Skip to main content

A Bibliometric Analysis of Lower Limb Exoskeletons for Rehabilitation Applications

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
XXVII Brazilian Congress on Biomedical Engineering (CBEB 2020)

Part of the book series: IFMBE Proceedings ((IFMBE,volume 83))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 48 Accesses

Abstract

This paper presents a systematic literature review method and a bibliometric analysis for the topic “Lower limb exoskeletons for rehabilitation applications”. The method can also be applied to other topics. Five databases were chosen for documents search, which are: Web of Science, Scopus, IEEE Xplore, Catálogo de Teses e Dissertações (CTD) and Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações (BDTD) of CAPES. All the results presented in this paper were obtained on December 31, 2019, as they might change with time. To make the review reproducible, updatable and continuous, a review protocol was created. Results from the secondary analysis were further analyzed, presenting the best “top 10”: most prominent research areas, most highlighted research countries, sources with the highest register of documents and, most cited documents from Web of Science and Scopus respectively. However, in the bibliometric analysis, VOSviewer tool was used for the co-authorship, co-citation and bibliographic coupling analyses, while TagCrowd was used for keywords co-occurrence analysis. The work is concluded with some important considerations observed during this analysis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 509.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Dewey A, Drahota A (2016) Introduction to systematic reviews: online learning module Cochrane training. https://training.cochrane.org/interactivelearning/module-1-introduction-conducting-systematic-reviews

  2. Marino AM, Rocha MS (2017) Revisão da Literatura: Apresentação de uma Abordagem Integradora. In: 2017 AEDEM international conference on economy, business and uncertainty: ideas for a European and Mediterranean industrial policy? Reggio Calabria, Italia, 2017, pp 427–443

    Google Scholar 

  3. Dollar AM, Herr H (2008) Lower extremity exoskeletons and active orthoses: challenges and state-of-the-art. IEEE Trans Rob 24:144–158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Huo W, Mohammed S, Moreno JC, Amirat Y (2016) Lower limb wearable robots for assistance and rehabilitation: a state of the art. IEEE Syst J 10:1068–1081

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Zoss A, Chu A, Kazerooni H (2006) Biomechanical design of the Berkeley Lower Extremity Exoskeleton (BLEEX). IEEE/ASME Trans Mechatron 11:128–138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Mcdaid AJ, Xing S, Xie SQ (2013) Brain controlled robotic exoskeleton for neurorehabilitation. In: 2013 IEEE/ASME international conference on advanced intelligent mechatronics. Wollongong, NSW, Australia, 2013, pp 1039–1044

    Google Scholar 

  7. Vinoj PG, Jacob S, Menon VG (2019) Brain-controlled adaptive lower limb exoskeleton for rehabilitation of post-stroke paralyzed. IEEE Access 7:132628–132648

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Atallah AN, Castro AA (1998) Revisão Sistemática da Literatura e Metanálise: a melhor forma de evidência para tomada de decisão em saúde e a maneira mais rápida de atualização terapêutica. https://www.centrocochranedobrasil.com.br/cms/apl/artigos/artigo_530.pdf

  9. Martins LFL, Thuler LCS, Valente JG (2005) Cobertura do exame de Papanicolaou no Brasil e seus fatores determinantes: uma revisão sistemática da literatura. Revista Brasileira de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia 27:485–492

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Pereira ÂL, Bachion MM (2008) Atualidades em revisão sistemática de literatura, critérios de força e grau de recomendação de evidência. Revista Gaúcha de Enfermagem 27:491–498

    Google Scholar 

  11. Van Eck NJ, Waltman L (2018) Manual of Vosviewer tool at https://www.vosviewer.com/documentation/Manual_VOSviewer_1.6.8.pdf

  12. Akdoǧan E, Adli MA (2011) The design and control of a therapeutic exercise robot for lower limb rehabilitation: physiotherabot. Mechatronics 21:509–522

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Bortole M, Venkatakrishnan A, Zhu F et al (2015) The H2 robotic exoskeleton for gait rehabilitation after stroke: early findings from a clinical study wearable robotics in clinical testing. J NeuroEng Rehabil 12:1–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Donati ARC, Shokur S et al (2016) Long-term training with a brain-machine interface-based gait protocol induces partial neurological recovery in paraplegic patients. Sci Rep 6:1–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Farris RJ, Quintero HA, Goldfarb M (2011) Preliminary evaluation of a powered lower limb orthosis to aid walking in paraplegic individuals. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng 19:652–659

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Heo P, Gu GM, Lee SJ et al (2012) Current hand exoskeleton technologies for rehabilitation and assistive engineering. Int J Precis Eng Manuf 13:807–824

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Jiménez-Fabián R, Verlinden O (2012) Review of control algorithms for robotic ankle systems in lower-limb orthoses, prostheses, and exoskeletons. Med Eng Phys 34:397–408

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Meng W, Liu Q, Zhou Z et al (2015) Recent development of mechanisms and control strategies for robot-assisted lower limb rehabilitation. Mechatronics 31:132–145

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Pons JL (2008) Wearable robots: biomechatronic exoskeletons. Wiley, Madrid

    Book  Google Scholar 

  20. Tucker MR, Olivier J, Pagel A et al (2015) Control strategies for active lower extremity prosthetics and orthotics: a review. J NeuroEng Rehabil 12:1–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Yan T, Cempini M, Oddo CM et al (2015) Review of assistive strategies in powered lower-limb orthoses and exoskeletons. Robot Auton Syst 64:120–136

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Yin YH, Fan YJ, Xu LD (2012) EMG and EPP-integrated human-machine interface between the paralyzed and rehabilitation exoskeleton. IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed 16:542–549

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Young AJ, Ferris DP (2017) Analysis of state of the art and future directions for robotic exoskeletons. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng 25:171–182

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Farris DP, Murakami MA, Apple F (2005) Analytical evaluation of the Abbott Architect (R) STAT Troponin-I immunoassay. Clin Chem 51:28–28

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The Authors thank Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES), for proving the free access to all the databases consulted in elaborating this work.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Marafa, N.A., Llanos, C.H., Taco, P.W.G. (2022). A Bibliometric Analysis of Lower Limb Exoskeletons for Rehabilitation Applications. In: Bastos-Filho, T.F., de Oliveira Caldeira, E.M., Frizera-Neto, A. (eds) XXVII Brazilian Congress on Biomedical Engineering. CBEB 2020. IFMBE Proceedings, vol 83. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-70601-2_98

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-70601-2_98

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-70600-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-70601-2

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics