Abstract
As passionate fans of nonnormative media, fujoshi—female fans of male–male romance Japanese comics—often experience harsh criticism, which fujoshi reportedly deflect with self-denigration. Through a close discourse analysis of two key posts from a popular internet bulletin board, this chapter sought to examine how such self-denigration functions and helps form community. Both posts had many similarities, including frequent self-denigration, and both were able to create a sense of community to differing degrees. Although Post 1 included many playful contextualization cues, Post 2 generally did not, and responses to Post 2 were more critical, suggesting that without contextualization cues, self-denigration may become face-threatening acts to the in-group. In comparison, the noncritical acceptance and self-disclosure of Post 1 is similar to discourse on ibasho ‘one’s sense of place’, suggesting fujoshi can successfully create marginalized spaces of tension that function as positive ibasho, thus questioning whether marginalized spaces are inherently negative.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Agostini, G., SturtzSreetharan, C., Wutich, A., Williams, D., & Brewis, A. (2019). Citizen sociolinguistics: A new method to understand fat talk. PLoS ONE, 14, e0217618.
Androutsopoulos, J. (2014). Mediatization and sociolinguistic change. Key concepts, research traditions, open issues. In J. Androutsopoulos (Ed.), Mediatization and sociolinguistic change (pp. 3–48). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
Bamba, S., & Haight, W. L. (2011). Child welfare and development: A Japanese case study. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Bennett, G. (2012). Say what? (笑): The representation of laughter as a contextualization cue in online Japanese discourse. Linguistica, 52(1), 187–199.
Bucholtz, M., & Hall, K. (2005). Identity and interaction: A sociocultural linguistic approach. Discourse Studies, 7(4-5), 585–614.
Galbraith, P. (2011a). Otaku consumers. In P. Haghirian (Ed.), Japanese consumer dynamics (pp. 146–167). London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Galbraith, P. (2011b). Fantasy play and transgressive intimacy among “rotten girls” in contemporary Japan. Signs, 37(1), 211–232.
Greene, K., Derlega, V. J., & Mathews, A. (2006). Self-disclosure in personal relationships. In A. L. Vangelisti & D. Perlman (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of personal relationships (pp. 409–428). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hay, J. (2001). Pragmatics of humor support. Humor, 14(1), 55–82.
Hori, A. (2009). Yokubō no kōdo: Manga ni miru sekushuariti no danjosa [The code of desire: Sexuality gender differences in manga]. Kyoto: Rinsen Book Co..
Kam, T. H. (2013). The common sense that makes the ‘otaku’: Rules for consuming popular culture in contemporary Japan. Japan Forum, 25(2), 151–173.
Kaneda, J. (2007). Manga dōjinshi: Kaishaku kyōdōtai no poritikusu [Amateur manga magazines: The politics of interpretive communities]. In K. Sato & S. Yoshimi (Eds.), Bunka no shakaigaku [The sociology of culture]. Yuhikaku (pp. 163–190). Tokyo.
Kikuchi, S. (2008). “Otaku” sutereotaipu no hensen to Akihabara burando [The transformation and the diffusion of “otaku” stereotypes and the establishment of ‘Akihabara’ as a place-brand]. Chi’iki Burando Kenykyū [Local Brand Research], 4, 47–78.
Kim, Y., & Seo, K. (2015). Nihon taishū-bunka ni okeru “fujoshi” ni kansuru ikkōsatsu [Thoughts on the role of ‘fuzyosi’ in Japanese popular culture]. Ilbon Keundae Hak’yeongu [Japanese Modern Studies], 47, 307–322.
Kinsella, S. (1998). Japanese subculture in the 1990s: Otaku and the amateur manga movement. The Journal of Japanese Studies, 24(2), 289–316.
Lockyer, S., & Pickering, M. (2008). You must be joking: The sociological critique of humour and comic media. Sociology Compass, 2(3), 808–820.
Loop_pino. (2015). 26sai otaku/fujoshi/komyushō/debusu/kitsuon-mochi Ranbun oyurushi kudasai [26-year-old otaku/fujoshi/komyushō/ugly/stutterer Excuse the long post]. Retrieved July 25, 2020, from detail.chiebukuro.yahoo.co.jp/qa/question_detail/q13152835828?fr=pc_ogp_other.
Loop_pino. (2018). Fujoshi no kata, mata wa moto fujoshi no kata ni shitsumon desu. Genzai kekkon shite imasu ka? [This is a question for fujoshi or ex-fujoshi. Are you married now?]. Retrieved March 25, 2020, from detail.chiebukuro.yahoo.co.jp/qa/question_detail/q13187149618?fr=pc_ogp_other.
Matwick, K., & Matwick, K. (2017). Self-deprecatory humor on TV cooking shows. Language & Communication, 56, 33–41.
Maynard, S. K. (1991). Pragmatics of discourse modality: A case of da and desu/masu forms in Japanese. Journal of Pragmatics, 15(6), 551–582.
Maynard, S. K. (1993). Discourse modality: Subjectivity, emotion and voice in the Japanese language. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
McLelland, M. (2015). Regulation of manga content in Japan: What is the future for BL? In M. McLelland, K. Nagaike, K. Suganuma, & J. Welker (Eds.), Boys love manga and beyond: History, culture and community in Japan (pp. 253–273). Jackson, MI: University of Mississippi Press.
Miyake, K. (2005). Keitai mēru no hanashikotoba to kakikotoba: Denshi media jidai no vijuaru komyunikēshon [Spoken and written writing in phone email: Visual communication for the age of digitial media]. In K. Miyake, N. Okamoto, & A. Satoh (Eds.), Media to kotoba 2: Kumikomareru ōdiensu [Media and language 2: The incorporated audience] (pp. 234–261). Tokyo: Hituzi-shobo.
Nishimura, Y. (2003). Establishing a community of practice on the internet: Linguistic behavior in online Japanese communication. Annual Proceedings of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, 2003, 337–348.
Ogi, N. (2017). Involvement and attitude in Japanese discourse: Interactive markers. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Okabe, D. (2008). Fujoshi no aidentiti gēmu: Aidentiti no kashi/fukashi o megutte [Making “fujoshi” identity visible/invisible]. Ninchi Kagaku [Cognitive studies], 15, 671–681.
Oto, T. (2014). Dōitsushikō no joshi komyuniti ni okeru junsui na kankeisei: Fujoshi no media riyō to taimen komyunikēshon o jirei toshite [Pure relationship in the community of girls: A case study of media use and face-to-face communication in Fujyoshi community]. Nihon Bunkajinruigakkai Kenkyūtaikai Happyō Yōshishū [Japanese Cultural Anthropology Association Conference Presentation Abstracts], 2014, 110.
Postmedia Editorials. (2018). Oshi ga tōtosugite shindoi no ni goiryoku ga nasasugite shindoi: Fujoshi no kanjō ruigo jiten [[My] #1 is too precious it hurts but [my] vocabulary is so small it hurts: A fujoshi emotional expressions thesaurus]. Tokyo: Ichijinsha.
Schnurr, S., & Chan, A. (2011). When laughter is not enough: Responding to teasing and self-denigrating humour at work. Journal of Pragmatics, 43(1), 20–35.
Shamoon, D. (2012). Passionate friendship: The aesthetics of girls’ culture in Japan. Honolulu: University of Hawai’i Press.
Speer, S. A. (2019). Reconsidering self-deprecation as a communication practice. British Journal of Social Psychology, 58(4), 806–828.
Stanley, M. (2008). 101 uses for boys: Communing with the reader in yaoi and slash. In A. Levi, M. McHarry, & D. Pagliassotti (Eds.), Boys’ love manga: Essays on the sexual ambiguity and cross-cultural fandom of the genre (pp. 99–109). Jefferson, NC: McFarland & Company.
Sugiura, Y. (2006). Fujoshika suru sekai: Higashi Ikebukuro no otaku joshi-tachi [The fujoshified world: The otaku girls of East Ikebukuro]. Tokyo: Chuokoron-Shinsha.
Tanaka, H., & Ishida, S. (2015). Enjoying manga as fujoshi: Exploring its innovation and potential for social change from a gender perspective. International Journal of Behavioral Science, 10(1), 77–95.
Tsuji, I., & Okabe, D. (2014). Ima koso, otaku o kataru beki toki dearu [This is the time to talk about otaku]. In S. Miyadai, I. Tsuji, D. Okabe, & M. Ito (Eds.), Otakuteki sōzō no rimitto: “Rekishi, kūkan, kōryū” kara tou [The limits of otaku creativity: Questioning from “history, space, exchange”] (pp. 7–30). Tokyo: Chikumashobo.
Tsuru, Y. (2019). BL ga tōtosugiru watashitachi: Fujoshi aruaru zadankai 5 [We for whom BL is too precious: A round talk about things every fujoshi has experienced 5]. Tokyo: Renta Comics.
Yamaoka, S. (2016). Fujoshi no shinrigaku: Kanojotachi wa naze BL (dansei dōsei aisha) o konomu no ka? [The psychology of fujoshi: Why do they like BL (male homosexuals)?]. Tokyo: Fukumura Shuppan.
Youth Division, Office for Youth Affairs and Public Safety, Tokyo Metropolitan Government. (2018). Heisei 29 nendo ni okeru jōrei no tekiyō jōkyō [Application situation of the bylaws for 2017]. Retrieved September 1, 2018, from www.seisyounen-chian.metro.tokyo.jp/seisyounen/pdf/seisyounen/pdf/10_eiga_tosyo_ichiran/29tosyo11.pdf.
yozakirubi. (2016). Otaku joshi wa kirai desu ka? [Do you hate girl nerds?]. Retrieved March 16, 2018, from detail.chiebukuro.yahoo.co.jp/qa/question_detail/q11168261526.
Zajdman, A. (1995). Humorous face-threatening acts: Humor as strategy. Journal of Pragmatics, 23(3), 325–339.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Unser-Schutz, G. (2021). Self-denigration Among Japanese Female Fans Online: Creating Community Through Marginality. In: Kroo, J., Satoh, K. (eds) Linguistic Tactics and Strategies of Marginalization in Japanese. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-67825-8_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-67825-8_9
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-67824-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-67825-8
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)