Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Seven Points to Reappropriate Gamification

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Transforming Society and Organizations through Gamification

Abstract

Games have always been everywhere. This is increasingly so because of the expanding pervasiveness of games in contemporary culture, shift to post-industrial era and the general awakening to the importance of human motivation, creativity and empowerment in the context of today’s human pursuits. This sudden but explosively expanding trend of gamification of our reality has suffered from growing pains, which has led to polarized, ideological and opportunistic discussions, narrative and debate about what gamification is, how it should be defined, how it should be applied (if at all), where it should be applied as well as about its overall ethical and societal premise and scope. In this chapter, we attempt to make sense of some of the prevailing foci of this discussion during the early growing pains of the development of gamification. We feel that this sense-making effort is crucial for a mature, constructive and healthy development of increasing pervasiveness of gamification, which commands an increasing meaning and importance in our daily lives. Therefore, in this chapter we wish to reclaim the discussion and help redirect it to its constructive rails and to save it from the dangers of Luddism toward ludism.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bai, S., Hew, K. F., & Huang, B. (2020). Is gamification “bullshit”? Evidence from a meta-analysis and synthesis of qualitative data in educational contexts. Educational Research Review, 30, 1–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bogost, I. (2011, August 8). Gamification is Bullshit, Ian Bogost’s blog. Retrieved from http://bogost.com/writing/blog/gamification_is_bullshit/.

  • Bonenfant, M., & Genvo, S. (2014). Une approche située et critique du concept de gamification. Sciences du jeu, 2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyd, D., & Crawford, K. (2012). Critical questions for big data: Provocations for a cultural, technological, and scholarly phenomenon. Information, Communication & Society, 15(5), 662–679.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Connolly, T. M., Boyle, E. A., MacArthur, E., Hainey, T., & Boyle, J. M. (2012). A systematic literature review of empirical evidence on computer games and serious games. Computers & Education, 59(2), 661–686.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daniels, B. C. (1995). Puritans at play: Leisure and recreation in colonial New England. London: Macmillan Press Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deterding, S. (2014). Eudaimonic design, or: Six invitations to rethink gamification. In M. Fuchs, S. Fizek, P. Ruffino, & N. Schrape (Eds.), Rethinking gamification (pp. 305–323). Leuphana: Meson press.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeWinter, J., Kocurek, C. A., & Nichols, R. (2014). Taylorism 2.0: Gamification, scientific management and the capitalist appropriation of play. Journal of Gaming & Virtual Worlds, 6(2), 109–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dichev, C., Dicheva, D., Angelova, G., & Agre, G. (2014). From gamification to gameful design and gameful experience in learning. Cybernetics and Information Technologies, 14(4), 80–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eco, U. (1994). Apocalypse postponed. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Floridi, L., Cowls, J., Beltrametti, M., Chatila, R., Chazerand, P., Dignum, V., & Schafer, B. (2018). AI4People—An ethical framework for a good AI society: Opportunities, risks, principles, and recommendations. Minds and Machines, 28(4), 689–707.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fuchs, M. (2014). Gamification as twenty-first-century ideology. Journal of Gaming & Virtual Worlds, 6(2), 143–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodman, N. (1976). Languages of art: An approach to a theory of symbols. Indianapolis: Hackett publishing.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Henricks, T. (2017). Foreword. In B. Sutton-Smith (Ed.), Play for life. Play theory and play as emotional survival. American Journal of Play special issue, The Strong.

    Google Scholar 

  • Högberg, J., Hamari, J., & Wästlund, E. (2019). Gameful experience questionnaire (GAMEFULQUEST): An instrument for measuring the perceived gamefulness of system use. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction, 29(3), 619–660.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huizinga, J. (1949). Homo Ludens. A study of the play-element of culture. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huotari, K., & Hamari, J. (2017). A definition for gamification: Anchoring gamification in the service marketing literature. Electronic Markets, 27(1), 21–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, K. E. (2009). Problematizing puritan play. Leisure/Loisir, 33(1), 31–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, T. W., & Werbach, K. (2016). More than just a game: Ethical issues in gamification. Ethics and Information Technology, 18(2), 157–173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koivisto, J., & Hamari, J. (2019). The rise of motivational information systems: A review of gamification research. International Journal of Information Management, 45, 191–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Landers, R. (2019). Gamification misunderstood: How badly executed and rhetorical gamification obscures its transformative potential. Journal of Management Inquiry, 28(2), 137–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Landers, R. N., Tondello, G. F., Kappen, D. L., Collmus, A. B., Mekler, E. D., & Nacke, L. E. (2019). Defining gameful experience as a psychological state caused by gameplay: Replacing the term ‘Gamefulness’ with three distinct constructs. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 127, 81–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lehman, T. (2015). Countering the modern luddite impulse. The Independent Review, 20(2), 265–283.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leone, M. (2016). La Pallavolo Sacra. In M. Thibault (Ed.), Gamification Urbana: Letture e Riscritture ludiche degli spazi cittadini. Aracne: Rome.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liang, F., Das, V., Kostyuk, N., & Hussain, M. M. (2018). Constructing a data-driven society: China’s social credit system as a state surveillance infrastructure. Policy & Internet, 10(4), 415–453.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Linehan, C., Harrer, S., Kirman, B., Lawson, S., & Carter, M. (2015). Games against health: A player-centered design philosophy. In proceedings of the 33rd annual ACM conference extended abstracts on human factors in. Computing Systems, 589–600.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lopez, S. (2010, October 19). Disney hotel workers try to stay ahead of the ‘electronic whip’. LA Times.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lorenz, C. (2015). The metrification of ‘quality’ and the fall of the academic profession. Oxford Magazine, 355, 7–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malone, T. W. (1981). Toward a theory of intrinsically motivating instruction. Cognitive Science, 5(4), 333–369.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGonigal, J. (2011a). Reality is broken: Why games make us better and how they can change the world. London: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGonigal, J. (2011b). We don’t need no stinkin badges: How to reinvent reality without gamification. [Video]. GDC Vault. Retrieved October 30, 2020, from http://www.gdcvault.com/play/1014576/We-Don-t-Need-No.

  • Minard, P. (2007). Le retour de Ned Ludd. Le luddisme et ses interprétations. Revue d’histoire moderne contemporaine, 1, 242–257.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mollick, E. R., & Rothbard, N. (2014). Mandatory fun: Consent, gamification and the impact of games at work. The Wharton School research paper series.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moran, I. P. (2010). Punk: The do-it-yourself subculture. Social Sciences Journal, 10(1), 58–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nacke, L. E., & Deterding, C. S. (2017). The maturing of gamification research. Computers in Human Behaviour, 450–454.

    Google Scholar 

  • Navickas, K. (2005). The search for ‘general Ludd’: The mythology of Luddism. Social History, 30(3), 281–295.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nof, S. Y. (2009). Automation: What it means to us around the world. In Springer handbook of automation (pp. 13–52). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Raessens, J. (2006). Playful identities, or the ludification of culture. Games and Culture, 1(1), 52–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rapp, A., Hopfgartner, F., Hamari, J., Linehan, C., & Cena, F. (2019). Strengthening gamification studies: Current trends and future opportunities of gamification research. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 127, 1–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, R. M., Rigby, C. S., & Przybylski, A. (2006). The motivational pull of video games: A self-determination theory approach. Motivation and Emotion, 30(4), 344–360.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salvador, M. (2015). In gioco e fuori gioco. Il ludico nella cultura e nei media. Milan: Mimesis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seligman, M. E., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2014). Positive psychology: An introduction. In Flow and the foundations of positive psychology (pp. 279–298). Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaw, A. (2011). Do you identify as a gamer? Gender, race, sexuality, and gamer identity. New Media and Society, 14(1), 28–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simonelli, D. (2002). Anarchy, pop and violence: Punk rock subculture and the rhetoric of class, 1976-78. Contemporary British History, 16(2), 121–144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thibault, M. (2019). Punk Gamification. In Proceedings of the 3rd international GaminFIN conferenc (pp. 58–69). CEUR-WS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, E. P. (1991) [1963]. The making of the English working class. London: Victor Gollancz Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vesa, M., Hamari, J., Harviainen, J. T., & Warmelink, H. (2017). Computer games and organization studies. Organization Studies, 38(2), 273–284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walter-Herrmann, J., & Büching, C. (Eds.). (2014) FabLab: Of machines, makers and inventors transcript-Verlag. https://translate.google.com/translate?sl=de&tl=en&u=https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transcript_Verlag.

  • Williamson, J. G. (1982). Was the industrial revolution worth it? Disamenities and death in 19th century British towns. Explorations in Economic History, 19(3), 221–245.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wittgenstein, L. (1953). Philosophical investigations. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodcock, J., & Johnson, M. R. (2018). Gamification: What it is, and how to fight it. The Sociological Review, 66(3), 542–558.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This project has received funding from the Academy of Finland Flagship Programme (337653—Forest-Human-Machine Interplay (UNITE)), and the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under the Marie Sklodowska-Curie grant agreement No 793835.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Gamification Group, Faculty of Information Technology and Communication Sciences, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland

    Mattia Thibault & Juho Hamari

Authors
  1. Mattia Thibault
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Juho Hamari
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mattia Thibault .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Business and Management, Heriot-Watt University, Edinburgh, UK

    Agnessa Spanellis

  2. Information Technology and Communication Sciences, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland

    J. Tuomas Harviainen

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Thibault, M., Hamari, J. (2021). Seven Points to Reappropriate Gamification. In: Spanellis, A., Harviainen, J.T. (eds) Transforming Society and Organizations through Gamification. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-68207-1_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation