Skip to main content

A New Genre Arena? Questions of Genre in the Digital Age of Promotional Media

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Media and Genre
  • 407 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter examines how advertising materials of film and television do not simply advertise the “primary” text, nor do they offer “pure” industrial information; it argues that they serve a more complex purpose. As specifically created, stylized, and choreographed texts, promotional materials promote, amongst other things, specific generic features. These materials work to establish genre implications not only by opening up generic references but also by critically interrogating assumptions and ideas surrounding generic definitions. Although journalistic discourses and industrial advertising materials have been considered as significant to the genre identity of a movie or series, these older analyses could not take into consideration the many changes the digital transformation has brought on to media industries and marketing practices. Combining new approaches from media studies, productions studies, and promotional screen studies, the chapter emphasizes that these materials are not simple marketing tools but embedded in an ongoing digital transformation of media industries, to which they have become the primary mode of operation. Drawing explicit connections between these approaches and genre theory sheds new light on the long-standing intermediary role promotional media have for genre in the digital age. Through an analysis of different promotional materials, the chapter approaches the question how do promotional media “work” generic references and signifiers today and what effect do they have on our understanding of genre? The analysis includes promotional materials such as making-ofs, still photographs, and teasers associated with the series Bates Motel, Scream Queens and Killing Eve, which circulate across multiple digital platforms. By addressing their aesthetic, semiotic, and spreadable value as well as the industrial theorizing they perform, the analysis shows that promotional media not only appeal to the audience’s interest in genres but also negotiates genre on different levels. By using iconic references, a familiarity with specific generic worlds and a sense of irony, promotional media generate the generic significance of the associated primary text and sets specific viewing expectations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    The relationship between the role of stars and genres has been subject in several studies, including, among others, Kernan (2004), Dyer (1998), and Britton (1991).

  2. 2.

    By pointing to the promotional nature of making-ofs, this chapter neither implies a critique of those features, nor tends to reproach makings ofs for misleading the audience. Audiences know very well that the promise to get a look ‘behind the scenes’ does not include an insight in the socio-critical sense of labor.

  3. 3.

    The term “nostalgic” used here refers to Abend et al. (2017) who define nostalgia as an emotional state which longs for the return to a (former) place that represents another time. For a more detailed discussion of nostalgia see Boym (2001) who makes the distinction between “restorative” and “reflective” nostalgia.

  4. 4.

    According to Jacobs, film stills were a well-defined photographic genre and an established studio practice during Hollywood’s classic era (2010, 378). With the end of the studio era, studio film stills disappeared, while magazines or agencies started sending their own photographers to cover the life of Hollywood stars. Although Jacobs states that the implementation of video technologies has made the distinction between stills and enlargements irrelevant, many still images are still circulating today (ibid., 386).

References

  • Abend, Pablo, et al. 2017. Einleitung. In Just Little Bits of History Repeating. Medien|Nostalgie|Retromanie, ed. Pablo Abend et al., 11–35. Münster/Berlin: LIT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Albarran, Alan B. 2009. The Transformation of the Media and Communication Industries: A 21st Century Examination and Analysis. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.21235.07204.

  • Altman, Rick. 1999. Film/Genre. London: BFI.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Boym, Svetlana. 2001. The Future of Nostalgia. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Britton, Andrew. 1991. Stars and Genre. In Stardom: Industry of Desire, ed. Christine Gledhill, 198–206. London: Routlegde.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Caldwell, John T. 2009. Screen Studies and Industrial ‘Theorizing’. Screen 50 (1): 167–179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clover, Carol J. 2015. Men, Women, and Chain Saws. Gender in the Modern Horror Film. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, Jim. 2012. Genericity in the Nineties: Eclectic Irony and the New Sincerity. In Film Theory Goes to the Movies, ed. Jim Collins et al., 242–263. New York: Routledge.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Dyer, Richard. 1998. Stars. London: British Film Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, John. 1981. Visible Fictions: Cinema, Television, Video. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finler, Joel W. 1995. Hollywood Movie Stills: The Golden Age. London: BT Batsford Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Florin, Bo et al., ed. 2016. Films That Sell. Moving Pictures and Advertising. London: Palgrave.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grainge, Paul, and Catherine Johnson. 2015. Promotional Screen Industries. London/New York: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gray, Jonathan. 2010. Show Sold Separately. Promos, Spoiler, and Other Media Paratexts. New York: New York University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hediger, Vinzenz. 2001. Verführung zum Film. Der amerikanische Kinotrailer seit 1912. Marburg: Schüren.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hediger, Vinzenz. 2004. Trailer Online. Der Hypertext als Paratext oder das Internet als Vorhof des Films. In Paratexte in Literatur, Film, Fernsehen, ed. Klaus Kreimeier and Georg Stanitzek, 283–299. Berlin: Akademie Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hediger, Vinzenz, and Patrick Vonderau. 2005. Landkarten des Vergnügens: Genres in Filmwerbung und Filmvermarktung. In Demnächst in Ihrem Kino. Grundlagen der Filmwerbung und Filmvermarktung, ed. Vinzenz Hediger and Patrick Vonderau, 240–248. Marburg: Schüren.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs, Steven. 2010. The History and Aesthetics of the Classical Film Still. History of Photography 34 (4): 373–386.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins, Henry, et al. 2013. Spreadable Media: Creating Value and Meaning in a Networked Culture. New York: New York University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kernan, Lisa. 2004. Coming Attractions: Reading American Movie Trailers. Austin: University of Texas Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kerrigan, Final. 2017. Film Marketing. Abingdon/New York: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, Vicki. 2011. Below the Line. Producers and Production Studies in the New Television Economy. Durham: Duke University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Neale, Steve. 1980. Genre. London: British Film Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neale, Steve. 2012. Questions of Genre. In Film Genre Reader IV, ed. Barry Keith Grant, 178–202. Austin: University of Texas Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Staiger, Janet. 1990. Announcing Wares, Winning Patrons, Voicing Ideals. Thinking about the History and Theory of Film Advertising. Cinema Journal 29 (3): 3–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vonderau, Patrick. 2016. Introduction: On Advertising’s Relation to Moving Pictures. In Films That Sell. Moving Pictures and Advertising, ed. Bo Florin et al., 1–18. London: BFI, Palgrave.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, Linda. 2012. Film Bodies. Gender, Genre, and Excess. In Film Genre Reader IV, ed. Barry Keith Grant, 159–177. Austin: University of Texas Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wyatt, Justin. 1994. High Concept. Movies and Marketing in Hollywood. Austin: University of Texas Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Karina Kirsten .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Kirsten, K. (2021). A New Genre Arena? Questions of Genre in the Digital Age of Promotional Media. In: Ritzer, I. (eds) Media and Genre. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-69866-9_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics