Abstract
This chapter centres on the professional preparation of English Language Teaching (ELT) professionals in CLIL settings and specifically addresses the preparation of these professionals to effectively develop the types of academic language that students need for successful outcomes in academic settings in the United States. The chapter focuses on the development of academic English at the Pk-12 in the US and how traditional TESOL/ELT degree programmes approach the professional preparation of educators. The focus is on CLIL settings (North American K-12 context), where the focus is on the teaching of language and content simultaneously in formal academic settings and where teachers primarily see themselves as teaching both language and content.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Andrews, S. (2007). Teacher language awareness. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Arkoudis, S. (2003). Teaching English as a second language in science classes: Incommensurate epistemologies. Language and Education, 17(3), 161–173.
Arkoudis, S. (2006). Negotiating the rough ground between ESL and mainstream teachers. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 9(4), 415–433.
Baecher, L., Farnsworth, T., & Ediger, A. (2014). The challenges of planning language objectives in content-based ESL instruction. Language Teaching Research, 18(1), 118–136.
Baecher, L., Farnsworth, T., & Ediger, A. (2017). Teacher planning in content-based instruction: Supports for developing novice teachers’ language awareness. In M. A. Snow & D. Brinton (Eds.), The content-based classroom: New perspectives on integrating language and content (pp. 79–96). Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
Bailey, A. L. (2007). The language demands of school: Putting academic English to the test. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Baker, C. (2011). Foundations of bilingual education and bilingualism (5th ed.). Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters.
Cummins, J. (1979). Linguistic interdependence and the educational development of bilingual children. Review of Educational Research, 49(2), 222–251.
de Oliveira, L. C., & Cheng, D. (2011). Language and the multisemiotic nature of mathematics. The Reading Matrix, 11(3), 255–268.
DelliCarpini, M. (2009). Enhancing cooperative learning in TESOL teacher education. ELT Journal, 63(1), 42–50.
DelliCarpini, M. (2014). Modeling collaboration for ESL teacher candidates. The New Educator, 10(2), 129–144.
DelliCarpini, M. (2018). Administrative issues in collaborative teaching. In J. I. Liontas (Ed.), The TESOL encyclopedia of English language teaching. Boston: Wiley.
DelliCarpini, M., & Alonso, O. B. (2013). Content-based instruction. Boston: Wiley-Blackwell.
DelliCarpini, M., & Alonso, O. B. (2014). Teacher education that works: Preparing secondary-level math and science teachers for success with English language learners through content-based instruction. Global Education Review, 1(4), 155–178.
DelliCarpini, M., & Alonso, O. B. (2015). Teaching everything to no one and nothing to everyone: Addressing the content in content-based instruction. In T. Farrell (Ed.), International perspectives on language teacher education: Innovations from the field (pp. 51–73). Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave.
DelliCarpini, M., & Gulla, A. (2009). Success with Ells: Creating space for collaboration. English Journal, 98(4), 133–137.
DelliCarpini, M., & Gulla, A. N. (2010). Crossing borders: Interdisciplinary collaboration among teacher education faculty. In I. Park, H. Widodo, & A. Cirocki (Eds.), Observation of teaching: Bridging theory and practice through research on teaching. Munich, Germany: Lincom Europa.
DelliCarpini, M., & Gulla, A. N. (2017). Preparing pre-service teachers to work with ELLs in the mainstream, ELA classroom through collaboration and two-way CBI. In L. de Oliveira & M. Shoffner (Eds.), ELA teachers and ELL students: Preparing English language arts teachers to teach English language learners (pp. 79–106). Urbana, IL: NCTE.
Giles, A., & Yazan, B. (2019). ESL and content teachers’ collaboration. Indonesian Journal of English Language Teaching, 14(1), 125–142.
Giles, A., & Yazan, B. (2020). “You’re not an island”: A middle grades language arts teacher’s changed perceptions in ESL and content teachers’ collaboration. RMLE Online, 43(3), 1–15.
Gottlieb, M., & Ernst-Slavit, G. (2014). Academic language in diverse classrooms. Thousand Oaks, CA: Routledge.
Hansen-Thomas, H., Langman, J., & Farias Sokoloski, T. (2018). The role of language objectives: Strengthening math and science teachers’ language awareness with emergent bilinguals in secondary classrooms. LACLIL Journal, 11(2), 193–214.
Lindahl, K. (2019). Teacher language awareness development and its implications for new educators. The New Educator, 15(2), 85–100.
Lucas, T., & Villegas, A. M. (2013). Preparing linguistically responsive teachers: Laying the foundation in pre-service teacher education. Theory Into Practice, 52(2), 98–109.
Miles, M., & Huberman, A. (1984). Qualitative data analysis. London: Sage.
Peercy, M. M., DeStefano, M., Kidwell, T., & RamĂrez, R. (2016). Co-constructing practice in an online ESOL literacy methods course. Professional Development in Education, 42(5), 752–766.
Quintero, D., & Hansen, M. (2017). English learners and the growing need for qualified teachers. Brookings Institute, Brown Center Chalkboard.
Schleppegrell, M. J. (2004/2010). The language of schooling: A functional linguistics perspective. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Snow, C. E. (2010). Academic language and the challenge of learning about science. Science, 328(5977), 450–452.
The National Clearinghouse for English Language Acquisition and Language Instruction Educational Programs. (2007). Fast facts.
Thomas, W. P., & Collier, V. P. (2002). A national study of school effectiveness for language minority students’ long-term academic achievement (Final Report). Santa Cruz, CA: Center for Research on Education, Diversity & Excellence.
Uccelli, P., & Galloway, E. (2017). Academic language across content areas: Lessons from an innovative assessment and from students’ reflections about language. Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy, 60(4), 395–404.
Uccelli, P., Galloway, E., Barr, C. D., Meneses, A., & Dobbs, C. L. (2015). Beyond vocabulary: Exploring cross-disciplinary academic-language proficiency and its association with reading comprehension. Reading Research Quarterly, 50(3), 337–356.
U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics. (2020). English language learnewrs in public schools. Washington D.C. Author.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Appendix A: Course Structure
Appendix A: Course Structure
Course goals:
-
Support secondary-level content teachers in teaching ENL students in the mainstream, secondary content classroom
-
Support ENL teachers in their ability to understand and effectively engage in CBI
-
Build Teacher Language Awareness and skills around the development of academic language
-
Support collaborative partnerships between secondary-level ENL and content teachers
Course structure
-
Ongoing development of a framework identifying and assessing linguistic issues related to the development of academic language in both the ENL classroom and mainstream secondary content classroom
-
Explicit ongoing development of TLA combined with embedded, contextually relevant instruction about language, the language of the discipline, and the linguistic demands of learning the content in a language other than the students’ native language
-
Weekly readings related to the topic and guided reflections on the readings, course discussions, and experiences in the candidates’ field placement
-
Lecture, discussion, and a related group activity
-
Field observations reflections (Reflecting on reflections)
-
Course assignments (in detail, to follow)
Course assignments
-
Narrative inquiry
-
Collaboratively developed content/ENL units of study explicitly addressing the needs identified, using the knowledge and skills gained during the course
-
Position paper: Participants, through individual and collaborative inquiry, reading/reflecting, analysis of classroom observations, and reflective discussions and writing problematise the identified needs, reconceptualising and reframing their initial needs/solutions within a theoretical and sociocultural context.
-
Action research
-
Field observations
-
Guided reflections
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
DelliCarpini, M. (2021). Developing the C in Content and Language Integrated Learning: Teacher Preparation That Builds Learners’ Content Knowledge and Academic Language Through Teacher Collaboration and Integrated Pedagogical Training. In: Hemmi, C., Banegas, D.L. (eds) International Perspectives on CLIL. International Perspectives on English Language Teaching. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-70095-9_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-70095-9_11
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-70094-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-70095-9
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)