Skip to main content

Emerging Ideas of ‘New Governance’ in Higher Education

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Marketisation of Higher Education

Abstract

This chapter examines how higher education systems are currently being influenced by the ideas of new public management. With the aid of a systematic literature review, it maps the use of post-new public management governance concepts in the higher education context, including network governance and the neo-Weberian state.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Agranoff, R. (2007). Managing within networks: Adding value to public organizations. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Agranoff, R. (2008). Enhancing performance through public sector networks: Mobilizing human capital in communities of practice. Public Performance & Management Review, 31(3), 320–347. https://doi.org/10.2753/PMR1530-9576310301.

    Google Scholar 

  • Agranoff, R., & McGuire, M. (2001). Big questions in public network management research. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 11(3), 295–326. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.jpart.a003504.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ball, S., & Junemann, C. (2012). Networks new governance and education. Bristol, UK: Policy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baschung, L. (2010). Changes in the management of doctoral education. European Journal of Education, 45(1), 138–152. JSTOR. www.jstor.org/stable/40664655.

  • Bozeman, B. (2007). Public values and public interest. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, R. (Ed.). (2010). Higher education and the market. Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Canhoto, A. I., et al. (2016). The co-production of value in digital, university-industry R&D collaborative projects. Industrial Marketing Management, 56, 86–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2016.03.010.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christensen, T. (2011). Japanese university reform—Hybridity in governance and management. Higher Education Policy, 24(1), 127–142. https://doi.org/10.1057/hep.2010.28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christensen, T., & Lægreid, P. (2006). The whole-of-government approach—Regulation, performance, and public-sector reform (Working Paper). Stein Rokkan Centre for Social Studies. Retrieved from http://bora.uib.no/handle/1956/1893.

  • Denhardt, J. V., & Denhardt, R. B. (2007). The new public service, serving, not steering (Expanded ed.). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diefenbach, T. (2009). New public management in public sector organizations: The dark sides of managerialistic ‘enlightenment’. Public Administration, 87(4), 892–909. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9299.2009.01766.x.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dill, D. D. (1997). Higher education markets and public policy. Higher Education Policy, 10(3/4), 167–185. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.hep.8380082.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dollinger, M., Lodge, J., & Coates, H. (2018). Co-creation in higher education: Towards a conceptual model. Journal of Marketing for Higher Education, 28(2), 210–231.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donina, D., & Paleari, S. (2018). New public management: Global reform script or conceptual stretching? Analysis of university governance structures in the napoleonic administrative tradition. Higher Education, 78(2), 193–219. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-018-0338-y.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunleavy, P., & Margetts, H. (2007). Digital era governance: IT corporations, the state, and e-government. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunn, W. N., & Miller, D. Y. (2007). A critique of the new public management and the neo-Weberian state: Advancing a critical theory of administrative reform. Public Organization Review, 7(4), 345–358. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11115-007-0042-3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferlie, E., et al. (2008). The steering of higher education systems: A public management perspective. Higher Education, 56(3), 325–348. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-008-9125-5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fink, A. (2014). Conducting research literature reviews: From the Internet to paper (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldfinch, S., & Wallis, J. (2010). Two myths of convergence in public management reform. Public Administration, 88(4), 1099–1115. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9299.2010.01848.x.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greve, C. (2015). Ideas in public management reform for the 2010s. Digitalization, value creation and involvement. Public Organization Review, 15(1), 49–65. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11115-013-0253-8.

  • Griffiths, S., Kippin, H., & Stoker, G. (2013). Public services a new reform agenda. London: Bloomsbury Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hood, C. (1991). A public management for all seasons? Public Administration, 69(1), 3–19. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9299.1991.tb00779.x.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, O. (2010). Does governance exist? In S. P. Osborne (Ed.), The new public governance? Emerging perspectives on the theory and practice of public governance (pp. 103–120). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jongbloed, B. (2003). Marketisation in higher education, Clarks triangle and the essential ingredients of markets. Higher Education Quarterly, 57(2), 110–135. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2273.00238.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karpov, A. O. (2016). University 3.0 as a corporate entity of knowledge economy: Models and missions. International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, 6(8), 354–360.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karpov, A. O. (2017). University 3.0—Social mission and reality. Sociological Studies, 9(9), 114–124. https://doi.org/10.7868/S0132162517060137.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khelifi, S. (2019). Interplay between politics and institution in higher education reform. European Journal of Educational Research, 8(3), 671–681. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.8.3.671.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kooiman, J. (1993). Modern governance: New government-society interactions. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laitinen, I., et al. (2013). Palvelutiede Julkisten Palveluiden Uudistajana: Kansainvälinen Vertailu. Finland: Tampere University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maassen, P., & Stensaker, B. (2019). From organised anarchy to de-coupled bureaucracy: The transformation of university organisation. Higher Education Quarterly, 73(4), 456–468. https://doi.org/10.1111/hequ.12229.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marginson, S. (2008). Academic creativity under new public management: Foundations for an investigation. Educational Theory, 58(3), 269–287. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-5446.2008.00288.x.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCulloch, A. (2009). The student as co-producer: Learning from public administration about the student-university relationship. Studies in Higher Education, 32(2), 171–183. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070802562857.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neave, G., & Van Vught, F. (1991). Prometheus bound: The changing relationship between government and higher education in Western Europe. Oxford: Pergamon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osborne, S. P. (2007). The new public governance? Public Management Review, 8(3), 377–387. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719030600853022.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osborne, S. P. (2010). The new public governance: Emerging perspectives on the theory and practice of public governance. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pekkola, E., & Kivistö, J. (2018). Higher education governance and reforms. In A. Farazmand (Ed.), Global encyclopedia of public administration, public policy, and governance. Cham: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinheiro, R., et al. (2019). Reforms, organizational change and performance in higher education: A comparative account from the Nordic countries. Cham: Palgrave.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollitt, C. (1990). Managerialism and the public services: The Anglo-American experience. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollitt, C. (2003). Joined-up government: A survey. Political Studies Review, 1(1), 34–49. https://doi.org/10.1111/1478-9299.00004.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollitt, C., & Bouckaert, G. (2011). Public management reform: A comparative analysis-new public management, governance, and the Neo-Weberian state. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Radnor, Z., Osborne, S. P., Kinder, T., & Mutton, J. (2014). Operationalizing co-production in public services delivery: The contribution of service blueprinting. Public Management Review, 16(3), 402–423. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2013.848923.

  • Reale, E., & Primeri, E. (2015). Approaches to policy and governance in higher education. In J. Huisman, et al. (Eds.), The Palgrave international handbook of higher education policy and governance (pp. 20–37). London, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reiter, R., & Klenk, T. (2019). The manifold meanings of ‘post-new public management’—A systematic literature review. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 85(1), 11–27. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020852318759736.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rhodes, R. A. W. (1997). Understanding governance: Policy networks, governance, reflexivity and accountability. Philadelphia: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross, F., & Woodfield, S. (2017). Mutuality, metaphor and micropolitics in collaborative governance: A joint venture in UK Higher Education. Higher Education Quarterly, 71(1), 33–52. https://doi.org/10.1111/hequ.12110.

    Google Scholar 

  • SCImago. (n.d.). SJR—SCImago Journal & Country Rank [Portal]. Retrieved 1.2.2020, from http://www.scimagojr.com.

  • Siekkinen, T., et al. (2020). Change and continuity in the academic profession: Finnish universities as living labs. Higher Education, 79(3), 533–551. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-019-00422-3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stoker, G. (2006). Public value management: A new narrative for networked governance? The American Review of Public Administration, 36(1), 41–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vedung, E. (2010). Four waves of evaluation diffusion. Evaluation, 16(3), 263–277. https://doi.org/10.1177/1356389010372452.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitty, G., & Wisby, E. (2016). Education in England—A testbed for network governance? Oxford Review of Education, 42(3), 316–329. https://doi.org/10.1080/03054985.2016.1184873.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhao, L. (2018). China’s world-class 2.0: Towards more institutionalized and participatory policymaking? The Copenhagen Journal of Asian Studies, 36(1), 5–27. https://doi.org/10.22439/cjas.v36i1.5510.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jari-Pekka Kanniainen .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Kanniainen, JP., Pekkola, E., Kivistö, J. (2021). Emerging Ideas of ‘New Governance’ in Higher Education. In: Branch, J.D., Christiansen, B. (eds) The Marketisation of Higher Education. Marketing and Communication in Higher Education. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-67441-0_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-67441-0_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-67440-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-67441-0

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics