Abstract
There is a rising interest in engineering ethics education. As research in this field shows, the most common reasons for that are rather formal implying to satisfaction of accreditation requirements and complying with the recommendations of a disciplinary professional association. Resistance to notions such as professional judgment and the absence of any substantial reference to engineering ethics in general conversations about educational decision-making and governance is also witnessed. Teaching engineering ethics to students could be considered a crucial course that builds the necessary basis so that engineering students can develop better, i.e. more sustainable and responsible, technological solutions to societal challenges. At the same time, we do not have much information or many studies about the actual beliefs or ethics attitudes of future engineers and methods of influencing their attitudes concerning challenges related to sustainable development. The purpose of the study is twofold, we 1) explore the ethics and sustainability attitudes of engineering students and 2) make preliminary proposals for the betterment of engineering ethics teaching. Our study shows that shaping attitudes and behavioural intention towards certain values, for example towards sustainability, needs clearer manifestation in societies in general, as well as in professional communities.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
SDGs 10 Reduced Inequalities, and 3 Good Health and Well-Being.
References
Techdirt webpage. https://www.techdirt.com/articles/20200317/04381644114/volunteers-3d-print-unobtainable-11000-valve-1-to-keep-covid-19-patients-alive-original-manufacturer-threatens-to-sue.shtml. Accessed 26 May 2020
United Nations Sustainable Development webpage. https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/?menu=1300. Accessed 26 May 2020
Mitcham, C., Englehardt, E.E.: Ethics across the curriculum: prospects for broader (and deeper) teaching and learning in research and engineering ethics. Sci. Eng. Ethics 25, 1735–1762 (2019)
Murphy, C., Gardoni, P.: Understanding engineers’ responsibilities: a prerequisite to designing engineering education. Sci. Eng. Ethics 25, 1817–1820 (2019)
Fatehiboroujeni, S., Akera, A., Riley, D., Cheville, A., Karlin, J., Appelhans, S., De Pree, T.: Why engineering ethics? How do educators and administrators justify the development of engineering ethics? In: ASEE 2019 Annual Conference, Paper ID 26017 (2019)
Balakrishnan, B., Tochinai, F., Kanemitsu, H.: Engineering ethics education: a comparative study of Japan and Malaysia. Sci. Eng. Ethics 25, 1069–1083 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-018-0051-3
Murrugarra, R., Wallace, W.: The effect of a stand-alone ethics course in Chilean engineering students’ attitudes. IEEE Commun. Mag. 53, 30–34 (2015)
Harris, C.E., Jr., Davis, M., Pritchard, M.S., Rabins, M.J.: Engineering ethics: what? Why? How? And when? J. Eng. Educ. 85, 93–96 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.1996.tb00216.x
Barakat, N.: Engineering ethics: a critical dimension of the profession. In: IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON) – “Learning Environments and Ecosystems in Engineering Education”, pp. 159–164 (2011)
Beever, J., Brightman, A.O.: Reflexive principlism as an effective approach for developing ethical reasoning in engineering. Sci. Eng. Ethics 22, 275–291 (2016)
European Council of Engineers Chambers Homepage. https://www.ecec.net/fileadmin/pdf/ECEC-Code-of-Conduct.pdf. Accessed 26 May 2020
NSPE Homepage. https://www.nspe.org/resources/ethics/code-ethics. Accessed 26 May 2020
Jonson, E., McGuire, L., Cooper, B.: Does teaching ethics do any good? Education + Training 58(4), 439–454 (2016)
Waples, E.P., Antes, A.L., Murphy, S.T., Connelly, S., Mumford, M.D.: A meta-analytic investigation of business ethics instruction. J. Bus. Ethics 87(1), 133–151 (2008)
Riemenschneider, C.K., Leonard, L.N.K., Manly, T.S.: Students’ ethical decision-making in an information technology context: a theory of planned behavior approach. J. Inf. Syst. Educ. 22(3), 203–214 (2011)
Lance, C.E., Butts, M.M., Michels, L.C.: The sources of four commonly reported cutoff criteria: what did they really say? Organ. Res. Methods 9(2), 202–220 (2006)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Durst, S., Pevkur, A., Parts, V. (2021). Ethical Attitudes Among Engineering Students: Some Preliminary Insights. In: Auer, M.E., Rüütmann, T. (eds) Educating Engineers for Future Industrial Revolutions. ICL 2020. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 1329. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-68201-9_77
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-68201-9_77
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-68200-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-68201-9
eBook Packages: Intelligent Technologies and RoboticsIntelligent Technologies and Robotics (R0)