Skip to main content

Abstract

Municipal waste management has emerged in the last two decades as one of the most critical European environmental policy fields regulated into detail through the acquis. As Romania had the least “goodness-of-fit” with the goals set in the acquis at the moment of accession, it required the highest number of provisional arrangements, the most significant increase in investment, and the most effort to create from scratch a new county-based system for managing waste. As the transition period expired and the targets assumed in the Accession Treaty had to be met, Romania achieved minimal success in meeting these targets. I explain this result as the structural misalignment of incentives among actors at different levels (operator, local, county, and national) brought by the chosen solutions for the new county-level municipal waste management systems and the pervasive lack of administrative and policy-making capacity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The objectives achieved through SOP Environment 2007–2013 were as follows: 20 compliant landfills, 58 transfer stations, 16 composting stations, 22 sorting stations, 7 mechanical-biological treatment stations (MBTs); 39 waste collection centers, and 120 municipal landfills in urban areas.

  2. 2.

    Objectives, financed through Operational Program for Big Infrastructure 2014–2020, to be achieved are the following: 7 regional landfills, 16 new transfer stations and 7 extended ones, 20 new composting stations and an extended station, 17 new sorting stations and an extended station, 9 MBTs, 6 waste collection centers, and 32 municipal waste landfills in closed urban areas.

  3. 3.

    This section was presented during training on Environmental Public Policies (March 11–15, 2019), held with representatives from the Intercommunity Development Associations (IDAs).

  4. 4.

    Its name and composition have recently changed. As of October 2020, it is the Ministry of Environment, Waters and Forests.

References

  • AFP-Agence France A-AF. 2020. Activists Concerned Over Increase In Waste Smuggling In Romania.

    Google Scholar 

  • Angelova, M., T. Dannwolf, and T. König. 2012. How robust are compliance findings? A research synthesis. Journal of European Public Policy 19: 1269–1291. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2012.705051.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • BBC. 2019. Why does Romania, a country overflowing with rubbish, import more from abroad? Romania Insider. https://www.romania-insider.com/bbc-romania-waste-import. Accessed 3 Nov 2020.

  • Bibro. 2017. Support to selected Member States in improving hazardous waste management based on assessment of Member States’ performance. Brussels: European Commission.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bondarouk, E., and E. Mastenbroek. 2018. Reconsidering EU Compliance: Implementation performance in the field of environmental policy. Environmental Policy and Governance 28: 15–27. https://doi.org/10.1002/eet.1761.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Börzel, T.A. 2009. Environmental Policy and the Challenge of Accession. In Coping with Accession to the European Union: New Modes of Environmental Governance, ed. T.A. Börzel, 32–47. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Buzogány, A. 2009. Romania: Environmental Governance — Form without Substance. In Coping with Accession to the European Union: New Modes of Environmental Governance, ed. T.A. Börzel, 169–191. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Cugleșan, N. 2019. Post accession compliance with EU environmental legislation in Romania and Bulgaria in the first ten years of EU membership. Conditionality and social learning, as drivers of success? Denver, Colorado.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ecologic. 2017. O situaţie a Sistemelor de Management Integrat al Deşeurilor (A situation of Integrated Waste Management Systems). Bucharest.

    Google Scholar 

  • Euractiv. 2014. Waste business ‘very vulnerable to corruption.’ www.euractiv.com. https://www.euractiv.com/section/sustainable-dev/news/waste-business-very-vulnerable-to-corruption/. Accessed 3 Nov 2020.

  • European Commission. 2010. Being wise with waste: The EU’s approach to waste management. European Commission.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2017. Waste: Commission refers Romania to Court of Justice for failing to adopt national measures on waste management and waste prevention.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2018. Romania. From waste to resources. Luxembourg.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2019. The Environmental Implementation Review 2019 Country Report Romania. Brussels: European Comission.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Union. 2005. Annex VII of the Act concerning the conditions of accession of the Republic of Bulgaria and Romania and the adjustments to the Treaties on which the European Union is founded EUR-Lex – 12005SA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eurostat. 2020. Recycling rate of municipal waste. https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/tgm/table.do?tab=table&init=1&plugin=1&pcode=t2020_rt120&language=en. Accessed 7 Oct 2020.

  • Falkner, G., and O. Treib. 2008. Three Worlds of Compliance or Four? The EU-15 Compared to New Member States*. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies 46: 293–313. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5965.2007.00777.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mastenbroek, E., and M. Kaeding. 2006. Europeanization Beyond the Goodness of Fit: Domestic Politics in the Forefront. Comparative European Politics 4: 331–354. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.cep.6110078.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ministerul Mediului. 2018. Planul National de Gestionare a Deseurilor (PNGD). http://mmediu.ro/categorie/planul-national-de-gestionare-a-deseurilor-pngd/239. Accessed 7 Oct 2020.

  • Ministry of Environment of Romania. 2018. Regarding question nr. 3974A/02.05.2018 regarding the state of implementation of the Sistem for Integrated Waste Management.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orru, K., and H. Rothstein. 2015. Not ‘Dead Letters’, Just ‘Blind Eyes’: The Europeanisation of Drinking Water Risk Regulation in Estonia and Lithuania. Environment and Planning A. https://doi.org/10.1068/a130295p.

  • Schiopu, A.-M., I. Apostol, M. Hodoreanu, and M. Gavrilescu. 2007. Solid Waste in Romania: Management, Treatment And Pollution Prevention Practices. Environmental Engineering and Management Journal 6: 451–465.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Selin H, Van Deveer SD (2015) EU Environmental Policy Making and Implementation: Changing Processes and Mixed Outcomes.

    Google Scholar 

  • Todor, A., and M. Chiper. 2014. ADI – Deşeuri: Starea de fapt. In Analize de politici publice cu impact asupra mediului şi dezvoltării durabile. Bucureşti: Wolters Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Special thanks to Lavinia Andrei, Natalia Cugleșa, and Florența-Elena Helepciuc for providing valuable suggestions on improving the draft version of this chapter.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Arpad Todor .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Todor, A. (2021). Municipal Waste Management. In: Todor, A., Helepciuc, F.E. (eds) Europeanization of Environmental Policies and their Limitations . Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-68586-7_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-68586-7_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-68585-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-68586-7

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics