Skip to main content

Equity Market Segmentation in Risk-Based Portfolio Construction Techniques

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Eurasian Business and Economics Perspectives

Part of the book series: Eurasian Studies in Business and Economics ((EBES,volume 18))

  • 522 Accesses

Abstract

Risk-based portfolio construction models—i.e., strategic asset allocation approaches that do not make use of expected returns as inputs, such as optimal risk parity, most diversified portfolio, global minimum variance, and equal weighting—have reached a widespread use in the asset management industry. The aim of this research is to verify how these techniques reach different results depending on whether the global equity market is subdivided on the basis of a sector breakdown, carried out according to the industry sectors of each company, or in function of a geographical breakdown, carried out according to the listing market of each company. An empirical analysis, applied on a representative sample of global equity market indexes calculated by MSCI, is implemented by making use of the typical and most advanced statistical and financial evaluation measures. This comparative analysis reaches consistent results, showing a significant preference for the sector breakdown compared to the geographical one. In conclusion, this outcome can be ascribed to the segmentation of the equity market into sector indexes characterized by better external differentiation and stronger internal coherence. Moreover, sector indexes are characterized by a lower degree of concentration in comparison to the geographical ones.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abate, G. (2014). The (ir)rationality of the 1/N heuristic. International Journal of Behavioural Accounting and Finance, 4(4), 305–324.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Basile, I., & Ferrari, P. (Eds.). (2016). Asset management and institutional investors. Cham: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Best, M. J., & Grauer, R. R. (1991). On the sensitivity of mean-variance-efficient portfolios to changes in asset means. Some analytical and computational results. The Review of Financial Studies, 4(2), 315–342.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Braga, M. D. (2016). Risk-based approaches to asset allocation. Concepts and practical applications. Cham: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chopra, V. K., & Ziemba, W. T. (1993). The effect of errors in means, variances, and covariances on optimal portfolio choice. The Journal of Portfolio Management, 19(2), 6–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Choueifaty, Y., & Coignard, Y. (2008). Toward maximum diversification. The Journal of Portfolio Management, 35(1), 40–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, R., De Silva, H., & Thorley, S. (2013). Risk parity, maximum diversification and minimum variance: An analytical perspective. The Journal of Portfolio Management, 39(3), 39–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeMiguel, V., Garlappi, L., & Uppal, R. (2009). Optimal versus naĂŻve diversification: How inefficient is the 1/N portfolio strategy? Review of Financial Studies, 22(5), 1915–1953.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Denault, M. (2001). Coherent allocation of risk capital. Journal of Risk, 4(1), 1–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haesen, D., Hallerbach, W., Markwat, T., & Molenaar, R. (2014). Enhancing risk parity by including views. Rotterdam: Robeco Asset Management.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Jurczenko, E., & Teiletche, J. (2018). Active risk-based investing. Journal of Portfolio Management, 44(3), 56–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kritzman, M., Page, S., & Turkington, D. (2010). In defense of optimization: The fallacy of 1/N. Financial Analysts Journal, 66(2), 31–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, W. (2011). Risk-based asset allocation: A new answer to an old question? The Journal of Portfolio Management, 37(4), 11–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maillard, S., Roncalli, T., & Teiletche, J. (2010). The properties of equally weighted risk contribution portfolios. The Journal of Portfolio Management, 36(4), 60–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neurich, Q. (2008). Alternative indexing with the MSCI World Index. Bad Homburg vor der Höhe: Harald Quandt Holding.

    Google Scholar 

  • Qian, E. (2005). Risk parity portfolios: Efficient portfolios through true diversification. Boston: Panagora Asset Management.

    Google Scholar 

  • Qian, E. (2006). On the financial interpretation of risk contribution: Risk budgets do add up. The Journal of Investment Management, 4(4), 41–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roncalli, T. (2014). Introduction to risk parity and budgeting. Boca Raton: Chapman & Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scherer, B. (2011). A note on the returns from minimum variance investing. Journal of Empirical Finance, 18(4), 652–660.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scherer, B. (2015). Portfolio construction and risk budgeting. London: Risk Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsay, R. S. (2010). Analysis of financial time series. Hoboken: Wiley.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Windcliff, H., & Boyle, P. P. (2004). The 1/n pension investment puzzle. North American Actuarial Journal, 8(3), 32–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Guido Abate .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Abate, G. (2021). Equity Market Segmentation in Risk-Based Portfolio Construction Techniques. In: Bilgin, M.H., Danis, H., Demir, E. (eds) Eurasian Business and Economics Perspectives. Eurasian Studies in Business and Economics, vol 18. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-71869-5_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics