Skip to main content

Im/pulse to See in Rosalind Krauss

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Palgrave Handbook of Image Studies
  • 1748 Accesses

Abstract

“After Greenberg, no one has had as much influence on American art critics as Krauss”, wrote David Carrier in his intellectual biography of the American critic and art historian Rosalind Krauss (Carrier, Rosalind Krauss and American Philosophical Art Criticism. Westport, CT and London: Praeger, 2002, 2). He refers to criticism, which he calls philosophical, based on a solid theoretical ground, though one that underwent diverse transformations throughout Krauss’ career. Krauss’ art criticism, at the beginning published in Artforum and since 1976 in October (the magazine she co-founded with Annette Michelson and Jeremy Gilbert-Rolfe), and the task she set for herself as an art historian to rewrite the history of modernism, first from the structuralist, and later from poststructuralist and psychoanalytical perspectives, are complementary and inseparable.

The article is an edited, fragmentarily modified, and translated by the author version of an original text which was published in Polish as “Rosalind Krauss: przekraczanie modernizmu?” in Didaskalia 111, 2012, 41–50.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Barthes, Roland. 1998. The Pleasure of the Text. Trans. by Richard Miller. New York: Hill and Wang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barthes, Roland. 1991. Mythologies. Trans. by Annette Lavers. New York: The Noonday Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benjamin, Walter. 1979. “A Small History of Photography”. In: Walter Benjamin. One-Way Street and Other Writings. Trans. by Edmund Jephcott and Kingsley Shorter. London: NLB.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boehm, Gottfried. 1994. Was Ist ein Bild? München: Wilhelm Fink.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bois, Yve-Alain and Krauss, Rosalind. 1997. The Formless. A User’s Guide. Cambridge, MA: Zone Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borch-Jacobsen, Mikkel. 1988. The Freudian Subject. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Carrier, David. 2002. Rosalind Krauss and American Philosophical Art Criticism. Westport, CT and London: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cavell, Stanley. 1971. The World Viewed. New York: The Viking Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Costello, Diarmuid. 2007. “Greenberg’s Kant and the Fate of Aesthetics in Contemporary Art Theory”. Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 65 (2): 217–228.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crary, Jonathan. 1992. Techniques of the Observer. On Vision and Modernity in the Nineteenth Century. Cambridge: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foster, Hal (ed.). 1988. Vision and Visuality. Seattle: Bay Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freud, Sigmund. 1955. “‘A Child is Being Beaten’: A Contribution to the Study of the Origin of Sexual Perversions”. In: The Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud, vol. 17. Ed. by John Strachey. London: Hogarth Press and the Institute of Psychoanalysis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fried, Michael. 1998. “Art and Objecthood”. In: Michael Fried, Art and Objecthood. Essays and Reviews. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenberg, Clement. [1960] 1995. “Modernist Painting”. In: Clement Greenberg.Collected Essays and Criticisms, vol. 4, Modernism with a Vengeance. Ed. by John O’Brian, Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenberg, Clement. [1967] 1995. “Complaints of an Art Critic”. In: Clement GreenbergCollected Essays and Criticisms, vol. 4, Modernism with a Vengeance. Ed. by John O’Brian. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jay, Martin. 1994. Downcast Eyes. The Denigration of Vision in Twentieth-Century French Thought. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krauss, Rosalind. 1971. Terminal Iron Works: The Sculpture of David Smith. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krauss, Rosalind. 1976. “Video: The Aesthetics of Narcissism”. October, 1: 50–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krauss, Rosalind. 1977. Passages in Modern Sculpture. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krauss, Rosalind. 1985. Originality of the Avant-Garde and Other Modernist Myths. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krauss, Rosalind. 1988. “Im/pulse to See”. In: Hal Foster (ed.) Vision and Visuality. Seattle: Bay Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krauss, Rosalind. 1993. The Optical Unconscious. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krauss, Rosalind. 1999a. Cindy Sherman: Untitled. In: Rosalind Krauss, Bachelors. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krauss, Rosalind. 1999b. “Reinventing the Medium”. Critical Inquiry, 25 (2): 289–305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krauss, Rosalind. 2000. A Voyage on the North Sea. Art in the Age of Post-medium Condition. London: Thames and Hudson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krauss, Rosalind. 2010. Perpetual Inventory. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krauss, Rosalind. 2011. Under Blue Cup. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lejeune, Anaël; Mignon, Olivier, and Pirenne, Raphaël (eds.). 2013. French Theory and American Art. Berlin: Sternberg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyotard, Jean-François. [1971] 2011. Discourse, Figure. Trans. by Antony Hudek and Mary Lydon. Minneapolis: Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, W. J. T. 1992. “The Pictorial Turn”. Artforum, 30 (7): 15–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Owens, Craig. [1985] 1992. “Analysis Logical and Ideological”. In: Craig Owens, Beyond Recognition. Representation, Power, and Culture. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rebentisch, Juliane. 2012. Aesthetics of Installation Art. Trans. by Daniel Hendrickson with Gerrit Jackson. Berlin: Sternberg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rejniak-Majewska, Agnieszka. 2010. “‘Kondycja postmedialna’ i wynajdowanie medium według Rosalind Krauss”. In: Tomasz Załuski (ed.), Sztuki w przestrzeni transmedialnej. Łódź: Akademia Sztuk Pięknych., pp. 42–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenthal, Mark. 2003. Understanding Installation Art. From Duchamp to Holzer. München: Prestel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sontag, Susan. 1966. “Against Interpretation”. In: Susan Sontag, Against Interpretation and Other Essays. New York: Delta.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Filip Lipiński .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Lipiński, F. (2021). Im/pulse to See in Rosalind Krauss. In: Purgar, K. (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of Image Studies. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-71830-5_24

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics