Skip to main content

Affective Priming and Decision-Making in the Economic Game

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advances in Cognitive Research, Artificial Intelligence and Neuroinformatics (Intercognsci 2020)

Abstract

Emotions are rarely studied in economic models. However, their contribution to the economic decision-making (DM) process is underestimated. The present study is based on the model of multiple regulation of DM (an interaction between cognitive, emotional, and personal processes) and investigates the influence of emotions via affective priming on DM in an economic game — the Trust Game (TG). The participants were 71 Russian students (34 men and 37 women, aged between 17 and 39 years, M age = 20.8; SD = 4.8). The masked priming paradigm is used in the experiment. Priming pictures are presented at different durations (33 or 500 ms) and valences (positive, neutral or negative). Participants played TG with three computer players (distinguished by their strategies: imitator, detective, vindictive) and they were asked to make a choice to either “trust” or “cheat” by clicking one of the buttons. The results reveal that both the computer player and the affective priming influenced DM and gain, but priming stimuli duration impacted neither the DM nor the gain. These findings reaffirm the statement that emotions can influence economic behavior.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Kornilova, T.V.: Intellectual and Personal Potential Under Uncertainty and Risk. Nestor-Istoria, Saint Petersburg (2016).(in Russian)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Lerner, J.S., Li, Y., Valdesolo, P., Kassam, K.S.: Emotion and decision making. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 66, 799–823 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-010213-115043

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Menninghaus, W., Wagner, V., Wassiliwizky, E., Schindler, I., Hanich, J., Jacobsen, T., Koelsch, S.: What are aesthetic emotions? Psychol. Rev. 126(2), 171–195 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1037/rev0000135

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Kirk, U., Skov, M., Hulme, O., Christensen, M.S., Zeki, S.: Modulation of aesthetic value by semantic context: an fMRI study. Neuroimage 44, 1125–1132 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.10.009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Garcia-Garcia, I., Kube, J., Morys, F., Schrimpf, A., Kanaan, A.S., Gaebler, M., Neumann, J.: Liking and left amygdala activity during food versus nonfood processing are modulated by emotional context. Cogn. Affective Behav. Neurosci. 20(1), 91–102 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1101/707844

  6. Nodine, C., Mello-Thoms, C., Krupinski, E., Locher, P.: Visual interest in pictorial art during an aesthetic experience. Spat. Vis. 21(1–2), 55–77 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1163/156856807782753868

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Lohse, M., Overgaard, M.: Emotional priming depends on the degree of conscious experience. Neuropsychologia 128, 96–102 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2017.10.028

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Berg, J., Dickhaut, J., McCabe, K.: Trust, reciprocity, and social history. Games Econ. Behav. 10, 122–142 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1006/game.1995.1027

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Emonds, G., Declerck, C.H., Boone, C., Vandervliet, E.J.M., Parizel, P.M.: The cognitive demands on cooperation in social dilemmas: an fMRI study. Soc. Neurosci. 7, 494–509 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1080/17470919.2012.655426

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Ramsøy, T.Z., Overgaard, M.: Introspection and subliminal perception. Phenomenol. Cogn. Sci. 3(1), 1–23 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:PHEN.0000041900.30172.e8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Cheesman, J., Merikle, P.M.: Priming with and without awareness. Percept. Psychophys. 36(4), 387–395 (1984). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03202793

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Nakanishi, D., Ohtsubo, Y.: Do people react differently to natural and social risk? J. Soc. Evol. Cult. Psychol. 2(3), 122–132 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1037/h0099350

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the Russian Foundation for Basic Research, project 19–29-07069. We thank M.P. Gambarian for writing the computer program for the experiment.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shestova Mariia .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Mariia, S., Tatiana, K. (2021). Affective Priming and Decision-Making in the Economic Game. In: Velichkovsky, B.M., Balaban, P.M., Ushakov, V.L. (eds) Advances in Cognitive Research, Artificial Intelligence and Neuroinformatics. Intercognsci 2020. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 1358. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-71637-0_30

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics