Abstract
Municipal waste management has emerged in the last two decades as one of the most critical European environmental policy fields regulated into detail through the acquis. As Romania had the least “goodness-of-fit” with the goals set in the acquis at the moment of accession, it required the highest number of provisional arrangements, the most significant increase in investment, and the most effort to create from scratch a new county-based system for managing waste. As the transition period expired and the targets assumed in the Accession Treaty had to be met, Romania achieved minimal success in meeting these targets. I explain this result as the structural misalignment of incentives among actors at different levels (operator, local, county, and national) brought by the chosen solutions for the new county-level municipal waste management systems and the pervasive lack of administrative and policy-making capacity.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
The objectives achieved through SOP Environment 2007–2013 were as follows: 20 compliant landfills, 58 transfer stations, 16 composting stations, 22 sorting stations, 7 mechanical-biological treatment stations (MBTs); 39 waste collection centers, and 120 municipal landfills in urban areas.
- 2.
Objectives, financed through Operational Program for Big Infrastructure 2014–2020, to be achieved are the following: 7 regional landfills, 16 new transfer stations and 7 extended ones, 20 new composting stations and an extended station, 17 new sorting stations and an extended station, 9 MBTs, 6 waste collection centers, and 32 municipal waste landfills in closed urban areas.
- 3.
This section was presented during training on Environmental Public Policies (March 11–15, 2019), held with representatives from the Intercommunity Development Associations (IDAs).
- 4.
Its name and composition have recently changed. As of October 2020, it is the Ministry of Environment, Waters and Forests.
References
AFP-Agence France A-AF. 2020. Activists Concerned Over Increase In Waste Smuggling In Romania.
Angelova, M., T. Dannwolf, and T. König. 2012. How robust are compliance findings? A research synthesis. Journal of European Public Policy 19: 1269–1291. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2012.705051.
BBC. 2019. Why does Romania, a country overflowing with rubbish, import more from abroad? Romania Insider. https://www.romania-insider.com/bbc-romania-waste-import. Accessed 3 Nov 2020.
Bibro. 2017. Support to selected Member States in improving hazardous waste management based on assessment of Member States’ performance. Brussels: European Commission.
Bondarouk, E., and E. Mastenbroek. 2018. Reconsidering EU Compliance: Implementation performance in the field of environmental policy. Environmental Policy and Governance 28: 15–27. https://doi.org/10.1002/eet.1761.
Börzel, T.A. 2009. Environmental Policy and the Challenge of Accession. In Coping with Accession to the European Union: New Modes of Environmental Governance, ed. T.A. Börzel, 32–47. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK.
Buzogány, A. 2009. Romania: Environmental Governance — Form without Substance. In Coping with Accession to the European Union: New Modes of Environmental Governance, ed. T.A. Börzel, 169–191. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK.
Cugleșan, N. 2019. Post accession compliance with EU environmental legislation in Romania and Bulgaria in the first ten years of EU membership. Conditionality and social learning, as drivers of success? Denver, Colorado.
Ecologic. 2017. O situaţie a Sistemelor de Management Integrat al Deşeurilor (A situation of Integrated Waste Management Systems). Bucharest.
Euractiv. 2014. Waste business ‘very vulnerable to corruption.’ www.euractiv.com. https://www.euractiv.com/section/sustainable-dev/news/waste-business-very-vulnerable-to-corruption/. Accessed 3 Nov 2020.
European Commission. 2010. Being wise with waste: The EU’s approach to waste management. European Commission.
———. 2017. Waste: Commission refers Romania to Court of Justice for failing to adopt national measures on waste management and waste prevention.
———. 2018. Romania. From waste to resources. Luxembourg.
———. 2019. The Environmental Implementation Review 2019 Country Report Romania. Brussels: European Comission.
European Union. 2005. Annex VII of the Act concerning the conditions of accession of the Republic of Bulgaria and Romania and the adjustments to the Treaties on which the European Union is founded EUR-Lex – 12005SA.
Eurostat. 2020. Recycling rate of municipal waste. https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/tgm/table.do?tab=table&init=1&plugin=1&pcode=t2020_rt120&language=en. Accessed 7 Oct 2020.
Falkner, G., and O. Treib. 2008. Three Worlds of Compliance or Four? The EU-15 Compared to New Member States*. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies 46: 293–313. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5965.2007.00777.x.
Mastenbroek, E., and M. Kaeding. 2006. Europeanization Beyond the Goodness of Fit: Domestic Politics in the Forefront. Comparative European Politics 4: 331–354. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.cep.6110078.
Ministerul Mediului. 2018. Planul National de Gestionare a Deseurilor (PNGD). http://mmediu.ro/categorie/planul-national-de-gestionare-a-deseurilor-pngd/239. Accessed 7 Oct 2020.
Ministry of Environment of Romania. 2018. Regarding question nr. 3974A/02.05.2018 regarding the state of implementation of the Sistem for Integrated Waste Management.
Orru, K., and H. Rothstein. 2015. Not ‘Dead Letters’, Just ‘Blind Eyes’: The Europeanisation of Drinking Water Risk Regulation in Estonia and Lithuania. Environment and Planning A. https://doi.org/10.1068/a130295p.
Schiopu, A.-M., I. Apostol, M. Hodoreanu, and M. Gavrilescu. 2007. Solid Waste in Romania: Management, Treatment And Pollution Prevention Practices. Environmental Engineering and Management Journal 6: 451–465.
Selin H, Van Deveer SD (2015) EU Environmental Policy Making and Implementation: Changing Processes and Mixed Outcomes.
Todor, A., and M. Chiper. 2014. ADI – Deşeuri: Starea de fapt. In Analize de politici publice cu impact asupra mediului şi dezvoltării durabile. Bucureşti: Wolters Kluwer.
Acknowledgments
Special thanks to Lavinia Andrei, Natalia Cugleșa, and Florența-Elena Helepciuc for providing valuable suggestions on improving the draft version of this chapter.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Todor, A. (2021). Municipal Waste Management. In: Todor, A., Helepciuc, F.E. (eds) Europeanization of Environmental Policies and their Limitations . Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-68586-7_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-68586-7_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-68585-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-68586-7
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)