Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Visual Sociology

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Palgrave Handbook of Image Studies

Abstract

The history of visual sociology is intimately entwined with the evolution of sociology and has dispersed and episodic trajectories across various geographies and historical periods. In this chapter, I will present visual sociology not as a subfield of sociology but rather as a para-field, and trace some of the historical routes and roots contributing to the ongoing emergence of its post-disciplinary features. Addressing how and in what context the topic emerged will primarily focus on critical moments and thinkers whose contributions nourish the field in important ways but have sometimes been overlooked. To do visual sociology justice, this depiction must be considered a piece in a vastly larger ecology of schools of visual sociology intercontinentally and historically with diverging perspectives that merit being addressed in a more extensive work. The specific aims of this chapter are to present critical points of traction that attend specifically to the questions of how this post-discipline matters for the study of images; what particular set of problems are raised; what consequences visual sociology has had that matter for image studies; and generally what visual sociology offers for understanding images. Readers will not be surprised to find shared approaches, thinkers, and theoretical perspectives with other topic areas.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Agee, James and Evans, Walter. 1941. Let us now praise famous men: Three tenant families. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bal, Mieke. 2003. Visual essentialism and the object of visual culture. Journal of Visual Culture, 2 (1): 5–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Banks, Marcus. 2001. Visual Methods in Social Research. London: SAGE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauman, Zigmunt. 2007. “Liquid Arts”. Theory, Culture, and Society, 24 (1): 117–126.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker, Howard S. 1995. “Visual sociology, documentary photography, and photojournalism: It’s (almost) all a matter of context”. Visual Studies, 10 (1–2): 5–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Belting, Hans. 2011. An Anthropology of Images: Picture, Medium, Body. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blanc, Mathias. 2013. “Le savoir sociologique par l’image Éléments sur les conditions d’acceptabilité d’une épistémologie visuelle”. Revue de l’Institut de sociologie, 2010–2011: 31–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bohnsack, Ralf. 2008. Qualitative Bild- und Videointerpretation: Die dokumentarische Methode: Einführung in die dokumentarische Methode. 1. Aufl. Stuttgart: UTB.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, Pierre (ed.). 1965. Un art moyen. Essai sur les usages sociaux de la photographie. Paris: Éditions De Minuit.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brighenti, Andrea Mubi. 2010. Visibility in Social Theory and Social Research. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cambre, Maria-Carolina. 2014. “Becoming Anonymous: A politics of Masking”. In: Educational, Psychological, and Behavioral Considerations in Niche Online Communities. Ed. by Vivek Venkatesh et. al. Hershey, PA: Information Science Reference.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cambre, Carolina. 2019. “Visual criminology and the social image/s of crime”. Current Sociology, Special Subsection on Visual Criminology, 67 (5): 645–649.

    Google Scholar 

  • Canclini, Nestor Garcia. 1979. La producción simbólica. Teoría y método en sociología del arte. México: Siglo XXI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Canclini, Nestor Garcia. 2014. Art beyond Itself: Anthropology for a Society without a Story Line. Durham: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chalfen, Richard. 2005. “Looking at Japanese society: Hashiguchi George as visual sociologist”. Visual Studies, 20 (2): 140–158.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chalfen, Richard. 2011. “Looking two ways: Mapping the social scientific study of visual culture”. Ch. 2. In: SAGE Handbook of Visual Research Methods. Ed. by E. Margolis and L. Pauwels. Los Angeles: SAGE Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chaplin, Elizabeth. 1994. Sociology and Visual Representation. Routledge: London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheatwood, Derrall and Stasz, Clarice. 1979. “Visual Sociology”. In: Jon Wagner (ed.) Images of Information. Beverly Hills, CA: SAGE Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, Patricia Hill. 2007. “Pushing the Boundaries or Business as Usual? Race, Class, and Gender Studies and Sociological Inquiry”. In: Sociology in America: A History. Ed. by Craig Calhoun. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Curry, Timothy J. and Clarke, Alfred C. 1977. Introducing Visual Sociology. Dubuque, IA: Kendall/Hunt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Didi-Huberman, Georges. 2004. Confronting Images: Questioning the Ends of a Certain History of Art. University Park, PA: Penn State University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Du Bois, William Edward Burghardt. 1970. WEB Du Bois Speaks: Speeches and Addresses 1890–1919. Ed. by P. S. Foner. New York: Pathfinder Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Florensky, Pavel. 1996. Iconostasis (original from 1922. Trans. by D. Sheehan and O. Andrejev). Crestwood, NY: St Vladimir’s seminary press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fraser, Sarah E. 2010. “The Face of China: Photography’s Role in Shaping Image, 1860–1920”. Getty Research Journal, 2: 39–52. The University of Chicago Press on behalf of the J. Paul Getty Trust.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fyfe, Gordon and Law, John. 1988. “Introduction: On the Invisibility of the Invisible”. In: Picturing Power: Visual Depiction and Social Relations. Ed. by G. Fyfe and J. Law. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garland-Thomson, Rosemarie. 2006. “Ways of Staring”. Journal of Visual Culture, 5 (2): 173–192.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gell, Alfred. 1998. Art and agency: An anthropological theory. Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldmann, Annie. 1974. Cinéma et société moderne. Paris: Denoël.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodwin, John. 2018. “Searching for pearls: ‘Doing’ biographical research on Pearl Jephcott”. Contemporary Social Science, 14 (3-4): 528–541.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodwin, John and O’Connor, Harriet. 2018. “Pearl Jephcott: reflections, resurgence and replications”. Women’s History Review, 28 (5): 1–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grady, John. 1991. “The visual essay and sociology”. Visual Studies, 6 (2): 23–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grønstad, Asbjørn and Vågnes, Øyvind (eds.). 2019. Invisibility in Visual and Material Culture. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guggenheim, Michael. 2013. “What was Visual Sociology”. Blog of the Centre for Invention & Social Process, Goldsmiths. At: http://www.csisponline.net/2013/07/01/what-was-visual-sociology/.

  • Guggenheim, Michael. 2015. “The media of sociology: tight or loose translations?” The British Journal of Sociology, 66 (2): 345–370.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamus-Vallée, Réjane et al. (eds.). 2013. “Sociologie de l’image, sociologie par l’image”. CinémAction, 147.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harper, Douglas. 1987. “The visual ethnographic narrative”. Visual Anthropology, 1 (1): 1–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harper, Douglas. 1988. “Visual Sociology: Expanding Sociological Vision”. The American Sociologist, 19: 54–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harper, Douglas. 2000. “The image in sociology: histories and issues”. Journal des Anthropologues, 80–81: 143–160.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henny, Leonard M. 1986. “A short history of visual sociology.” Current Sociology, 34 (3): 1–4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Illich, Ivan. 1991. “The Scopic Past and the ethics of the Gaze” (unpublished) Mirror II, Available at: http://www.pudel.uni-bremen.de/subjects/entkoerperung/SCOPICPU.PDF.

  • King, Martin Luther. 1968. “Honoring Dr. Du Bois”. Reprinted in: Foner P. S. (ed.) WEB Du Bois Speaks: Speeches and Addresses 1890–1919. New York: Pathfinder Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knoblauch, Hubert und Bernt Schnettler. 2007. Powerpoint-Präsentationen. Neue Formen der gesellschaftlichen Kommunikation von Wissen. Konstanz: UVK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knowles, Caroline & Sweetman, Paul (eds.). 2004. Picturing the Social Landscape: Visual Methods and the Sociological Imagination. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krase, Jeremy & Shortell, Tim. 2011. “On the Spatial Semiotics of Vernacular Landscapes in Global Cities”. Visual Communication, 10 (3): 367–400.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lather, Patti. 1994. “Fertile obsession: Validity after post-structuralism”. In: Power and method: Political activism in educational research. Ed. by A. Gitlin. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mills, Charles Wright. 1959. The Sociological Imagination. London: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mirzoeff, Nicolas. 1999. An Introduction to Visual Culture. London and New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, W. J. T. 1984. “What is an image”. New Literary History (Image/Imago/Imagination), 15 (3): 503–537.

    Google Scholar 

  • Naville, Pierre. 1966. “Instrumentation audiovisuelle et recherche en sociologie”. Revue française de sociologie, 7 (2): 159–168.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neiva, Eduardo. 1999. “Redefining the Image: Mimesis, Convention, and Semiotics”. Communication Theory, 9 (1): 75–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pauwels, Luc. 2010. “Visual Sociology Reframed: An Analytical Synthesis and Discussion of Visual Methods in Social and Cultural Research”. Sociological Methods & Research, 38: 545–581.

    Google Scholar 

  • Péquignot, Bruno. 2008. Recherches sociologiques sur les images. Paris: L’Harmattan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porterfield, Laura Krystal. 2017. “(Re)Seeing Black girls: intersections of liberalism, difference, and the hidden curriculum”. Visual Studies, 32 (4): 301–312.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prosser, Jon. 1998. Image-Based Research. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rieger, Jon H. 1991. “Visual sociology: A practical pedagogy”. Visual Studies, 6 (1): 38–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rimke, Heidi. 2010. “Remembering the sociological imagination: Transdisciplinarity, the genealogical method, and epistemological politics”. The International Journal of Interdisciplinary Social Sciences, 5 (1): 239–254.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodowick, David N. 2001. Reading the Figural or Philosophy after the New Media. Durham and London: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shields, Rob. 2004. “Visualicity”. Visual Culture in Britain, 5 (1), 23–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stasz, Clarice. 1979. “The Early History of Visual Sociology”. In: Images of Information. Ed. by Jon Wagner. Beverly Hills, CA: SAGE Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strangleman, Tim. 2008. “Representations of Labour: Visual Sociology and Work”. Sociology Compass, 2 (5): 1491–1505.

    Google Scholar 

  • Terrenoire, Jean-Paul. 1985. “Images et sciences sociales: l’objet et l’outil”. Revue française de sociologie, 26 (3): 509–527.

    Google Scholar 

  • Traue, Boris. 2013. “Visuelle Diskursanalyse. Ein programmatischer Vorschlag zur Untersuchung von Sicht- und Sagbarkeiten im Medienwandel”. Zeitschrift für Diskursforschung, 1 (2): 117–136.

    Google Scholar 

  • Traue, Boris; Blanc, Mathias, and Cambre, Carolina. 2019. “Visibilities and Visual Discourses: Rethinking the Social with the Image”. Qualitative Inquiry, 25 (4): 327–337.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Leeuwen, Theo and Jewitt, Carey. 2001. The Handbook of Visual Analysis. London: SAGE Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, Jon. 1979. “Photography and Social Science Process”. In: Jon Wagner (ed.). Images of Information: Still Photography in the Social Sciences. Beverly Hills: SAGE Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright II, Earl. 2015. “W. E. B. Du Bois and the Atlanta Sociological Laboratory”. Berkeley Journal of Sociology [online] http://berkeleyjournal.org/2016/02/w-e-b-du-bois-and-the-atlanta-sociological-laboratory/.

Download references

Acknowledgments

I am dearly grateful to both Mathias Blanc and Boris Traue for allowing me to draw heavily from our previous work together.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Concordia University, Montreal, QC, Canada

    Carolina Cambre

Authors
  1. Carolina Cambre
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Carolina Cambre .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Academy of Arts and Culture, Josip Juraj Strossmayer University, Osijek, Croatia

    Krešimir Purgar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Cambre, C. (2021). Visual Sociology. In: Purgar, K. (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of Image Studies. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-71830-5_45

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation