Skip to main content

18F-FDG PET-CT and 18F-NaF in Treatment Response Evaluation: Bone Metastases and Bone Tumours

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Atlas of Clinical PET-CT in Treatment Response Evaluation in Oncology

Abstract

The ability of functional imaging to detect and monitor metastatic disease in the skeleton, with advantages over conventional imaging such as bone scintigraphy or computed tomography (CT), has led to positron emission tomography (PET), particularly with the tracer 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG), to be adopted into clinical practice. 18F-sodium fluoride (18F-NaF) is a bone-specific tracer with uptake related to local osteoblastic activity and mineralisation and may also be useful in breast, prostate and other cancers. The relationship between tumour activity and osteoblastic activity in skeletal metastases may therefore be complex and a careful assessment with full knowledge of the length and type of therapy is essential to accurately monitor disease response.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Cook GJ, Azad GK, Goh V. Imaging bone metastases in breast cancer: staging and response assessment. J Nucl Med. 2016;57(Suppl 1):27S–33S.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Mahajan A, Azad GK, Cook GJ. PET imaging of skeletal metastases and its role in personalizing further management. PET Clin. 2016;11:305–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Azad GK, Cook GJ. Multi-technique imaging of bone metastases: spotlight on PET-CT. Clin Radiol. 2016;71:620–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Cook GJ, Goh V. Functional and hybrid imaging of bone metastases. J Bone Miner Res. 2018;33:961–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Azad GK, Taylor BP, Green A, Sandri I, Swampillai A, Harries M, Kristeleit H, Mansi J, Goh V, Cook GJR. Prediction of therapy response in bone-predominant metastatic breast cancer: comparison of [(18)F] fluorodeoxyglucose and [(18)F]-fluoride PET/CT with whole-body MRI with diffusion-weighted imaging. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2019;46:821–30.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Tateishi U, Gamez C, Dawood S, Yeung HW, Cristofanilli M, Macapinlac HA. Bone metastases in patients with metastatic breast cancer: morphologic and metabolic monitoring of response to systemic therapy with integrated PET/CT. Radiology. 2008;247:189–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Specht J, Tam S, Kurland B, Gralow JR, Livingston RB, Linden HM, et al. Serial 2-[18F] fluoro-2-deoxy-d-glucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) to monitor treatment of bone-dominant metastatic breast cancer predicts time to progression (TTP). Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2007;105:87–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Cook GJ, Azad G, Padhani AR. Bone imaging in prostate cancer: the evolving roles of nuclear medicine and radiology. Clin Transl Imaging. 2016;4:439–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Azad GK, Taylor B, Rubello D, Colletti PM, Goh V, Cook GJ. Molecular and functional imaging of bone metastases in breast and prostate cancers: an overview. Clin Nucl Med. 2016;41:e44–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Yu EY, Duan F, Muzi M, Deng X, Chin BB, Alumkal JJ, et al. Castration-resistant prostate cancer bone metastasis response measured by 18F-fluoride PET after treatment with dasatinib and correlation with progression-free survival: results from American College of Radiology Imaging Network 6687. J Nucl Med. 2015;56:354–60.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Harmon SA, Perk T, Lin C, Eickhoff J, Choyke PL, Dahut WL, et al. Quantitative assessment of early [18F]sodium fluoride positron emission tomography/computed tomography response to treatment in men with metastatic prostate cancer to bone. J Clin Oncol. 2017;35:2829–37.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Hillner BE, Siegel BA, Hanna L, Duan F, Quinn B, Shields AF. 18F-fluoride PET used for treatment monitoring of systemic cancer therapy: results from the National Oncologic PET Registry. J Nucl Med. 2015;56:222–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gary J. R. Cook .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Cook, G.J.R., Usmani, S. (2021). 18F-FDG PET-CT and 18F-NaF in Treatment Response Evaluation: Bone Metastases and Bone Tumours. In: Fanti, S., Gnanasegaran, G., Carrió, I. (eds) Atlas of Clinical PET-CT in Treatment Response Evaluation in Oncology. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-68858-5_24

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-68858-5_24

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-68857-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-68858-5

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics