Abstract
By reflecting on the thinking that has come to prevail with regard to women and HIV and, doing so, by working back through an albeit brief outline genealogy of the development of PrEP, I examine how the relevancies of HIV prevention regimes have become folded into a particular scientific logic and why this should concern us. Without disputing the affordances of PrEP, in either pill or long-term acting form, I suggest that the WHO/UNAIDS 90-90-90 goals and, no less, an optimism for a future end to the dynamics of the epidemic is founded on a misplaced conception of what is at stake. Drawing on a branch of process philosophy that has earned the term ‘event-thinking’, I propose that if biomedicine is to be responsive to the relevancies of those affected by HIV, a more open conception of what is assumed by international health authorities as the ‘dynamics of the epidemic’ may be warranted.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
The interview is titled ‘Dr. Fauci Discusses Ending the HIV Epidemic from the 2019 IAS Conference on HIV Science’. It was was conducted by Anne Rancourt and is available online at https://www.niaid.nih.gov/news-events/ias-2019-fauci-discussion [accessed November 2019]
- 2.
There are a host of reasons that might be offered to explain why women did adhere to using PrEP in these two trials and not the others. For instance, knowing that a sexual partner is HIV positive was likely to be significant in the Partners PrEP trial. However, the smaller Botswana trial did not involve serodiscordant couples. Arguably, the most plausible is that the situated nature of the trials affected the outcome (see Rosengarten and Savransky 2018).
- 3.
I have purposely resisted speculating on what might comprise this multi-factorial terrain. First, because I do not want to attempt to speak for the women. Second, consistent with what I later propose of possibles, I do not want to impose a conventional and, no doubt, frequently pragmatically helpful disciplinary distinction of a social and a biological realm. As Whitehead remarks: ‘No one ever says, here I am and I have brought my body with me’ (Whitehead 1938/1968, p. 114).
- 4.
References
Auerbach, J. D., & Hoppe, T. A. (2015). Beyond “getting drugs into bodies”: Social science perspectives on pre-exposure prophylaxis for HIV. Journal of the International AIDS Society, 18(4, Suppl 3), 19983.
Baeten, J. M., Donnell, D., Ndase, P., Mugo, N. R., Campbell, J. D., Wangisi, J., et al. (2012). Antiretroviral prophylaxis for HIV prevention in heterosexual men and women. New England Journal of Medicine, 367(5), 399–410.
Blumenthal, J., & Haubrich, R. (2014). Risk compensation in PrEP: An old debate emerges yet again. The Virtual Mentor, 16(11), 909–915.
Cáceres, C. F., Goicochea, P., Sow, P.-S., Mayer, K. H., & Godfrey-Faussett, P. (2015). The promises and challenges of pre-exposure prophylaxis as part of the emerging paradigm of combination HIV prevention. Journal of the International AIDS Society, 18(4 (Suppl 3)), 19949.
Cairns, G. (n.d.). Magical thinking? FEM-PrEP trial may have failed because Participants used testing as prevention. Aidsmap.Com. Retrieved January 9, 2020, from https://www.aidsmap.com/news/jul-2013/magical-thinking-fem-prep-trial-may-have-failed-because-participants-used-testing.
Celum, C., Mgodi, N., Bekker, L., Hosek, S., Anderson, P., & Dye, B., et al. (2019) PrEP use in young African women in HPTN 082 effect of drug Level Feedback. Slide Presentation 23. Retrieved April 12, 2020, from http://www.natap.org/2019/IAS/2019CelumIAS_082primaryfindings_FINAL.pdf.
Deleuze, G. (1990). The logic of sense, C.V. Boundas (Ed.) (M. Lester & C. Stivale, Trans.). (Reprint ed.). New York: Columbia University Press.
Deleuze, G. (1994). Difference and repetition (P. Patton, Trans.). New York: Columbia University Press.
Epstein, S. (1998). Impure science: AIDS, activism and the politics of knowledge (New ed.). Berkeley: University of California Press.
Fleck, F. (2013). The new Women’s health agenda. World Health Organization. Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 91(9), 628–629.
Flowers, P. (2001). Gay men and HIV/AIDS risk management. Health: An Interdisciplinary Journal for the Social Study of Health, Illness and Medicine, 5(1), 50–75.
Flowers, P., & Davis, M. D. M. (2013). Understanding the biopsychosocial aspects of HIV disclosure among HIV-positive gay men in Scotland. Journal of Health Psychology, 18(5), 711–724.
Forbes, A. (2013). Mobilizing women at the grassroots to shape health policy: A case study of the global campaign for Microbicides. Reproductive Health Matters, 21(42), 174–183.
Fraser, M. (2009). Facts, ethics and event. In C. Bruun Jensen & K. Rodje (Eds.), Deleuzian intersections in science, technology and anthropology (pp. 57–82). New York: Berghahn Books.
Global Campaign for Microbicides (GCM). (n.d.). Retrieved December 20, 2019, from http://www.global-campaign.org/about.htm.
Grant, R. M., Lama, J. R., Anderson, P. L., McMahan, V., Liu, A. Y., Vargas, L., et al. (2010). Preexposure chemoprophylaxis for HIV prevention in men who have sex with men. New England Journal of Medicine, 363(27), 2587–2599.
Holt, M., & Murphy, D. (2017). Prevention optimism related to HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis: Shifting the focus from individual to community-level risk compensation. American Journal of Public Health, 107(10), 1568–1571.
IAS (International AIDS Society). (2005). Building collaboration to advance HIV prevention: Global consultation on tenofovir pre- exposure prophylaxis research. Retrieved July 1, 2012, from https://library.iasociety.org/MediaView.aspx?media_id=3391.
Jintarkanon, S., Napapiew, S., Tiendudom, N., Suwannawong, P., & Wilson, D. (2005). Unethical clinical trials in Thailand: A community response. Lancet, 365(9471), 1617–1618.
Kippax, S., & Race, K. (2003). Sustaining safe practice: Twenty years on. Social Science & Medicine, 57(1), 1–12.
Kippax, S., & Stephenson, N. (2012). Beyond the distinction between biomedical and social dimensions of HIV prevention through the Lens of a social public health. American Journal of Public Health, 102(5), 789–799.
Kippax, S., & Van de Ven, P. (1998). An epidemic of orthodoxy? Design and methodology in the evaluation of the effectiveness of HIV health promotion. Critical Public Health, 8(4), 371–386.
Koenig, L. J., Lyles, C., & Smith, D. K. (2013). Adherence to antiretroviral medications for HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 44(1), S91–S98.
Michael, M., & Rosengarten, M. (2013). Innovation and biomedicine: Ethics, evidence and expectation in HIV. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Newman, C., Hughes, S., Persson, A., Truong, H.-H. M., & Holt, M. (2019). Promoting ‘equitable access’ to PrEP in Australia: Taking account of stakeholder perspectives. AIDS and Behavior, 23(7), 1846–1857.
Nicholls, E., & Rosengarten, M. (2019). PrEP (HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis) and its possibilities for clinical practice. Sexualities. https://doi.org/10.1177/1363460719886556.
Race, K. (2012). Framing responsibility: HIV, biomedical prevention, and the performativity of the law. Journal of Bioethical Inquiry, 9(3), 327–338.
Race, K. (2016). Reluctant objects: Sexual pleasure as a problem for HIV biomedical prevention. GLQ: A Journal of Lesbian and Gay Studies, 22(1), 1–31.
Rosengarten, M. (2009). HIV interventions: Biomedicine and the traffic between information and flesh. In vivo. Seattle: University of Washington Press.
Rosengarten, M. (2017). Pluralities of action, a lure for speculative thought. In A. Wilkie, M. Savransky, & M. Rosengarten (Eds.), Speculative research: The lure of possible futures (pp. 71–83). Abingdon: Routledge.
Rosengarten, M., & Murphy, D. (2019). A wager on the future: A practicable response to HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) and the stubborn fact of process. Social Theory & Health, 18, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41285-019-00115-y.
Rosengarten, M., & Savransky, M. (2018). A careful biomedicine? Generalization and abstraction in RCTs. Critical Public Health, 29(2), 181–191.
Savransky, M. (2014). The adventure of relevance: An ethics of social inquiry. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Savransky, M. (2018). The social and its problems: On the problematic of sociology. In N. Marres, M. Guggenheim, & A. Wilkie (Eds.), Inventing the social (pp. 212–233). Manchester: Mattering Press.
Savransky, M., & Rosengarten, M. (2016). What is nature capable of? Evidence, ontology and speculative medical humanities. Medical Humanities, 42, 166–172.
Schillmeier, M. (2017). Eventful bodies. Oxfordshire and New York: Routledge.
Sehgal, M. (2018). Aesthetic concerns, philosophical fabulations: The importance of a “new aesthetic paradigm.”. SubStance, 47(1), 112–129.
Sheth, A. N., Rolle, C. P., & Gandhi, M. (2016). HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis for women. Journal of Virus Eradication, 2(3), 149–155.
Stein, Z. A. (1990). HIV prevention: The need for methods women can use. American Journal of Public Health, 80(4), 460–462.
Stengers, I. (2000). The invention of modern science (D. W. Smith, Trans). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Stengers, I. (2011). Sciences were never “Good.”. Common Knowledge, 17(1), 82–86.
Stengers, I., & Ralet, O. (1997). Drugs: Ethical choice or moral consensus. In I. Stengers (Ed.), Power and invention: Situating science (Paul Bains, P. Trans.) (pp. 215–232). Minneapolis and London: University of Minnesota Press.
Thigpen, M. C., Kebaabetswe, P. M., Paxton, L. A., Smith, D. K., Rose, C. E., Segolodi, T. M., et al. (2012). Antiretroviral Preexposure prophylaxis for heterosexual HIV transmission in Botswana. New England Journal of Medicine, 367(5), 423–434.
UNAIDS. (2019). 19.6 million girls and women living with HIV. Retrieved November 5, 2019, from https://www.unaids.org/en/resources/infographics/girls-and-women-living-with-HIV.
Valencia-Garcia, D., Rao, D., Strick, L., & Simoni, J. M. (2017). Women’s experiences with HIV-related stigma from health care providers in Lima, Peru: “I would rather die than go back for care”. Health Care for Women International, 38(2), 144–158.
van der Straten, A., Van Damme, L., Haberer, J. E., & Bangsberg, D. R. (2012). Unraveling the divergent results of pre-exposure prophylaxis trials for HIV prevention. AIDS, 26(7), F13–F19.
Whitehead, A. N. (1920/1964). The concept of nature (Reprint ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Whitehead, A. N. (1938/1968). Modes of thought. 1st free press paperback. New York: Fireside.
WHO/UNAIDS. (2006). Creating effective partnerships for HIV prevention trials: Report of a UNAIDS consultation, Geneva 20–21 June 2005. AIDS, 20(6), W1–W11.
Women’s Network for Unity, Cambodia. (2004, June 15). Protests drug trial recruitment tactics. Public statement released by WNU Secretariat.
Young, I., Flowers, P., & McDaid, L. (2016). Can a pill prevent HIV? Negotiating the Biomedicalisation of HIV prevention. Sociology of Health & Illness, 38(3), 411–425.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Rosengarten, M. (2021). An Unfinished History: A Story of Ongoing Events and Mutating HIV Problems. In: Bernays, S., Bourne, A., Kippax, S., Aggleton, P., Parker, R. (eds) Remaking HIV Prevention in the 21st Century. Social Aspects of HIV, vol 5. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-69819-5_21
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-69819-5_21
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-69818-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-69819-5
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)