Skip to main content

Method for Assessing Accessibility in Videoconference Systems

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Intelligent Human Systems Integration 2021 (IHSI 2021)

Abstract

The World Health Organization reveals that over one billion persons worldwide living with some disability. On the other hand, videoconferencing applications have become massively popular in our daily lives, from the domestic to the professional, even for the management of public services. Therefore, the use of video conferencing systems by any person, especially the elderly, with a disability or little training, is essential. Furthermore, not all videoconferencing applications comply with accessibility standards. In this study, the six most used videoconferencing systems were selected to evaluate compliance with accessibility guidelines, related to the principles of the Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) 2.1 and 2.2. This study has limitations, depending on the experience of the evaluators in accessibility. This study can serve as a guide for expert and non-expert users in the selection of accessible applications.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    https://data.mendeley.com/datasets/jjngcn3j62/1.

References

  1. World Health Organization (WHO): 10 facts on disability (2017). https://www.who.int/features/factfiles/disability/en/. Accessed 22 Sep 2020

  2. World Wide Web Consortium (W3C): Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) 2.1 (2017). https://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG21/. Accessed 20 Sep 2020

  3. World Wide Web Consortium (W3C): Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) 2.2 (2020). https://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG22/. Accessed 20 Sep 2020

  4. Acosta-Vargas, P., Luján-Moras, S., Salvador-Ullauri, L.: Web accessibility policies of higher education institutions. In: ITHET2017, Ohrid, 10th, 11th and 12th of July, 16th International Conference on Information Technology Based Higher Education and Training, Ohrid, Macedonia, pp. 1–7 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Braun, S.: Audio Description from a discourse perspective : a socially relevant framework for research and training (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Acosta-Vargas, P., Esparza, W., Rybarczyk, Y., et al.: Educational resources accessible on the tele-rehabilitation platform. In: AHFE International Conference on Human Factors System Interaction 2018, vol. 781, pp. 210–220 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Funes, M.M., Sp, S.C., Sp, S.C., et al.: Gesture4All : a framework for 3D gestural interaction to improve accessibilit of web videos. In: Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Symposium on Applied Computing, pp. 2151–2158. ACM (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Salvador-Ullauri, L., Acosta-Vargas, P., Gonzalez, M., Luján-Mora, S.: Combined method for evaluating accessibility in serious games. Appl. Sci. 10, 6324 (2020). https://doi.org/10.3390/app10186324

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Acosta-Vargas, P., Luján-Mora, S., Salvador-Ullauri, L.: Quality evaluation of government websites. In: 2017 4th International Conference on eDemocracy and eGovernment, ICEDEG 2017, pp. 8–14. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc. (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Acosta-Vargas, P., Hidalgo, P., Acosta-Vargas, G., et al.: Challenges and improvements in website accessibility for health services. AISC 1131, 875–881 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  11. World Wide Web Consortium (W3C): Website Accessibility Conformance Evaluation Methodology (WCAG-EM) 1.0 (2014). https://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG-EM/

  12. World Wide Web Consortium (W3C): Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) 2.0 (2008). https://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG20/. Accessed 26 Sep 2020

  13. Acosta-Vargas, P., Salvador-Ullauri, L., Luján-Mora, S.: A heuristic method to evaluate web accessibility for users with low vision. IEEE Access 7, 125634–125648 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2939068

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. HubSpot: Los mejores 6 programas para videoconferencias en 2020 (2020). https://blog.hubspot.es/sales/programas-videoconferencias

  15. Business Insider: 9 aplicaciones con las que puedes organizar videoconferencias y reuniones de trabajo online (2020). https://www.businessinsider.es/9-aplicaciones-organizar-videoconferencias-reuniones-online-597077

  16. Nielsen, J., Rolf, M.: Heuristic evaluation of user interfaces. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 249–256 (1990)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the Pontificia Universidad Católica del Ecuador for funding this work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Patricia Acosta-Vargas .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Acosta-Vargas, P., Guaña-Moya, J., Acosta-Vargas, G., Villegas-Ch, W., Salvador-Ullauri, L. (2021). Method for Assessing Accessibility in Videoconference Systems. In: Russo, D., Ahram, T., Karwowski, W., Di Bucchianico, G., Taiar, R. (eds) Intelligent Human Systems Integration 2021. IHSI 2021. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 1322. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-68017-6_99

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics