Abstract
Creativity and discovery are two notions that have consistently and famously aroused hot debates in cognitive science, epistemology, and philosophy of science almost since the dawn of these disciplines. This part of the Handbook of Abductive Cognition proposes to consider abduction as a concept that brings out complex reflections regarding how human agents consider new possibilities, discover new findings, and adopt creative processes to solve problems within and outside the scientific context. In particular, the chapters’ authors offer a way to see abduction as a bridge between concepts linked to creative cognition and scientific processes that are still often discussed and presented as opposed, dichotomous, or simply too distant to be meaningfully connected: creativity and reason, logic and discovery, and a representational view of cognition and theories of embodiment. These authors do so, in part, by referring to the epistemological works done by Peirce, especially on the idea of scientific progress, and, in part, by discussing current and hot debates in cognitive science, philosophy of science, and epistemology. In this introduction, the content of the chapters that compose this part of the Handbook will be briefly introduced and commented on (using the alphabetical order applied to the authors’ surname). At the same time, it will also be presented a discussion that links these contributions together and reflects on the role they play in the broader exploration of abductive cognition.
References
De Freitas, R. S., & Pietrobon, R. (2007). Whoever could get rid of the context of discovery/context of justification dichotomy? A proposal based on recent developments in clinical research. The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy, 32(1), 25–42.
Menary, R. (2010). Introduction to the special issue on 4E cognition. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 9(4), 459–463.
Newen, A., De Bruin, L., & Gallagher, S. (2018). 4E cognition: Historical roots, key concepts, and central issues. In The Oxford handbook of 4E cognition (Vol. 1, pp. 3–15). Oxford University Press.
Nickles, T. (2006). Heuristic appraisal: Context of discovery or justification? In Revisiting discovery and justification (pp. 159–182). Springer.
Novak, M. (2013). The argument from psychological typology for a mild separation between the context of discovery and the context of justification. In Legal argumentation theory: Cross-disciplinary perspectives (pp. 145–162). Springer.
Peirce, C. S. (1931). Collected papers of Charles Sanders Peirce. Harvard University Press.
Sans Pinillos, A. (2021). Neglected pragmatism: Discussing abduction to dissolute classical dichotomies. Foundations of Science, 1–19.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Section Editor information
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this entry
Cite this entry
Arfini, S. (2022). Introduction to Abduction, Creative Cognition, and Discovery. In: Magnani, L. (eds) Handbook of Abductive Cognition. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-68436-5_89-1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-68436-5_89-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-68436-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-68436-5
eBook Packages: Springer Reference Intelligent Technologies and RoboticsReference Module Computer Science and Engineering