Abstract
This chapter examines how advertising materials of film and television do not simply advertise the “primary” text, nor do they offer “pure” industrial information; it argues that they serve a more complex purpose. As specifically created, stylized, and choreographed texts, promotional materials promote, amongst other things, specific generic features. These materials work to establish genre implications not only by opening up generic references but also by critically interrogating assumptions and ideas surrounding generic definitions. Although journalistic discourses and industrial advertising materials have been considered as significant to the genre identity of a movie or series, these older analyses could not take into consideration the many changes the digital transformation has brought on to media industries and marketing practices. Combining new approaches from media studies, productions studies, and promotional screen studies, the chapter emphasizes that these materials are not simple marketing tools but embedded in an ongoing digital transformation of media industries, to which they have become the primary mode of operation. Drawing explicit connections between these approaches and genre theory sheds new light on the long-standing intermediary role promotional media have for genre in the digital age. Through an analysis of different promotional materials, the chapter approaches the question how do promotional media “work” generic references and signifiers today and what effect do they have on our understanding of genre? The analysis includes promotional materials such as making-ofs, still photographs, and teasers associated with the series Bates Motel, Scream Queens and Killing Eve, which circulate across multiple digital platforms. By addressing their aesthetic, semiotic, and spreadable value as well as the industrial theorizing they perform, the analysis shows that promotional media not only appeal to the audience’s interest in genres but also negotiates genre on different levels. By using iconic references, a familiarity with specific generic worlds and a sense of irony, promotional media generate the generic significance of the associated primary text and sets specific viewing expectations.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
- 1.
- 2.
By pointing to the promotional nature of making-ofs, this chapter neither implies a critique of those features, nor tends to reproach makings ofs for misleading the audience. Audiences know very well that the promise to get a look ‘behind the scenes’ does not include an insight in the socio-critical sense of labor.
- 3.
The term “nostalgic” used here refers to Abend et al. (2017) who define nostalgia as an emotional state which longs for the return to a (former) place that represents another time. For a more detailed discussion of nostalgia see Boym (2001) who makes the distinction between “restorative” and “reflective” nostalgia.
- 4.
According to Jacobs, film stills were a well-defined photographic genre and an established studio practice during Hollywood’s classic era (2010, 378). With the end of the studio era, studio film stills disappeared, while magazines or agencies started sending their own photographers to cover the life of Hollywood stars. Although Jacobs states that the implementation of video technologies has made the distinction between stills and enlargements irrelevant, many still images are still circulating today (ibid., 386).
References
Abend, Pablo, et al. 2017. Einleitung. In Just Little Bits of History Repeating. Medien|Nostalgie|Retromanie, ed. Pablo Abend et al., 11–35. Münster/Berlin: LIT.
Albarran, Alan B. 2009. The Transformation of the Media and Communication Industries: A 21st Century Examination and Analysis. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.21235.07204.
Altman, Rick. 1999. Film/Genre. London: BFI.
Boym, Svetlana. 2001. The Future of Nostalgia. New York: Basic Books.
Britton, Andrew. 1991. Stars and Genre. In Stardom: Industry of Desire, ed. Christine Gledhill, 198–206. London: Routlegde.
Caldwell, John T. 2009. Screen Studies and Industrial ‘Theorizing’. Screen 50 (1): 167–179.
Clover, Carol J. 2015. Men, Women, and Chain Saws. Gender in the Modern Horror Film. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Collins, Jim. 2012. Genericity in the Nineties: Eclectic Irony and the New Sincerity. In Film Theory Goes to the Movies, ed. Jim Collins et al., 242–263. New York: Routledge.
Dyer, Richard. 1998. Stars. London: British Film Institute.
Ellis, John. 1981. Visible Fictions: Cinema, Television, Video. London: Routledge.
Finler, Joel W. 1995. Hollywood Movie Stills: The Golden Age. London: BT Batsford Ltd.
Florin, Bo et al., ed. 2016. Films That Sell. Moving Pictures and Advertising. London: Palgrave.
Grainge, Paul, and Catherine Johnson. 2015. Promotional Screen Industries. London/New York: Routledge.
Gray, Jonathan. 2010. Show Sold Separately. Promos, Spoiler, and Other Media Paratexts. New York: New York University Press.
Hediger, Vinzenz. 2001. Verführung zum Film. Der amerikanische Kinotrailer seit 1912. Marburg: Schüren.
Hediger, Vinzenz. 2004. Trailer Online. Der Hypertext als Paratext oder das Internet als Vorhof des Films. In Paratexte in Literatur, Film, Fernsehen, ed. Klaus Kreimeier and Georg Stanitzek, 283–299. Berlin: Akademie Verlag.
Hediger, Vinzenz, and Patrick Vonderau. 2005. Landkarten des Vergnügens: Genres in Filmwerbung und Filmvermarktung. In Demnächst in Ihrem Kino. Grundlagen der Filmwerbung und Filmvermarktung, ed. Vinzenz Hediger and Patrick Vonderau, 240–248. Marburg: Schüren.
Jacobs, Steven. 2010. The History and Aesthetics of the Classical Film Still. History of Photography 34 (4): 373–386.
Jenkins, Henry, et al. 2013. Spreadable Media: Creating Value and Meaning in a Networked Culture. New York: New York University Press.
Kernan, Lisa. 2004. Coming Attractions: Reading American Movie Trailers. Austin: University of Texas Press.
Kerrigan, Final. 2017. Film Marketing. Abingdon/New York: Routledge.
Mayer, Vicki. 2011. Below the Line. Producers and Production Studies in the New Television Economy. Durham: Duke University Press.
Neale, Steve. 1980. Genre. London: British Film Institute.
Neale, Steve. 2012. Questions of Genre. In Film Genre Reader IV, ed. Barry Keith Grant, 178–202. Austin: University of Texas Press.
Staiger, Janet. 1990. Announcing Wares, Winning Patrons, Voicing Ideals. Thinking about the History and Theory of Film Advertising. Cinema Journal 29 (3): 3–31.
Vonderau, Patrick. 2016. Introduction: On Advertising’s Relation to Moving Pictures. In Films That Sell. Moving Pictures and Advertising, ed. Bo Florin et al., 1–18. London: BFI, Palgrave.
Williams, Linda. 2012. Film Bodies. Gender, Genre, and Excess. In Film Genre Reader IV, ed. Barry Keith Grant, 159–177. Austin: University of Texas Press.
Wyatt, Justin. 1994. High Concept. Movies and Marketing in Hollywood. Austin: University of Texas Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Kirsten, K. (2021). A New Genre Arena? Questions of Genre in the Digital Age of Promotional Media. In: Ritzer, I. (eds) Media and Genre. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-69866-9_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-69866-9_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-69865-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-69866-9
eBook Packages: Literature, Cultural and Media StudiesLiterature, Cultural and Media Studies (R0)