Abstract
Cost-effective and efficient techniques of geoelectrics for groundwater exploration, especially in karstic regions, can be used to as an appropriate tool to recognition of karst hydrogeological potential. This paper provides a method based on the geoelectrical tomography to precise determination of the water well drilling location in karstic limestones of Izeh, southwest Iran. The geoelectrical operation done in 98 VES of Schlumberger and two profiles using dipole–dipole and Wenner–Shlumberger arrays. The 1D interpretation of VES using IPI2win followed by 2D electrical resistivity and induced polarization (IP) tomography using Res2Dinv in two sites, Naale Asbi syncline and the west of Izeh limestones, is carried out in order to propose the best locations for drilling of water wells. The results of the geoelectrical study of Asmari limestone of Izeh show the high electrical resistivity (between 200 and 1000 ohms-m) and low IP (lower than 3 Mv%V) indicates dry limestone, which decreases electrical resistivity (between 50 and 150 ohms-m) and stability in IP values, while the layers become water bearing. The dry cavities are characterized by very high electrical resistivity anomalies (ranging from 1500 to higher than 2000 ohms-m) with low IP values in the matrix of limestone with medium high electrical resistivity. The marl and marly limestone layers with low permeability can be detected by very low electrical resistivity (lover than 20 ohms-m) and high IP (higher than 10 Mv%V). The tomography of electrical resistivity and IP have strongly confirmed each other especially in the dipole–dipole array, and however, in some cases of Schlumberger array, the deviations are seen in the depth that can arise due to the high sensitivity of the IP data in high depths.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Aizebeokhai, A. P., & Oyeyemi, K. D. (2014). The use of the multiple-gradient array for geoelectrical resistivity and induced polarization imaging. Journal of Applied Geophysics, 111, 364–376.
Alile, O. M., Ujuanbi, O., & Evbuomwan, I. A. (2010). Geoelectric investigation of groundwater in Obaretin Iyanomon Locality, Edostate. Nigeria. Geology and Mining Research, 3(1), 13–20.
Bharti, R. (2016). The vertical electrical sounding (VES) procedure to delineate potential groundwater aquifer in Guna Madhya Pradesh. Imperial Journal of Interdisciplinary Research, 24, 253–256.
Dahlin, T. (1996). 2D resistivity surveying for environmental and engineering application. First Break, 14, 275–283.
Gupta, G., Patil, J. D., Maiti, S., Erram, V. C., Pawar, N. J., Mahajan, S. H., & Suryawanshi, R. A. (2015). Electrical resistivity imaging for aquifer mapping over Chikotra basin, Kolhapur district. Maharashtra. Environmental Earth Sciences, 73(12), 8125–8143.
Loke, M. H., & Barker, R. D. (1995). Least-squares deconvolution of apparent resistivity pseudosections. Geophysics, 60(6), 1682–1690.
Nassery, H. R., Alijani, F., & Nakhaei, M. (2013). The comparison of hydrodynamic characteristics of karst aquifers: Application on two karst formations in Zagros (Asmari and Ilam-Sarvak), southwest Iran. Arabian Journal of Geosciences, 7(11), 4809–4818.
Oldenburg, D. W., & Li, Y. G. (1999). Estimating depth of investigation in DC resistivity and IP surveys. Geophysics, 64, 403–416.
Prins, C., Thuro, K., & Krautblatter, M., (2018). The effectiveness of an inverse Wenner-Schlumberger array for geoelectrical karst reconnaissance, on the Swabian Alb high plain, new line Wendlingen-Ulm, Southwestern Germany. In IAEG/AEG Annual Meeting Proceedings, San Francisco, California, vol 3, 115–122.
Ranjy Roodposhti, H., Hafizi, M. K., Soleymani Kermani, M. R., & Ghorbani Nik, M. R., (2019). Electrical resistivity method for water content and compaction evaluation, a laboratory test on construction material. Journal of Applied Geophysics, 168, 49–58.
Samanovac, F., & Alvanja, S. D. (2007). Determination of resolution limits of electrical tomography on the block model in a homogenous environment by means of electrical modeling. Rudarsko Geološko Naftni Zbornik, 19(1), 47–56.
Saribudaka, M., & Hawkins, A. (2019). Hydrogeopysical characterization of the Haby Crossing fault, San Antonio, Texas, USA. Journal of Applied Geophysics. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jappgeo.2019.01.009
Schrott, L., & Sass, O. (2008). Application of field geophysics in geomorphology: Advances and limitations exemplified by case studies. Geomorphology, 93, 55–73.
Sharifi, F., Arab-Amiri, A. R., & Kamkar-Rouhani, A., (2014). Karstic water exploration using the Schlumberger VES and dipole–dipole resistivity profiling surveys in the Tepal area, west of Shahrood, Iran. Journal of Mining & Environment, 5(1), 1–12.
Stummer, P., Maurer, H., & Green, A. G. (2004). Experimental design: Electrical resistivity data sets that provide optimum subsurface information. Geophysics, 69(1), 120–139.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Mirzaei, L., Hafizi, M.K., Riahi, M.A. (2021). Application of Dipole–Dipole, Schlumberger, and Wenner–Schlumberger Arrays in Groundwater Exploration in Karst Areas Using Electrical Resistivity and IP Methods in a Semi-arid Area, Southwest Iran. In: Al-Maktoumi, A., et al. Water Resources in Arid Lands: Management and Sustainability. Advances in Science, Technology & Innovation. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-67028-3_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-67028-3_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-67027-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-67028-3
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)