Skip to main content

Cognitive Domains in Low Literacy Populations: The Experience of the Maracaibo Aging Study

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Understanding the Context of Cognitive Aging

Abstract

Although there is a growing interest in improving cognitive abilities in older adults, there has been considerable variation in how different cognitive domains have been conceptualized over time. Broadly, neuropsychology assumes that cognitive processes are fundamentally similar across humankind (Nell, 1999), and as such, the manner in which cognitive processes are assessed is similar across cultures (Rivera Mindt, Byrd, Saez, & Manly, 2010).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • American Psychiatric Association. (1994). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arbuckle, J. L. (2003). AMOS 5.0 [computer software]. Chicago: SPSS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ardila, A. (2005). Cultural values underlying psychometric cognitive testing. Neuropsychology Review, 15(4), 185–195. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11065-005-9180-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Axelsson, Ö., Berglund, B., & Molero Suárez, M. (2010). Soundscape management urgently needed in developing countries. In Inter Noise 2010. Lisbon, Portugal: Portuguese Acoustical Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benton, A. (1955). The visual retention test. New York: The Psychological Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berry, C. M., Clark, M. A., & McClure, T. K. (2011). Racial/ethnic differences in the criterion-related validity of cognitive ability tests: A qualitative and quantitative review. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96(5), 881.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blessed, G., Tomlinson, B. E., & Roth, M. (1968). The association between quantitative measures of dementia and of senile change in the cerebral grey matter of elderly subjects. The British Journal of Psychiatry, 114(512), 797–811.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bollen, K. A. (1989). Structural equations with latent variables. New York: John Wiley & Sons.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Buschke, H., & Fuld, P. A. (1974). Evaluating storage, retention, and retrieval in disordered memory and learning. Neurology, 24(11), 1019–1025.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Byrne, B. M. (2001). Structural equation modeling with AMOS, EQS, and LISREL: Comparative approaches to testing for the factorial validity of a measuring instrument. International Journal of Testing, 1(1), 55–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chou, C.-P., & Bentler, P. M. (1995). Estimates and tests in structural equation modeling. In R. H. Hoyle (Ed.), Structural equation modeling concepts, issues, and applications (pp. 37–54). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Costello, A. B., & Osborne, J. W. (2005). Best practices in exploratory factor analysis: Four recommendations for getting the most from your analysis. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 10(7), 1–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cummings, J. L., Mega, M., Gray, K., Rosenberg-Thompson, S., Carusi, D. A., & Gornbein, J. (1994). The neuropsychiatric inventory: Comprehensive assessment of psychopathology in dementia. Neurology, 44(12), 2308–2314.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • D’Angiulli, A., Lipina, S. J., & Olesinska, A. (2012). Explicit and implicit issues in the developmental cognitive neuroscience of social inequality. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 6, 254. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2012.00254

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dotson, V. M., Kitner-Triolo, M. H., Evans, M. K., & Zonderman, A. B. (2009). Effects of race and socioeconomic status on the relative influence of education and literacy on cognitive functioning. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 15(4), 580–589. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1355617709090821

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Early, D. R., Widaman, K. F., Harvey, D., Beckett, L., Park, L. Q., Farias, S. T., … Mungas, D. (2013). Demographic predictors of cognitive change in ethnically diverse older persons. Psychology and Aging, 28(3), 633–645. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0031645

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farias, S. T., Mungas, D., Hinton, L., & Haan, M. (2011). Demographic, neuropsychological, and functional predictors of rate of longitudinal cognitive decline in Hispanic older adults. The American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 19(5), 440–450. https://doi.org/10.1097/JGP.0b013e3181e9b9a5. PMID: 20808135; PMCID: PMC3200310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodglass, H., & Kaplan, D. (1983). The assessment of aphasia and related disorders (2nd ed.). Philadelphia: Lea & Febiger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gupta, S., Vaida, F., Riggs, K., Jin, H., Grant, I., Cysique, L., … Heaton, R. K. (2011). Neuropsychological performance in mainland China: The effect of urban/rural residence and self-reported daily academic skill use. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 17(1), 163-173. doi: S1355617710001384 [pii]https://doi.org/10.1017/S1355617710001384.

  • Gustafsson, J.-E. (1984). A unifying model for the structure of intellectual abilities. Intelligence, 8, 179–203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Helms-Lorenz, M., Van de Vijver, F. J. R., & Poortinga, Y. H. (2003). Cross-cultural differences in cognitive performance and Spearman's hypothesis: g or c? Intelligence, 31(1), 9–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0160-2896(02)00111-3

  • Hui, C. H., & Triandis, H. C. (1985). The instability of response sets. Public Opinion Quarterly, 49(2), 253–260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jukes, M. C., & Grigorenko, E. L. (2010). Assessment of cognitive abilities in multiethnic countries: The case of the Wolof and Mandinka in the Gambia. The British Journal of Educational Psychology, 80(Pt 1), 77–97. doi: bjep746 [pii]https://doi.org/10.1348/000709909X475055.

  • Kawas, C., Segal, J., Stewart, W. F., Corrada, M., & Thal, L. J. (1994). A validation study of the dementia questionnaire. Archives of Neurology, 51(9), 901–906.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kline, R. B. (2011). Convergence of structural equation modeling and multilevel modeling.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Maestre, G. E., Pino-Ramirez, G., Molero, A. E., Silva, E. R., Zambrano, R., Falque, L., … Sulbaran, T. A. (2002). The Maracaibo aging study: Population and methodological issues. Neuroepidemiology, 21(4), 194–201. doi: 59524 [pii]59524.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manly, J. J., Byrd, D. A., Touradji, P., & Stern, Y. (2004). Acculturation, reading level, and neuropsychological test performance among African American elders. Applied Neuropsychology, 11(1), 37–46. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15324826an1101_5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mattis, S. (1976). Mental status examination for organic mental syndrome in the elderly patient. In I. Bellak & T. B. Karasu (Eds.), Geriatric psychiatry (pp. 77–121). New York: Grune & Stratton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moraes, C., Pinto, J. A., Jr., Lopes, M. A., Litvoc, J., & Bottino, C. M. (2010). Impact of sociodemographic and health variables on mini-mental state examination in a community-based sample of older people. European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience, 260(7), 535–542. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00406-010-0104-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morris, J. C. (1993). The clinical dementia rating (CDR): Current version and scoring rules. Neurology, 43(11), 2412–2414.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nell, V. (1999). Cross-cultural neuropsychological assessment: Theory and practice. Psychology Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Parker, C., & Philp, I. (2004). Screening for cognitive impairment among older people in black and minority ethnic groups. Age and Ageing, 33(5), 447–452. https://doi.org/10.1093/ageing/afh135afh135. [pii].

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pedraza, O., & Mungas, D. (2008). Measurement in cross-cultural neuropsychology. Neuropsychology Review, 18(3), 184–193. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11065-008-9067-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Proust-Lima, C., Amieva, H., Letenneur, L., Orgogozo, J. M., Jacqmin-Gadda, H., & Dartigues, J. F. (2008). Gender and education impact on brain aging: A general cognitive factor approach. Psychology and Aging, 23(3), 608–620. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0012838. PMID: 18808250

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rivera Mindt, M., Byrd, D., Saez, P., & Manly, J. (2010). Increasing culturally competent neuropsychological services for ethnic minority populations: A call to action. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 24(3), 429–453. https://doi.org/10.1080/13854040903058960

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosen, W. (1981). The Rosen drawing test. Bronx, NY: Veterans Admisnitration Medical Center.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwab, R., & England, A. C. (1969). Projection Technique for evaluating surgery in Parkinson’s Disease. Edinburgh, Scotland: Paper presented at the Third Symposium of Parkinson’s Disease.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siedlecki, K. L., Honig, L. S., & Stern, Y. (2008). Exploring the structure of a neuropsychological battery across healthy elders and those with questionable dementia and Alzheimer’s disease. Neuropsychology, 22(3), 400–411. https://doi.org/10.1037/0894-4105.22.3.400

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Siedlecki, K. L., Manly, J. J., Brickman, A. M., Schupf, N., Tang, M. X., & Stern, Y. (2010). Do neuropsychological tests have the same meaning in Spanish speakers as they do in English speakers? Neuropsychology, 24(3), 402-411. doi: 2010-07896-012 [pii]10.1037/a0017515.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snitz, B. E., Unverzagt, F. W., Chang, C. C., Bilt, J. V., Gao, S., Saxton, J., … Ganguli, M. (2009). Effects of age, gender, education and race on two tests of language ability in community-based older adults. International Psychogeriatrics, 21(6), 1051-1062. doi: S1041610209990214 [pii]10.1017/S1041610209990214.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stern, Y., Andrews, H., Pittman, J., Sano, M., Tatemichi, T., Lantigua, R., & Mayeux, R. (1992). Diagnosis of dementia in a heterogeneous population. Development of a neuropsychological paradigm-based diagnosis of dementia and quantified correction for the effects of education. Archives of Neurology, 49(5), 453–460. https://doi.org/10.1001/archneur.1992.00530290035009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thurstone, E. (1938). Primary mental abilities. Chicago: Chicago University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verhey, F. R., Huppert, F. A., Korten, E. C., Houx, P., de Vugt, M., van Lang, N., … Jolles, J. (2003). Cross-national comparisons of the Cambridge cognitive examination-revised: The CAMCOG-R: Results from the European harmonization project for instruments in dementia. Age and Ageing, 32(5), 534–540.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van de Vijver, F. J., Leung, K., & Leung, K. (1997). Methods and data analysis for cross-cultural research (Vol. 1). Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van de Vijver, F. J., & Poortinga, Y. H. (1997). Towards an integrated analysis of bias in cross-cultural assessment. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 13(1), 29–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wechsler, D. (1981). Wechsler adult intelligence scale revised. New York: The Psychological Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • West, S. G., Finch, J. F., & Curran, P. J. (1995). Structural equation models with non-normal variables: Problems and remedies. In R. H. Hoyle (Ed.), Structural equation modeling: Concepts, issues, and applications (pp. 56–75). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

In memory of Milady Urribarri, who died September 5, 2016 and contributed extensively to the cognitive testing in Maracaibo Aging Study. This work was supported by Grants G-97000726 from FONACIT (Maestre, Pino, Arteaga), 1R01AG036469-01A1 from the National Institute on Aging and Fogarty International Center (Maestre, Melgarejo). None of the sources of financial support for this study had any involvement in study design, collection, analysis, or interpretation of data, nor in the writing of the report or in the decision to submit the material for publication. We also acknowledge the South Texas Diabetes and Obesity Institute (STDOI) for support in preparation of this report.

Declaration of Interest

The authors declared no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gladys E. Maestre .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Arteaga-Bracho, E.E. et al. (2021). Cognitive Domains in Low Literacy Populations: The Experience of the Maracaibo Aging Study. In: Angel, J.L., López Ortega, M., Gutierrez Robledo, L.M. (eds) Understanding the Context of Cognitive Aging. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-70119-2_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-70119-2_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-70118-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-70119-2

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics