Abstract
Industry 4.0 communication and data management technologies enable the development of distributed, product-driven control architectures, where intelligent products can play active roles in manufacturing control processes. Although simulation is a widespread practice to test, evaluate, compare and validate different design alternatives, there is still a lack of papers that assess and discuss the capabilities of available simulation software to meet and implement the requirements of such distribution as a design alternative. This paper provides an analysis of distributed, product driven control requirements and benchmarks them against the capabilities of two commercially available simulation software, namely FlexSim and AnyLogic. A comparison of the strengths and weaknesses of each software is provided through a case study.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
ODBC is a standard application programming interface (API) for accessing database management systems (DBMS).
- 2.
Dynamic-link library (DLL) is Microsoft's implementation of the shared library concept in the Microsoft Windows and OS/2 operating systems.
- 3.
R is a programming language and free software environment for statistical computing and graphics.
References
Derigent, W., Cardin, O., Trentesaux, D.: Industry 4.0: contributions of holonic manufacturing control architectures and future challenges. J. Intell. Manuf., 1–22 (2020)
Leitão, P., Mařík, V., Vrba, P.: Past, present, and future of industrial agent applications. IEEE Trans. Ind. Inf. 9(4), 2360–2372 (2013)
Mourtzis, D.: Simulation in the design and operation of manufacturing systems: state of the art and new trends. Int. J. Prod. Res. 58, 1–23 (2019)
Dias, L.M.S., Vieira, A.A.C., Pereira, G.A.B., Oliveira, J.A.: Discrete simulation software ranking - a top list of the worldwide most popular and used tools. In: Proceedings of the 2016 Winter Simulation Conference, pp. 1060–1071 (2016)
Abar, S., Theodoropoulos, G.K., Lemarinier, P., O’Hare, G.M.P.: Agent based modelling and simulation tools: a review of the state-of-art software. Comput. Sci. Rev. 24, 13–33 (2017)
Meyer, G.G., Framling, K., Holmstrom, J.: Intelligent products: a survey. Comput. Ind. 60, 137–148 (2009)
Kovalenko, I., Tilbury, D., Barton, K.: The model-based product agent: a control oriented architecture for intelligent products in multi-agent manufacturing systems. Control Eng. Pract. 86, 105–117 (2019)
Dias-Ferreira, J., Ribeiro, L., Akillioglu, H., Neves, P., Onori, M.: BIOSOARM: a bio-inspired self-organising architecture for manufacturing cyber-physical shopfloors. J. Intell. Manuf. 29(7), 1659–1682 (2018)
Zhang, L., Zhou, L., Ren, L., Laili, Y.: Modeling and simulation in intelligent manufacturing. Comput. Ind. 112, 103123 (2019)
Swain, J.J.: 2019 Simulation Software Survey, Software Survey (2019). https://pubsonline.informs.org/do/10.1287/orms.2019.05.10/full/. Accessed 18 Apr 2020
Guimarães, A.M.C., Leal, J.E., Mendes, P.: Discrete-event simulation software selection for manufacturing based on the maturity model. Comput. Ind. 103, 14–27 (2018)
Fumagalli, L., Polenghi, A., Negri, E., Roda, I.: Framework for simulation software selection. J. Simul. 13(4), 286–303 (2019)
Schreiber, S., Fay, A.: Requirements for the benchmarking of decentralized manufacturing control systems. In: IEEE International Conference on Emerging Technologies and Factory Automation, ETFA (2011)
Mönch, L.: Simulation-based benchmarking of production control schemes for complex manufacturing systems. Control Eng. Pract. 15(11), 1381–1393 (2007)
Cardin, O., L’Anton, A.: Proposition of an implementation framework enabling benchmarking of Holonic manufacturing systems. In: Studies in Computational Intelligence, vol. 762, pp. 267–280 (2018)
Ackoff, R.: From data to wisdom. J. Appl. Syst. Anal. 16(1), 3–9 (1989)
Valckenaers, P., Kollingbaum, M., Van Brussel, H.: Multi-agent coordination and control using stigmergy. Comput. Ind. 53(1), 75–96 (2004)
Ounnar, F., Ladet, P.: Consideration of machine breakdown in the control of flexible production systems. Int. J. Comput. Integr. Manuf. 17(1), 69–82 (2004)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Attajer, A., Darmoul, S., Chaabane, S., Riane, F., Sallez, Y. (2021). Benchmarking Simulation Software Capabilities Against Distributed Control Requirements: FlexSim vs AnyLogic. In: Borangiu, T., Trentesaux, D., Leitão, P., Cardin, O., Lamouri, S. (eds) Service Oriented, Holonic and Multi-Agent Manufacturing Systems for Industry of the Future. SOHOMA 2020. Studies in Computational Intelligence, vol 952. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-69373-2_38
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-69373-2_38
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-69372-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-69373-2
eBook Packages: Intelligent Technologies and RoboticsIntelligent Technologies and Robotics (R0)