Skip to main content

Low Processing Power Algorithm to Segment Tumors in Mammograms

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
XXVII Brazilian Congress on Biomedical Engineering (CBEB 2020)

Part of the book series: IFMBE Proceedings ((IFMBE,volume 83))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 64 Accesses

Abstract

The diagnosis based on mammography depends on relevantly upon the radiologist’s experience and accuracy in identifying shapes and tenuous contrast in the images. A possible improvement in the mammography consists of image analysis algorithms suitable for detecting and segmenting tumors. However, such an approach usually demands high computational processing. In this context, the present work objective was to develop an algorithm to accurately search and segment tumors in mammography images without requiring high processing power. Thus, efficient, low computational demanding, and automatic image segmentation occurred by performing traditional image processing, including uniform equalization, adaptive enhancement (CLAHE), simple thresholding, Otsu multiple thresholds, and morphology operators. The development of the algorithm divides into two steps. The first step was the isolation of the breast and removing the pectoral muscle. The breast isolation occurred by removing artifacts outside of the breast image. The pectoral muscle removes as this region presents gray levels similar to the tumor. Finally, the second step segmented the tumor mass. The algorithm validation occurred by determining the accuracy and the Dice similarity coefficient, which values (mean ± standard deviation) were, respectively, 0.75 ± 0.09 and 0.71 ± 0.11. These average values resulted after processing 150 images of the CBIS-DDSM database, signifying a good segmentation outcome. As for the processing speed, the algorithm spent 14,5 s to segment a tumor in an image sizing 5383 × 3190 pixels (16 bits), using a conventional computer. The tool was able to segment both tiny and large tumors, and it may represent a convenient approach to assist in the analysis of mammograms without requiring high computational resources.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 509.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Padhi S, Rup S, Saxena S, Mohanty F (2019) Mammogram segmentation methods: a brief review. In: 2nd International conference on intelligent communication and computational techniques (ICCT). Jaipur, India, pp 218–223

    Google Scholar 

  2. Lee RS et al (2017) A curated mammography data set for use in computer-aided detection and diagnosis research. Sci Data 4:170–177

    Google Scholar 

  3. Moreira IC, Ramos I, Ventura SR, Rodrigues PP (2019) Learner’s perception, knowledge and behavior assessment within a breast imaging e-learning course for radiographers. Eur J Radiol 111:47–55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Ekpo EU et al (2015) Breast composition: measurement and clinical use. Radiography 21(4):324–333

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Gaur S et al (2013) Architectural distortion of the breast. Am J Roentgenol 201(5):W662–W670

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Makandar A, Halalli B (2015) Breast cancer image enhancement using median filter and CLAHE. Int J Sci Eng Res 6(4):462–465

    Google Scholar 

  7. Padhi S, Rup S, Saxena S, Mohanty F (2019) Mammogram segmentation methods: a brief review. In: 2019 2nd International conference on intelligent communication and computational techniques (ICCT). Jaipur, India, pp 218–223

    Google Scholar 

  8. Zhu W et al (2018) Adversarial deep structured nets for mass segmentation from mammograms. In: IEEE 15th International symposium on biomedical imaging (ISBI 2018)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Singh VK et al (2020) Breast tumor segmentation and shape classification in mammograms using generative adversarial and convolutional neural network. Expert Syst Appl 139:112855

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Taha AA, Hanbury A (2015) Metrics for evaluating 3D medical image segmentation: analysis, selection, and tool. BMC Med Imaging 15(1):29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. lbachir IA, Es-salhi R, Daoudi I, Tallal S, Medromi H (2016) A survey on segmentation techniques of mammogram images. In: International symposium on ubiquitous networking. Springer, Singapore, pp 545–556

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful to FAPESP (proc. 2017/22949-3) and FINEP (Ref. 1266/2013) for the financial support that helped to equip the Biomedical Computing Laboratory (at UNIFESP—São José dos Campos/SP, Brazil) with hardware and software resources used in the present work.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to R. C. Coelho .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Vieira, R.E.Q., de Godoy, C.M.G., Coelho, R.C. (2022). Low Processing Power Algorithm to Segment Tumors in Mammograms. In: Bastos-Filho, T.F., de Oliveira Caldeira, E.M., Frizera-Neto, A. (eds) XXVII Brazilian Congress on Biomedical Engineering. CBEB 2020. IFMBE Proceedings, vol 83. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-70601-2_271

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-70601-2_271

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-70600-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-70601-2

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics