Skip to main content

Conclusion: Grasping Foreign Policy Change

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Foreign Policy Change in Europe Since 1991

Abstract

Foreign policy change is as ubiquitous as it is hard to grasp. Against this background, the edited volume seeks to expand our understanding of foreign policy change and to identify the drivers and inhibitors of such processes. This concluding chapter discusses key lessons and insights that can be drawn from the empirical chapters for the volume’s two main objectives. Particular emphasis is placed on: types of foreign policy change; the temporal dimension of foreign policy change; and drivers and inhibitors of foreign policy change. Building on those insights, the chapter suggests several avenues—both conceptual and empirical—for future research. These avenues concern: the classification of specific episodes of foreign policy change; typologies of the drivers (and inhibitors) of foreign policy change; the interaction between different drivers and the promise of a leader-oriented perspective; moving beyond state-centrism in analyzing foreign policy change; a theoretical dialogue with approaches in public policy; and exploring the drivers and inhibitors of foreign policy change in non-Western settings.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    An exception to this pattern is the Finnish case, in which Russian opposition has been shown to inhibit domestic debate about joining NATO (see the chapter by Raunio in this volume).

References

  • Baumgartner, F. R., & Jones, B. D. (1993). Agendas and Instability in American Politics. University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blavoukos, S., & Bourantonis, D. (2014). Identifying Parameters of Foreign Policy Change: An Eclectic Approach. Cooperation and Conflict, 49(4), 483–500.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brummer, K. (2019, June). Role Entrepreneurs: Leaders, National Role Conceptions, and Foreign Policy Redirection. Paper presented at the 6th European Workshops in International Studies (EWIS).

    Google Scholar 

  • Brummer, K. (2021). Advancing Foreign Policy Analysis by Studying Leaders from the Global South. International Affairs, 972), 405–421.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brummer, K., Harnisch, S., Oppermann, K., & Panke, D. (2019). Foreign Policy as Public Policy? Exploring Promises and Pitfalls of Public Policy Approaches for Foreign Policy Analysis. Manchester University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dolowitz, D. P., & Marsh, D. (2000). Learning from Abroad: The Role of Policy Transfer in Contemporary Policy-Making. Governance, 13(1), 5–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldmann, K. (1988). Change and Stability in Foreign Policy. The Problems and Possibilities of Détente. Harvester Wheatsleaf.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gustavsson, J. (1999). How Should We Study Foreign Policy Change? Cooperation and Conflict, 34(1), 73–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hermann, C. F. (1990). Changing Course: When Governments Choose to Redirect Foreign Policy. International Studies Quarterly, 34(1), 3–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holsti, K. J. (1982). Why Nations Realign: Foreign Policy Restructuring in the Postwar World. George Allen & Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hudson, V. M. (2005). Foreign Policy Analysis: Actor-Specific Theory and the Ground of International Relations. Foreign Policy Analysis, 1(1), 1–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kingdon, J. W. (1995). Agendas, Alternatives, and Public Policies (2nd ed.). Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kleistra, Y., & Mayer, I. (2001). Stability and Flux in Foreign Affairs. Modelling Policy and Organizational Change. Cooperation and Conflict, 36(4), 381–414.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kruck, A., Oppermann, K., & Spencer, A. (Eds.). (2018). Political Mistakes and Policy Failures in International Relations. Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lebow, R. N. (2018). Counterfactuals in Foreign Policy Analysis. In C. Thies (Ed.), The Oxford Encyclopedia of Foreign Policy Analysis (Vol. 1, pp. 259–273). Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lukes, S. (1974). Power: A Radical View. Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Oppermann, K., & Brummer, K. (2018). Veto player approaches in Foreign Policy Analysis. In C. Thies (Ed.), The Oxford Encyclopedia of Foreign Policy Analysis (Vol. 2, pp. 807–824). Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pierson, P. (2000). Increasing Returns, Path Dependence, and the Study of Politics. American Political Science Review, 94(2), 251–267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosati, J. A. (1994). Cycles in Foreign Policy Restructuring: The Politics of Continuity and Change in US Foreign Policy. In J. A. Rosati, J. D. Hagan, & M. W. Sampson III (Eds.), Foreign Policy Restructuring: How Governments Respond to Global Change (pp. 221–261). University of South Carolina Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosati, J. A., Hagan, J. D., & Sampson, M. W., III. (1994). Foreign Policy Restructuring: How Governments Respond to Global Change. University of South Carolina Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sabatier, P., & Weible, C. (2007). The Advocacy Coalition Framework: Innovations and Clarifications. In P. Sabatier & C. Weible (Eds.), Theories of the Policy Process (pp. 189–222). Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schweller, Randall L. (2004). Unanswered Threats. A Neoclassical Realist Theory of Underbalancing. International Security, 29(2), 159–201.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shipan, C. R., & Volden, C. (2008). The Mechanisms of Policy Diffusion. American Journal of Political Science, 52(4), 840–857.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsebelis, G. (2002). Veto Players. How Political Institutions Work. Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Walt, S. M. (1987). The Origins of Alliances. Cornell University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waltz, K. N. (1959). Man, the State and War. A Theoretical Analysis. Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Welch, D. A. (2005). Painful Choices. A Theory of Foreign Policy Change. Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wendt, A. (1999). Social Theory of International Politics. Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Klaus Brummer .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Brummer, K., Oppermann, K. (2021). Conclusion: Grasping Foreign Policy Change. In: Joly, J.K., Haesebrouck, T. (eds) Foreign Policy Change in Europe Since 1991. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-68218-7_13

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics