Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Interpersonal Relationships and Reciprocity: Their Influence in Knowledge Transfer Inside of Mexican Hotels

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Technological and Industrial Applications Associated With Industry 4.0

Part of the book series: Studies in Systems, Decision and Control ((SSDC,volume 347 ))

  • 463 Accesses

Abstract

Knowledge stands out as a strategic asset that has been employed from past times up to the present age. Its management began in recent decades, with an increasing business interest, except in the case of the tourism and hospitality sector. Knowledge transfer is one of the vital areas of this field. Interpersonal relationships, reciprocity and the intention to share are among the factors that affect it. To advance knowledge, in the context of hotels located on the island of Cozumel, Mexico, this work aims to establish whether the first two parameters influence the transfer of intra-hotel knowledge, through the mediation of the intention to share. The research design was quantitative, non-experimental, cross-sectional, correlational-causal, with an intentional non-probabilistic sample. Surveys were employed as the preferred data collection technique, applied through a self-administered questionnaire. The variables were measured with scale items available in literature, translated into Spanish, and adapted to the context. They were valued with a Likert-like measurement scale. Modeling structural equations (SEM) with partial least squares (PLS) was used as a statistical analysis technique. Interpersonal relationships have a significant impact on the intention to share and the expectation of reciprocity, but do not directly affect knowledge transfer. The expectation of reciprocity significantly influences the transfer and the intention to share. The intention to share knowledge impacts knowledge transfer. The strongest relationship arises between interpersonal relationships and the intention to share knowledge, mediated by an expectation of reciprocity. Interpersonal relationships influence the expectation of reciprocity both in a direct and indirect manner. Sharing knowledge is not only essential to improving the performance of individuals and businesses, it is also a moral challenge for organizations. Our findings show that, because of sharing knowledge, new services and work activities are created, and that knowledge becomes a part of normal work tasks in Mexican hotels. Moreover, we agree that interpersonal relationships favor knowledge transfer. On the expectation of reciprocity, we identify that these variable influences knowledge transfer. In this context, the variable was conveyed through people’s trust to share their knowledge with their co-workers in their certainty that, in doing so, they strengthen their relationship with them. Finally, the intention to share was the main direct antecedent of knowledge transfer inside hotels; is further reflected in the confidence of employees on the importance of sharing their knowledge and in their certainty that they can provide important knowledge for the hotel.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Aalbers, R., Dolfsma, W., Koppius, O.: Rich ties and innovative knowledge transfer within a firm. Br. J. Manage. 25(4), 833–848 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.12040

  2. Abdelwhab Ali, A., Panneer Selvam, D.D.D., Paris, L., Gunasekaran, A.: Key factors influencing knowledge sharing practices and its relationship with organizational performance within the oil and gas industry. J. Knowl. Manage. (2019). https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-06–2018-0394

  3. Ambrosini, V., Bowman, C.: Tacit knowledge: some suggestions for operationalizacion. J. Manage. Stud. 38(6), 811–829 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6486.00260

  4. Anderson, J.C., Gerbing, D.W.: Some methods for respecifying measurement models to obtain unidimensional construct measurement. J. Market. Res. 19(4), 453–460 (1982). https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378201900407

  5. Argote, L., Ingram, P.: Knowledge transfer: a basis for competitive advantage in firms. Organizat. Behav. Human Dec. Process. 82(1), 150–169 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1006/obhd.2000.2893

  6. Asrar-ul-Haq, M., Anwar, S.: A systematic review of knowledge management and knowledge sharing: trends, issues, and challenges. Cogent Bus. Manage. 3(1), 1127744 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2015.1127744

  7. Bal, P.M., Jansen, P.G.W., van der Velde, M.E.G., de Lange, A.H., Rousseau, D.M.: The role of future time perspective in psychological contracts: a study among older workers. J. Vocat. Behav. 76(3), 474–486 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Barroso, C., Carrión, G.C., Roldán, J.L.: Applying maximum likelihood and PLS on different sample sizes: studies on SERVQUAL model and employee behavior model. In: Vinzi, V.E., Chin, W.W., Henseler, J., Wang, H. (eds.) Handbook of Partial Least Squares: Concepts, Methods and Applications, pp. 427–447. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Bavik, Y.L., Tang, P.M., Shao, R., Lam, L.W.: Ethical leadership and employee knowledge sharing: exploring dual-mediation paths. Leader. Quart. 29(2), 322–332 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2017.05.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Berends, H., Vanhaverbeke, W., Kirschbaum, R.: Knowledge management challenges in new business development: case study observations. J. Eng. Technol. Manag. Jet-M 24(4), 314–328 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jengtecman.2007.09.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Blau, P.M.: On the Nature of Organizations. Wiley, New York (1974)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Bloodgood, J.M., Morrow Jr., J.L.: Strategic organizational change: exploring the roles of environmental structure, internal conscious awareness and knowledge. J. Manage. Stud. 40(7), 1761–1782 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6486.00399

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Bock, G.-W., Kim, Y.-G.: Breaking the myths of rewards: an exploratory study of attitudes about knowledge sharing. Inf. Res. Manage. J. 15(2), 14–21 (2002). https://doi.org/10.4018/irmj.2002040102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Bock, G.-W., Zmud, R.W., Kim, Y.-G., Lee, J.-N.: Behavioral intention formation in knowledge sharing: examining the roles of extrinsic motivators, social-psychological forces, and organizational climate. MIS Q. 29(1), 87–111 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Bollinger, A.S., Smith, R.D.: Managing organizational knowledge as a strategic asset. J. Knowl. Manage. 5(1), 8–18 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1108/13673270110384365

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Bourdieu, P.: The forms of capital. In: Handbook of Theory and Research for the Sociology of Education, pp. 241–258. Greenwood, New York (1986)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Cabrera, E.F., Cabrera, A.: Fostering knowledge sharing through people management practices. Int. J. Hum. Res. Manage. 16(5), 720–735 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1080/09585190500083020

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Castro, C., Fontela, E.: Transfer of socially complex knowledge in mergers and acquisitions. J. Knowl. Manage. 11(4), 58–71 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1108/13673270710762710

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Chadwick-Jones, J.K.: Social Exchange Theory: Its Structure and Influence in Social Psychology. Academic Press, New York (1976)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Chin, W.W.: How to write up and report PLS analyses. In: Vinzi, V.E., Chin, W.W., Henseler, J., Wang, H. (eds.) Handbook of Partial Least Squares: Concepts, Methods and Applications. pp. 655–690. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Chin, W.W., Newsted, P.R.: Structural equation modeling analysis with small samples using partial least squares. In: Hoyle, R.H. (ed.) Statistical Strategies for Small Sample Research, vol. 1, pp. 307–341. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, California (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Chow, W.S., Chan, L.S.: Social network, social trust and shared goals in organizational knowledge sharing. Inf. Manag. 45(7), 458–465 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2008.06.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Chua, A.: The influence of social interaction on knowledge creation. J. Intell. Capit. 3(4), 375–392 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1108/14691930210448297

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Cross, R., Borgatti, S.P., Parker, A.: Making invisible work visible: using social network analysis to support strategic collaboration. Calif. Manag. Rev. 44(2), 25–46 (2002). https://doi.org/10.2307/41166121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Dixon, N.: The neglected receiver of knowledge sharing. Ivey Bus. J. 66(4), 35–40 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Dyer, J.H., Hatch, N.W.: Using supplier networks to learn faster. MIT Sloan Manage. Rev. 45(3), 57–63 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Ekeh, P.P.: Social Exchange Theory: The Two Traditions. Harvard University Press, Cambridge (1974)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Evanschitzky, H., Ahlert, D., Blaich, G., Kenning, P.: Knowledge management in knowledge-intensive service networks: a strategic management approach. Manage. Dec. 45(2), 265–283 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1108/00251740710727287

  29. Fullwood, R., Rowley, J., Delbridge, R.: Knowledge sharing amongst academics in UK universities. J. Knowl. Manage. 17(1), 123–136 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1108/13673271311300831

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Ghobadi, S., D’Ambra, J.: Knowledge sharing in cross-functional teams: a coopetitive model. J. Knowl. Manage. 16(2), 285–301 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1108/13673271211218889

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Granovetter, M.S.: The strength of weak ties. Am. J. Sociol. 78(6), 1360–1380 (1973)

    Google Scholar 

  32. Grant, R.M.: Toward a knowledge-based theory of the firm. Strat. Manage. J. 17(Winter Special Issue), 109–122 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250171110

  33. Guofeng, M., Jianyao, J., Shan, J., Zhijiang, W.: Incentives and contract design for knowledge sharing in construction joint ventures. Automat. Const. 119, 1–11 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2020.103343

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Hafeez, K., Abdelmeguid, H.: Dynamics of human resource and knowledge management. J. Oper. Res. Soc. 54(2), 153–164 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jors.2601513

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  35. Hair Jr., J.F., Hult, G.T.M., Ringle, C.M., Sarstedt, M.: A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) (2nd ed.). Sage Publications, Inc. (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  36. Haldin-Herrgard, T.: Difficulties in diffusion of tacit knowledge in organizations. J. Intell. Capit. 1(4), 357–365 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1108/14691930010359252

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Han, J., Pashouwers, R.: Willingness to share knowledge in healthcare organisations: the role of relational perception. Knowl. Manage. Res. Pract. 16(1), 42–50 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1080/14778238.2017.1405144

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Hansen, M.T.: The search-transfer problem: the role of weak ties in sharing knowledge across organization subunits. Adm. Sci. Q. 44(1), 82–111 (1999). https://doi.org/10.2307/2667032

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Hansen, M.T., Nohria, N.: How to build collaborative advantage. MIT Sloan Manage. Rev. 46(1), 22–30 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  40. Henriksen, L.: Knowledge management and engineering practices: the case of knowledge management, problem solving and engineering practices. Technovation 21(9), 595–603 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0166-4972(01)00023-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Henseler, J., Ringle, C.M., Sinkovics, R.R.: The use of partial least squares path modeling in international marketing. In: Sinkovics, R.R. Ghauri, P.N. (eds.) New Challenges to International Marketing Advances in International Marketing, vol. 20, pp. 277–319. Emerald Group Publishing Limited (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  42. Henttonen, K., Janhonen, M., Johanson, J.-E.: Internal social networks in work teams: structure, knowledge sharing and performance. Int. J. Manpower 34(6), 616–634 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1108/IJM-06-2013-0148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Hernández Sampieri, R., Fernández Collado, C., Baptista Lucio, M.d.P.: Metodología de la investigación (6a. ed.). Mc Graw Hill Education, México (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  44. Herschel, R.T., Nemati, D.R.: Chief knowledge officer: critical success factors for knowledge management. Inf. Strat. Executive’s J. 16(4), 37–45 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1080/07438613.2000.10744623

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Hooff, B.v.d.: What one feels and what one knows: the influence of emotions on attitudes and intentions towards knowledge sharing. J. Knowl. Manage. 16(1), 148–158 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1108/13673271211198990

  46. Hsu, I.-C.: Knowledge sharing practices as a facilitating factor for improving organizacional performance through human capital: a preliminary test. Expert Syst. Appl. 35(3), 1316–1326 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2007.08.012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Hua, T.K., Platts, K.: A connectance-based approach for managing manufacturing knowledge. Ind. Manage. Data Syst. 104(2), 158–168 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1108/02635570410522134

  48. Huber, G.P.: Transfer of knowledge in knowledge management systems: unexplored issues and suggested studies. Eur. J. Inf. Syst. 10(2), 72–79 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Hung, Y.-C., Chuang, Y.-H.: Factors affecting knowledge sharing behavior: a content analysis of empirical findings. Paper presented at the International Conference of Pacific Rim Management, July (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  50. Israilidis, J., Siachou, E., Cooke, L., Lock, R.: Individual variables with an impact on knowledge sharing: the critical role of employees’ ignorance. J. Knowl. Manage. 19(6), 1109–1123 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-04-2015-0153

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Jolaee, A., Md Nor, K., Khani, N., Md Yusoff, R.: Factors affecting knowledge sharing intention among academic staff. Int. J. Educat. Manage. 28(4), 413–431 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEM-03-2013-0041

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Kachra, A., White, R.E.: Know-how transfer: the role of social, economic/competitive, and firm boundary factors. Strateg. Manag. J. 29(4), 425–445 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.668

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Kankanhalli, A., Tan, B.C., Wei, K.-K.: Contributing knowledge to electronic knowledge repositories: an empirical investigation. MIS Q. 29(1), 113–143 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Kwon, K., Mai, L., Peng, N.: Determinants of consumers’ intentions to share knowledge and intentions to purchase on s-commerce sites: incorporating attitudes toward persuasion attempts into a social exchange model. Euras. Bus. Rev. 10, 157–183 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40821-019-00146-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Lai, H.-M., Hsieh, P.-J.: The effects of the norm of reciprocity and interpersonal trust on knowledge-sharing behavior: a longitudinal analysis. Paper presented at the Pacific Asia Conference on Information Systems. PACIS 2018 Proceedings (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  56. Levin, D.Z., Walter, J., Appleyard, M.M., Cross, R.: Relational enhancement: how the relational dimension of social capital unlocks the value of network-bridging ties. Group Org. Manage. 41(4), 415–457 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1177/1059601115574429

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Liao, L.-F.: Knowledge-sharing in RyD departments: a social power and social exchange theory perspective. Int. J. Hum. Res. Manage. 19(10), 1881–1895 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1080/09585190802324072

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Liao, S.-H., Hu, T.-C.: Knowledge transfer and competitive advantage on environmental uncertainty: an empirical study of the Taiwan semiconductor industry. Technovation 27(6–78), 402–411 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2007.02.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Lin, H.-F.: Effects of extrinsic and intrinsic motivation on employee knowledge sharing intentions. J. Inf. Sci. 33(2), 135–149 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1177/0165551506068174

  60. Liyanage, C., Elhag, T., Ballal, T., Li, Q.: Knowledge communication and translation—a knowledge transfer model. J. Knowl. Manage. 13(3), 118–131 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1108/13673270910962914

  61. Mahmood, T., Mubarik, M.S.: Balancing innovation and exploitation in the fourth industrial revolution: role of intellectual capital and technology absorptive capacity. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 160, 1–9 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120248

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Malone, D.: Knowledge management. A model for organizational learning. Int. J. Account. Inf. Syst. 3(2), 111–123 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1016/S1467-0895(02)00039-8

  63. Marco-Lajara, B., Zaragoza-Sáez, P.d.C., Claver-Cortés, E., Úbeda-García, M.: Hotel performance and knowledge sources in Spanish tourism districts. Curr. Issues Tour. 21(17), 1988–2013 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1080/13683500.2016.1225696

  64. Martín, N., Martín, V., Trevilla, C.: The influence of employee motivation on knowledge transfer. J. Knowl. Manage. 13(6), 478–490 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1108/13673270910997132

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. Massingham, P.: An evaluation of knowledge management tools: part 1—managing knowledge resources. J. Knowl. Manage. 18(6), 1075–1100 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-11-2013-0449

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. Maynez Guaderrama, A.I.: La Transferencia de Conocimiento Organizacional como Fuente de Ventaja Competitiva Sostenible: Modelo Integrador de Factores y Estrategias (Doctorado Documento), Universidad Popular Autónoma del Estado de Puebla, Puebla, Mexico (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  67. Mazloomi, H., Jolly, D.R.: Knowledge transfer in alliances: determinant factors. J. Knowl. Manage. 12(1), 37–50 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1108/13673270810852377

    Article  Google Scholar 

  68. Moffett, S., McAdam, R., Parkinson, S.: Developing a model for technology and cultural factors in knowledge management: a factor analysis. Knowl. Process Manage. 9(4), 237–255 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1002/kpm.152

  69. Nahapiet, J., Ghosal, S.: Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage. Acad. Manag. Rev. 23(2), 242–266 (1998). https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1998.533225

    Article  Google Scholar 

  70. Nonaka, I., Takeuchi, H.: The Knowledge-Creating Company: How Japanese Companies Create the Dynamics of Innovation. Oxford University Press (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  71. Pesämaa, O., Pieper, T., da Silva, R.V., Black, W.C., Hair, J.F.: Trust and reciprocity in building inter-personal and inter-organizational commitment in small business co-operatives. J. Co-operat. Organizat. Manage. 1(2), 81–92 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcom.2013.10.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  72. Plouffe, C.R., Grégoire, Y.: Intraorganizational employee navigation and socially derived outcomes: conceptualization, validation, and effects on overall performance. Person. Psychol. 64(3), 693–738 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2011.01223.x

  73. Portes, A.: Social capital: its origins and applications in modern sociology. In: LESSER, Eric L. Knowledge and Social Capital, pp. 43–67. Butterworth-Heinemann, Boston (2000). https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.24.1.1

  74. Reagans, R., McEvily, B.: Network structure and knowledge transfer: the effects of cohesion and range. Administ. Sci. Quart. 48(2), 240–267 (2003). https://doi.org/10.2307/3556658

  75. Requena Santos, F.: Análisis de redes sociales: Orígenes, teorías y aplicaciones, 497 pp. Centro de Investigaciones Sociológicas, Madrid

    Google Scholar 

  76. Rhodes, J., Hung, R., Lok, P., Ya-Hui Lien, B., Wu, C.-M.: Factors influencing organizational knowledge transfer: implication for corporate performance. J. Knowl. Manage. 12(3), 84–100 (2008).https://doi.org/10.1108/13673270810875886

  77. Settoon, R.P., Bennett, N., Liden, R.C.: Social exchange in organizations: perceived organizational support, leader–member exchange, and employee reciprocity. J. Appl. Psychol. 81(3), 219–227 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.81.3.219

    Article  Google Scholar 

  78. Shamim, S., Cang, S., Yu, H.: Supervisory orientation, employee goal orientation, and knowledge management among front line hotel employees. Int. J. Hospit. Manage. 62(Supplement C), 21–32 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2016.11.013

  79. Sternberg, R.J.: What do we know about tacit knowledge? Making the tacit become explicit. In: Sternberg, R.J., Horvath, J.A. (eds.) Tacit Knowledge in Professional Practice. Researcher and Practitioner Perspectives. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, New Jersey (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  80. Thomas, J., Watts, S., Henderson, J.: Understanding “strategic learning”: linking organizational learning, knowledge management, and sensemaking. Organ. Sci. 12(3), 331–345 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.12.3.331.10105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  81. Titi Amayah, A.: Determinants of knowledge sharing in a public sector organization. J Knowl Manage 17(3), 454–471 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-11-2012-0369

    Article  Google Scholar 

  82. Van Wijk, R., Jansen, J.J., Lyles, M.A.: Inter-and intra-organizational knowledge transfer: a meta-analytic review and assessment of its antecedents and consequences. J. Manage. Stud. 45(4), 830–853 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2008.00771.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  83. Vaux, A., Harrison, D.: Support network characteristics associated with support satisfaction and perceived support. Am. J. Community Psychol. 13(3), 245–265 (1985). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00914932

    Article  Google Scholar 

  84. Wills, T.A., DePaulo, B.M.: Interpersonal analysis of the help-seeking process. In: Snyder, C.R., Forsyth, D.R. (eds.) Handbook of Social and Clinical Psychology: The Health Perspective, vol. 162, pp. 350–375. Pergamon Press, New York (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  85. Wong, K.Y., Aspinwall, E.: An empirical study of the important factors for knowledge-management adoption in the SME sector. J Knowl Manage 9(3), 64–82 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1108/13673270510602773

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Doctorado en Tecnología, Universidad Autónoma de Ciudad Juárez, Ciudad Juárez, Mexico

    Aurora Máynez, Hilda Zorrilla-Nuñez, Alberto Ochoa-Zezzatti & Andres Hernández Gómez

Authors
  1. Aurora Máynez
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Hilda Zorrilla-Nuñez
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Alberto Ochoa-Zezzatti
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Andres Hernández Gómez
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Aurora Máynez .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Universidad Autonoma de Ciudad Juarez, Ciudad Juarez, Mexico

    Alberto Ochoa-Zezzatti

  2. Departamento de Ciencias Computacionales, Universidad de Guadajalara, Guadajalara, Jalisco, Mexico

    Diego Oliva

  3. Faculty of Computers and Artificial Intelligence Information Technology Department, Cairo University, Giza, Egypt

    Aboul Ella Hassanien

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Máynez, A., Zorrilla-Nuñez, H., Ochoa-Zezzatti, A., Gómez, A.H. (2022). Interpersonal Relationships and Reciprocity: Their Influence in Knowledge Transfer Inside of Mexican Hotels. In: Ochoa-Zezzatti, A., Oliva, D., Hassanien, A.E. (eds) Technological and Industrial Applications Associated With Industry 4.0 . Studies in Systems, Decision and Control, vol 347 . Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-68663-5_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-68663-5_7

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-68662-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-68663-5

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation