Skip to main content

Managing Chernozem for Reducing Global Warming

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Regenerative Agriculture

Abstract

Chernozems or Black Earth in Russian (Mollisols in the USDA taxonomy), cover a total of 916 million ha or 7% of the world’s ice-free land: 485 Mha in Eurasia, 290 Mha in North America and 102 Mha in South America. On the occasion of the first World Soil Day, 5th December 2005, the Chernozem was proclaimed Soil of the Year because of its environmental, economic and societal significance. Chernozems are formed under grassland across the Steppes of Eastern Europe, Russia and Central Asia, the Prairies in North America and on the Pampas in South America, under a wide range of climate with mean annual temperatures of 5–20 °C and annual rainfall of 500–1500 mm. Their thick, humus-rich topsoil contains 4–16% organic matter or 2–8% soil organic carbon (SOC) which creates a favourable structure, high water retention capacity and large plant nutrient reserves; and their subsoils exhibit a concentration of primary and secondary carbonates. Land misuse and soil mismanagement have accelerated soil erosion, undermined their productivity and depleted SOC with associated emissions of CO2, CH4 and N2O. Fifty years or more of continual cultivation has depleted SOC down to depths of 120–130 cm with losses of 38–43% from the top 0–10 cm layer. Restoring degraded Chernozems is a win-win-win strategy with agronomic, environmental, economic and societal benefits including advancing the UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). Restoration would sustain and enhance crop yields, use-efficiency of inputs and advance SDG2 (Zero Hunger). It would reduce gaseous emissions and sequester carbon while reducing risks of accelerated soil erosion and non-point-source pollution, advancing SDGs 6 (Clean Water) and 13 (Climate Action). It would improve farm income and profitability and advance SDG1 (No Poverty). And it would improve societal wellbeing and advance SDG3 (Good Health and Wellbeing). An important global benefit of restoring degraded Chernozems would be adaptation and mitigation of climate change by offsetting anthropogenic emissions; SOC sequestration with improved management can be 0.7–1.5 MgC/ha/y.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Altermann, M., J. Rinklebe, I. Merbach, et al. 2005. Chernozem—Soil of the year 2005. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science 168 (6): 725–740.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bezuglova, O.S., and N.V. Yudina. 2006. Interelationship between the physical properties and the humus content of Chernozems in the south of European Russia. Eurasian Soil Science 39 (2): 187–194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borontov, O.K., I.M. Nikul’nikov, V.I. Kurakov, and A.N. Sumin. 2005. The water-physical properties and water regime of leached Chernozems under different tillage and fertilization practices in crop rotation. Eurasian Soil Science 38 (1): 103–110.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bremer, E., H.H. Janzen, B.H. Ellert, and R.H. McKenzie. 2008. Soil organic carbon after twelve years of various crop rotations in an Aridic Boroll. Soil Science Society of America Journal 72 (4): 970–974.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bughio, M.A., P. Wang, F. Meng, et al. 2016. Neoformation of pedogenic carbonates by irrigation and fertilization and their contribution to carbon sequestration in soil. Geoderma 262: 12–19.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bulygin, S.Y. 1993. Rate of erosion of the Chernozem of the Donets Steppe. Eurasian Soil Science 25: 17–126.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buol, S.W., R.J. Southard, R.C. Graham, and P.A. McDaniel. 2011. Soil genesis and classification, 6th ed. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Chendev, Y.G., T.J. Sauer, G. Ramirez, and C. Burras. 2015a. History of East European Chernozem soil degradation; protection and restoration by tree windbreaks in the Russian steppe. Sustainability 7 (1): 705–724.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chendev, Y.G., T.J. Sauer, A.N. Gennadiev, et al. 2015b. Accumulation of organic carbon in Chernozems (Mollisols) under shelterbelts in Russia and the United States. Eurasian Soil Science 48 (1): 43–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cihacek, L.J., and M.G. Ulmer. 2002. Effects of tillage on inorganic carbon storage in soils of the northern Great Plains of the US. In Agricultural practices and policies for carbon sequestration in soil, ed. J.M. Kimble, et al., 63–69. Boca Raton, FL: Lewis Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Devyatova, T.A., and A.P. Shcherbakov. 2006. Biological activity of Chernozems in the centre of the Russian Plain. Eurasian Soil Science 39 (4): 450–456.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dokuchaev, V.V. 1883. Russian Chernozem. St. Petersburg: Printing House of Dekleron and Evdokimo (Russian).

    Google Scholar 

  • Dumanski, J., R.L. Desjardins, C. Tarnocai, et al. 1998. Possibilities for future carbon sequestration in Canadian agriculture in relation to land use changes. Climatic Change 40 (1): 81–103.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eremin, D.I. 2016. Changes in the content and quality of humus in leached Chernozem of the Trans-Ural forest-steppe zone under the impact of their agricultural use. Eurasian Soil Science 49 (5): 538–545.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gerasimov, I.P. 1973. Chernozems, buried soils, and loesses of the Russian Plain: Their age and genesis. Soil Science 116 (3): 202–210.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Groshans, G., E. Mikhailova, C. Post, and M. Schlautman. 2018. Accounting for soil inorganic carbon in the ecosystem services framework for United Nations Sustainable Development Goals. Geoderma 324: 37–46.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gusarov, A.V., V.N. Golosov, A.G. Sharifullin, and A.M. Gafurov. 2018. Contemporary trend in erosion of arable Southern Chernozems (Haplic Chernozems Pachic) in the west of Orenburg Oblast (Russia). Eurasian Soil Science 51 (5): 561–575.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ivanov, I.V., L.S. Pesochina, and V.M. Semenov. 2009. Biological mineralization of organic matter in the modern virgin and ploughed Chernozems, buried Chernozems, and fossil Chernozems. Eurasian Soil Science 42 (10): 1109–1119.

    Google Scholar 

  • Janzen, H.H. 1987. Effect of fertilizer on soil productivity in long-term spring wheat rotations. Canadian Journal of Soil Science 67 (1): 165–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kalinina, O., S.E. Krause, S.V. Goryachkin, et al. 2011. Self-restoration of post-agrogenic Chernozems of Russia: Soil development, carbon stocks, and dynamics of carbon pools. Geoderma 162 (1–2): 196–206.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Karbozova-Saljnikov, E., S. Funakawa, K. Akhmetov, and T. Kosaki. 2004. Soil organic matter status of Chernozem soil in North Kazakhstan: Effects of summer fallow. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 36 (9): 1373–1381.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Khaidapova, D.D., V.V. Chestnova, E.V. Shein, and E.Y. Milanovskii. 2016. Rheological properties of typical Chernozem (Kursk Oblast) under different land uses. Eurasian Soil Science 49 (8): 890–897.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khokhlova, O.S., S.N. Sedov, and A.A. Khokhlov. 2000. Carbonate status of modern and paleo Chernozem of the Sunzha (Chechen) Depression, Northern Caucasus. Eurasian Soil Science 33 (4): 360–369.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khokhlova, O.S., I.S. Kovalevskaya, and S.A. Oleynik. 2001. Records of climatic changes in the carbonate profiles of Russian Chernozems. CATENA 43 (3): 203–215.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kraemer, R., A.V. Prishchepov, D. Müller, et al. 2015. Long-term agricultural land-cover change and potential for cropland expansion in the former Virgin Lands area of Kazakhstan. Environmental Research Letters 10 (5): 054012.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuznetsova, I.V. 1998. The content and composition of organic matter in Chernozem and its role in the formation of a water-stable structure. Eurasian Soil Science 31 (1): 36–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuznetsova, I.V. 2013. Changes in the physical status of typical and leached Chernozem of Kursk Oblast within 40 years. Eurasian Soil Science 46 (4): 393–400.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lal, R. 2015. A system approach to conservation agriculture. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 70 (4): 82A–88A.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lal, R. 2019. Carbon cycling in global drylands. Current Climate Change Reports 5 (3): 221–232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lal, R., J.M. Kimble, and B.A. Stewart, eds. 2000. Global climate change and pedogenic carbonates. Boca Raton, FL: Lewis Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Larionova, A.A., B.N. Zolotareva, I.V. Yevdokimov, et al. 2008. The rates of organic matter renewal in Grey forest soil and Chernozem. Eurasian Soil Science 41 (13): 1378–1386.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lazarev, A.P., and D.R. Maisyamova. 2006. The decomposition of after-harvest residues in Chernozem during the autumn-spring period and in the annual cycle. Eurasian Soil Science 3 (6): 676–682.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lebedeva, I.I. 2002. Hydrological profiles of typical Chernozem and Agrochernozem with migrational forms of pedogenic carbonates. Eurasian Soil Science 35 (10): 1076–1084.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lebedeva, I.I. 2004. Hydrological profiles of Southern Chernozem and Agrochernozem (genetic analysis of published materials). Eurasian Soil Science 37 (7): 726–736.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu, X., C. Lee Burras, Y.S. Kravchenko, et al. 2012. Overview of Mollisols in the world: Distribution, land use and management. Canadian Journal of Soil Science 92 (3): 383–402.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyfroidt, P., F. Schierhorn, A.V. Prishchepov, et al. 2016. Drivers, constraints and trade-offs associated with recultivating abandoned cropland in Russia, Ukraine and Kazakhstan. Global Environmental Change 37: 1–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mikhailova, E.A., and C.J. Post. 2006. Effects of land use on soil inorganic carbon stocks in the Russian Chernozem. Journal of Environmental Quality 35 (4): 1384–1388.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mikhailova, E.A., R.B. Bryant, V.I. Vassenev, et al. 2000. Cultivation effects on soil carbon and nitrogen contents at depth in the Russian Chernozem. Soil Science Society of America Journal 64 (2): 738–745.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mikhailova, E.A., C.J. Post, L. Cihacek, and M. Ulmer. 2009. Soil inorganic carbon sequestration as a result of cultivation in the Mollisols. In Carbon sequestration and its role in global carbon cycle, 129–133. Geophysical monograph series 183. American Geophysical Union. https://doi.org/10.1029/2005GM000313.

  • Monger, H.C., R.A. Kraimer, S.E. Khresat, et al. 2015. Sequestration of inorganic carbon in soil and groundwater. Geology 43 (5): 375–378.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Montanarella, L., P. Panagos, and S. Scarpa. 2021. The relevance of Black Soils for sustainable development. In Regenerative agriculture. What’s missing? What else do we need to know?, ed. D.L. Dent and B.P. Boincean. Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ovechkin, S.V., and G.S. Bazykina. 2011. The carbonate profile and water regime of migrational-mycelial Chernozem in different ecosystems of Kursk Oblast. Eurasian Soil Science 44 (12): 1352–1363.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rodionov, A., W. Amelung, I. Urusevskaja, and W. Zech. 2001. Origin of the enriched labile fraction (ELF) in Russian Chernozems with different site history. Geoderma 102 (3–4): 299–315.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rusanov, A.M. 1998. Humus status of the Chernozem of the Ural region as a function of the period of their biological activity. Eurasian Soil Science 31 (3): 274–280.

    Google Scholar 

  • Semenov, V.M., L.A. Ivannikova, T.V. Kuznetsova, et al. 2008. Mineralization of organic matter and the carbon sequestration capacity of zonal soils. Eurasian Soil Science 41 (7): 717–730.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shcherbakov, A.P., and I.I. Vasenev. 1999. Problems of management and conservation of Chernozem (to grant a worthy future for Chernozem). Eurasian Soil Science 3 (1): 70–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tanasienko, A.A., and A.S. Chumbaev. 2010. Conditions of the formation of ice barriers in eroded Chernozem of Western Siberia. Eurasian Soil Science 43 (4): 417–426.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zavalin, A.A., V.K. Dridiger, V.P. Belobrov, and S.A. Yudin. 2018. Nitrogen in Chernozem under traditional and direct-seeding cropping systems: A review. Eurasian Soil Science 51 (12): 1497–1506.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rattan Lal .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Lal, R. (2021). Managing Chernozem for Reducing Global Warming. In: Dent, D., Boincean, B. (eds) Regenerative Agriculture. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-72224-1_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics