Skip to main content

New Political Scenario, New Motivations?

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Politicians in Hard Times

Abstract

The Spanish political scenario has substantially changed since the beginning of the Great Recession. The emergence of new formations and the high levels of renewal among traditional parties (the PP and PSOE) have provided a ‘structure of opportunities’ that favours entry into politics. However, widespread discontent with political representatives may also have negatively affected many people’s motivations to go into politics. This chapter focuses on a fundamental question: in this context of political turmoil and regeneration, coupled with widespread political disaffection, why do people decide to become politicians? Using the CIUPARCRI data, MPs’ motivations are studied by analysing the differences between sex, age, parties, chambers, socialisation, and recruitment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    PSOE (120 seats), PP (89), Vox (52), Unidas Podemos (35), Ciudadanos (10) and Más País (2). Vox and Más País do not appear in the study, because when the field work was carried out in 2018, they had not yet entered parliament.

  2. 2.

    Portillo-Pérez and Domínguez (2020) measure fragmentation using the Effective Number of Parliamentary Parties (ENPP), and polarisation using the Polarisation Index (PI). By 2020, the ENPP was 4.6, only lower than the previous term (4.8), whereas the PI was the highest in the last democratic period (of 6 vs 3.1 in 2008), making the 14th term the most ideologically polarised to date.

  3. 3.

    Data come from the project CIUPARCRI, which is the acronym for the project “Ciudadanía y parlamentarios en tiempos de crisis y renovación democrática: el caso comparado de España en el contexto del sur de Europa” (CSO2016-78016-R). The authors of this chapter thank the editors of the book for the invitation to analyse the data and their comments made to improve this chapter.

  4. 4.

    López-Nieto interviews Congress and Senate ex-deputies.

  5. 5.

    It should be noted that in the 2002 questionnaire (López-Nieto 2004), former MPs were asked by means of an open question for the two main reasons that they dedicated themselves to politics. In the 2011–2013 questionnaire (Galais 2018), motivations were asked for in a series of items, which excluded the option of social change, although the question leaves an open answer option.

References

  • Alarcón, F. J., & Trujillo, J. M. (2020). Medición de la vocación política a partir de la adaptación y validación de la escala “Calling”. Revista Española de Investigaciones Sociológicas, 171, 3–22. https://doi.org/10.5477/cis/reis.171.3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alcántara, M. (2012). El oficio del Político. Madrid: Tecnos.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aldrich, J. H., & Bianco, W. T. (1992). A Game-Theoretic Model of Party Affiliation of Candidates and Office Holders. Mathematical and Computer Modelling, 16(8–9), 103–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allen, N., & Birch, S. (2012). On Either Side of a Moat? Elite and Mass Attitudes Towards Right and Wrong. European Journal of Political Research, 51(1), 89–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brewer, G. A., Coleman, S., & Facer, R. L., II. (2000). Individual Conceptions of Public Service Motivation. Public Administration Review, 60(3), 254–264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burrell, B. C. (1994). A Woman’s Place Is in the House: Campaigning for Congress in the Feminist Era. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Center for Sociological Research (Centro de Investigaciones Sociológicas—CIS). (2020a). Three Main Problems in Spain. Retrieved October 30, 2020, from http://www.cis.es/cis/export/sites/default/-archivos/indicadores/documentos_html/tresproblemas.html

  • Center for Sociological Research (Centro de Investigaciones Sociológicas—CIS). (2020b). Indicator of political confidence. Retrieved October 30, 2020, from http://www.cis.es/cis/opencms/ES/11_barometros/Indicadores_PI/documentos/serPol1.html.

  • CIUPARCRI. (2018). Ciudadanía y parlamentarios en tiempos de crisis y renovación democrática: el caso comparado de España en el contexto del sur de Europa. Research Project funded by the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness (CSO2016-78016-R).

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, H. D., & Price, R. G. (1977). A Note on the Pre-Nomination Role Socialization of Freshmen Members of Parliament. Canadian Journal of Political Science/Revue canadienne de science politique, 10(2), 391–406.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clary, E. G., & Miller, J. (1986). Socialization and Situational Influences on Sustained Altruism. Child Development, 57, 1358–1369.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coller, X., Cordero, G., & Echavarren, J. M. (2018b). Recruitment and Selection. In X. Coller, A. Jaime, & F. Mota (Eds.), Political Power in Spain: The Multiple Divides between MPs and Citizens (pp. 83–103). London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Coller, X., Domínguez, P., Portillo-Pérez, M., & Escobar, M. (2018). Elites políticas en España. ¿Convergencia o divergencia con la sociedad? In B. Pendás (dir.), E. González, & R. Rubio (coords.), España constitucional (1978–2018). Trayectorias y perspectivas (pp. 3363–3385). Madrid: Centro de Estudios Políticos y Constitucionales.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coller, X., Jiménez, M., & Portillo-Pérez, M. (2020). It is Not the Economy: How Spanish Established Political Elites Understand the (Political) Crisis and Its Effects. In A. Freire, M. Barragán, X. Coller, M. Lisi, & E. Tsatsanis (Eds.), Political Representation in Southern Europe and Latin America Before and After the Great Recession and Commodity Crisis (pp. 85–101). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Constantini, E., & Craig, K. H. (1977). Women as Politicians: The Social Background, Personality and Political Careers of Female Party Leaders. In M. Githens & J. L. Prestage (Eds.), A Portrait of Marginality: The Political Behavior of the American Woman. New York: McKay.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dickinson, N. (2018). Advice Giving and Party Loyalty: An Informational Model for the Socialisation Process of New British MPs. Parliamentary Affairs, 71(2), 343–364.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fenno, R. F. (1978). Home Style: House Members in their Districts. Boston: Litde, Brown and Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fox, R. L., & Lawless, J. L. (2003). Family Structure, Sex-Role Socialization, and the Decision to Run for Office. Women and Politics, 24(4), 19–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fox, R. L., & Lawless, J. L. (2005). To Run or Not to Run for Office: Explaining Nascent Political Ambition. American Journal of Political Science, 49(3), 642–659.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fox, R. L., & Lawless, J. L. (2011). Gaining and losing Interest in Running for Public Office: The concept of Dynamic Political Ambition. The Journal of Politics, 73(2), 443–462.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fox, R. L., & Lawless, J. L. (2014). Uncovering the Origins of the Gender Gap in Political Ambition. The American Political Science Review, 108(3), 499–519.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freire, A., Lisi, M., Andreadis, I., & Leite Viegas, J. M. (Eds.). (2016). Political Representation in Times of Bailout: Evidence from Greece and Portugal. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galais, C. (2018). Political Socialization and Motivation. In X. Coller, A. Jaime & F. Mota (eds.), Political Power in Spain: The Multiple Divides between MPs and Citizens. London: Palgrave Macmillan. 978-3-319-63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galais, C., Öhberg, P., & Coller, X. (2016). Enduring at the Top: Gender and political ambition of Spanish and Swedish MPs. Politics & Gender, 12(3), 596–621.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Granik, S. (2005). A Reconceptualisation of the Antecedents of Party Activism: A Multidisciplinary Approach. Political Studies, 53, 598–620.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jaime-Castillo, A., Coller, X., & Cordero, G. (2018). New Parties and New Ways of Candidate Selection in Spain. In X. Coller, G. Cordero, & A. Jaime-Castillo (Eds.), The Selection of Politicians in Times of Crisis (pp. 226–242). London: Routledge.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Jennings, M. K., Stoker, L., & Bowers, J. (2009). Politics Across Generations: Family Transmission Reexamined. Journal of Politics, 71(3), 782–799.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jiménez-Sánchez, M., Coller, X., & Portillo-Pérez, M. (2018). MPs of Traditional Parties’ Perceptions on Candidate Selection in Times of Political Crisis and Reform. In G. Cordero & X. Coller (Eds.), Democratizing Candidates Selection. New Methods, Old Receipts? (pp. 147–171). London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Kakepaki, M., Kountouris, F., Verzichelli, L., & Coller, X. (2018). The Sociopolitical Profile of Parliamentary Representatives in Greece, Italy, and Spain Before and After the Eurocrisis. A Comparative Empirical Assessment. In G. Cordero & X. Coller (Eds.), Democratizing Candidates Selection. New Methods, Old Receipts? (pp. 175–200). London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Lawless, J. L., & Fox, R. L. (2005). It Takes A Candidate, Why Women Don’t Run for Office. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawless, J. L. & Fox, R. L. (2010). It Still Takes A Candidate, Why Women Don’t Run for Office (Revised Edn). New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Linz, J. J. (1992). Discurso de Investidura de Doctor “Honoris Causa”. Madrid: Universidad Autónoma de Madrid.

    Google Scholar 

  • López Nieto, L. (Ed.). (2004). Entre el deseo y la realidad. ¿Políticos profesionales o vocacionales? Madrid: UNED Ediciones.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maestas, C. D., Fulton, S., Maisel, S., & Stone, W. J. (2006). When to Risk it? Institutions, Ambitions, and the Decision to Run for the US House. American Political Science Review, 100(2), 195–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martínez Rosón, M. M. (2009). La ambición política en situaciones adveras: contextos institucionales y personales. Revista de Estudios Políticos, 146, 113–148.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayhew, D. (1974). Congress: The Electoral Connection. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Montero, J. R., Günther, R., & Torcal, M. (1999). Legitimidad, descontento y desafección: el caso español. Estudios Públicos., 74, 107–149.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morales Díez de Ulzurrum, L. (2009). Joining Political Organizations: Institution, Mobilization, and Participation in Western Democracies. Colchester: ECPR Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morlino, L., & Raniolo, F. (2017). The Impact of the Economic Crisis on South European Democracies. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Müller, W. C., & Strom, K. (1999). Policy, Office, or Votes: How Political Parties in Western Europe Make Hard Decisions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Norris, P. (Ed.). (1997). Passages to Power. Legislative Recruitment in Advanced Democracies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norris, P., & Lovenduski, J. (1995). Political Recruitment. Gender, Race and Class in the British Parliament. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palmer, B., & Simon, D. (2003). Political Ambition and Women in the U.S. House of Representatives, 1916–2000. Political Research Quarterly, 56(2), 127–138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perry, J. L. (1996). Measuring Public Service Motivation: An Assessment of Construct Reliability and Validity. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 7(1), 3–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perry, J. L., & Wise, L. R. (1990). The Motivational Bases of Public Service. Public Administration Review, 50(3), 367–373.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Portillo-Pérez, M., & Domínguez, P. (2020). The Social Profile of the New Political Elites in Spain. In A. Freire, M. Barragán, X. Coller, M. Lisi, & E. Tsatsanis (Eds.), Political Representation in Southern Europe and Latin America Before and After the Great Recession and Commodity Crisis (pp. 85–101). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community. New York: Simon & Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schlesinger, J. (1966). Ambition and Politics: Political Careers in the United States. Chicago: Rand McNally and Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Torcal, M., Montero, J. R., & Günther, R. (2003). Ciudadanos y partidos en el sur de Europa: los sentimientos antipartidistas. REIS: Revista Española de Investigaciones Sociológicas, 101, 9–48. https://doi.org/10.2307/40184450.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tourangeau, R., Rips, L., & Rasinski, K. (2000). The Psychology of Survey Response. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Uriarte, E. (1997). El análisis de las élites políticas en las democracias. Revista de Estudios Políticos, 9, 249–275.

    Google Scholar 

  • Uriarte, E. (2000). La política como vocación y como profesión: análisis de las motivaciones y de la carrera política de los diputados españoles. Revista Española de Ciencias Política, 3, 97–124.

    Google Scholar 

  • Uriarte, E. (2004). Políticos, ciudadanos y desafección política. In L. López Nieto (Ed.), Entre el deseo y la realidad. ¿Políticos profesionales o vocacionales? (pp. 69–83). Madrid: UNED Ediciones.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Liefferinge, H., & Steyvers, K. (2009). Family Matters? Degrees of Family Politization in Political Recruitment and Career start of Mayors in Belgium. Acta Politica, 44(2), 125–149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verba, S., Burns, N., & Schlozman, K. L. (1997). Knowing and Caring about Politics: Gender and Political Engagement. Journal of Politics, 59, 1051–1072.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weber, M. (1946). Politics as Vocation. In H. H. Gerth, & Ch. Wright Mills (eds. & trads.), From Max Weber: Essays in Sociology (pp: 77–128). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whiteley, P., & Seyd, P. (2002). High Intensity Participation. The Dynamics of Party Activism in Britain. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Manuel Portillo-Pérez .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Portillo-Pérez, M., Del Río, A. (2021). New Political Scenario, New Motivations?. In: Coller, X., Sánchez-Ferrer, L. (eds) Politicians in Hard Times. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-70242-7_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics