurg. Focus 36(4), E12 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Rosheim, M.E.: Leonardo’s Lost Robots. Springer, vol. 69 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Doulgeris, J.J., Gonzalez-Blohm, S.A., Filis, A.K., Shea, T.M., Aghayev, K., Vrionis, F.D.: Robotics in Neurosurgery: Evolution, Current Challenges, and Compromises

    Google Scholar 

  6. Lanfranco, A.R., Castellanos, A.E., Desai, J.P., et al.: Robotic surgery: a current perspective. Ann. Surg. 239(1), 14–21 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Kriss, T.C., Kriss, V.M.: History of the operating microscope: from magnifying glass to microneurosurgery. Neurosurgery 42, 899–907 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Van Zuylen, J.: The microscopes of Antoni van Leeuwenhoek. J. Microsc. 121, 309–328 (1981)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Louw, D.F., Fielding, T., McBeth, P.B., et al.: Surgical robotics: a review and neurosurgical prototype development. Neurosurgery 54, 525–537 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Int. J. Med. Robot. Comput. Assist. Surg. 2, 105–106 (2006). (www.interscience.wiley.com), https://doi.org/10.1002/rcs.93

  11. Apuzzo, M.L.J.: In the realm of ideas: the advent of advanced surgery of the human cerebrum and neurosurgical education. Acta Neurochir. Suppl. (Wien) 69, 145–150 (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  12. http://www.frc.ri.cmu.edu/robotics-faq/1.html#1.1. Accessed 2 Apr 2005

  13. Nathoo, et al.: In touch with robotics: neurosurgery for the future. Neurosurgery 56, 421–433 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Cavusoglu, M.C., Williams, W., Tendick, F., Sastry, S.S.: Robotics for telesurgery: Second generation Berkeley/UCSF laparoscopic telesurgical workstation and looking towards the future applications—Special issue on medical robotics. Ind Rob 30, 22–29 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Holly, L.T.: Int. J. Med. Robot. Comput. Assist. Surg. 2, 105–106 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Kwoh, Y.S., Hou, J., Jonckheere, E.A., Hayati, S.: A robot with improved absolute positioning accuracy for CT guided stereotactic brain surgery. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 35, 153–160 (1988)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Veejay, B., et al.: Robotics in Neurosurgery. Ann. R. Coll. Surg. Engl. 100(6), 23–26 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Sutherland, et al.: The Evolution of NeuroArm. Neurosurgery 72, S1 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Attenello, F., Lee, B., Yu, C., Liu, C.Y., Apuzzo, M.L.: Supplementing the neurosurgical virtuoso: evolution of automation from mythology to operating room adjunct. World Neurosurg. (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2014.03.011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Hokayem, P.F., Spong, M.W.: Bilateral teleoperation: an historical survey. Automatica 42(12), 2035–2057 (2006)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  21. Nelson, J.H.: Robotic stereotactic assistance (ROSA) for pediatric epilepsy: a single-center experience of 23 consecutive cases. Children 7, 94 (2020). https://doi.org/10.3390/children7080094

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Fresci, C., et al.: Int. J. Med. Robot. Comput. Assist. Surg. 9, 396–406 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1002/rcs.1468

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Ballantyne, G.H., Moll, F.: The da Vinci telerobotic surgical system: the virtual operative field and telepresence surgery. Surg. Clin. North Am. 83(1293–1304), vii (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Bonsor, K., Strickland, J.: How Robotic Surgery Will Work (2000). http://science.howstuffworks.com/roboticsurgery.html

  25. D’Souza, M., et al.: Robotic-assisted spine surgery: history, efficacy, cost, and future trends. Robot. Surg. Res. Rev. 6, 9–23 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Lee, J.Y.K., Bhowmick, D.A., Eun, D.D., Welch, W.C.: Minimally invasive, robot-assisted, anterior lumbar interbody fusion: a technical note. J. Neurol. Surg. Part A Cent. Eur. Neurosurg. 74, 258–261 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0032-1330121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Kaushal., et al.: Robotic-Assisted Systems for Spinal Surgery. http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.88730

  28. Dreval, O.N., Rynkov, I.P., Kasparova, K.A., Bruskin, A., Aleksandrovskii, V., Bernstein, V.Z.I.L.: Results of using spine assist mazor in surgical treatment of spine disorders. Zhurnal Vopr Neirokhirugii Im N N Burdenko (2014)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Łątka Dariusz .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Tomasz, O., Waldemar, K., Kajetan, Ł., Jacek, C., Tomasz, S., Dariusz, Ł. (2021). Robotics in Neurosurgery – Past, Presence and Future. In: Paszkiel, S. (eds) Control, Computer Engineering and Neuroscience. ICBCI 2021. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 1362. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-72254-8_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics