Abstract
Recently in many scientific disciplines, e.g. physics, chemistry, biology and multidisciplinary research have shifted to computational modelling. The main instrument for such numerical experiments has been supercomputing. However, the number of supercomputers and their performance grows significantly slower than the growth of user’s demands. As a result, users of supercomputers may wait for weeks until their job will be done. At the same time the computational power of cloud computing recently grows up considerably represented by heterogeneous DC network with plenty of available resources for numerical experiments. In these circumstances, it may turn out that the time spent by the task in the system, i.e. the time spent in the queue \(+\) computing time, in the cloud environment may be shorter than in HPC installation. There are several problems related to cloud and supercomputer environments integration. First, is how to make a decision where to send a computational task: to a supercomputer or to cloud. Secondly, these environments may have significantly different APIs, so moving a computational task from one environment to another may require a lot of code modification. Another significant problem is an automatic provisioning of virtual environment to execute the task properly. The third one is how to organize effectively migration data, computational tasks, applications and services in DC network, between DC and HPC installation? Saying effectively, we mean that network can allocate shortly, on demand, the necessary capacity in order to transfer the necessary amount of data for the right time. It is called ‘Capacity on Demand’ service. In this chapter an environment for academic multidisciplinary research – Meta Cloud Computing Environment (MC2E) is presented. This environment demonstrates the possible solutions and approaches to the problems listed above.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Meuer, H., et al.: The Top500 project. [Online] Available: http://www.top500.org/ [Accessed: 01-Nov-2019]
Kranzlmüller, D., de Lucas, J.M., Öster, P.: The european grid initiative (EGI). In: Remote Instrumentation and Virtual Laboratories, pp. 61–66. Springer, Boston, MA (2010)
Telecommunications market research that’s data-driven, TeleGeography. [Online] Available: https://www.telegeography.com/ [Accessed: 01-Nov-2019]
Sefraoui, O., Aissaoui, M., Eleuldj, M.: OpenStack: toward an open-source solution for cloud computing. Int. J. Comput. Appl. 55(3), 38–42 (2012)
VMWare products. [Online] Available: https://www.vmware.com/products.html [Accessed: 01-Nov-2019]
Hwang, T.: NSF GENI cloud enabled architecture for distributed scientific computing. In: 2017 IEEE Aerospace Conference, pp. 1–8. IEEE (2017)
Baldin, I., Nikolich, A., Griffioen, J., Monga, I., Wang, K.-C., Lehman, T., Ruth, P.: FABRIC: a national-scaleprogrammable experimentalnetwork infrastructure. IEEE Internet Comput. 23 (2020)
Dewar, R.G., MacKinnon, L.M., Pooley, R.J., Smith, A.D., Smith, M.J., Wilcox, P.A.: The OPHELIA project: supporting software development in a distributed environment. In: ICWI, pp. 568–571 (2002)
Fed4Fire project. [Online] Available: https://www.fed4fire.eu/the-project/ [Accessed: 01-Nov-2019]
Grossman, R.L., Gu, Y., Mambretti, J., Sabala, M., Szalay, A., White, K.: An overview of the open science data cloud. In: Proceedings of the 19th ACM International Symposium on High Performance Distributed Computing, pp. 377–384. ACM (2010)
Bal, H.E., Bhoedjang, R., Hofman, R., Jacobs, C., Langendoen, K., Rühl, T., Kaashoek, M.F.: Performance evaluation of the Orca shared-object system. ACM Trans. Comput. Syst. (TOCS) 16(1), 1–40 (1998)
Brun, R., Urban, L., Carminati, F., Giani, S., Maire, M., McPherson, A., Patrick, G., et al.: GEANT: detector description and simulation tool (No. CERN-W-5013). CERN (1993)
Kreutz, D., Ramos, F., Verissimo, P., Rothenberg, C.E., Azodolmolky, S., Uhlig, S.: Software-defined networking: a comprehensive survey (2014). arXiv:1406.0440
Hawilo, H., Shami, A., Mirahmadi, M., Asal, R.: NFV: State of the art, challenges and implementation in next generation mobile networks (vEPC) (2014). arXiv:1409.4149
Netto, M.A., Calheiros, R.N., Rodrigues, E.R., Cunha, R.L., Buyya, R.: HPC cloud for scientific and business applications: taxonomy, vision, and research challenges. ACM Comput. Surv. (CSUR) 51(1), 8 (2018)
Gupta, A., Faraboschi, P., Gioachin, F., Kale, L.V., Kaufmann, R., Lee, B.S., Suen, C.H.: Evaluating and improving the performance and scheduling of HPC applications in cloud. IEEE Trans. Cloud Comput. 4(3), 307–321 (2016)
Gupta, A., Milojicic, D.: Evaluation of hpc applications on cloud. In: 2011 Sixth Open Cirrus Summit, pp. 22–26. IEEE (2011)
Infiniband in supercomputer systems. [Online] Available: https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20181112005379/en/Mellanox-InfiniBand-Ethernet-Solutions-Accelerate-Majority-TOP500 [Accessed: 01-Nov-2019]
Gigabit Ethernet in supercomputer systems. [Online] Available: https://www.mellanox.com/solutions/high-performance-computing/top500.php [Accessed: 01-Nov-2019]
NAS Parallel Benchmarks. [Online] Available: https://www.nas.nasa.gov/publications/npb.html [Accessed: 01-Nov-2019]
Goyal, T., Singh, A., Agrawal, A.: Cloudsim: simulator for cloud computing infrastructure and modeling. Procedia Eng. 38, 3566–3572 (2012)
Prabhakaran, A., Lakshmi J.: Cost-benefit analysis of public clouds for offloading in-house HPC jobs. In: 2018 IEEE 11th International Conference on Cloud Computing (CLOUD), San Francisco, CA, pp. 57–64 (2018)
Perf Linux utility. [Online] Available: https://perf.wiki.kernel.org/index.php/Main_Page [Accessed: 01-Nov-2019]
Netstat Linux utility. [Online] Available: https://linux.die.net/man/8/netstat [Accessed: 01-Nov-2019]
Traffic control Linux utility. [Online] Available: https://linux.die.net/man/8/tc [Accessed: 01-Nov-2019]
Böhme, Thomas., Göring, Frank, Harant, Jochen: Menger’s theorem. J. Graph Theory 37(1), 35–36 (2001)
Stepanov, E., Smeliansky, R.: On analysis of traffic flow demultiplexing effectiveness. In: 2018 International Scientific and Technical Conference Modern Computer Network Technologies (MoNeTeC). IEEE (2018)
Kukreja, N., Maier, G., Alvizu, R., Pattavina, A.: SDN based automated testbed for evaluating multipath TCP. In: IEEE International Conference on Communication, ICC 2015, London, United Kingdom, June 8–12, 2015, Workshop Proceedings, pp. 718–723 (2016)
Awduche, D., et al.: RSVP-TE: extensions to RSVP for LSP tunnels (2001). [Irawati_2017] Irawati, I.D., Hadiyoso, S., Hariyani, Y.S.: Link aggregation control protocol on software defined network. Int. J. Electrical Comput. Eng. 7(5), 2706 (2017)
Raiciu, C., Paasch, C., Barre, S., Ford, A., Honda, M., Duchene, F., Bonaventure, O., Handley, M.: How hard can it be? Designing and implementing a deployable multipath tcp. In: Presented as part of the 9th USENIX Symposium on Networked Systems Design and Implementation (NSDI 12), pp. 399–412. San Jose, CA, USENIX (2012)
Chemeritskiy, Evgeny., Stepanov, Evgeny, Smeliansky, Ruslan: Managing network resources with flow (de) multiplexing protocol. Math. Comput. Methods Electr. Eng. 53, 35–43 (2015)
Chiesa, Marco., Kindler, Guy, Schapira, Michael: Traffic engineering with equal-cost-multipath: an algorithmic perspective. IEEE/ACM Trans. Netw. (TON) 25(2), 779–792 (2017)
Awduche, D., Malcolm, J., Agogbua, J., O’Dell, M., McManus, J.: Requirements for Traffic Engineering Over MPLS, RFC 2702, Sep. (1999)
Irawati, I.D., Hadiyoso, S., Hariyani, Y.S.: Link aggregation control protocol on software defined network. Int. J. Electr. Comput. Eng. 7(5), 2706 (2017)
Dilmore, M., Doufexi, A., Oikonomou, G.: Analysing interface bonding in 5G WLANs. In: 2018 IEEE 23rd International Workshop on Computer Aided Modeling and Design of Communication Links and Networks (CAMAD). IEEE (2018)
Bernstein, G.M.: IP bandwidth on demand and traffic engineering via multi-layer transport networks. In: 2006 IEEE First International Workshop on Bandwidth on Demand. IEEE (2006)
Bertsekas, Dimitri P., Gallager, Robert G., Humblet, Pierre: Data Networks, vol. 2. Prentice-Hall International, New Jersey (1992)
Mahimkar, A., Chiu, A., Doverspike, R., Feuer, M.D., Magill, P., Mavrogiorgis, E., Yates, J., et al.: Bandwidth on demand for inter-data center communication. In: Proceedings of the 10th ACM Workshop on Hot Topics in Networks, p. 24. ACM (2011)
ETSI NFV MANO Specification. [Online] Available: https://www.etsi.org/deliver/etsi_gs/NFV-MAN/001_099/001/01.01.01_60/gs_NFV-MAN001v010101p.pdf [Accessed: 01-Nov-2019]
Zabbix, S.I.A.: Zabbix. The Enterprise-class Monitoring Solution for Everyone (2014)
Barth, W.: Nagios: System and network monitoring. No Starch Press (2008)
Coffman, E.G.: Computer and Job-shop Scheduling Theory. Wiley (1976)
Martello, S., Toth, P.: Knapsack problems. ?. 221. Wiley (1990)
Dempster, A.P., Laird, N.M., Rubin, D.B.: Maximum likelihood from incomplete data via the EM algorithm. J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. B 39(1), 1–38 (1977)
Acknowledgements
This work is supported by Russian Ministry of Science and Higher Education, grant #05.613.21.0088, unique ID RFMEFI61318X0088 and the National Key R&D Program of China (2017YFE0123600).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Antonenko, V., Chupakhin, A., Kolosov, A., Smeliansky, R., Stepanov, E. (2021). On HPC and Cloud Environments Integration. In: Bocewicz, G., Pempera, J., Toporkov, V. (eds) Performance Evaluation Models for Distributed Service Networks. Studies in Systems, Decision and Control, vol 343. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-67063-4_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-67063-4_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-67062-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-67063-4
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)