Skip to main content

The Person and the Brain

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Discussing Cognitive Neuroscience

Part of the book series: Annals of Theoretical Psychology ((AOTP,volume 17))

  • 916 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter gives a brief overview of the (European) beginnings of positivist psychology, i.e. of the ways of thinking and research that promise an objective view into human experience by recording the brain’s physiological processes that accompany mental processes.

First published in C. R. Bartram, M. Bobbert, D. Dölling, T. Fuchs, G. Schwarzkopf and K. Tanner (Eds.), (2012). Der (un-)durchsichtige Mensch. Wie weit reicht der Blick in die Person? (pp. 33–45). Heidelberg: Winter

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Change history

  • 07 October 2021

    This book was inadvertently published as an authored volume instead of an edited work. The chapter author names have now been updated in the table of contents, in all chapter opening pages and throughout the book as required.

Notes

  1. 1.

    In his Essay Concerning Human Understanding (1694), Locke defines a person as “a thinking intelligent Being, that has reason and reflection, and can consider it self as itself, the same thinking thing, in different times and places” (Locke 1979, § 9, 335). Therefore, personal identity consists in the continuity of memory and self-consciousness, namely, in “the sameness of a rational Being: and as far as this consciousness can be extended backwards to any past action or thought, so far reaches the identity of that person” (ibid.).

  2. 2.

    This was shown in a detailed manner by Herman Schmitz to whose fundamental analysis of subjective facts or circumstances I here refer: “Ein Sachverhalt […] ist subjektiv, wenn höchstens einer, und zwar nur im eigenen Namen, ihn aussagen kann, während die Anderen zwar mit eindeutiger Kennzeichnung darüber sprechen, aber nie und nimmer das Gemeinte aussagen können” (Schmitz 1995, 6). [“A circumstance […] is subjective, if one at most, in fact only on one’s own behalf, can articulate it while the others can indeed talk about it with a clear description, but never ever can convey the actually meant”].

  3. 3.

    “Subjektive Tatsachen sind sozusagen in höherem Maß als objektive Tatsachen tatsächlich; sie haben die Lebendigkeit des blutvoll und dringlich Wirklichen, während die bloß objektive, allein durch objektive Tatsachen konstituierte Welt so etwas wie ein Präparat ist, abgeblasst und zurechtgemacht für Erzählungen in der dritten grammatischen Person …” (Schmitz 1995, 7). [“Subjective facts are to a greater extend actual than objective facts, so to speak; they have the liveliness of the powerful [blutvoll] and urgent Real, whereas the mere objective world which is solely constituted by objective facts, is something like a preserved specimen, discoloured and dressed for third-person stories”].

  4. 4.

    Regarding the “module of the self”, see also Blakeslee (1996); regarding “model of the self”, see Metzinger 1999. The inherent limitations of the self-consciousness’s modelling by the brain research is debated in Lindemann (2007, 407).

  5. 5.

    At a glance, see Fuchs (2010, 68).

  6. 6.

    Cf. the website of John-Dylan Haynes: www.bccn-berlin.de/Mitglieder/haynes/?languageld=2.

  7. 7.

    Cf. Penfield and Perot (1963). The surgeries served the excision of seizure foci of patients suffering from therapy-resistant epilepsies. As the brain is insensitive to pain, patients could remain conscious and were able to communicate with the surgeons during surgery. For stimulation, fine electrodes were used to identify relevant brain areas and to operate as gently as possible.

  8. 8.

    Cf. the elaborated debate on the thought experiment at Cosmelli and Thompson (2011).

References

  • Bennett, M. R., & Hacker, P. M. S. (2003). Philosophical foundations of neuroscience. Malden: Blackwell Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blakeslee, T. (1996). Beyond the conscious mind. Unlocking the secrets of the self. New York: Plenum Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, A. (1997). Being there. Putting brain, body, and world together again. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cosmelli, D., & Thompson, E. (2011). Embodiment or envatment? Reflections on the bodily basis of consciousness. In J. Stewart, O. Gapenne, & E. Di Paolo (Eds.), Enaction: towards a new paradigm for cognitive science (pp. 361–385). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crick, F. (1995). The astonishing hypothesis. The scientific search of the soul. New York: Touchstone.

    Google Scholar 

  • Damasio, A. (1994). Descartes’ error: Emotion, reason and the human brain. New York: Putnam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Damasio, A. (1999). The feeling of what happens. Body and emotion in the making of consciousness. New York: Hartcourt Brace.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feuerbach, L. (1985/1846). Wider den Dualismus von Leib und Seele, Fleisch und Geist. In L. Feuerbach (Ed.), Anthropologischer Materialismus. Ausgewählte Schriften I (pp. 165–191). Frankfurt: EVA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuchs, T. (2008). Leib und Lebenswelt. Neue philosophisch-psychiatrische essays. Die Graue Edition: Kusterdingen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuchs, T. (2010). Das Gehirn – ein Beziehungsorgan. Eine phänomenologisch-ökologische Konzeption (3rd ed.). Stuttgart: Kohlhammer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuchs, T. (2011). The brain – A mediating organ. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 18, 196–221.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuchs, T. (2013). The phenomenology and development of social perspectives. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 12(4), 655–683.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gazzaniga, M. S. (2005). The ethical brain. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaspers, K. (1973). Philosophie II: Existenzerhellung. Berlin: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Leibniz, G. W. (2017/1714). The monadology. Whithorn: Anodos Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindemann, G. (2007). Plädoyer für einen methodologisch pluralistischen Monismus. In H.-P. Krüger (Ed.), Hirn als Subjekt? Philosophische Grenzfragen der Neurobiologie (pp. 401–410). Berlin: Akademie-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Locke, J. (1979/1694). An essay concerning human understanding. London: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McMahan, J. (2003). The ethics of killing. Problems at the margins of life. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mead, G. H. (1973). Geist, Identität und Gesellschaft. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meltzoff, A. N., & Prinz, W. (Eds.). (2002). The imitative mind: development, evolution, and brain bases. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merleau-Ponty, M. (1966). Phänomenologie der Wahrnehmung. Berlin: De Gruyter.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Metzinger, T. (1999). Subjekt und Selbstmodell (2nd ed.). Paderborn: Mentis.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Metzinger, T. (2009). The ego tunnel: The science of the mind and the myth of the self. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nagel, T. (1974). What is it to be a bat? Philosophical Review, 83, 435–450.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Noë, A., & Thompson, E. (2004). Are there neural correlates of consciousness? Journal of Consciousness Studies, 11, 3–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parfit, D. (1984). Reasons and persons. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Penfield, W., & Perot, P. (1963). The brain’s record of an auditory and visual experience. Brain, 86, 595–696.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Platon. (1995). Sophistes. In E. A. Duke et al. (Eds.), Platonis opera (Vol. 1, pp. 383–471). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, H. (1981). Reason, truth and history. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Schleim, S. (2008). Gedankenlesen. Pionierarbeit der Hirnforschung. Hannover: Heise.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmitz, H. (1995). Der unerschöpfliche Gegenstand. Grundzüge der Philosophie (2nd ed.). Bonn: Bouvier, Bonn.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siep, L. (1983). Identität der Person. Aufsätze aus der nordamerikanischen Gegenwartsphilosophie. Basel: Schwabe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singer, P. (1979). Practical ethics. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spaemann, R. (2006). Persons: The difference between ‘someone’ and ‘something’. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Straus, E. (1956). Vom Sinn der Sinne (2nd ed.). Berlin: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, E. (2007). Mind in life. Biology, phenomenology, and the sciences of mind. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tomasello, M. (1999). The cultural origins of human cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tomasello, M. (2008). The origins of human communication. Cambridge, MA: MIT-Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Trevarthen, C. (2001). The neurobiology of early communication: Intersubjective regulations in human brain development. In A. F. Kalverboer & A. Gramsberg (Eds.), Handbook of brain and behaviour in human development (pp. 841–881). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Uexküll, J. v. (1973). Theoretische Biologie. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Varela, F., Thompson, E., & Rosch, E. (1992). Der mittlere Weg der Erkenntnis. München: Scherz.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vidal, F. (2011). Von unserem eigenen Gehirn überlebt. In C. M. Schmitz & L. Kesner (Eds.), Images of the mind. Bildwelten des Geistes aus Kunst und Wissenschaft (pp. 41–48). Wallstein Verlag: Dresden.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Thomas Fuchs .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Fuchs, T. (2021). The Person and the Brain. In: Discussing Cognitive Neuroscience. Annals of Theoretical Psychology, vol 17. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-71040-8_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics