Skip to main content

Effects of Question Type Presentation on Raised Questions in a Video Learning Framework

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Diversity, Divergence, Dialogue (iConference 2021)

Abstract

This paper examines the effect of explicitly presenting types of questions to students in an online learning environment. In our setting, people are shown online videos for lectures and then asked to raise questions. We compare the collected questions with those collected in the same situation but without presenting types of questions. We find that presenting types of questions improves the quality of questions, but does not increase the number of questions raised.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    In the simplest way, each chunk is composed of one sentence.

  2. 2.

    “How to make boiled and soaked aubergines”

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=27sVEYPlomw.

  3. 3.

    “The evolution of the coffee cup lid”

    https://www.ted.com/talks/a_j_jacobs_the_evolution_of_the_coffee_cup_lid.

References

  1. Chen, C.H., Bradshaw, A.C.: The effect of web-based question prompts on scaffolding knowledge integration and ill-structured problem solving. J. Res. Technol. Educ. 39(4), 359–375 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Choi, I., Land, S.M., Turgeon, A.J.: Scaffolding peer-questioning strategies to facilitate metacognition during online small group discussion. Instr. Sci. 33(5–6), 483–511 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Endo, K.: A pilot study on the facilitating effect of the questioning behavior of students through the internet. J. Educ. Appl. Inf. Commun. Technol. 14(1), 11–15 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Ge, X., Chen, C.H., Davis, K.A.: Scaffolding novice instructional designers’ problem-solving processes using question prompts in a web-based learning environment. J. Educ. Comput. Res. 33(2), 219–248 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Guthrie, J.T., et al.: Increasing reading comprehension and engagement through concept-oriented reading instruction. J. Educ. Psychol. 96(3), 403 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Hirai, Y., Hazeyama, A.: A learning support system based on question-posing and its evaluation. In: Fifth International Conference on Creating, Connecting and Collaborating through Computing (C5 2007), pp. 178–184. IEEE (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Hirai, Y., Hazeyama, A., Inoue, T.: Assessment of learning in concerto III: a collaborative learning support system based on question-posing. In: Proceedings of Computers and Advanced Technology in Education, pp. 36–43. ACTA Press, Calgary (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Izumi, H., Matsubara, M., Watanabe, C., Morishima, A.: A microtask approach to identifying incomprehension for facilitating peer learning. In: 2019 IEEE International Conference on Big Data (Big Data), pp. 4624–4627. IEEE (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  9. King, A., Rosenshine, B.: Effects of guided cooperative questioning on children’s knowledge construction. J. Exp. Educ. 61(2), 127–148 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Kruger, J., Dunning, D.: Unskilled and unaware of it: how difficulties in recognizing one’s own incompetence lead to inflated self-assessments. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 77(6), 1121 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Lin, S.S.P., Samuel, M.: Scaffolding during peer response sessions. Proc. Soc. Behav. Sci. 90, 737–744 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Luxton-Reilly, A., Bertinshaw, D., Denny, P., Plimmer, B., Sheehan, R.: The impact of question generation activities on performance. In: Proceedings of the 43rd ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, pp. 391–396 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Miyake, N., Norman, D.A.: To ask a question, one must know enough to know what is not known. J. Verbal Learn. Verbal Behav. 18(3), 357–364 (1979)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. White, R.T., Gunstone, R.F.: Metalearning and conceptual change. Int. J. Sci. Educ. 11(5), 577–586 (1989)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was partially supported by JST CREST Grant Number JPMJCR16E3, JSPS KAKENHI Grant Number JP19K11978, and JST-Mirai Program Grant Number JPMJMI19G8, Japan.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hinako Izumi .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Izumi, H., Matsubara, M., Watanabe, C., Morishima, A. (2021). Effects of Question Type Presentation on Raised Questions in a Video Learning Framework. In: Toeppe, K., Yan, H., Chu, S.K.W. (eds) Diversity, Divergence, Dialogue. iConference 2021. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 12646. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-71305-8_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-71305-8_9

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-71304-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-71305-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics