Abstract
Genome editing and modification techniques enable breeders to create single point mutations and to insert or delete new DNA sequences at a specific location in the plant genome thus for the first time making possible the precise modulation of traits of interest with unprecedented control and efficiency. The advent of genome editing has evoked enthusiasm but also controversy, creating regulatory and governance challenges worldwide. Plant genome editing could play a key role in developing crops that will contribute significantly to attaining multiple Sustainable Development Goals provided that accompanying the rapid scientific progress also policy and governance problems will be solved. Today, several countries, most of which located in the Americas, have adapted legislations to these technologies or released guidelines supporting the use of genome editing. Other countries are debating the path to come either because there is no clarity on the legal classification or due consensus is hampered by a renewed GMO debate. In recent years (2017–2020), eight countries have introduced guidelines clarifying the legal status of genome edited products and many of those are actively committed to international harmonization of their policies. In this chapter which is mainly based on a recent up-to-date review published by Menz et al. (Front Plant Sci 11(588027), 2020) we provide an overview on the current and potentially future regulatory environment for genome edited plants at national and international level.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
ABBC (2019) ABBC 2019 declaration pretoria. Accessed 06 Sept 2019. https://abbcsymposium.org/blog?slug=pretoria-abbc-r2019-declaration
Australian Federal Executive Council (2019) Gene technology amendment (2019 Measures No. 1) regulations 2019
Australian Government—The Department of Health (2018) The third review of the National Gene Technology Scheme October 2018 final report.
Bioteknologirådet (2018) Forslag til oppmyking av regelverket for utsetting av genmodifiserte organismer
CAST (2018) Regulatory barriers to the development of innovative agricultural biotechnology by small businesses and universities
Cohen J, Desai N (2019) With its CRISPR revolution, China becomes a world leader in genome editing. Accessed 02 Sept 2019. https://www.sciencemag.org/news/2019/08/its-crispr-revolution-china-becomes-world-leader-genome-editing
Commitee on Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures (2018) International statement on agricultural applications of precision biotechnology: communication from Argentina, Australia, Brazil, Canada, The Dominican Republic, Guatemala, Honduras, Paraguay, The United States of America and Uruguray
Commitee on Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures (2019) Specific trade concerns 2018: G/SPS/GEN/204/Rev.19
Court of Justice of the European Union (2018) Organisms obtained by mutagenesis are GMOs and are, in principle, subject to the obligations laid down by the GMO directive: judgment in Case C-528/16 Confédération paysanne and Others v Premier ministre and Ministre de l’Agriculture, de l’Agroalimentaire et de la Forêt. Press release no 111/18.
Dobrovidova O (2019) Russia joins in global gene-editing bonanza. Nature 569:319–320. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-019-01519-6
ENGL (2019) Detection of food and feed plant products obtained by new mutagenesis techniques: report endorsed by the ENGL Steering Committee Publication date 26 Mar 2019
Environmental Protection Authority (2013) Determination of whether or not any organism is a new organism under section 26 of the Hazardous Substances and New Organisms (HSNO) Act 1996: APP201381, April 19. Accessed 05 Sept 2019.
EPA (2017) Modernizing the regulatory system for biotechnology products: final version of the 2017 update to the coordinated framework for the regulation of biotechnology
Eriksson D (2018) The Swedish policy approach to directed mutagenesis in a European context. Physiol Plant 164:385–395. https://doi.org/10.1111/ppl.12740
Eriksson D, Brinch-Pedersen H, Chawade A, Holme IB, Hvoslef-Eide TAK, Ritala A et al (2017) Scandinavian perspectives on plant gene technology: applications, policies and progress. Physiol Plant 162:219–238. https://doi.org/10.1111/ppl.12661
EuropaBio (2019) Pricing innovation out of the EU: counting the costs of GMO Authorisations
European Commission (2001–2010) EUR 24473—a decade of EU-funded GMO research
European Commission (2020) Decree amending the list of techniques for obtaining genetically modified organisms traditionally used without any noted drawbacks with regard to public health or the environment: communication from the Commission—TRIS/(2020) 01601. Accessed 26 May 2020. https://ec.europa.eu/growth/tools-databases/tris/en/index.cfm/search/?trisaction=search.detail&year=2020&num=280&mLang=EN
European Commission (2021) Study on the status of new genomic techniques under Union law and in light of the Court of Justice ruling in Case C-528/16. https://ec.europa.eu/food/system/files/2021-04/gmo_mod-bio_ngt_exec-sum_en.pdf
FDA (2018) FDA’s plant and animal biotechnology innovation action plan
Friedrichs S, Takasu Y, Kearns P, Dagallier B, Oshima R, Schofield J et al (2019) Policy considerations regarding genome editing. Trends Biotechnol 37:1029–1032. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tibtech.2019.05.005
FSANZ (2018a) Consultation paper: food derived using new breeding techniques
FSANZ (2018b) Preliminary report: review of food derived using new breeding techniques—consultation outcomes
Gao W, Xu W-T, Huang K-L, Guo M-z, Luo Y-B (2018) Risk analysis for genome editing-derived food safety in China. Food Control 84:128–137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2017.07.032
Generalsekretariat UVEK (2018). Neue gentechnische Verfahren: bundesrat prüft Anpassung der rechtlichen Regelung. Accessed 09 May 2019. https://www.uvek.admin.ch/uvek/de/home/uvek/medien/medienmitteilungen.msg-id-73173.html
Grohmann L, Keilwagen J, Duensing N, Dagand E, Hartung F, Wilhelm R et al (2019) Detection and identification of genome editing in plants: challenges and opportunities. Front Plant Sci 10:236. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2019.00236
Hardegger A (2019). Neue Gentech-Verfahren sollen in der Schweiz liberaler reguliert werden als in der EU. Accessed 25 Jan 2019. https://www.nzz.ch/schweiz/crisprcas-bundesrat-strebt-liberalere-regelung-an-als-die-eu-ld.1452558
Indian Ministry of Science and Technology (2020) Draft document on genome edited organisms: regulatory framework and guidelines for risk assessment
ISAAA (2018) Global status of commercialized biotech/GM crops in 2018: biotech crops continue to help meet the challeges of increased population and climate change: executive summary. ISAAA Brief 54
Ishii T, Araki M (2017) A future scenario of the global regulatory landscape regarding genome-edited crops. GM Crops Food 8:44–56. https://doi.org/10.1080/21645698.2016.1261787
Igarashi K, Hatta K (2018) Env Ministry committee proposes deregulating some genetically edited organisms. Mainichi Japan
Japanese Cabinet Office (2018) Integrated innovation strategy: provisional translation
Kershen DL (2015) Sustainability council of New Zealand trust v. The environmental protection authority: gene editing technologies and the law. GM Crops Food 6:216–222. https://doi.org/10.1080/21645698.2015.1122859
Leopoldina DFG, Akademieunion (2019) Wege zu einer wissenschaftlich begründeten, differenzierten Regulierung genomeditierter Planzen in der EU: Stellungnahme = Towards a scientifically justified, differentiated regulation of genome edited plants in the EU. Halle (Saale), Berlin, Mainz: Deutsche Akademie der Naturforscher Leopoldina e.V; Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft; Union der Deutschen Akademien der Wissenschaften e.V
Mallapaty S (2019) Australian gene-editing rules adopt ‘middle ground.’ Nature. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-019-01282-8
Menz J, Modrzejewski D, Hartung F, Wilhelm R, Sprink T (2020) Genome edited crops touch the market: a view on the global development and regulatory environment. Front Plant Sci 11(588027)
MHLW Japan (2019) Food hygiene handling procedures for food and additives derived from genome editing technology
Ministry for the Environment New Zealand (1998) Hazardous substances and new organisms (Organisms not genetically modified) regulations 1998: HSNO regulation
MoE Japan (2018) Decision guidance: to genome editing technologies users. https://www.env.go.jp/press/2_2_%20genome%20editing_En.pdf
Nicolia A, Manzo A, Veronesi F, Rosellini D (2014) An overview of the last 10 years of genetically engineered crop safety research. Crit Rev Biotechnol 34:77–88. https://doi.org/10.3109/07388551.2013.823595
Norwegian Biotechnology Advisory Board (2018) A forward-looking regulatory framework for GMO
OECD Review of Fisheries: Policies and Summary Statistics 2017 (2017)
Royal Society/Te Aparangi (ed) (2019) Gene editing: legal and regulatory implications
Russian Government (2019) On approval of the federal scientific and technical program for the development of genetic technologies for 2019–2027: resolution No. 479
Schmidt SM, Belisle M, Frommer WB (2020) The evolving landscape around genome editing in agriculture. EMBO Rep 21:e50680
Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity (2000) Cartagena protocol on biosafety to the convention on biological diversity: text and annexes. Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity, Montreal
Smyth SJ (2017) Canadian regulatory perspectives on genome engineered crops. GM Crops Food 8:35–43. https://doi.org/10.1080/21645698.2016.1257468
Sprink T, Eriksson D, Schiemann J, Hartung F (2016) Regulatory hurdles for genome editing: process- vs product-based approaches in different regulatory contexts. Plant Cell Rep 35:1493–1506. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00299-016-1990-2
The White House (2019) Executive order on modernizing the regulatory framework for agricultural biotechnology products: land & agriculture. Accessed 12 June 2019. https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/executive-order-modernizing-regulatory-framework-agricultural-biotechnology-products/
Thygesen P (2019) Clarifying the regulation of genome editing in Australia: situation for genetically modified organisms. Transgenic Res 28:151–159. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11248-019-00151-4
Transkript (2018) Bundesrat setzt Genscheren auf Agenda. Accessed 10 Oct 2019. https://transkript.de/meldungen-des-tages/detail/bundesrat-setzt-genscheren-auf-agenda.html
USDA APHIS (2019) Proposed rules for 7 CFR parts 340 and 372 movement of certain genetically engineered organisms
USDA APHIS (2020) 7 CFR parts 330, 340, and 372: RIN 0579–AE47
USDA FAS (2018a) Japan discusses genome editing technology: GAIN report number: JA8048
USDA FAS (2018b) Israel agricultural biotechnology annual 2018: GAIN report number: IS18011
USDA FAS (2019a) Regulatory process getting more unpredictable, additional requirements on trials and data for approvals: GAIN report number: CH 18085
USDA FAS (2019b) Environment ministry finalizes policy for regulating genome editing: GAIN report number: JA9024
Whelan AI, Lema MA (2015) Regulatory framework for gene editing and other new breeding techniques (NBTs) in Argentina. GM Crops Food 6:253–265. https://doi.org/10.1080/21645698.2015.1114698
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Schiemann, J., Hartung, F., Menz, J., Sprink, T., Wilhelm, R. (2021). Policies and Governance for Plant Genome Editing. In: Ricroch, A., Chopra, S., Kuntz, M. (eds) Plant Biotechnology. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-68345-0_18
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-68345-0_18
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-68344-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-68345-0
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)