Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The Elephant

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Project Management in the 21st Century

Part of the book series: Management for Professionals ((MANAGPROF))

  • 777 Accesses

Abstract

The purpose of this book is to challenge the way you think about project management. It will not make you better at scheduling or cost planning – but it might make you ask whether we should do these things. This book turns a spotlight on gaping holes in the current project management theory, and challenges you to think about project management in a whole new way. If you don’t know why the Project Management Elephant, Eco-system and Experience are important, then this is the book for you.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Project Management Institute (U.S.) (2017) A guide to the project management body of knowledge (PMBOK® Guide), 6th edn. Project Management Institute, Newtown Square, PA

    Google Scholar 

  2. Koskela L, Ballard G (2006) Should project management be based on theories of economics or production? Build Res Inform 34(2):154–163

    Google Scholar 

  3. Taylor FW (1911) The principles of scientific management. Harper & Brothers, New York, NY

    Google Scholar 

  4. Deming WE (1967) Walter A. Shewhart, 1891-1967. Am Stat 21(2):39–40

    Google Scholar 

  5. Shewhart WA (1931) Economic control of quality of manufactured product. ASQ Quality Press

    Google Scholar 

  6. Naruse T (1991) Taylorism and Fordism in Japan. Int J Polit Econ:32–48

    Google Scholar 

  7. Bak R (2003) Henry and Edsel: the creation of the ford empire. Wiley, Hoboken, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  8. Gelderman CW (1981) Henry Ford: the wayward capitalist. Dial Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  9. Koskela L, Howell G (2008) The underlying theory of project management is obsolete. Eng Manage Rev IEEE 36(2):22–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Fayol H (1916) General principles of management. Class Organizat Theory 2(15):57–69

    Google Scholar 

  11. Kwak YH, Anbari FT (2009) Analyzing project management research: perspectives from top management journals. Int J Proj Manag 27(5):435–446

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Weick KE, Sutcliffe KM, Obstfeld D (2005) Organizing and the process of sensemaking. Organ Sci 16(4):409–421

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Flood B (2003) The New Zealand storm-petrel is not extinct. Bird World 16(11):479–482

    Google Scholar 

  14. Pant I, Baroudi B (2008) Project management education: the human skills imperative. Int J Proj Manag 26(2):124–128

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Wellman JL (2011) Improving project performance: eight habits of successful project teams. Macmillan

    Book  Google Scholar 

  16. Usher G (2019) Creating confidence amongst complexity: the ‘lived experience’ of client-side project managers in the Australian construction sector. Ph.D., Business and Management, University of Southern Queensland, Brisbane, Australia

    Google Scholar 

  17. Usher G, Whitty SJ (2017) Identifying and managing drift-changes. Int J Proj Manag 35(4):586–603

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Usher G, Whitty SJ (2017) Project Management Yinyang: coupling project success and client satisfaction. Proj Manage Res Pract 4

    Google Scholar 

  19. Usher G, Whitty SJ (2017) Embracing Paradox: utilizing design thinking in project management. In: Innovate, influence and implement—proceedings of the australian institute of project management national conference, Melbourne

    Google Scholar 

  20. Thomas J, Mengel T (2008) Preparing project managers to deal with complexity—advanced project management education. Int J Proj Manag 26(3):304–315

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Aritua B, Smith NJ, Bower D (2009) Construction client multi-projects—a complex adaptive systems perspective. Int J Proj Manag 27(1):72–79

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Bakhshi J, Ireland V, Gorod A (2016) Clarifying the project complexity construct: past, present and future. Int J Proj Manag 34(7):1199–1213

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Usher G, Whitty SJ (2017) The final state convergence model. Int J Manag Proj Bus 10(4):770–795

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Adams H (2016) A different approach to project management: the use of soft skills. http://digitalcommons.harrisburgu.edu/pmgt_dandt/2

  25. Gillard S (2009) Soft skills and technical expertise of effective project managers. Issues Inform Sci Inf Technol 6

    Google Scholar 

  26. Mahasneh KJ, Thabet W (2015) Rethinking construction curriculum: a descriptive cause analysis for the soft skills gap among construction graduates. In: 51st ASC Annual International Conference Proceedings

    Google Scholar 

  27. Marando A (2012) Balancing project management hard skills and soft skills. http://projectmgmt.brandeis.edu/downloads/BRU_MSMPP_WP_Feb2012_Balancing_project_Management.pdf

  28. Cicmil S, Williams T, Thomas J, Hodgson D (2006) Rethinking Project Management: researching the actuality of projects. Int J Proj Manag 24(8):675–686

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Usher G (2014) Rethinking project management theory: a case for a paradigm shift in the foundational theory of client-side, construction, project management. Presented at the proceedings of the Australian Institute of Project Management National Conference, Brisbane

    Google Scholar 

  30. Cicmil S, Cooke-Davies T, Crawford L, Richardson K (2017) Exploring the complexity of projects: implications of complexity theory for project management practice. Project Management Institute

    Google Scholar 

  31. Cooke-Davies T, Cicmil S, Crawford L, Richardson K (2007) We’re not in Kansas anymore, Toto: mapping the strange landscape of complexity theory, and its relationship to project management. Proj Manag J 38(2):50–61

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Koskela L, Rooke J, Bertelsen S, Henrich G (2007) The TFV theory of production: new developments. Michigan: anais IGLC-15 International Group for Lean Construction

    Google Scholar 

  33. Winter M, Szczepanek T (2007) Reframing project management: new thinking, new practice. Gower, Farnham, England

    Google Scholar 

  34. Smith A (1950) An inquiry into the nature and causes of the Wealth of Nations,(1776). Methuen

    Google Scholar 

  35. Matinheikki J, Artto K, Peltokorpi A, Rajala R (2016) Managing inter-organizational networks for value creation in the front-end of projects. Int J Proj Manag 34(7):1226–1241

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Matinheikki J, Pesonen T, Artto K, Peltokorpi A (2017) New value creation in business networks: the role of collective action in constructing system-level goals. Ind Mark Manag 67:122–133

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Yang JB, Peng SC, (2008) Development of a customer satisfaction evaluation model for construction project management. Build Environ 43(4):458–468

    Google Scholar 

  38. Seidl D, Becker KH (2006) Organizations as distinction generating and processing systems: Niklas Luhmann’s Contribution to Organization studies. Organization 13(1):9–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Woodside AG (2014) Embrace•perform•model: complexity theory, contrarian case analysis, and multiple realities. J Bus Res 67(12):2495–2503

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Winter M, Szczepanek T (2008) Projects and programmes as value creation processes: a new perspective and some practical implications. Int J Proj Manag 26(1):95–103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Leung M, Liu AM (1998) Developing a value management model–by value-goal system approach. In: Proceeding of 14th annual conference of association of researchers in construction management (ARCOM 98), vol 2. The University of Reading Reading, pp 496–505

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Enso Consulting, Lawnton, QLD, Australia

    Gregory Usher

Authors
  1. Gregory Usher
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Usher, G. (2021). The Elephant. In: Project Management in the 21st Century. Management for Professionals. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-71543-4_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation