Skip to main content

Exploring Sustainability Science, the Agenda 2030, and the UN SDGs from the Social Sustainability Handprint Perspective

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
Handbook of Sustainability Science in the Future
  • 30 Accesses

Abstract

Sustainable development and sustainability encompass a strong focus on the advancement of more sustainable societies, social sustainability, and overall well-being of people now and in the future. These goals also include a strong focus on society/social-environment relationships and interfaces to promote sustainable development of both people and the planet. This study applies a qualitative research approach to the exploration of sustainability science, the UN SDGs, and the Agenda 2030 from the social sustainability handprint perspective. It aims at identifying key elements, approaches, and development focus areas within these frameworks and at suggesting associated implications for social sustainability handprint development including society/social-environment relationships and interfaces. The social sustainability handprint concept is approached from the sustainable development and sustainability perspective, and it is about dynamic positive actions, innovations and impacts towards sustainable development and sustainability created by organizations and individuals. The findings highlight the significant potential and the broadness and diversity of opportunities related to the development of social sustainability handprints and associated approaches including management and assessment of and creation of innovations, changes, actions, initiatives, and impacts to implement the social/societal sustainability priorities including social/society-environment relationships and interfaces acknowledged by sustainability science, the Agenda 2030, and the UN SDGs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Behm K, Husgafvel R, Hohenthal C, Pihkola H, Vatanen S (2016) Carbon handprint – communicating the good we do. Research Report. VTT, Espoo

    Google Scholar 

  • Benoît Norris C, Norris GA, Azuero L, Pflueger J (2019) Creating social handprints: method and case study in the electronic computer manufacturing industry. Resources 8:176

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bettencourt LMA, Kaur J (2011) Evolution and structure of sustainability science. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 108(49):19540–19545

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Biemer J, Dixon W, Blackburn N (2013) Our environmental handprint. The good we do. Proceedings of the 2013 1st IEEE conference on Technologies for Sustainability (SusTech). Institute of Electrical and Electronic Engineers, Portland, pp 146–153

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Center for Environmental Education (2007) About Handprint. Retrieved May 8th 2021 from, https://www.handprint.in/

  • Clark WC, Harley AG (2019) Sustainability science: towards a synthesis. Sustainability science program working paper 2019–01, John F. Kennedy School of Government. Harvard University, Cambridge, MA. Retrieved May 8th 2021 from, http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:42574531

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark WC, Harley AG (2020) Sustainability science: toward a synthesis. Annu Rev Environ Resour 45(1):331–386

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen MJ (2021) Sustainability. Polity Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • De Vries BJM (2012) Sustainability science, 1st edn. Cambridge University Press

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Denis M (2017) Mainstreaming sustainability science in research. Presentation. Third symposium on sustainability science: towards guidelines on research and education. UNESCO Headquarters – room XIII (Bonvin building). UNESCO, Paris. Retrieved May 8th 2021 from, https://en.unesco.org/sites/default/files/panel_4_presentation_mathieudenis.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  • Germanwatch (2021) A tool for more sustainability. Retrieved May 8th 2021 from, https://germanwatch.org/de/17687

  • Grönman K, Pajula T, Sillman J, Leino M, Vatanen S et al (2019) Carbon handprint – an approach to assess the positive climate impacts of products demonstrated via renewable diesel case. J Clean Prod 206:1059–1072

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guillaume JHA, Sojamo S, Porkka M, Gerten D, Jalava M et al (2020) Giving legs to handprint thinking: foundations for evaluating the good we do. Earth’s Future 8(6)

    Google Scholar 

  • Husgafvel R (2021) Exploring social sustainability handprint – part 1: handprint and life cycle thinking and approaches. Submitted August 16th 2021 to sustainability

    Google Scholar 

  • Husgafvel R, Pajunen N, Päällysaho M, Paavola I-L, Inkinen V, Heiskanen K, Dahl O, Ekroos A (2013) Social metrics in the process industry – background, theory and development work. Int J Sustain Eng:171–182

    Google Scholar 

  • Husgafvel R, Pajunen N, Virtanen K, Paavola I-L, Päällysaho M, Inkinen V, Heiskanen K, Dahl O, Ekroos A (2014) Social sustainability performance indicators – experiences from process industry. Int J Sustain Eng:14–25

    Google Scholar 

  • Husgafvel R, Poikela K, Honkatukia J, Dahl O (2017) Development and piloting of sustainability assessment metrics for arctic process industry in Finland-the biorefinery investment and slag processing service cases. Sustainability 9:1693

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kates RW (ed) (2010) Readings in sustainability science and technology, CID working paper No. 213. Center for International Development, Harvard University

    Google Scholar 

  • Kates RW (2011a) What kind of science is sustainability science? Commentary. PNAS 108(49):19449–19450

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kates RW (2011b) From the unity of nature to sustainability science: ideas and practice. CID Working Paper Series 2011.218, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, March 2011. Retrieved May 10th 2021 from, https://nrs.harvard.edu/URN-3:HUL.INSTREPOS:37366242

  • Kates RW, Clark WC, Corell R, Hall MJ, Jaeger CC, Lowe I et al (2001) Environment and development: sustainability science. Policy Forum Sci 292(5517):641–642

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kates RW, Parris TM, Leiserowitz AA (2005) What is sustainable development? Goals, indicators, values and practice. Environ Sci Policy Sustain Dev 47(3):8–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Komiyama H, Kazuhiko T (2006) Sustainability science: building a new discipline. Sustain Sci 1(1):1–6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Komiyama H, Takeuchi K (2011) Sustainability science: building a new academic discipline. Chapter 1–1. In: Komiyama H, Takeuchi K, Shiroyama H, Mino T (eds) Sustainability science: A multidisciplinary approach. United Nations University Press, pp 2–19

    Google Scholar 

  • König A (2018) Sustainability science as a transformative social learning process. In: König A (ed) Sustainability science: key issues. Routledge, London/New York, pp 3–28

    Google Scholar 

  • Kühnen M, Silva S, Beckman JB, Eberle U, Hahn R, Hermann C, Shaltegger S, Schmid M (2019) Contributions to the sustainable development goals in life cycle sustainability assessment: insights from the handprint research project. Sustain Manag Forum 27:65–82

    Google Scholar 

  • Leiserowitz AA, Kates RW, Parris TM (2006) Sustainability values, attitudes, and Behaviors: A review of multinational and global trends. Annu Rev Environ Resour 31:413–444

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martens P (2006) Sustainability: science or fiction? Sustain Sci Pract Policy 2(1):36–41

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller TR, Wiek A, Sarewitz D, Robinson J, Olsson L et al (2014) The future of sustainability science: a solutions-oriented research agenda. Sustain Sci 9(2):240–246

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moran EF (2010a) Preface, xi-xiii. In: Moran EF (ed) Environmental Social science: human - environment interactions and sustainability. John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Moran EF (2010b) The challenge of human-environment interactions research. Chapter 1. In: Moran EF (ed) Environmental social science: human - environment interactions and sustainability. John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, pp 1–24

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Moran EF (2010c) Towards sustainability science. Chapter 8. In: Moran EF (ed) Environmental social science: human - environment interactions and sustainability. John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, pp 143–124

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Nagatsu M, Davis T, DesRoches CT, Koskinen I, MacLeod M (2020) Philosophy of science for sustainability science. Sustain Sci 15(6):1807–1817

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Norris G, Burek J, Moore EA, Kirchain RE, Gregory J (2021) Sustainability health initiative for NetPositive Enterprise handprint methodological framework. Int J Life Cycle Assess 26:528–542

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Osinski A (2021) Towards a critical sustainability science? Participation of disadvantaged actors and power relations in transdisciplinary research. Sustainability 13(3):1266

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pandya M, Vyas P, Schwarz R (2021) From footprint to handprint. Our personal action for sustainable development. Centre for Environment Education. Retrieved May 8th 2021 from, http://www.handprint.in/pdf/Handprint%20article%20GEER%20final.pdf

  • Parris TM, Kates RW (2003) Characterizing a sustainability transition: goals, targets, trends, and driving forces. Proc Natl Acad Sci 100(14):8068–8073

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Peattie K (2011) Developing and delivering social science research for sustainability. Chapter 2. In: Franklin A, Blyton P (eds) Researching sustainability. A guide to social science methods, practice and engagement. Earthscan, Washington, DC, pp 17–33

    Google Scholar 

  • Rohwedder R (2016) Ecological handprints: breakthrough innovations in the developing world. Retrieved May 8th 2021 from, https://seas.umich.edu/alumni/alumni-stories/ecological-handprints-breakthrough-innovations-developing-world

  • Rout PR, Verma AK, Bhunia P, Surampalli RY, Zhang TC et al (2020) Introduction to sustainability and sustainable development. Chapter 1. In: Surampalli RY, Zhang TC, Goyal MK, Brar SK, Tyagi RD (eds) Sustainability. Fundamentals and applications. John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, pp 3–19

    Google Scholar 

  • Saldana J (2011) Fundamentals of qualitative research. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • SHINE Summit (2015) Innovating for NetPositive impact. Summary report. Sustainability and Health Initiative for NetPositive Enterprise (SHINE). Center for Health and the Global Environment. Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health

    Google Scholar 

  • Spangenberg J (2011) Sustainability science: a review, an analysis and some empirical lessons. Environ Conserv 38(3):275–287

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stumpf KH, Baumgärtner S, Becker CU, Sievers-Glotzbach S (2015) The justice dimension of sustainability: a systematic and general conceptual framework. Sustainability 7:7438–7472

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Takeuchi K (2017) Role of research in sustainability science for implementing the SDGs. Presentation. Third symposium on sustainability science: towards guidelines on research and education. UNESCO Headquarters – room XIII (Bonvin building). UNESCO, Paris. Retrieved May 7th 2021 from, https://en.unesco.org/sites/default/files/panel_4_presentation_kazuhikotakeuchi.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  • Talan A, Tyagi RD, Surampalli RY (2020a) Social dimensions of sustainability. Chapter 9. In: Surampalli RY, Zhang TC, Goyal MK, Brar SK, Tyagi RD (eds) Sustainability. Fundamentals and Applications. John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken

    Google Scholar 

  • Talan A, Pathak AN, Tyagi RD (2020b) The Need, Role and Significance of Sustainability. Chapter 2. In: Surampalli RY, Zhang TC, Goyal MK, Brar SK, Tyagi RD (eds) Sustainability. Fundamentals and Applications. John Wiley & Sons, Incorporated, pp 21–41

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • UNESCO (2017) Guidelines on sustainability science in research and education. Natural sciences sector. Social and human sciences sector. UNESCO, Paris. Retrieved May 10th 2021 from, https://en.unesco.org/sites/default/files/guidelines_sus_f_0.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  • UNESCO (2021) Broadening the application of the sustainability science approach. UNESCO, Paris. Retrieved May 10th 2021 from, https://en.unesco.org/sustainability-science

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations (2015) Transforming our world: the 2030 agenda for sustainable development unit. New York: United Nations. Retrieved May 15th 2021 from, http://www.un.org/ga/search/view_doc.asp?symbol=A/RES/70/1&Lang=E

  • United Nations (2017) Resolution adopted by the general assembly on work of the statistical commission pertaining to the 2030 agenda for sustainable development. A/RES/71/313. United Nations, New York. Retrieved May 15th 2021 from, https://undocs.org/A/RES/71/313

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations (2021a) The sustainable development goals. New York: United Nations. Retrieved May 15th 2021 from, https://www.un.org/sustainabledevelopment/sustainable-development-goals/

  • United Nations (2021b) The 17 goals. Sustainable development. department of economic and social affairs. New York: United Nations. Retrieved May 15th 2021 from, https://sdgs.un.org/goals

  • United Nations (2021c) SDG indicators. Global indicator framework for the sustainable development goals and targets of the 2030 agenda for sustainable development. New York: United Nations. Retrieved May 15th 2021 from, https://unstats.un.org/sdgs/indicators/indicators-list/

  • Vatanen S, Grönman K, Pajula T, Pihkola H, Soukka R et al (2018) The carbon handprint approach to assessing and communicating the positive climate impact of products. Espoo, VTT Technology, p 346

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker I, Schandl H (2017) Introduction, 1-7. In: Walker I, Schandl H (eds) Social science and sustainability. CSIRO Publishing

    Google Scholar 

  • Weinstein MP, Turner RE (2012) Preface, 7-12. In: Weinstein MP, Turner RE (eds) Sustainability science. The emerging paradigm and the urban environment. Springer, New York/Dordrecht/Heidelberg/London

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiek A, Ness B, Brand F, Schweizer-Ries P, Farioli F (2012) From complex systems analysis to transformational change: a comparative appraisal of sustainability science projects. Sustain Sci 7(1):5–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was funded by the Kone Foundation, 202006340.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Roope Husgafvel .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Husgafvel, R. (2022). Exploring Sustainability Science, the Agenda 2030, and the UN SDGs from the Social Sustainability Handprint Perspective. In: Leal Filho, W., Azul, A.M., Doni, F., Salvia, A.L. (eds) Handbook of Sustainability Science in the Future. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-68074-9_87-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-68074-9_87-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-68074-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-68074-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Earth and Environm. ScienceReference Module Physical and Materials ScienceReference Module Earth and Environmental Sciences

Publish with us

Policies and ethics