Abstract
Water is a key element of all the ecosystems and creates a complex web of connections between nature and society that need to be properly understood and quantified. Ecosystem services assessment, combining ecology with economic evaluation, can help identify holistic management strategies that preserve the ecosystems multifunctionality while enhancing the benefits produced by water. In the last decades, Italy has moved towards the adoption of an “(eco)systemic approach” in natural resources management, from local pilot experiences (for instance, Regional Law no. 13/1997 in Piedmont) up to the recognition of the importance of Natural Capital and its accounting in the national legislation (the 2015 Collegato Ambientale). In between, several experiences of innovative management practices, such as Payments for Ecosystem Services, have been experimented. The overview here presented aims at giving evidence of the work done so far, highlighting the limits and potential of introducing the concept of ecosystem services to support watershed management.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Bagstad, K. J., Semmens, D. J., Waage, S., & Winthrop, R. (2013). A comparative assessment of decision-support tools for ecosystem services quantification and valuation. Ecosystem Services, 5, 27–39.
Bazilian, M., Rogner, H., Howells, M., Hermann, S., Arent, D., Gielen, D., & Yumkella, K. K. (2011). Considering the energy, water and food nexus: Towards an integrated modelling approach. Energy Policy, 39(12), 7896–7906.
Belnap, J., Welter, J. R., Grimm, N. B., Barger, N., & Ludwig, J. A. (2005). Linkages between microbial and hydrologic processes in arid and semiarid watersheds. Ecology, 86(2), 298–307.
Berardi, D., Borghini, A., Gusmerotti, N. M., Santolini, R., Signori, F., & Traini, S. (2017). Il capitale naturale: l’ambiente che vale. Acqua, 85, 1–23. Ref Ricerche ed. Milano.
Braat, L. C., & de Groot, R. (2012). The ecosystem services agenda: Bridging the worlds of natural science and economics, conservation and development, and public and private policy. Ecosystem Services, 1, 4–15.
Brauman, K. A. (2015). Hydrologic ecosystem services: linking ecohydrologic processes to human well‐being in water research and watershed management. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Water, 2(4), 345–358.
Brauman, K. A., Daily, G. C., Duarte, T. K. E., & Mooney, H. A. (2007). The nature and value of ecosystem services: An overview highlighting hydrologic services. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 32, 67–98.
Brouwer, R., Barton, D., Bateman, I., Brander, L., Georgiou, S., Martín-Ortega, J., & Wagtendonk, A. (2009). Economic valuation of environmental and resource costs and benefits in the water framework directive: Technical guidelines for practitioners. Amsterdam: Institute for Environmental Studies, VU University Amsterdam.
Carvalho, L., Mackay, E. B., Cardoso, A. C., Baattrup-Pedersen, A., Birk, S., Blackstock, K. L., & Globevnik, L. (2019). Protecting and restoring Europe’s waters: An analysis of the future development needs of the Water Framework Directive. Science of the Total Environment, 658, 1228–1238.
Cataldi, M. A., Morri, E., Scolozzi, R., Zaccarelli, N., Santolini, R., Pace, D. S., Berretta, C. (2010). Stima dei servizi ecosistemici a scala regionale come supporto a strategie di sostenibilità Evaluation of ecosystem services at regional scale as support.
CCN. (2017). Comitato per il Capitale Naturale. Primo rapporto sullo stato del capitale naturale in Italia.
CCN. (2018). Comitato per il Capitale Naturale. Secondo rapporto sullo stato del capitale naturale in Italia.
CCN (2019). Comitato per il Capitale Naturale. Terzo rapporto sullo stato del capitale naturale in Italia.
Costanza, R., & Daly, H. E. (1992). Natural capital and sustainable development. Conservation Biology, 6(1), 37–46.
Costanza, R., De Groot, R., Braat, L., Kubiszewski, I., Fioramonti, L., Sutton, P., ... & Grasso, M. (2017). Twenty years of ecosystem services: how far have we come and how far do we still need to go?. Ecosystem services, 28, 1–16.
Duku, C., Rathjens, H., Zwart, S. J., & Hein, L. (2015). Towards ecosystem accounting: a comprehensive approach to modelling multiple hydrological ecosystem services. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 19(10), 4377–4396
Eamus, D., Fu, B., Springer, A. E., & Stevens, L. E. (2016). Groundwater dependent ecosystems: Classification, identification techniques and threats. In Integrated groundwater management (pp. 313–346). Cham: Springer.
EEAC. (2019). The EU Water Framework Directive: Beyond the analysis of the partial success. Available at: http://eeac.eu/wp-content/uploads/2019/07/Summary-Document-19062019.pdf
Elmqvist, T., Tuvendal, M., Krishnaswamy, J., & Hylander, K. (2011). Managing trade-offs in ecosystem services. In Division of environmental policy implementation (Paper N° 4) (p. 15). The United Nations Environment Programme.
Falkenmark, M. (2003). Water management and ecosystems: Living with change (Vol. 9). Stockholm: Global water partnership.
Falkenmark, M., & Rockström, J. (2006). The new blue and green water paradigm: Breaking new ground for water resources planning and management. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, 132(3), 129–132.
Fisher, B., Turner, R. K., & Morling, P. (2009). Defining and classifying ecosystem services for decision-making. Ecological Economics, 68(3), 643–653.
Garcia, X., Barceló, D., Comas, J., Corominas, L., Hadjimichael, A., Page, T. J., & Acuña, V. (2016). Placing ecosystem services at the heart of urban water systems management. Science of the Total Environment, 563, 1078–1085.
Gordon, L. J., Finlayson, C. M., & Falkenmark, M. (2010). Managing water in agriculture for food production and other ecosystem services. Agricultural Water Management, 97(4), 512–519.
Grizzetti, B., Lanzanova, D., Liquete, C., Reynaud, A., & Cardoso, A. C. (2016). Assessing water ecosystem services for water resource management. Environmental Science & Policy, 61, 194–203.
Grizzetti, B., Liquete, C., Pistocchi, A., Vigiak, O., Zulian, G., Bouraoui, F., et al. (2019). Relationship between ecological condition and ecosystem services in European rivers, lakes and coastal waters. Science of the Total Environment, 671, 452–465.
IPBES. (2019). Global assessment report on biodiversity and ecosystem services of the intergovernmental science- policy platform on biodiversity and ecosystem services (E. S. Brondizio, J. Settele, S. Díaz, & H. T. Ngo, Eds.). Bonn: IPBES Secretariat
Maes, J., Liquete, C., Teller, A., Erhard, M., Paracchini, M. L., Barredo, J. I., & Meiner, A. (2016). An indicator framework for assessing ecosystem services in support of the EU Biodiversity Strategy to 2020. Ecosystem Services, 17, 14–23.
Maes, J., Teller, A., Erhard, M., Liquete, C., Braat, L., Berry, P., & Paracchini, M. L. (2013). Mapping and assessment of ecosystems and their services. An analytical framework for ecosystem assessments under action, 5, 1–58.
Martin-Ortega, J., Giannoccaro, G., & Berbel, J. (2011). Environmental and resource costs under water scarcity conditions: an estimation in the context of the European Water Framework Directive. Water Resources Management, 25(6), 1615–1633.
Martin-Ortega, J., Ferrier, R. C., Gordon, I. J., & Khan, S. (2015). Water ecosystem services: A global perspective (International hydrology series) (p. 175). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
MEA-Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. (2005). Ecosystems and human well-being: Synthesis (p. 155). Washington, DC: Island Press.
Mekonnen, M. M., & Hoekstra, A. Y. (2016). Four billion people facing severe water scarcity. Science Advances, 2(2), e1500323.
Metzger, M., Rounsevell, M. D. A., Acosta-Michlik, L., Leemans, R., & Schröter, D. (2006). The vulnerability of ecosystem services to land use change. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 114(1), 69–85.
Mooney, H. A., Ehrlich, P. R., & Daily, G. E. (1997). Ecosystem services: A fragmentary history. In Nature’s Services: Societal dependence on natural ecosystems (pp. 11–19).
O’Neill, J. (2013). Markets, deliberation and environment. London: Routledge.
Pacetti, T., Castelli, G., Bresci, & Caporali, E. (2020). Water values: Participatory water ecosystem services assessment in the Arno River Basin, Italy. Water Resources Management. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-020-02684-4.
Palomo, I., Martín-López, B., Potschin, M., Haines-Young, R., & Montes, C. (2013). National Parks, buffer zones and surrounding lands: Mapping ecosystem service flows. Ecosystem Services, 4, 104–116.
Pettenella, D., Vidale, E., Gatto, P., & Secco, L. (2012). Paying for water-related forest services: A survey on Italian payment mechanisms. Forest-Biogeosciences and Forestry, 5(4), 210.
Revenga, C., Brunner, J., Henninger, N., Kassem, K., & Payne, R. (2000). Freshwater systems. Washington, DC: World Resources Institute.
Salzman, J., Bennett, G., Carroll, N., Goldstein, A., & Jenkins, M. (2018). The global status and trends of Payments for Ecosystem Services. Nature Sustainability, 1(3), 136–144.
Santolini, R., & Morri, E. (2017a). Criteri ecologici per l’introduzione di sistemi di valutazione e remunerazione dei Servizi Ecosistemici (SE) nella progettazione e pianificazione. In La dimensione europea del consumo di suolo e le politiche nazionali, CRCS Rapporto 2017 (pp. 149–154). Roma: INU ed.
Santolini, R., & Morri, E. (2017b). Valutazione e mappatura dei Servizi Ecosistemici: strumenti di governance sostenibile del paesaggio (Urbanistica 158). Roma: INU ed.
Santolini, R., Morri, E., & D’Ambrogi, S. (2016). Connectivity and ecosystem services in the Alps. In C. Walzer (Ed.), ALPINE NATURE 2030– Concepts for the next generation from protected areas to an ecological continuum. Munchen: German Federal Ministry for the Environment.
Santolini, R., Morri, E., & Scolozzi, R. (2011). Mettere in gioco i servizi ecosistemici: Limiti e opportunità di nuovi scenari sociali ed economici. Ri-Vista. Ricerche Progetti. Paesaggio, 2011(4), 41–55.
Scolozzi, R., Cataldi, M., Morri, E., Santolini, R., & Zaccarelli, N. (2010). Il valore economico dei servizi ecosistemici in Italia dal 1990 al 2000: indicazioni per strategie di sostenibilità o vulnerabilità.
Scolozzi, R., Morri, E., & Santolini, R. (2012). Delphi-based change assessment in ecosystem service values to support strategic spatial planning in Italian landscapes. Ecological Indicators, 21, 134–144.
Staponites, L. R., Barták, V., Bílý, M., & Simon, O. P. (2019). Performance of landscape composition metrics for predicting water quality in headwater catchments. Scientific Reports, 9(1), 1–10.
Stets, E. G., Sprague, L. A., Oelsner, G. P., Johnson, H. M., Murphy, J. C., Ryberg, K., et al. (2020). Landscape drivers of dynamic change in water quality of US rivers. Environmental Science & Technology, 54(7), 4336–4343.
Vigerstol, K. L., & Aukema, J. E. (2011). A comparison of tools for modeling freshwater ecosystem services. Journal of Environmental Management, 92(10), 2403–2409.
WFD. (2000). European Directive 2000/60/EC – Water Framework Directive.
Wunder, S., & Wertz-Kanounnikoff, S. (2009). Payments for ecosystem services: A new way of conserving biodiversity in forests. Journal of Sustainable Forestry, 28(3–5), 576–596.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Santolini, R., Pacetti, T., Morri, E. (2021). Water-Dependent Ecosystems in Italy. In: Turrini, P., Massarutto, A., Pertile, M., de Carli, A. (eds) Water Law, Policy and Economics in Italy . Global Issues in Water Policy, vol 28. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-69075-5_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-69075-5_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-69074-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-69075-5
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)