Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Process of Technological Innovation Management in a Manufacturing Company: Assessment and Improvement

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Digital Transformation and New Challenges

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Information Systems and Organisation ((LNISO,volume 45))

  • 878 Accesses

Abstract

In the modern world, to ensure their competitiveness, organizations are forced to continuously improve their activities, especially through the implementation of innovative technological products and services. This paper presents an approach to assessing the innovation management process of a manufacturing company. It also formulates the areas for improving this process on the example of medium production enterprises in Russia. The TIPA process evaluation method is used as the basis of this approach. In analyzing and formulating recommendations for improving the process, the reference models, methods and frameworks are used: COBIT 2019, PCF APQC, Capability-Based Planning and TOGAF Standard, Agile—Stage-Gate method. Based on the experience of conducting this assessment at 3 Russian manufacturing enterprises, recommendations are formulated on the application of this approach. The main directions of improving the process of technological innovation management are also identified.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Cooper, R. G., & Edgett, S. (2012). Best practices in the idea-to-launch process and its governance. Research-Technology Management, 55(2), 43–54.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Cooper R. G., & Sommer A. F. (2018). Agile–Stage-Gate for manufacturers. Changing the way new products are developed. integrating agile project management methods into a stage-gate system offers both opportunities and challenges. Research-Technology Management.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Dearlove, D. (2007). The ultimate book of business thinking. Harnessing the power of the world’s greatest business ideas. Olimp-Business

    Google Scholar 

  4. Champy, J. (1995). Reengineering management. HarperBusiness.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Hammer, M. (2004). Deep change: How operational innovation can transform your company. Harvard Business Review. On Point Enhanced Edition. Harvard Business School Publishing

    Google Scholar 

  6. Hammer, M. (2007). Process audit. Harvard Business Review.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Harmon, P. (2003). Business process change: A manager’s guide to improving, redesigning and automating process. Morgan Kaufmann.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Madison, D. (2005). Process mapping, process improvement and process management. Paton Press.

    Google Scholar 

  9. ISO/IEC 33002:2015. Information technology—Process assessment—Requirements for performing process assessment. IDT.

    Google Scholar 

  10. What is CMMI®? CMMI Institute. https://cmmiinstitute.com/cmmi/intro.

  11. COBIT 2019 Framework. (2019). Governance and management objectives. ISACA.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Barafort, B., Shrestha, A., & Cortina, S. (2017). The evolution of the TIPA framework: Towards the automation of the assessment process in a design science research project. In International Conference on Software Process Improvement and Capability Determination. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-67383-7_9.

  13. Besson, J., Mitasiunas, A., & Ragaisis, S. (2015). Export process capability assessment model. Applied Computer Systems № 17. https://doi.org/10.1515/acss-2015-0009.

  14. Automotive SIG: Automotive SPICE—Process Assessment Model (2007). http://www.itq.ch/pdf/AutomotiveSPICE_PAM_v23.pdf.

  15. TIPA Classes of Assessment. https://www.tipaonline.org/tipa/tipa-classes-of-assessment/.

  16. Nuno, S., Mira, M., Barafort, B. (2015). Using ArchiMate to model a process assessment framework. In 30th Annual ACM symposium on applied computing, VOLS I AND (pp. 1189–1194), Salamanca, Spain, April 13–17, 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Aldea, A., Iacob, M. E., Lankhorst, M., Quartel, D., & Wimsatt, B. (2016). Capability-based planning: The link between strategy and enterprise architecture. Document No.: W16C Published by The Open Group, November 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Ries, E. (2011). The lean startup: How today’s entrepreneurs use continuous innovation to create radically successful businesses (1st Ed.). Crown Business.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Reinertsen D. G. (2009). The principles of product development flow: Second generation lean product development. Celeritas.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Larman, C., & Basili, V. R. (2003). Iterative and incremental development: A brief history. Computer, 36(6), 47–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Reinartz, W., Wiegand, N., & Imschloss, M. (2019). The impact of digital transformation on the retailing value chain. International Journal of Research in Marketing., 36(3), 350–366.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Barafort, B., Betry, V., Cortina, S., Picard, M., & Renaul, A. TIPA—Classes of Assessment 2.0. WhitePaper. https://docs.google.com/document/d/1V2XyWKTY7nPbEhzqmu_QHr5bKJpRODRU7Nve1yrrqLA/edit.

  23. Barafort, B., Shrestha, A., & Cortina, S. (2018). A software artefact to support standard-based process assessment: Evolution of the TIPA framework in a design science research project. Computer Standards & Interfaces, 60, 37–47.

    Google Scholar 

  24. COBIT 2019 Framework. (2018). Introduction and methodology. ISACA.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Consumer Products Process Classification Framework (v.7.2.1.). (2019). APQC and IBM.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Cooper, R. G. (2016). Agile–Stage-Gate hybrids: The next stage for product development. Research-Technology Management, 59(1), 21–29.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Sommer, A. F., Hedegaard, C., Dukovska-Popovska, I., & Steger-Jensen, K. (2015). Improved product development performance through Agile/Stage-Gate hybrids: The next-generation Stage-Gate process? Research-Technology Management, 58(1), 34–44.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Barbazange, H., et al. (2018). At all. Agile architecture in the digital age. The Open Group.

    Google Scholar 

  29. The TOGAF Standard, V. 9.2. The Open Group.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation, 125993, Moscow, Russia

    Olga Dolganova

Authors
  1. Olga Dolganova
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Olga Dolganova .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Higher School of Economics, National Research University, Moscow, Russia

    Evgeny Zaramenskikh

  2. HR Management and Psychology, Ural Federal University, Yekaterinburg, Russia

    Alena Fedorova

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Dolganova, O. (2021). Process of Technological Innovation Management in a Manufacturing Company: Assessment and Improvement. In: Zaramenskikh, E., Fedorova, A. (eds) Digital Transformation and New Challenges. Lecture Notes in Information Systems and Organisation, vol 45. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-71397-3_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation