Skip to main content

Reviewing Classification Methods on Health Care

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Intelligent Healthcare

Part of the book series: EAI/Springer Innovations in Communication and Computing ((EAISICC))

Abstract

Classification has huge applications in medical field starting from diagnosis, prognosis, or treatment outcome prediction. Classification task in medical field is not only simply related to accuracy but also reveals biological information and facts derived from classifier. Due to importance of classification task in health care, we have reviewed various classifiers on different datasets. The study presents a comparative performance analysis of various classifiers with the motive to select the classification algorithm that best classifies the data. All the classifier models are built and experiments are performed on different medical datasets using cross-validation technique. The performance analysis of these classifier models is validated using various metrics that include accuracy, precision, recall, and F1 score. The model that generates the best values for all these metrics is chosen as the best classifier. The experimental results obtained prove that the SVM (support vector machine) and the logistic regression classifier models gave the best and the most consistent results for all the chosen datasets.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. R. Deo, Machine learning in medicine. Am. Heart Assoc. J. 132(20), 1920–1930 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  2. D. Bhavani, A. Vasasvi, P. Keshava, Machine learning: a critical review of classification techniques. Intl. J. Adv. Res. Comp. Commun. Eng. ISSN: 2319-5940

    Google Scholar 

  3. O. Obaid, M. Mohammed, A. Ghani, S. Mostafa, F. Taha AL-Dhief, Evaluating the performance of machine learning techniques in the classification of Wisconsin breast cancer. Intl. J. Eng. Technol. (IJET) 7, 160–166 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  4. C. Latha, S. Jeeva, Improving the accuracy of prediction of heart disease risk based on ensemble classification techniques. Inform. Med. Unlocked 16, 100203 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  5. M. Saritas, A. Yasar, Performance analysis of ANN and Naive Bayes classification algorithm for data classification. Intl. J. Intelligent Systems Appl. Eng 7, 88–91 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. G. Rumbe, H. Youth, Comparative study of classification techniques on breast cancer FNA biopsy data. Intl. J. Artif. Intellig. Interact. Multim. 1, 5–12 (2010). https://doi.org/10.9781/ijimai.2010.131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. A. Christobel, P. Sivaprakasam, Improving the performance of k-nearest neighbor algorithm for the classification of diabetes dataset with missing values. Intl. J. Comp. Eng. Technol. (IJCET) 7(3), 155–167 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  8. I. Rish, An empirical study of the Naïve Bayes classifier. IJCAI 2001 Work Empir. Methods Artif. Intell. 3, 41–46 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  9. R. Wang, AdaBoost for feature selection, classification and its relation with SVM. Intl. Conf. Solid State Devices Mat. Sci. 25, 800–807 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  10. A. Wyner, M. Maolson, J. Bleich, Explaining the success of AdaBoost and random forests as interpolating classifiers. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 18 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  11. J. Peng, C.-Y.J. Peng, K.L. Lee, G.M. Ingersoll, An introduction to logistic regression analysis and reporting. J. Educ. Res. 96, 3–14 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. M. Gladence, M. Karthi, A. Maria, A statistical comparison of logistic regression and different Bayes classification methods for machine learning. ARPN J. Eng. Appl. Sci. 10, 5947–5953 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  13. M. Amin, A. Ali, Performance Evaluation of Supervised Machine Learning Classifiers for Predicting Healthcare Operational Decisions (Department of Computer Science & Engineering University of Engineering & Technology, Lahore, 2019)

    Google Scholar 

  14. E. Zriqat, A. Altamimi, M. Azzeh, A comparative study for predicting heart diseases using data mining classification methods. Intl. J. Comp. Sci. Inf. Security (IJCSIS) 14(12), 869–879 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  15. W. Shijun, R. Summers, Machine learning and radiology. Med. Image Anal. 16, 933–951 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.media.2012.02.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. D. Bansal, R. Chhikara, K. Khanna, P. Gupta, Comparative analysis of various machine learning algorithms for detecting dementia. Procedia Comput. Sci. 132, 1497–1502 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2018.05.102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. G. Munjal, M. Hanmandlu, S. Srivastava, Novel gene selection method for breast cancer classification. J. Biochem. Technol. 8(4), 1116–1120

    Google Scholar 

  18. M. Lamba, G. Munjal, Y. Gigras, Feature selection of micro-array expression data (FSM) – a review. Proc. Comput. Sci. 132, 1619–1625 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. C. Sidey-Gibbons, J. Sidey-Gibbons, Machine learning in medicine: a practical introduction. BMC Med. Res. Methodol. 19 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-019-0681-4

  20. J. Anderson, J. Parikh, D. Shenfeld, Reverse engineering and evaluation of prediction models for progression to Type 2 diabetes: application of machine learning using electronic health records. J. Diabetes Sci. Technol. 10 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1177/1932296815620200

  21. G. Bedi, F. Carrillo, G.A. Cecchi, D.F. Slezak, M. Sigman, N.B. Mota, S. Ribeiro, D.C. Javitt, M. Copelli, C.M. Corcoran, Automated analysis of free speech predicts psychosis onset in high-risk youths. Nat. Partner J. (NPJ) Schizophrenia 1(1), 15030 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Y. Yamada, M. Kobayashi, Detecting mental fatigue from eye-tracking data gathered while watching video: evaluation in younger and older adults. Artif. Intell. Med. 91 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artmed.2018.06.005

  23. Y. Liu, K. Gadepalli, M. Norouzi, G. Dahl, T. Kohlberger, A. Boyko, S. Venugopalan, A. Timofeev, P. Nelson, G. Corrado, J. Hipp, L. Peng, M. Stumpe. Detecting Cancer Metastases on Gigapixel Pathology Images (2017). arxiv:1703.02442.

    Google Scholar 

  24. N. Lutimath, C. Chethan, B.S. Pol, Prediction of heart disease using machine learning. Intl. J. Recent Technol. Eng. (IJRTE). ISSN: 2277-3878 8(2S10) (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  25. S. Vanaja, K. Rameshkumar, Performance analysis of classification algorithms on medical diagnoses-a survey. J. Comput. Sci. 11, 30–52 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. G. Munjal, S. Kaur. Comparative study of ANN for pattern classification WSEAS. International Conference on Mathematical Methods and Computational Techniques in Electrical Engineering, Bucharest, Romania (2006)

  27. R.L. Borges, Analysis of the Wisconsin Breast cancer dataset and machine learning for breast cancer detection. Proceedings of XI Workshop de Visao Computacional (October 5–7th, 2015)

    Google Scholar 

  28. M. Singaravelu, S. Rajapraksh, S. Krishnan, K. Karthik, Classification of liver patient dataset using machine learning algorithms. Intl. J. Eng. Technol. 7, 323–326 (2018). https://doi.org/10.14419/ijet.v7i3.34.19217

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. S. Abbas, R. Riaz, S. Kazmi, S. Rizvi, S.J. Kwon, Cause analysis of caesarian sections and application of machine learning methods for classification of birth data. IEEE 6, 67555–67561 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  30. F. Sardouk, A. Duru, O. Bayat, Classification of breast cancer using data mining. Am. Sci. Res. J. Eng. Technol. Sci. (ASRJETS) 51(1), 38–46 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  31. M. Rahman, N. Davis Darryl, Machine learning based missing value imputation method for clinical datasets. IAENG Trans. Eng. Technol. 229 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6190-2_19

  32. S. Kotsiantis, D. Kanellopoulos, P. Pintelas, Data preprocessing for supervised learning. Int. J. Comput. Sci. 1, 111–117 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  33. F. Ahmed, Y. Ali, S. Shamsuddin, Using K-fold cross validation proposed models for Spikeprop learning enhancements. Intl. J. Eng. Technol. (UAE) 7, 145–151 (2018). https://doi.org/10.14419/ijet.v7i4.11.20790

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Malik, D., Munjal, G. (2021). Reviewing Classification Methods on Health Care. In: Bhatia, S., Dubey, A.K., Chhikara, R., Chaudhary, P., Kumar, A. (eds) Intelligent Healthcare. EAI/Springer Innovations in Communication and Computing. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-67051-1_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-67051-1_8

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-67050-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-67051-1

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics