Skip to main content

Spatial Planning and Territorial Governance in North Macedonia: From Socialist Yugoslavia to European Integration

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Governing Territorial Development in the Western Balkans

Part of the book series: Advances in Spatial Science ((ADVSPATIAL))

Abstract

The present chapter discusses the evolution of the governance and planning system of North Macedonia. It does so by analysing the administrative and territorial subdivision of the country, the planning authorities in the multi-level governance system, and the main planning instruments produced at the different territorial levels. Particular attention is given to comparing the present situation with the system that existed in the former Yugoslavia, while also reflecting on the European influences in the period of post-socialist transition. The chapter concludes that, in North Macedonia, the remnants of the socialist past combined with the European integration requirements have given rise to a complex governance and planning system plagued by a lack of coordination and contested institutional competencies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The constitutional name of the country between 1991 and 2019 was the Republic of Macedonia. On 8 April 1993, the Republic of Macedonia was admitted as a member of the United Nations, with a recommendation to be temporarily named with the reference ‘the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia’ until the final settlement of the name dispute with Greece. Besides Greece, the temporary reference was used by other countries that did not recognise the constitutional name—Republic of Macedonia.

  2. 2.

    For more information, see Marjanović et al. in this volume.

  3. 3.

    Centres on Development of Planning Regions.

  4. 4.

    Today, they correspond to the planning regions.

  5. 5.

    17 of which make the Greater Skopje region which enjoys a distinct status.

  6. 6.

    A reduction from 84 established in 2004, following the 2014 Law on the Territorial Organisation of Local Self-Government (Official Gazette, No. 149/2014).

  7. 7.

    Public Enterprise for Spatial and Urban Plans.

  8. 8.

    The planning process at the local level starts with the development of the planning programme for an urban plan by a municipal urban planning department. The programme is evaluated by a commission for urban planning. In the case of favourable evaluation, it is then sent to a municipal council for adoption. Following the adoption of the programme, a licenced company is tasked with the preparation of the urban plan. Once the draft of the urban plan is ready, it is reviewed by an expert committee established by a Mayor. In the case of positive opinion, the draft plan is sent to the municipal council for adoption, while the Ministry of Transportation and Communications also has to endorse it.

  9. 9.

    Licences for urban planning are issued by the Chamber of certified architects and certified engineers of the Republic of North Macedonia.

  10. 10.

    As of October 2020, 104 public or private companies in North Macedonia possess the licence for the preparation of urban plans (MTC 2019).

  11. 11.

    Poland and Hungary Assistance for the Restructuring of the Economy.

  12. 12.

    The word ‘obnova’ means a ‘restoration’ or ‘reconstruction’ in the language of former Yugoslavia.

  13. 13.

    European Civil Protection and Humanitarian Aid Operations.

  14. 14.

    The EU support to non-members was expanded in 1999 with two sector-specific programmes: Sapard—the programme for rural and agricultural development and ISPA—the instrument for structural policies providing investment for large-scale infrastructure projects in the area of environment and transport, but Western Balkan countries could not be the beneficiaries of these initiatives.

  15. 15.

    Community Assistance for Reconstruction, Development, and Stabilisation.

  16. 16.

    Instrument for Pre-Accession.

  17. 17.

    Potential candidate countries have access only to components I and II.

  18. 18.

    Serbia and Albania got their candidacy approved too late to be fully eligible for IPA in 2007–2013, while Slovenia was already a member.

  19. 19.

    For example, the focus of the first IPA Regional Development Operational Programme in North Macedonia was on the continuation of the development of the Southeast Europe Core Regional Transport Network (corridors VIII and X), as well as on the investments in wastewater treatment and solid waste management projects (EC, n.d.).

  20. 20.

    This law was instrumental in the development of the country’s regional policy.

  21. 21.

    The key support areas included environment and climate action, transport, agriculture and rural development, innovation and competitiveness, and social policies. Particular attention was also given to the projects contributing to regional development and territorial cooperation.

  22. 22.

    This is also something that we can observe in other EU candidate countries as well (see Marjanović 2017).

  23. 23.

    Although it can be due to its unfavourable geographic location.

  24. 24.

    It was only in April 2020 that North Macedonia joined the EUSAIR—The EU Strategy for the Adriatic and Ionian Region (EUSAIR 2020), although the Strategy has been in force since 2014.

References

  • Adams N, Cotella G, Nunes R (2011) Spatial planning in Europe: The interplay between knowledge and policy in an enlarged EU. In: Adams N, Cotella, G, Nunes RJ (eds) Territorial Development, Cohesion and Spatial Planning. Knowledge and Policy Development in an Enlarged EU. Routledge, London, pp 1–25. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203842973

  • Akimovska-Maletić I (2017) Ustavne promene u Makedoniji - više od dve decenije. Nauka, bezbednost, policija 22(3):47–66. https://doi.org/10.5937/nabepo22-15508

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Angelovska Ž, Trpevski S (2019) Analysis of the Development of the Legislative Framework for the Spatial Plans in the Republic of North Macedonia as a Basis for the Development of the Local Level. In: Proceedings—International Scientific Symposium “New Trends in Geography”, October 3–4, Ohrid, Republic of North Macedonia, pp 387–397. https://doi.org/10.37658/procgeo19387a

  • Atanasova G, Bache I (2010) Europeanization and FYR Macedonia: towards a compound polity? Southeast Eur Black Sea Stud 10(1):85–96. https://doi.org/10.1080/14683851003606762

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bachtler J, Downes R, Gorzelak G (2019) Transition, cohesion and regional policy in Central and Eastern Europe. Routledge, London. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315185071

  • Berisha E, Colic N, Cotella G, Nedovic Budic Z (2018) Mind the gap: Spatial Planning Systems in the Western Balkan Region. Trans Assoc Eur Sch Plan 2:47–62. https://doi.org/10.24306/traesop.2018.01.004

  • Berisha E, Cotella G, Janin Rivolin U, Solly A (2020) Spatial governance and planning systems and the public control of spatial development: a European typology. European Planning Studies, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2020.1726295

  • Berisha E, Cotella G, Solly A (in this volume). Introduction. The Western Balkans between continuity and change. In: Berisha E, Cotella G, Solly A (eds), Governing Territorial Development in the Western Balkans–Challenges and Prospects of Regional Cooperation. New York, Springer, pp 1–19

    Google Scholar 

  • CEC—Commission of the European Communities (2000) The Phare Programme Annual Report 1998. Retrieved from: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=COM:2000:0183:FIN:EN:PDF

  • Constitution of the Republic of Macedonia, (“Official Gazette of the Republic of Macedonia”, No. 52/1991)

    Google Scholar 

  • Cotella G (2007) Central Eastern Europe in the global market scenario: Evolution of the system of governance in Poland from socialism to capitalism. Journal für Entwicklungspolitik 23(1):98–124. https://doi.org/10.20446/JEP-2414-3197-23-1-98

  • Cotella G (2014) Spatial Planning in Poland between European Influences and Dominant Market Forces. In: Reimer M, Getimis P, Blotevogel HH (eds) Spatial planning systems and practices in Europe: A comparative perspective on continuity and changes. Routledge, London, pp 255–277. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315852577

  • Cotella G (2020) How Europe hits home? The impact of European Union policies on territorial governance and spatial planning. Géocarrefour 94(3). https://doi.org/10.4000/geocarrefour.15648

  • Cotella G, Berisha E (2016) Changing institutional framework for spatial planning in the Western Balkan Region. Evidences from Albania. Bosnia Herzeg Croatia EUROPA XXI 30:41–57. https://doi.org/10.7163/Eu21.2016.30.3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cotella G, Janin Rivolin U (2015) Europeizzazione del governo del territorio: un modello analitico. Territorio 73:127–134. https://doi.org/10.3280/TR2015-073019

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Decision on amendment on Nomenclature of Territorial Units for Statistics—NUTS (“Official Gazette of the Republic of Macedonia” No. 10/2014)

    Google Scholar 

  • Decision on amendment on Nomenclature of Territorial Units for Statistics—NUTS (“Official Gazette of the Republic of North Macedonia” No. 131/2019)

    Google Scholar 

  • Decision on determining of Nomenclature of Territorial Units for Statistics—NUTS (“Official Gazette of the Republic of Macedonia” No. 158/2007)

    Google Scholar 

  • Dimitrov N, Koteski C (2014) Geographical foundation of spatial planning. Free publisher, New York. ISBN 978-608-65616-1-1

    Google Scholar 

  • EC—European Commission (2016) European Neighbourhood Policy And Enlargement Negotiations: Former Assistance, 12 June. Retrieved from: https://ec.europa.eu/neighbourhood-enlargement/instruments/former-assistance_en

  • EC—European Commission (n.d.) IPA Regional Development Programmes in Republic of North Macedonia. Retrieved from: https://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/en/funding/ipa/fyrom/

  • EUSAIR (2020). North Macedonia has officially been included in the EUSAIR!, 3 April. Retrieved from: https://www.adriatic-ionian.eu/2020/04/03/north-macedonia-has-officially-been-included-into-eusair/

  • Garding S (2020) North Macedonia: In Brief. Congressional Research Service Report, September, 9

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerovska Mitev M (2013) Europeanisation of Social Inclusion Policy in Macedonia-Trends, Challenges and Potential Benefits. Soc Policy & Adm 47(2):182–198. https://doi.org/10.1111/spol.12014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hayden R (1992) The beginning of the end of Federal Yugoslavia: The Slovenian amendment crisis of 1989. Center for Russian & East European Studies. University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh. https://doi.org/10.5195/cbp.1992.108

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kostoska O, Spirovski M, Ristovska M, Hristoski I (2017) EU Regional Policy and Pre-Accession Support for The Republic of Macedonıa. VI International Balkan and Near Eastern Social Sciences Congress Series—Ohrid/ Macedonia, October 28–29, 2017, pp 401–413. ISBN 978-9989-695-57-5

    Google Scholar 

  • Law on Administrative Bodies (“Official Gazette of the Republic of Macedonia” No. 40/1990)

    Google Scholar 

  • Law on Amendment to the Law on Territorial Organization of Local Self-Government in the Republic of Macedonia (“Official Gazette of the Republic of Macedonia” No. 149/2014)

    Google Scholar 

  • Law on Changing the Territory of Certain Municipalities in the People’s Republic of Macedonia (“Official Gazette of People’s Republic of Macedonia” No. 3/1962)

    Google Scholar 

  • Law on City of Skopje (“Official Gazette of the Republic of Macedonia” No. 55/2004)

    Google Scholar 

  • Law on Illegal Buildings (“Official Gazette of the Republic of Macedonia”, No 23/2011)

    Google Scholar 

  • Law on Local Self-Government (“Official Gazette of the Republic of Macedonia” No. 5/2002)

    Google Scholar 

  • Law on Organisation of State Administration (“Official Gazette of the Republic of Macedonia” No. 44/2000)

    Google Scholar 

  • Law on Organization and Work of the State Administration Bodies (“Official Gazette of the Republic of Macedonia” No. 58/2000)

    Google Scholar 

  • Law on Regional Spatial and Urban Planning (“Official Gazette of Socialist Republic of Macedonia” No. 7/1965)

    Google Scholar 

  • Law on Spatial and Urban Planning (“Official Gazette of Republic of Macedonia” No. 4/1996)

    Google Scholar 

  • Law on Spatial and Urban Planning (“Official Gazette of the Republic of Macedonia” No. 51/2005, 137/2007, 91/2009, 124/2010, 18/2011, 53/2011, 144/2012)

    Google Scholar 

  • Law on Territorial Division and Local Self-Government of Macedonia (“Official Gazette of the Republic of Macedonia” No. 55/2004)

    Google Scholar 

  • Law on Territorial Division of Federal Republic of Macedonia (“Official Gazette of Federal Republic of Macedonia” No. 17/1945)

    Google Scholar 

  • Law on Territorial Division of the Republic of Macedonia and Determining the Areas of the Local Self-Government Units (“Official Gazette of the Republic of Macedonia”, No. 49/1996)

    Google Scholar 

  • Law on the Division of the People’s Republic of Macedonia into Districts, Cities, Town-Municipalities, and Municipalities (“Official Gazette of People’s Republic of Macedonia”, No. 13/1952)

    Google Scholar 

  • Law on the Spatial and Urban Planning System (“Official Gazette of Socialist Republic of Macedonia” No. 38/1985)

    Google Scholar 

  • Law on the Territory of Districts and Municipalities in the People’s Republic of Macedonia (“Official Gazette of People’s Republic of Macedonia”, No. 19/1957)

    Google Scholar 

  • Law on the Territory of the Municipalities in the Socialist Republic of Macedonia from 1965 (“Official Gazette of Socialist Republic of Macedonia” No. 2/1965)

    Google Scholar 

  • Law on the Transformation of Enterprises with Social Capital (“Official Gazette of the Republic of Macedonia” No. 38/1993)

    Google Scholar 

  • Levitas T. (2011). Local government finances and the status of fiscal decentralisation in Macedonia: A statistical review, 2008–2011. Urban Institute Center on International Development and Governance, IDG Working paper, No. 2011-02

    Google Scholar 

  • Marjanović M (2017) Echoes of Europeanisation of spatial planning in EU candidate countries. The case of Serbia and Bosnia & Herzegovina. Retrieved from: http://bth.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:1131178/FULLTEXT02.pdf

  • Marjanović M, Miličević M, Ristić D (in this volume) New European regionalism: Regional planning in the ex-Yugoslavian countries. In: Berisha E, Cotella G, Solly A (eds), Governing Territorial Development in the Western Balkans–Challenges and Prospects of Regional Cooperation. New York, Springer, pp 43–66

    Google Scholar 

  • Mihaila R, Oliva E, Sorbello P, Malshina KV, Grahovac B (2012) Europeanisation Faces Balkanisation: Political Conditionality and Democratisation-Croatia and Macedonia in Comparative Perspective. European Perspectives, 11

    Google Scholar 

  • Milevska T (2009) Maкeдoниja дoби пpeпopaкa зa пpeгoвopи co EУ, 14 October. Retrieved from: https://web.archive.org/web/20091016012226/; http://www.a1.com.mk/vesti/default.aspx?VestID=114931

  • Ministry of Local Self-Government (2015) Program for sustainable local development and decentralization in the Republic of Macedonia 2015–2020. Skopje

    Google Scholar 

  • MTC—Ministry of Transport and Communications (2019) Registry of issued and suspended licenses for making urban plans. Retrieved from: http://www.mtc.gov.mk/licenci-gradeznistvo-formulari/Registar-na-izdadeni-i-odzemeni-litsentsi-za-izrabotka-na-urbanistichki-planovi

  • Nadin V, Stead D (2008) European spatial planning systems, social models and learning. DISP Plan Rev 44(172):35–47. https://doi.org/10.1080/02513625.2008.10557001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nadin V, Fernández Maldonado AM, Zonneveld W, Stead D, Dąbrowski M, Piskorek K, Cotella G, Janin Rivolin U (2018) ESPON COMPASS—Comparative Analysis of Territorial Governance and Spatial Planning Systems in Europe: Applied Research 2016–2018. ESPON EGTC, Luxembourg

    Google Scholar 

  • Nedović-Budić Z, Cavrić B (2006) Waves of planning: Framework for studying the evolution of planning systems and empirical insights from Serbia and Montenegro. Planning Persp 21(4):393–425. https://doi.org/10.1080/02665430600892146

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nedović-Budić Z, Djordjević D, Dabović T (2011) The mornings after… Serbian spatial planning legislation in context. Eur Plan Stud 19(3):429–455. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2011.548448

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newman P, Thornley A (1996) Urban Planning in Europe—International Competition, National Systems and Planning Projects. London, Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203427941

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Pajović D (2006) Urbanistiki zakoni jugoslovenskih zemalja—Bosna i Hercegovina, Crna Gora, Hrvatska, Makedonija, Slovenija, Srbija—sa objasnjenjima. Novi Sad, Zavod za Urbanizam

    Google Scholar 

  • Penev S, Trenovski B (2017) Policy on Balanced Regional Development in Macedonia-Goals, Challenges, Trends (No. 76506). University Library of Munich, Germany

    Google Scholar 

  • Pojani D (2019) Informal settlements in the Balkans: Squatters’ magic realism vs. planners’ modernist fantasy vs. governments’ tolerance and opportunism. In: Rocco R, van Ballegooijen J (eds) The Routledge handbook on informal urbanization. Routledge, London. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315645544

  • Radaelli CM (2006) Europeanisation: solution or problem? Palgrave Advances in EU Studies. Palgrave Macmillan, London, UK, pp 56–76

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • ReliefWeb (2003) European Commission adopts Annual Programme for FYR of Macedonia, 25 April. Retrieved from: https://reliefweb.int/report/former-yugoslav-republic-macedonia/european-commission-adopts-annual-programme-fyr-macedonia

  • Risteska M (2013) The role of the EU in promoting good governance in Macedonia: towards efficiency and effectiveness or deliberative democracy? Nationalities Papers 41(3):431–446. https://doi.org/10.1080/00905992.2013.769504

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rocheska S, Angel M, Milevska M, Kostoska O (2014) Territorial cohesion and regional development in the context of EU integration–the case of Macedonia. East J Eur Stud 5(1):67–77. ISSN 2068-651X; e-ISSN: 2068-6633

    Google Scholar 

  • Shukarova A, Panov M, Georgiev D, Bitovski K, Katardziev I, Stojcke V, Veljanovski N, Chepreganov T (2008) History of the Macedonian People. Institute of National History, Ss Cyril and Methodius University, Skopje

    Google Scholar 

  • Spasov A (2009) The decentralization in Macedonia (equable regional development and education)—current conditions and perspectives. Progres—Institute for social democracy

    Google Scholar 

  • State Statistical Office (2019) Regions in the Republic of North Macedonia. Retrieved from: http://www.stat.gov.mk/publikacii/2019/RegioniteVoRM.2019.pdf

  • Stefanovska J, Kozelj J (2012) Urban planning and transitional development issues: The case of Skopje, Macedonia. Urbani izziv 23(1):91–100. https://doi.org/10.5379/urbani-izziv-en-2012-23-01-002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strategy on Regional Development 2009–2019 (“Official Gazette of the Republic of Macedonia” No. 119/2009)

    Google Scholar 

  • Taşan-Kok T (2004) Budapest, Istanbul, and Warsaw: Institutional and spatial change. Eburon. ISBN. 9059720415/9789059720411

    Google Scholar 

  • Tošić B, Živanović Z (2019) Comparative analysis of spatial planning systems and policies: Case study of Montenegro, Republic of North Macedonia and Republic of Serbia. Zbornik radova-Geografski fakultet Univerziteta u Beogradu 67(2):5–19. https://doi.org/10.5937/zrgfub1902005T

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trkulja S, Tošić B, Živanović Z (2012) Serbian spatial planning among styles of spatial planning in Europe. Eur Plan Stud 20(10):1729–1746. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2012.713327

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trkulja S, Dabović T (in this volume). Supranational frameworks for territorial governance and spatial planning in the Western Balkans. In: Berisha E, Cotella G, Solly A (eds), Governing Territorial Development in the Western Balkans–Challenges and Prospects of Regional Cooperation. New York, Springer, pp 265–287

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsenkova S, Nedović-Budić Z (2006) The urban mosaic of post-socialist Europe. Physica-Verlag HD. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-7908-1727-9_1

  • UNECE (2015) Formalizing the Informal: Challenges and Opportunities of Informal Settlements in South-East Europe. United Nations, New York and Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  • Valtonen E, Falkenbach H, Viitanen K (2017) Development-led planning practices in a plan-led planning system: empirical evidence from Finland. Eur Plan Stud 25(6):1053–1075. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2017.1301885

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vitorovič Z (2009) The legislation and analysis of the implementation of spatial and urban planning in Albania, Kosovo, Macedonia, Moldova, Republika Srpska and Turkey as compares to the case of Denmark. Association of Municipalities and Towns of Slovenia. ISBN 978-961-91519-2-1)

    Google Scholar 

  • Vujošević M (2010) Collapse of strategic thinking, research and governance in Serbia and possible role of the spatial plan of the Republic of Serbia (2010) in its renewal. Spatium 23:22–29. https://doi.org/10.2298/SPAT1023022V

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vujošević M, Zeković S, Maričić T (2012) Post-socialist transition in Serbia and its unsustainable path. Eur Plan Stud 20(10):1707–1727. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2012.713330

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zeković S, Vujošević M, Maričić T (2015) Spatial regularization, planning instruments and urban land market in a post-socialist society: The case of Belgrade. Habitat Int 48:65–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2015.03.010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zikov M (1995) Spatial planning: Theory and methodology. SKAJ, Skopje

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marko Ivanišević .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Ivanišević, M., Marjanović, M., Iliev, D. (2021). Spatial Planning and Territorial Governance in North Macedonia: From Socialist Yugoslavia to European Integration. In: Berisha, E., Cotella, G., Solly, A. (eds) Governing Territorial Development in the Western Balkans. Advances in Spatial Science. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-72124-4_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics